HOUSE BILL NO. 49 "An Act extending the termination date of the Board of Parole; and providing for an effective date." LARRY JONES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD OF PAROLE testified in support of the legislation. He noted that the Board of Parole supports the extension of the sunset date to June 30, 2006. The Board is made up of five citizen members and is tied to every element of the justice system. He stressed the importance of the Parole Board and emphasized that it represents the most humanized aspect of the criminal justice system. Parole is not a right; it is a discretion and the privilege of parole rests solely with the Parole Board. Public safety is the number one factor in considering parole. He observed that the state of Alaska saves between $10 - $12 million dollars in hard bed costs by allowing prisoners to go into the public sector with close supervision. Vice-Chair Bunde observed that the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee report supports a longer extension. Mr. Jones agreed that a longer extension would be useful. He emphasized that extensive financial review is unnecessary due to the size of the Board. He explained that the Board chose a 2006 review date based on its past experiences. He pointed out that Alaska has a constitutional mandate for a parole system. He said that an increase to 2010 would be welcomed. Representative Lancaster noted that there was a small concern regarding overseeing parolees by the Board and/or the Administration. Mr. Jones explained that all parolees are under the jurisdiction of the Board, but supervision is conducted by the Department of Corrections. Only about 4 percent of revocation hearings are discretionary parolees. Mandatory parolees are released without personal interaction with the Parole Board. The supervision provided by the department is sufficient in the mind of the Board. Vice-Chair Bunde MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 1: delete "2006" and insert "2008". There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. Representative Hudson MOVED to report CSHB 49 (FIN) out of Committee with the accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. CSHB 49 (FIN) was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with a previously published zero fiscal note (#1) by the Department of Corrections.