HFSH - 02/20/95 HB 140 - SMALL FISH PROCESSOR SURETY BONDS Number 061 CHAIRMAN AUSTERMAN called for a ten minute recess. Number 062 CHAIRMAN AUSTERMAN reopened the meeting at 6:05 p.m., noting that Representative Ogan was present. Number 076 ANDY GOLIA, testified via teleconference from Dillingham, in support of HB 140. He stated for the record, "I believe HB 140 will increase the economic opportunities for small processors or operators who want to market salmon. It is estimated that the Bristol Bay permit holder, has paid about $1.4 million in the 1994 season, towards the 1 percent marketing tax. I expect the domestic market to open up for Alaska salmon and HB 140 will help to facilitate that." Number 155 JEROME SELBY, Mayor, Kodiak Island Borough, testified via teleconference from Kodiak, in support of HB 140. He stated, "HB 140 was drafted in response to a resolution passed by the Southwest Alaska Municipal Conference. It is orientated towards trying to make it a little easier for some of the smaller communities to develop an economy, geared towards processing specialty packs of fish products. The purpose of this bill to allow these people to reduce their start up costs and build this type of economic venture. The marketing analysts seem to think that there is a viable market for this kind of specialty product." Number 215 JERRY McCUNE, President, United Fishermen of Alaska, testified in support of HB 140. He stated, "This bill would be very helpful to the small outfits starting up, because it drops the $10,000 bonding requirement, for processing under 30,000 pounds." Number 231 REPRESENTATIVE SCOTT OGAN asked, "What is the cost difference between a $10,000 surety bond and a $2,000 surety bond?" MR. McCUNE wasn't sure what a company charges. MR. SELBY stated, "There is no hard set fee. Each case is treated on an individual basis. The surety bond companies consider the product, the risk involved and circumstantial information." Number 251 REPRESENTATIVE KIM ELTON moved an amendment forward. The amendment takes place on page 2, line 10, insert the words that are the same as on page 1 where it says if the money is insufficient as a bond, then the bond will double over time if a processor has a claim against him or a judgment resulting from a claim. Basically, it takes Section 1 and inserts it into Section 2. MR. SELBY stated he had no objection to the amendment. MR. GOLIA said he did not object to the amendment. Number 295 CHAIRMAN AUSTERMAN asked if there was any opposition from the committee. Hearing no objection, Amendment Number 1 passed. REPRESENTATIVE ELTON made a motion to move CSHB 140(FSH) out of committee with individual recommendations, and a zero fiscal note. Hearing no objection, CHAIRMAN AUSTERMAN announced that CSHB 140(FSH) moved out of the House Special Committee on Fisheries.