CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 144(FIN) "An Act relating to hunting permits and tag fees for musk oxen." 9:18:00 AM TIM BENINTENDI, STAFF, SENATOR DONNY OLSEN, explained that the bill would authorize a second permit for resident and subsistent hunters to take musk oxen. He added that the bill would double the chances of getting an animal but would not change the current bag limit of one per year, either a cow or a bull. The second permit applies when a hunter is unable to get a musk ox under the first permit. He stressed that non-resident hunters could not take advantage of the second permit. Mr. Benintendi informed the committee that musk oxen are the only game animal left in Alaska with a one-permit restriction. He reviewed the four game management areas musk oxen are located in and noted that the current estimation of the size of the herd is 4,400; annually between 325 and 350 are available for harvest. He noted that wildlife biologist regulators in the Department of Fish and Game have determined that the size and health of the herd would allow for expansion of hunting. The department estimates that the minimum number of additional permits would be 50 to 60 and that approximately 25 animals would be harvested per year under SB 144. Mr. Benintendi remarked that the Board of Game would have authority under the bill to reduce or eliminate subsistence tag and fee requirements. The bill would also change the calendar year to a regulatory year, which would accommodate August to March hunts and allow hunters to pay once for the season. The legislation would take effect August 2010. The fiscal note is zero. The bill has the support of the department and several hunting groups. Vice-Chair Thomas acknowledged the Tenakee Springs group in the audience. 9:22:11 AM Co-Chair Stoltze stated that he supported the residence preference provision in SB 144. Representative Fairclough questioned whether the provision meets constitutionality since a recent ruling. Mr. Benintendi replied that out-of-state residents could take part in drawing hunts (as opposed to permit hunts) and so are accommodated. Co-Chair Stoltze asked whether there could be a situation in which non-resident hunters would feel disadvantaged. Mr. Benintendi answered that the provision would not take away existing rights but only adds to opportunities for Alaskan resident hunters; other hunts would not be impacted. Co-Chair Stoltze referred to challenges from non-resident fishermen. Representative Fairclough stated that she preferred to have Alaskan preference. Co-Chair Stoltze closed public testimony. 9:25:02 AM Vice-Chair Thomas MOVED to report SB 144 out of Committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal note. SB 144 was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with previously published fiscal note: FN1 (DFG).