HOUSE BILL NO. 217 "An Act relating to obligations and payments to the state under fishery cooperative contracts; and providing for an effective date." TIM BENINTENDI, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE MOSES spoke in support of HB 217. He maintained that HB 217 is needed to authorize the Department of Revenue to collect payments in lieu of fisheries landing taxes. "These payments were established in the federal American Fisheries Act of 1998, and are part of the fisheries cooperative contracts existing among those active in the pollock fishery. The basic provision is for payments to be made in lieu of taxes on product, which is not landed, for processing in Alaska. The payments are justified in that, like the landing taxes, they help reimburse coastal communities for basic services rendered to the offshore fleet during the fishing seasons. Because the American Fisheries Act changed the competitive nature and fast pace of the fishery, some boats might well find it in their best interest to return to places like Seattle to refuel, take on supplies, and change crews. In this event, they would take loads of pollock with them, foregoing landing in Alaska. Since the extent of these changes will not be known until at least next year, we can only speculate on the impact on the fisheries landing tax. In the support material to the fiscal note, it is estimated that the potential loss of landing tax revenue would be between $256,000 to $512,000. It may likely be higher." Mr. Benintendi stated that "HB 217 would clearly authorize the Department of Revenue to collect these payments, and process them as though they were regular landing taxes. It is necessary to achieve passage of this legislation this year in order that it be in place for next season." BRETT FRIED, ECONOMIST, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE stated that the Department of Revenue supports the legislation. In response to a question by Representative J. Davies, Co- Chair Therriault pointed out that the legislation allows the state to collect money that it could not otherwise collect. Vice-Chair Bunde agreed and added that it is new money that the state was not previously able to collect under the fisheries tax. He noted that the state has not had the benefit of collection on resources going to Seattle. In response to a question by Representative Kohring, Co- Chair Therriault explained that the state charges a tax on fish that are landing in the state of Alaska. Offshore factory ships go to Seattle without unloading in Alaska. The federal provision allows the current state tax to be collected on the fish resources that are taken to Seattle. It allows the state to collect the tax that is already in place on the total resource that is fished in the state of Alaska. Co-Chair Mulder MOVED to report HB 217 out of Committee with the accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. HB 217 was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with a fiscal impact note by the Department of Revenue.