CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 172(FIN) "An Act relating to an annual report by the court system to the public and the legislature." DEB DAVIDSON, STAFF, SENATOR DONLEY testified in support of the legislation. She explained that the legislation would require an annual report from the Alaska Court System to the legislature and the public. The report would require information regarding withheld pay warrants as a result of the timeliness of decisions, travel by the appellate and supreme courts, and information regarding the time taken in decisions. She acknowledged that much of the information is already provided in an annual report. She argued that placing the requirements in law would assure that the reporting would remain consistent. She maintained that the requirements do not add an additional burden to the court's resources. CHRIS CHRISTENSEN, DEPUTY ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR, ALASKA COURT SYSTEM testified that the Court is neutral on the legislation. The Supreme Court has provided an annual report since 1960. He pointed out that the report is the Supreme Court's annual message on judicial branch operations. Much of the information is currently provided in the annual report; some of the information is not currently included. He noted that the additional information already exists or would be easy to obtain. He stated that the information would either be added to the annual report or would be placed in a supplemental form. In response to a question by Representative Croft, Mr. Christensen reviewed items that are required by the legislation. The current report contains items 1, 2 and part of 3. The report does not contain information in item 4 or 6. Representative John Davies questioned how much of the information not contained in the annual report is available in other sources. Mr. Christensen noted that the information in number 4 is collected and provided on request. Under 3 the average, mean, or minimum, time periods for individual judges that cases are dispose is not collected. Time standards were adopted last year and court reports will contain the information. Representative John Davies expressed concern with the attachment of standards to individual judges. He pointed out that cases take a variety of time. He questioned if other data is needed to consider the impacts of the total cases, in order not to be taken out of context. Mr. Christenson agreed that cases and caseloads vary. He anticipated that additional data would be included to keep the data in perspective. Representative Foster MOVED to report CSSB 172 (FIN) out of Committee with the accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 172 (JUD) was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with a previously published fiscal note (#1 - CRT).