HOUSE BILL NO. 428 "An Act relating to interest on child support overpayments that are disbursed to the obligor." WILDA RODMAN, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE THERRIAULT spoke in support of the legislation. She noted that CSHB428(FIN) requires the Child Support Enforcement Division to pay interest on the return of overpayments of child support when the overpayment is due to a mistake made by the agency. The agency would be required to pay obligors six percent, the same amount of interest the agency can charge on child support arrearages set out in AS 25.27.025, imposed under AS 25.27.020(a)(2)(B). The requirement to pay interest on returns of overpayment is not a new precedent; AS 43.05.280 imposes a similar requirement on the Department of Revenue when refunding or crediting an overpayment of tax. CSHB 428(FIN) is in response to an inequity in the child support collection system that allows the agency to charge interest when an obligor is late paying support, but does not require the agency to pay interest when returning overpayments that are the direct result of a mistake made by the agency. The bill would provide incentive to the agency to be more careful when calculating support and more prompt about returning overpayments. House Bill 428 carries no fiscal note as the agency would be expected to absorb the cost of paying the interest out of its annual budget. The Committee Substitute for HB 428 changes the amount of interest the Division of Child Support Enforcement must pay under AS 25.27.062(l)(1) when it is delinquent returning overpayments that have been withheld by an employer after the support order has been satisfied. CSHB 428(FIN) changes the rate of interest to make it consistent with the rate set in AS 25.27.320. Vice Chair Bunde observed that the Division's budget is $16.5 million dollars. He questioned how much leverage the legislation would apply. Co-Chair Therriault explained that the department estimated that it would take $3 thousand dollars to fund the interest. He observed that it would not be his intent to give the department separate funding for the interest. He maintained that the department could absorb the cost. Vice Chair Bunde agreed that obligors should have right to have interest on their money. Co-Chair Therriault observed that the department has been careful to repay funds owed in other programs. Co-Chair Therriault stressed that it is fair for the state or the obligor to the state to pay interest if the money is late. LARRY PERSILY, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE spoke in support of the bill. He acknowledged that the state should pay interest if the department makes a mistake. He observed that paying the same 6% interest that the state would charge seems reasonable. Co-Chair Therriault questioned if it would be fair to take the interest out of the department's existing budget. Mr. Persily agreed and stated that he did not expect to have many cases. Co-Chair Therriault observed that the House Finance Committee would submit a zero fiscal note. Vice Chair Bunde MOVED to report CSHB 428 (FIN) out of Committee with the accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. CSHB 428 (FIN) was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with a zero fiscal note by the House Finance Committee.