SENATE BILL NO. 207 "An Act relating to the establishment and enforcement of medical support orders for children; and providing for an effective date." BARBARA MIKLOS, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION testified via teleconference in support of SB 207. Senate Bill 207 helps both parents by providing more flexibility in child support cases. It gives the parents a choice by allowing the Child Support Enforcement Division to establish a medical support order without also establishing a financial support order at the same time. The child support agency is currently required to establish a medical support order whenever a child starts receiving medical assistance benefits. This is to ensure that the non-custodial parent provides health care coverage if available at a reasonable cost from his or her employer. Under existing statute, the agency must also establish a financial order at the same time -- even though the parents may not want or need a financial order. This creates problems if the financial order for monthly child support payments is not needed, and it also creates problems if the custodial parent later receives public assistance benefits and the child support agency has to go back and collect financial support. This legislation would solve both problems by allowing the agency to set up a medical support order only -- if that is what both parents want. This bill also amends the medical support statutes to provide that either parent, not simply the non- custodial parent, may be required to provide health care coverage. This allows the court or the child support agency to consider which parent has the better or more cost-effective health care coverage available for the child. The bill also amends state law to clarify that a medical support order shall be issued regardless whether CSED knows at the time if health care coverage is available to either parent. That provision, however, would not take effect unless one or both of the parents has health insurance available at a reasonable cost. This allows more efficient enforcement of medical support for children. In a survey of other states, most have separate provisions for medical and financial orders as proposed in SB 207. This change in Alaska statutes is allowed under federal law and regulations. Representative J. Davies questioned if the legislation allows for the possibility that both parents be required to provide medical insurance. DIANE WENDLANDT, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LAW testified via teleconference. She affirmed that the legislation allows for the possibility that both parents be required to provide medical insurance. She noted that courts could require both parents to provide coverage. One parent's coverage may not cover everything that the other parent has. Representative Foster MOVED to report SB 207 out of Committee with the accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. SB 207 was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with a zero fiscal note by the Department of Revenue, published 1/20/00. RECESSED The meeting was recessed at 4:10 p.m. RECONVENED The meeting reconvened at 4:50 p.m.