HB 67 - MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION/INSURANCE Number 1063 CHAIR ROKEBERG announced that the next order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 67, "An Act requiring proof of motor vehicle insurance in order to register a motor vehicle; and relating to motor vehicle liability insurance for taxicabs." [Before the committee was CSHB 67(L&C).] Number 1086 JANET SEITZ, Staff to Representative Norman Rokeberg, Alaska State Legislature, explained that the proposed committee substitute (CS) for HB 68, version 22-LS0299\J, Ford, 4/4/01, merely establishes minimum requirements for taxicab insurance. She added that Version J has lower requirements than the previous version because of concerns expressed by some of the taxicab companies. CHAIR ROKEBERG added that his research indicates that currently the state does not require insurance for taxicabs. Number 1143 CHAIR ROKEBERG made a motion to adopt the proposed CS for HB 68, version 22-LS0299\J, Ford, 4/4/01, as a work draft. Number 1147 REPRESENTATIVE BERKOWITZ objected for the purpose of discussing the distinctions between Version J and CSHB 67(L&C). MS. SEITZ explained that in CSHB 67(L&C), the limit for coverage was set at $300,000 for the bodily injury or death of one person in one accident (in Version J it is set at $100,000); at $500,000 for the bodily injury or death of two or more persons in one accident (in Version J it is set at $300,000); and at $100,000 for injury to or destruction of property (in Version J it is set at $50,000). She again said that this change is a result of concerns expressed by the taxicab companies. She noted that in some areas of Alaska, local ordinances require insurance for taxicabs; she also noted that included in the members' packets is a chart detailing these specific local requirements. REPRESENTATIVE BERKOWITZ requested that HB 67 be held over until the next scheduled meeting. REPRESENTATIVE JAMES commented that if there is not insurance available specifically for taxicabs, then there should not be taxicabs [operating]. She said she was under the impression that there were laws requiring all vehicles to be insured, regardless of whether the vehicle was owned by a company or a person. CHAIR ROKEBERG added that this lack of insurance requirements is an "obvious hole in our statutes." [HB 67 was held over, with the adoption of Version J as a work draft pending.]