HOUSE BILL NO. 132 "An Act relating to technical education and apprenticeships; relating to concurrent vocational education, training, and on-the-job trade experience programs for students enrolled in public secondary schools; relating to child labor; and providing for an effective date." 3:50:28 PM Co-Chair Merrick indicated there were 3 amendments for HB 132. 3:50:42 PM AT EASE 3:51:15 PM RECONVENED Representative Josephson MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 1 (copy on file): Page 4, lines 30-31 : Delete "end of the employment period described in (c) of this section" Insert "date the taxpayer hires the registered apprentice" Representative LeBon OBJECTED for discussion. Representative Josephson explained that the amendment would make a correction. The bill, as currently written, referred to an end of employment period described in Section C. The amendment removed an end of employment period and was a technical fix. Representative LeBon WITHDREW the objection. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. Amendment 1 was ADOPTED. Representative LeBon MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 2 (copy on file): Page 4, line 26, following "is": Insert "$1,250." Page 4, lines 27 - 28: Delete all material. Page 5, lines 6 - 11: Delete all material. Co-Chair Merrick OBJECTED for discussion. Representative LeBon explained that with his amendment he was trying to create parody between a possible beneficiary of the program. Currently, there was a division between students and veterans - there was a $1000 potential tax credit for an employer to hire a student versus $1500 for for that same employer to hire a veteran. He was suggesting the amount of $1250 across the board to encourage an employer to hire students or veterans. Representative Wool like the amendment. He suggested that if he was an employer looking at hiring a student or a veteran, the student would be at a disadvantage depending on how many positions were open. He believed in parody as well. Co-Chair Merrick invited the bill sponsor to comment on the amendment. REPRESENTATIVE ZACK FIELDS, SPONSOR, supported the amendment. Co-Chair Merrick WITHDREW the objection. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. Amendment 2 was ADOPTED. Representative Thompson MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 3 (copy on file): Page 5, line 8, following "States": Insert "or the United States Coast Guard" Page 5, line 9, following "States": Insert "or the United States Coast Guard" Co-Chair Merrick OBJECTED for discussion. Representative Thompson explained that the amendment included the United States Coast Guard. There was a letter attached to his amendment from Legislative Legal Services confirming that the United States Coast Guard was part of the armed forces. Co-Chair Merrick WITHDREW the objection. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. Amendment 3 was ADOPTED. Co-Chair Foster MOVED to report CSHB 132(FIN) out of Committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. CSHB 132(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with seven "do pass" recommendations, one "do not pass" recommendation, and two "no recommendation" recommendation; and with one new zero note from the Department of Labor and Workforce Development; one previously published indeterminate note: FN3 (REV); and two previously published zero notes: FN2 (LWF) and FN5 (EED). Co-Chair Merrick reviewed the agenda for the following meeting.