CSSB 264(JUD) - LIMIT SUSPENDED IMPOSITION OF SENTENCE CHAIRMAN PORTER announced the next order of business would be CSSB 264(JUD), "An Act limiting the authority of courts to suspend the imposition of sentence in criminal cases." KELLY HUBER, Legislative Assistant, to Senator Rick Halford, came forward to address the committee. She said SB 264 limits the authority of courts to suspend the imposition of sentence. This bill deals directly with AS 11.41. which are crimes against a person on a first time conviction. Ms. Huber said in the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding the first time conviction where they removed "misdemeanors" for the first time. It would only be felony convictions on the first time. The misdemeanors were put in for a second felony. So if it is a misdemeanor and it is a second offense, the SIS (suspension of imposition of sentence) would take effect or if it was a felony for the second time. She stated it is a very straight forward bill and deals with AS 11.41. Number 736 REPRESENTATIVE FINKELSTEIN asked that the Department of Law state their position for the record. Number 780 ANNE CARPENETI, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division Department of Law, came before the committee. She said the committee aide had just raised a question which she needs to familiarize herself with, which is that sexual abuse of a minor in the fourth degree may be a misdemeanor. She said she had thought Ms. Huber was correct when she said all the misdemeanors had been removed from the first time..... Ms. Carpeneti said there is a misdemeanor which is sexual abuse of a minor in the fourth degree. She explained the change was made in the Senate Judiciary Committee and there wasn't a hearing on the changes. She informed the committee members that assault in the fourth degree is 230, reckless endangerment is 240 and those are both A misdemeanors. Custodial interference is 330. She said those are removed from the prohibition of a SIS for the first conviction. Ms. Carpeneti noted the Department of Law doesn't have a problem with the bill. Number 868 CHAIRMAN PORTER said for the record, "SIS is to law enforcement are not what you want to hear coming out of the sentencing judge and it has been, in the past, on some accessions a defendant who is convicted gets an SIS and then the next time they get before the court they get what we call an `SSIS' - serious suspension of imposition of sentencing." Chairman Porter said what the bill provides is that people who have harmed others should not be considered for an SIS. CHAIRMAN PORTER asked if there was further testimony. There being none, he asked what the wish of the committee was. Number 989 REPRESENTATIVE CYNTHIA TOOHEY made a motion to move CSSB 264(JUD) out of committee with zero fiscal notes and individual recommendations. CHAIRMAN PORTER asked if there was an objection. Hearing none, CSSB 264(JUD) moved out of the House Judiciary Committee.