HOUSE BILL NO. 78 "An Act extending the termination date of the Board of Public Accountancy; and providing for an effective date." Mr. Jackson explained the Board of Public Accountancy shares some of the same issues as the Board of Veterinary Examiners. The big difference is that there is a four-year extension for the Board of Public Accountancy as recommended by Legislative Audit. Ms. Davidson informed the Committee that under professional auditing standards one of the most important standard is that auditors be independent of the organization they are auditing. She explained that Legislative Audit is not independent with respect to the Board of Public Accountancy. She clarified that a consultant was hired to conduct the audit. The contract required that the consultant perform the audit according to the same statutory areas that Legislative Audit would have used. Ms. Davidson read the conclusion of the audit: In recognition of the board's continuing efforts to utilize the services provided by the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy and the potential for additional statutory regulatory changes, the recommendation was for a four-year extension rather than the typical eight-year. Ms. Davidson shared the report's three recommendations: board membership be filled in a more timely manner, fees need to be re-evaluated with the intent of reducing them, and the Investigation Section should implement an effective case tracking system. Ms. Davidson gave an example of problems within the case management system. This recommendation would address case management systems in all occupational boards. 1:53:24 PM Co-Chair Stoltze summarized that the shorter extension is because the board is looking at outsourcing some of their services and restructuring. Co-Chair Stoltze noted a fiscal note from the Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development. He pointed out that costs were paid by activities, licensees, and other fees. 1:54:57 PM Co-Chair Hawker MOVED to REPORT HB 78 out of Committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. HB 78 was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with fiscal note #1 by the Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development.