HB 58 - OIL & GAS AUDITS CHAIRMAN KOTT announced that the final order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 58, "An Act relating to certain audits regarding oil and gas royalty and net profits and to audits regarding costs relating to exploration incentive credits and oil and gas exploration licenses; and providing for an effective date." Number 0342 CAROL CARROLL, Director, Central Office, Division of Support Services, Department of Natural Resources, came forward to explain HB 58. She advised members that the bill simply transfers some oil and gas auditors from the Department of Revenue back to the Department of Natural Resources. Both departments agree this should be done, and it will increase efficiency and productivity. She noted that Mike Barnhill was present from the Department of Law to answer legal questions. [End of tape 00-46; no testimony is missing.] TAPE 00-47, SIDE A REPRESENTATIVE KERTTULA asked if the written amendment in packets was necessary to change the title. That amendment read: Change title by adding the underlined An Act relating to certain audits regarding oil and gas royalty and net profits and to audits regarding costs relating to exploration incentive credits and oil and gas exploration licenses; repealing the notice requirement for the issuance of final written findings regarding sale, lease, or disposal of an interest in state land or resources for oil and gas subject to AS 38.05.180(b); and providing for an effective date. Add to page 4 line 28 the underlined Sec. 7. AS 38.05.036(d), 38.05.036(e), 38.05.945(a)(3)(B), and AS 43.05.010(15) are repealed. MS. CARROLL answered that it is an amendment from the department, but she didn't necessarily believe it had to be adopted because HB 259, which is in this committee, does the same thing. She then advised members that since [HB 58] was introduced last year, it has an effective date of 1999 that, if the committee wishes, should be changed to 2000. CHAIRMAN KOTT noted that his staff had pointed that out to him earlier. [It was then indicated that a proposed committee substitute (CS) had already been requested regarding the updated effective date.] Number 0167 REPRESENTATIVE JAMES made a motion to move HB 58 from the committee with individual recommendations and the attached zero fiscal note. There being no objection, it was so ordered and [because of the technical amendment changing the effective date] CSHB 58(JUD) was moved from the House Judiciary Standing Committee.