HB 59-COMMERCIAL FISHING LOAN ACT  6:25:29 PM CHAIR THOMPSON announced that the final order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 59, "An Act relating to loans made to commercial fishermen under the Commercial Fishing Loan Act for product quality improvements and energy efficiency upgrades; and providing for an effective date." 6:25:39 PM REPRESENTATIVE SEATON paraphrased from the sponsor statement, which read as follows: HB 59 allows the Department of Commerce Community and Economic Development to give Commercial Fishing Loan Fund borrowers a reduction in the interest rate on their loan if 50 percent of the loan is spent on a product produced or manufactured in the State of Alaska. The Commercial Fishing Loan Fund was created by the State of Alaska to aid commercial fishermen in securing new equipment, quota shares and upgrades to their vessels. The Department already allows reductions in interest rates for borrowers who pay on time, and make engine and fuel efficiency upgrades or product quality improvements. To be eligible for the rate reduction under HB 59 at least 50 percent of borrower's purchases with the loan fund have to be manufactured in the State of Alaska. The definition of manufacture is "processing, developing, or making an item into a new item with a distinct character and use." HB 59 does not make the rate reduction mandatory because the Department needs to have the discretion to institute it when the market allows. For example, in today's market the interest rates are so low, if the Department were required to issue the interest rate discount it would create a loss for the fund. HB 59 promotes economic development in Alaska by encouraging Alaska fisherman to purchase equipment manufactured in the State of Alaska when using Commercial Fishing Loan Fund dollars. 6:29:06 PM REPRESENTATIVE MILLER directed attention to the bill, page 1, line 7, to read "the department may," and asked what criteria the department would use to accept or reject an application. REPRESENTATIVE SEATON answered that the financial condition of the fund would be the guiding factor; it is necessary that prime interest rates be high enough to generate an income that covers the service cost of the loan. All applicants would be eligible during times of a healthy economy. 6:30:41 PM REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT inquired whether competition, within the industry, is being served by passage of HB 59. REPRESENTATIVE SEATON stated his understanding that no discrimination is being made regarding new versus existing businesses; nothing that would advantage a current manufacturer over someone new to the industry. The difference is that the loan would provide an incentive to purchase locally. The intent of the bill is to create and sustain jobs in Alaska, he said. REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT queried what constitutes/defines made in Alaska. REPRESENTATIVE SEATON referred to the bill page 1, line 13, and read: In this subsection, 'manufactured or produced' means processing developing, or making an item into a new item with a distinct character and use. REPRESENTATIVE SEATON said the Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development contributed to the bill language, to ensure an accurate, and adequate, definition. 6:34:53 PM CHAIR THOMPSON opened public testimony and announced that the bill would be held in committee for further consideration.