HOUSE BILL NO. 9 "An Act requiring the Joint In-State Gasline Development Team to report to the legislature recommended changes to state law that are required to enable or facilitate the design, financing, and construction of an in-state natural gas pipeline so that the in- state natural gas pipeline is operational before 2016; and providing for an effective date." 10:46:48 AM REPRESENTATIVE MIKE HAWKER, DISTRICT 32, announced that the sponsors submitted two amendments to HB 9. He reported that one amendment dealt with confidentiality and the provisions of state agencies. The other amendment was considerable and concerned "regulatory authority under the Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA) for contract carrier pipelines." TOM WRIGHT, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE MIKE CHENAULT, briefly synopsized that Amendment 2 was requested by the Department of Law (DOL) to ensure that any information the state obtained remained confidential. The amendment was a collaboration between the DOL and Alaska Gasline Development Corporation (AGDC). The amendment required the consent of the third-party to allow AGDC access to the information. RENA DELBRIDGE, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE MIKE HAWKER explained that the other amendment replaced three sections in HB 9. The amendment would exempt the gasline from regulatory oversight. The amendment would insert a new chapter into the Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA) statutes that indicated how the gasline was regulated within the Regulatory Commission of Alaska's statutory framework for regulating an instate gas pipeline explicitly authorized to operate as a contract carrier. Currently no statutes existed to regulate a contact carrier pipeline. The amendment created the framework for regulation and "required regulation on the front end through approval of contracts as just and reasonable provided they were entered into at arm's length, and required a special limited scope certificate of public convenience and necessity for the special pipeline." 10:50:53 AM Representative Gara spoke to amendment 3. He highlighted that the amendment proposed that the gas pipeline advanced only if it was the most efficient project that offered the lowest prices to Alaskan consumers. The amendment mandated the Alaska Natural Gas Development Authority (ANGDA) to analyze alternative projects such as determining if Cook Inlet contained enough natural gas reserves for further development as a stop gap until a large pipeline project was built. He opined that a large diameter pipeline produced the lowest price gas and generated the most revenue for the state. He added that another amendment would maintain RCA's current statutory framework. The RCA's process protected the consumer. Co-Chair Stoltze announced that all of the amendments were posted on BASIS for the public's interest and participation. HB 9 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further consideration.