HOUSE BILL NO. 4005 "An Act relating to the mining license tax; relating to the exploration incentive credit; relating to mining license application, renewal, and fees; and providing for an effective date." 3:27:06 PM Vice-Chair Saddler noted that the committee had a full discussion pertaining to the bill in previous meetings. He echoed the comments of Representative Pruitt. He did not support the mining tax but would vote to move the bill out of committee. He thought the concept that the taxes spread the burden on too few people was a rhetorical argument and he disagreed. Representative Gara supported the bill. He did not think the bill would raise much money, and regretted than an amendment to the bill the previous day had failed. He recounted that the proposal had been for mines that made over $250,000 per year in profit to pay an 11 percent tax on profits; which he thought was modest. He noted that with the amendment that did not pass the bill would have raised an extra $7 million, and in total would have raised $14 million. He added that the mining tax had not been changed since approximately 1955, and it was a profit-based tax. He thought the current 9 percent tax would only apply to larger mines. He did not think larger profitable mines paid very much back to the state. He was concerned that if the same approach was taken with every resource industry, the fiscal gap would not go away and the burden would be on those who did not make large amounts of money. Co-Chair Neuman MOVED to REPORT CSHB 4005(FIN) out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal note. Representative Wilson OBJECTED. She reminded the committee that the bill constituted a 29 percent increase in taxes. She referred to a letter she had received that indicated the bill would deter new investment in the state and would shorten the lives of existing mines. She discussed future investment in mining and jobs in the industry. She did not consider the tax to be trivial. She was concerned about diminished mining investment in the state and thought the state should do more to incentivize mines, oil development, and other industry. A roll call vote was taken on the motion. IN FAVOR: Edgmon, Gara, Guttenberg, Munoz, Pruitt, Saddler, Neuman, Thompson OPPOSED: Wilson, Gattis, Kawasaki The MOTION PASSED (8/3). There being NO further OBJECTION, CSHB 4005(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with "no recommendation" and with one fiscal impact note from the Department of Revenue. 3:33:20 PM AT EASE 3:36:38 PM RECONVENED