HB 203 - PREVIOUS CONVICTIONS FOR DWI OFFENSES Number 150 CHAIRMAN PORTER called Margot Knuth forward to explain HB 203. MARGOT KNUTH, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division, Department of Law, thanked the committee for hearing the bill, on behalf of both the Governor and the Department of Law. HB 203 addresses previous convictions for purposes of our driving while intoxicated (DWI) laws. The problem this bill remedies is an Alaska appellate opinion stating that convictions from ".08" jurisdictions are not substantially similar to Alaska DWI ".10" convictions; and therefore, these convictions were not counted as prior convictions, for purposes of our mandatory minimum sentencing for DWI offenses. This bill adds language to the current statute to include a law or ordinance of another jurisdiction that presumed the person was under the influence of intoxicating liquor at a lower percentage by weight of alcohol in the person's blood, than that required in Alaska law. The legislature has concluded that a DWI conviction is a DWI conviction, and should be treated as such. There are three places this requires changes in our Title 28, and HB 203 makes all of those necessary changes. Number 195 REPRESENTATIVE TOOHEY noted this is the third time the committee has looked at the DWI issue. She asked Ms. Knuth if these fix-it bills were just causing the committee to revisit issues that were not addressed properly or completely the first time around. She wondered if there was a more efficient way they could be handling this issue. MS. KNUTH thought there would not be a more efficient way, because it is the nature of criminal litigation that everybody who is convicted, has a right to try to poke a hole in the sand chute. The court looks at all of the arguments that are made. Even though the court only accepts one out of a hundred, they end up finding all of the other holes that need to be filled. Number 225 CHARLES MCKEE expressed personal concerns via teleconference from Anchorage. He spoke of his prior DWI conviction in 1976. He does not have a driver's license. He does not even have a state I.D. because of previous discrepancies with the actuaries and their affiliation with the DMV (Division of Motor Vehicles), and the state of Alaska, and the Judiciary. He has been made aware that if he decides to become licensed to drive in Alaska in the future, and then tries to drive through Canada, that previous conviction on his record would prohibit him from driving through Canada. He would like to see that remedied to his satisfaction. CHAIRMAN PORTER concluded the public hearing on HB 203. REPRESENTATIVE CON BUNDE made a motion to move HB 203 out of committee with individual recommendations and accompanying fiscal notes. Seeing no objection, it was so ordered.