HOUSE BILL NO. 533 An Act relating to the state's administrative procedures and to judicial oversight of administrative matters. LINDA SYLVESTER, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE BRUCE WEYHRAUCH, noted that Representative Weyhrauch was carrying the proposed legislation for the House State Affairs Committee. She commented that HB 533 was a part of a package put forth by the Regulation Review Committee, Chaired by Senator Therriault. The component is called Judicial extraction and would address circumstances when there is an unreasonable delay for an instate agency issue. She stated that Representative Weyhrauch was interested in carrying the bill, as it would address the impact of unreasonable delays causing irreparable harm. DAVE STANCLIFF, STAFF-REGULATION REVIEW COMMITTEE, REPRESENTATIVE PETE KOTT, stated that HB 533 was the final stage of a three-bill system, working through the Legislature and providing a safety valve. He referenced the data provided by Legislative Research. To date, only half the agencies have reported in. It is worthy to note for the record that since 1980, over 8,000 administrative cases have languished for more than a year. That does not count the contract-hearing officers. Mr. Stancliff commented it would be difficult to quantify how that would affect State government knowing it is a huge expense. The courts require that the administrative remedy must be exhausted before they can be brought before the court. He commented that the trick is to provide a safety valve without providing too easy a way to opt out of regulations. He noted that the sponsor had worked with the Department of Law. By the time it makes it to court, the court would have three options: · Site the agency to speed the process up; · Some type of alternate dispute resolution; · Claim that it was out there long enough to come to a resolution and in the matter of public interest, the court would opt to consider the case. Mr. Stancliff pointed out that the theory is, once a safety value is in place, on-going cases would become resolved. The reform is not sweeping, but to the businesses and citizens, it would be a sign that politicians understand that there are cases, which have gone on too long, and that there is an alternative option. It is anticipated that once the Department of Environmental Conservation and the Department of Education & Early Development weigh in with the contract cases, there could be somewhere between 12,000 and 15,000 cases that have gone on for more than a year. The cost is extraordinary. Mr. Stancliff pointed out the indeterminate notes. The intention is that once the cases are processed, the savings would reduce that level by offsetting them. He offered to answer questions of the Committee. Representative Hawker asked about the fiscal note from the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation. He pointed out that note related to HB 553 (analysis) and should not be included in the file for HB 533. Representative Hawker noted that he was disappointed that Representative Weyhrauch was not present. He asked if the bill was a vehicle being considered as an administrative relief language related to the expungement statute. Mr. Stancliff replied that it had not been considered for that reason. He discussed that they would respectfully request that it remain "whole" as it is one part of a three-part process. Ms. Sylvester interjected that Representative Weyhrauch was very interested in expungement concept and had investigated that. Representative Foster MOVED to report CS HB 533 (JUD) out of Committee with individual recommendations and with the accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. CS HB 533 (JUD) was reported out of Committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with a new fiscal note by Department of Law, indeterminate note #1 by the Alaska Court System, indeterminate note #2 by the Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission, and indeterminate note #3 by the Department of Health & Social Services.