SENATE BILL NO. 154 "An Act relating to mental health treatment facilities; repealing the termination date of the mental health treatment assistance program; and providing for an effective date." WENDY HALL, STAFF, SENATOR KELLY spoke in support of SB 154. She observed that the bill repeals the sunset date on previously passed legislation, which created the Designated Evaluation Program. She maintained that the Designated Evaluation Program is a critical component of mental health services in Alaska, particularly for indigent persons with mental illnesses who are being civilly committed or who meet the criteria for civil commitment. Through this program many poor people with mental illnesses who have not qualified for Medicaid are able to receive services in community hospitals around the state. Without the program it would be necessary to transport many clients in crisis to the Alaska Psychiatric Institute. She observed that the previous sunset date was placed on the program as a result of concerns that the funding would cease to exist, but funding has continued. ELMER LINDSTROM, SPECIAL ASSISTANT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES testified in support of the legislation. He explained that the department had just received a one-time federal grant at the time the original legislation was adopted. Another source of non-general funds have since been identified. Federal DSH funds through the Medicaid program have been utilized as an on going stream of revenue. They are expected to continue to support the program. He explained the fiscal note and pointed out that the fiscal cost is included in the Senate and House FY02 budgets. Mr. Lindstrom gave examples of the success of the program. The number of expected transports to API has fallen dramatically from 75 to less than 10. Representative Davies MOVED to report SB 154 out of Committee with the accompanying fiscal note. Co-Chair Mulder OBJECTED for the purpose of a question. He asked how success has been defined and when the program was established. Mr. Lindstrom noted that the program has been on the books for many years. Legislation was enacted two years ago, which defined eligibility and outlined how the payments would be made. The key measure of success has been the reduction in transports to API and the ability to treat clients locally. Co-Chair Mulder acknowledged the clinical value of treating locally and questioned the cost. Mr. Lindstrom did not think that it was more expensive to operate locally. He stated that he would prepare a cost comparison. He clarified that these clients are not Medicaid eligible and explained that clients between 21 and 65 are not Medicaid eligible. The income eligibility is 185 percent of the federal poverty level. There being NO OBJECTION, SB 154 was moved from Committee. SB 154 was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with a previously published fiscal impact note (#1) by the Department of Health and Social Services.