HOUSE BILL NO. 342 An Act relating to driving while intoxicated; and providing for an effective date. Co-Chair Harris MOVED to ADOPT Work Draft Version V, Luckhaupt dated 4-22-04. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. Co-Chair Harris asked if a person with a DUI conviction must install a device [ignition interlock] so that the vehicle will not start if the driver's breath contains alcohol. REPRESENTATIVE CARL GATTO affirmed, and explained that it is now virtually impossible for a good mechanic to defeat the ignition interlock device. Co-Chair Harris asked if this would place in statute that a person convicted of an alcohol-related offense could drive if he had an ignition interlock device in his vehicle. Representative Gatto explained that historically penalties for DUI were increased, with the State paying for jail time and medical treatment. He conducted research on the laws in other states, and he asserted that the single most effective way to prevent drunks from driving cars is an interlock device. He said that it had a good rate of reduction although it didn't eliminate recidivism. In previous versions of the bill, the penalties were "laddered." AMANDA WILSON, STAFF TO REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG, explained that the changes made to HB 342 dealt with the ignition interlock device, and allowing limited licenses for people in wellness courts or therapeutic courts, which are intensive outpatient treatment programs. The participants are monitored while taking Naltrexone, which prevents people from consuming alcohol. Ms. Wilson informed the Committee that the Wellness Court is an 18-month program. Upon completion of it, people currently may have portions of their sentence and fine reduced, and under this bill, could get a limited license as well. It is an effective tool and there is incentive to enter the program and successfully complete it. She noted that the Wellness Court has had tremendous success in turning peoples' lives around. The court also closely monitors the participants. Ms. Wilson discussed the changes in Version V of the bill. Section 2, subsections 2 and 3 [on page 3] refers to a court-ordered treatment program described under AS 28.35.030 (p) and it is the Wellness Court program. Ms. Wilson noted that Section 3, page 3, changes the "look back laws" which are currently lifetime. The lifetime look back at offenses was intended to nab the habitual offenders who re-offended every four or five years. Currently the license is suspended for a year and there is no ability to get a limited driver's license. For equity, the bill excludes offenses longer than fifteen years preceding the date of the present offense, so that an offender is not treated the same as someone with two DUI's within a few years. Ms. Wilson explained that Section 4 deals with the DUI courts for the felony offender, and it allows for a limited license if the offender has an ignition interlock as well. Completion of the lengthy and intensive therapeutic court program and treatment with Naltrexone is required. Ms. Wilson concluded that punishment is not an effective tool, and people must be socially reintegrated. The intent of the bill is to assist people with reentering society, reaching sobriety and maintaining a healthy lifestyle through finding steady employment. HB 342 was heard and HELD in Committee for further consideration.