CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 285(FIN) An Act relating to the power and duties of the Department of Education and Early Development for improving instructional practices in school districts; and providing for an effective date. 3:47:28 PM SENATOR GARY STEVENS, SPONSOR, explained that the bill was introduced in response to the court case decision of Moore et. al. vs. State of Alaska, which pertains to the Legislature fulfilling its constitutional mandate of overseeing school districts and schools in Alaska. The case concludes in part that the Legislature is failing this duty as regards schools with long-standing poor performance. Senator Stevens said the bill calls for the Department of Education and Early Development (DEED) to provide direction to schools that need to increase student achievement, including making decisions regarding personnel and expenditures to improve instructional practices. Representative Hawker stated his support of the bill and recommended reading Moore vs. State for understanding education issues. Vice-Chair Stoltze asked a question about athletic coaches. Senator Stevens clarified that academic coaches would be hired to help improve scores. TIM LAMKIN, STAFF, SENATOR GARY STEVENS, added that it is not the intent of the bill to have anything to do with sports coaches. 3:52:26 PM Co-Chair Chenault OPENED PUBLIC TESTIMONY. EDDY JEANS, DIRECTOR, SCHOOL FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT, stated the Department's support for the legislation. Representative Crawford asked for a description of how the legislation would change things. Mr. Jeans answered that the legislation provides clarification in statute that DEED as the Legislature's agent has the authority to intervene and provide supervision over school districts. One of the judge's criticisms of the State during the lawsuit was that utilizing the No Child Left Behind model, it takes too long for the State to intervene. 3:55:05 PM Representative Hawker asked if DEED would intervene at the individual school level or at the district level when a school is identified as needing intervention,. Mr. Jeans answered that the legislation covers both district and school levels, but all interventions would be through the district administration, working with the local school board. The Department would not go directly into a school. PUBLIC TESTIMONY CLOSED. Co-Chair Meyer referred to the fiscal note. Vice-Chair Stoltze MOVED to REPORT HCS CSSB 285(HES) out of Committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 285(HES) was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with attached fiscal note #1 by the Department of Education and Early Development and Senate Letter of Intent. AT EASE 3:57:45 PM RECONVENE 7:57:13 PM