HOUSE BILL NO. 216 "An Act relating to municipal taxation of refined fuel products." Co-Chair Harris MOVED to ADOPT Work Draft 23-LS0822\V (5/8/03). There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. RANDY RUARO, STAFF, CO-CHAIR WILLIAMS provided information on the bill. He explained that the committee substitute is an attempt to address concerns expressed by Representatives Croft and Whitaker regarding prohibition of taxation of fuels transiting through a borough or municipality on its way to another destination. The Sponsor had expressed his support of the bill. The bill also prohibits taxation of wholesale sales of fuels refined in a borough and the transit of fuel through a borough unless that activity currently exists, in which case it would be grand fathered in. Mr. Rauro observed that the Alaska Municipal League indicated that it would neither oppose nor advocate for the legislation. Representative Chenault MOVED to ADOPT Amendment #2. Co- Chair Williams OBJECTED. Representative Chenault noted the technical nature of the amendment: insert "or transfers" on page 2, line 7. SUSAN BURKE, ATTORNEY, WILLIAMS PETROLEUM provided information on the Committee Substitute. She noted that Amendment #2 would correct an oversight making sections congruent in language. Co-Chair Williams WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being no other objections, Amendment #2 was ADOPTED. Representative Hawker pointed out that the legislation would restrict a municipality's ability to collect local excise tax. Ms. Burke noted that they were attempting to prevent the type of municipal taxation that initiative sponsors in Fairbanks tried to get enacted: the physical transfer of refined fuel from one container to another. Representative Hawker questioned if Alaska Municipal League would support the legislation. Representative Foster noted that in 1993 he sponsored a bill to respond to a community that was charging a transfer tax for goods traveling through a variety of municipalities. Representative Foster MOVED to report CSHB 216 (FIN) out of Committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTIONS it was so ordered. CSHB 216 (FIN) was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass" recommendation and three, zero fiscal notes: two new fiscal notes from Department of Community and Economic Development (Community Assistance & Rural Energy Programs) and #2 from Department of Revenue.