SB 322-SALMON ENHANCEMENT TAX CHAIR SEATON announced that the first order of business would be SENATE BILL NO. 322, "An Act relating to the rate of the salmon enhancement tax." Number 0059 CHERYL SUTTON, Staff to the Joint Legislative Salmon Industry Task Force, Alaska State Legislature, presented SB 322 on behalf of Senator Ben Stevens, sponsor, who chairs the Task Force. This legislation, she explained, merely adds additional tax rates of 30, 20, 15, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, and 4 percent to the salmon enhancement tax. She further explained that under current law, commercial salmon interim-use and entry permit holders organized under regional aquaculture associations may vote to tax themselves at the rates of 1, 2, and 3 percent. The collected revenues pass through the Department of Revenue to the Department of Community & Economic Development (DCED) and back out to the regional aquaculture associations in order to fund the operations and programs of those associations. MS. SUTTON related that SB 322 was introduced because during the interim Senator Ben Stevens chaired the Hatchery Subcommittee of the Task Force during which much concern was related in regard to cost-recovery practices for the hatcheries. Some wanted to have the ability and flexibility to quickly "buy down" their debt service. She highlighted that this is a totally optional tax rate. In response to Chair Seaton, Ms. Sutton confirmed that SB 322 merely changes the tax rates, not the collection procedures or pass-through amounts. Number 0301 REPRESENTATIVE OGG inquired as to the percentage required to change the aquaculture associations' tax. MS. SUTTON answered that the statute, AS 43.76.015(a)(1) reads as follows: "it is approved by a majority vote of the eligible interim-use permit (IUP) and entry permit holders voting in an election held under this section in the region;". CHAIR SEATON mentioned that there have been questions with regard to cost-recovery fish and the high percentage of cost- recovery fish that are taken by some of the hatcheries. Some in the state would rather impose a high total tax and not have cost recovery occur at all. Therefore, the fishermen would be free to catch all of the fish rather than have special harvest areas. This legislation would provide fishermen another option by which they could fund the fisheries without having to segregate the fish. Number 0426 REPRESENTATIVE OGG moved to report SB 322 out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes. There being no objection, it was so ordered.