HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 18 Proposing amendments to the Constitution of the State of Alaska relating to the office of attorney general. 9:43:21 AM Co-Chair Stoltze presented HJR 18. He reported that Alaska was one of seven states that did not elect its attorney general. Instead, Alaska's attorney general was appointed by the governor. He expressed concern that, under the current practice, the people of Alaska did not have a voice. HJR 18 gave Alaskans a say in the process of electing their state attorney general, an official that made opinions under the force of the law. He also asserted that there were no checks and balances within the executive branch. Alaska's attorney general was given incredible powers working as the head of the Department of Law and for the governor. He declared that it was a stretch to refer to the attorney general as the "people's" attorney general. He expressed confidence that if HJR 18 was brought to a public vote it would be strongly supported and readily approved. In proposing HJR 18 he surmised that the legislature had the responsibility of practicing due diligence in reviewing, refining, and perfecting the legislation. He agreed with former governor Bill Egan, one of the founding founders of the state, who believed in a strong executive branch. Prior to attending the first constitutional convention, Territorial Senator Egan professed that the station of attorney general should be an elected position. Co-Chair Stoltze pointed out that the tenure of elected attorney generals in territorial times far surpassed that of appointed attorney generals since statehood, another argument in support of the resolution. Also, he noted members of the constitutional convention expressing concerns about not having enough attorneys to run for office. Today, Alaska had more than 4,000 members of the bar. He spoke of his admiration for former Governor Egan and was glad they shared the same opinion on the importance of a strong executive branch. He hoped for the committee's support to move the resolution forward. 9:51:55 AM Co-Chair Austerman stated that the objective was to introduce HJR 18; public testimony would be heard at a later date. HJR 18 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further consideration. 9:52:18 AM At EASE 9:53:03 AM RECONVENED