HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 47  Proposing amendments to the Constitution of the State of Alaska relating to the principal of the Alaska permanent fund; limiting appropriations from the Alaska permanent fund to amounts equal to that part of the market value of the fund that exceeds the principal based on an averaged percent of the fund market value; and permitting appropriations from the permanent fund only for costs of administering the fund, a program of dividend payments for state residents, and public education. TAPE HFC 04 - 83, Side B  Co-Chair Williams explained that HJR 47 includes a soft enshrinement. Pete Ecklund explained that the first portion of HJR 47 is the same as HJR 46. He noted that HJR 47 has a purposes section not included in HJR 46. Co-Chair Williams observed that the legislation was based on work by Senator Therriault, but that he would prefer not to have a purposes section. He felt that the legislature would be giving up the legislature's power of appropriation and could be challenged in court. Mr. Ecklund observed that some of the details would be included in a statutory bill (HB 553). Representative Hawker questioned if community dividends would be included. Mr. Ecklund could not respond. Representative Hawker stated that he would continue to pursue clarification on the inclusion of community dividends. Co-Chair Harris MOVED to report HJR 47 out of Committee with the accompanying fiscal notes. Representative Croft OBJECTED. He spoke in opposition to the legislation. He pointed out that the legislation would not implement POMV and would not offer protections to dividends or guarantee additional money for public education. He questioned what the legislation would buy. Representative Croft WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. Representative Fate expressed his concern but noted that he would allow the bill to move. Representative Hawker acknowledged concerns, but felt that the bill should be forwarded. Vice-Chair Meyer stated that he did not support the legislation but added that he would also support its movement. Representative Joule questioned if it is possible to see each proposal compared. HJR 47 was REPORTED out of Committee with individual recommendations and with two fiscal impact notes.