HOUSE BILL NO. 296 "An Act relating to program receipts; and relating to the acceptance of gifts, donations, and grants for the purpose of providing signage for assets under the control of the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities." 2:41:41 PM REPRESENTATIVE GEORGE RAUSCHER, SPONSOR, suggested that it was important for legislators to acknowledge individuals who had contributed to their community. One of the ways to achieve recognition was to name a geographical location or structure after a person of note. However, this naming could be expensive to implement and the cost alone had caused legislators to vote against legislation proposing a commemorative naming. He explained that HB 296 would provide a mechanism for funding a commemorative name to a project by allowing receipt authority to the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOT) so it could collect donations for signage. It would not require the costs to be paid by outside groups, but it would ensure that the process not be necessarily reliant on state funds. 2:43:47 PM RYAN MCKEE, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE GEORGE RAUCHER, read the sectional analysis: Section 1: AS 37.05.146(c) Page 1, Lines 5-7 This section adds gifts, donations, and grants received by DOT & PF to the definition of program receipts and non- general fund programs receipts found in the Fiscal Procedures Act in accordance with section 2 of this bill. Section 2: AS 44.42.060 Page 1, Lines 8-14, Page 2, Lines 1-3 This section adds that the department may receive gifts, donations, and grants in accordance with a memorandum of understanding with the donor party. This section also outlines that the funds may not be used until the necessary funds have been collected from the donor. 2:45:02 PM Representative Wool asked if the bill required the approval of a sign before collecting fees. Representative Rauscher deferred to Mr. Andy Mills. 2:45:47 PM ANDY MILLS, LEGISLATIVE LIAISON, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES (via teleconference), responded that when a bill that sought to name state infrastructure was introduced, it would include a provision pointing to the codifying language in HB 296 that would allow the bill to be paid for through outside donations. The interested donators would then sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) as outlined in the bill's language. The naming legislation would be taken from a legislator to instigate a fiscal note and point to statutorily designated program receipts as the source of funding. Representative Wool commented that if a group raised money for a sign and received the funding, the group could potentially influence the bill. He was glad there was a solution to the funding problem through donations, but thought it was important that the bill had to come first. 2:47:44 PM AT EASE 2:47:49 PM RECONVENED Co-Chair Merrick indicated the Senate version of the bill was an exact match and the committee would be taking that version up in the future. HB 296 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further consideration. 2:48:19 PM AT EASE 2:49:37 PM RECONVENED