HB 92: REGULATION OF NOTARIES PUBLIC Number 399 REPRESENTATIVE GENE THERRIAULT, PRIME SPONSOR of HB 92, called the members' attention to a draft committee substitute dated April 9, 1993. He said that the committee substitute dealt with issues on which the committee had expressed the desire for clarification and change. He supported the draft committee substitute, as did Ms. Patty Trott from the Lieutenant Governor's Office. Number 417 MS. HORETSKI commented that at the previous hearing on HB 92, the committee had a committee substitute before it. The April 9, 1993 draft committee substitute was a change from the previous committee substitute, she added. She said that new language appeared on page 2, lines 7-9. The phrase "applying for" was added, in order to clarify timetables within the bill. She commented that new language clarified the types of crimes which would make a person ineligible to be a notary. MS. HORETSKI stated that language requiring notaries to notarize all items presented to them, on page 3, line 13, was deleted from HB 92. Additionally, she said, on lines 17-18 of page 3, the language was reworded to allow notaries to promote or endorse products, but not to use their notarial seals or titles to do so. On page 3, lines 20-21, the words "notarial certificate" were substituted for "document," she said, based on language in the Model Notary Act. The last change was located on page 4, lines 30-31, and established who should notify the Lieutenant Governor's Office in the event that a notary public died. Number 480 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN asked Ms. Horetski to clarify HB 92's language regarding false certificates. Number 484 MS. HORETSKI explained that the language to which Representative Green was referring was identical to that in the last version of HB 92. Number 490 REPRESENTATIVE DAVIDSON asked what would happen in the event that a notary public's next of kin did not notify the lieutenant governor's office that the notary public had died. Number 493 MS. HORETSKI replied that there were no enforcement mechanisms for that requirement included in HB 92. Number 498 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN asked if HB 92's sponsor concurred with the changes in the draft committee substitute. REPRESENTATIVE THERRIAULT indicated that he concurred. Number 502 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN made a MOTION to ADOPT the draft committee substitute dated April 9, 1993. There being no objection, IT WAS SO ORDERED. REPRESENTATIVE GREEN made a MOTION to MOVE the Judiciary Committee substitute for HB 92 out of committee. There being no objection, IT WAS SO ORDERED. CHAIRMAN PORTER announced that the committee would take up HB 188 next.