SB 331 - DISTRICT COURT JURISDICTIONAL AMOUNT Number 0030 CHAIR ROKEBERG announced that the first order of business would be SENATE BILL NO. 331, "An Act relating to the jurisdiction of district courts." Number 0049 ZACH WARWICK, Staff to Senator Gene Therriault, Alaska State Legislature, said on behalf of Senator Therriault, sponsor, that SB 331 will clarify the statute relating the civil awards in district court cases. He said that current statute stipulates that the plaintiff in a district court case is limited to an award of $50,000; it's not clear, however, whether it's $50,000 per defendant or per case. Senate Bill 331 will add language clarifying that the $50,000 limit is per defendant. Without this clarification, plaintiffs in civil cases with multiple defendants must decide whether to file multiple suits or combine them into one case. Mr. Warwick added that SB 331 is "especially important to rural areas where there isn't access to superior courts." REPRESENTATIVE COGHILL indicated that he has a concern regarding the title. REPRESENTATIVE BERKOWITZ said he likes the title, mentioning that he has a conceptual amendment, which he will be offering on the House floor. He noted that he and Representative Meyer have been working on issues pertaining to jurisdictions. Given that the title of SB 331 reads, "An Act relating to the jurisdiction of district courts", he said it seems to him that the [the body] could extend that jurisdiction as far as it rightfully ought to go - "as far as it possibly can." REPRESENTATIVE COGHILL acknowledged that "the title does lend itself to general applicability." REPRESENTATIVE BERKOWITZ indicated that what he has in mind is: The jurisdiction of the district courts would extend to protect Alaskans anywhere they were; if anyone visited harm on them, and assuming that the appropriate authority - if it was either in a different country or different state - if they didn't choose to exercise their jurisdiction, then the Alaskan jurisdiction would exist as a safety net to protect the interests of Alaskans. CHAIR ROKEBERG suggested that such an [extension of jurisdiction] might be "entering the area of conflict of laws." REPRESENTATIVE BERKOWITZ said, "No, not if we structure this appropriately; and it's actually visions of law that other states have." Number 0464 REPRESENTATIVE JAMES moved to report SB 331 out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying zero fiscal note. There being no objection, SB 331 was reported from the House Judiciary Standing Committee.