HOUSE BILL NO. 366 An Act relating to rat racing charitable gaming; and providing for an effective date. Representative Stoltze MOVED to ADOPT Work Draft Version H There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. BEN MULLIGAN, STAFF TO REPRESENTATIVE STOLTZE, explained that the intent of the Committee Substitute is to include only charitable gaming in existence before Nov. 1, 2002, and it would not allow new forms of gaming. It is for nonprofit groups that supply money toward charities. Representative Fate referred to the definition of animal classics, and asked if there are other games using rats or gerbils. Mr. Mulligan said that he was not aware of any other games. Both Palmer and the Tanana Fair have rat racing. Representative Fate asked if this bill would provide for a new animal classic game. Representative Stoltze replied that the intent of the bill is a narrow focus allowing continuation of events having an historic precedent and to limit gaming and gambling to charitable operations. Representative Fate asked if a true rat race would be illegal under this bill. Representative Stoltze replied that it would have to be handled on a case-by-case basis as legislative policymakers. He expressed that the Legislature has a duty to ensure that big loopholes are not created and that the gaming activities are controlled by the Department of Revenue. By keeping the focus narrow, that goal would be accomplished. Representative Fate expressed concern that there could be other gaming events but agreed that the bill seems narrowly worded. Representative Joule commented on having a gaming commission versus legislative control. Representative Croft understood why it was narrowly drafted but asked if a separate statutory change would be needed for each game other than manure-related games. Representative Stoltze thought it was a good point, but the Department of Revenue (DOR) wouldn't be able to control the activities if the bill was too broadly crafted. Representative Croft moved to enter a photograph into the record. Representative Stoltze MOVED to ADOPT Amendment #1. Several OBJECTIONS were voiced simultaneously. Amendment #1 reads: Page 2, line 19 Delete "a" Page 2, line 19 following "chicken" insert manure Representative Joule and Representative Croft both asked how (b) would read. Representative Stoltze explained on page 2, line 19, (b) would read: "concerning an activity involving chicken manure and a numbered or lettered grid." Representative Chenault removed his objection. Amendment #1 was adopted. Representative Stoltze MOVED to report CSHB 366(FIN) out of Committee with individual recommendations the accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. CSHB 366(FIN) was REPORTED out of Committee with individual recommendations and with one previously published fiscal impact note.