HOUSE BILL NO. 405 "An Act relating to failing to stop a vehicle when directed to do so by a peace officer." Co-Chair Therriault MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 1 (copy on file). JAMES HORNADAY, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE KOTT stated that the sponsor supports the amendment. He added that representatives of the Anchorage Police Department and the Department of Public Safety also support the amendment. He explained that the amendment would add new language: "A person commits the offense of failure to stop at the direction of a peace officer in the first degree if the person violates (b) of this section and during the commission of that offense, the person violates a traffic law or commits another crime." The amendment also provides that "crime" has the meaning given in AS 11.81.900; and "traffic law" has the meaning given in AS 28.15.261. Co-Chair Therriault observed that there are approximately 330 of these types of violations on a yearly basis. The Department of Law indicated that that they would try to prosecute these offenses as felonies. He observed that the Department of Law could prosecute with the use discretion in order to reduce the fiscal impact. The Anchorage Police Department supports full prosecution of violations. CHRIS STOCKARD, CAPTAIN, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY explained that it is currently a class B misdemeanor to elude a police officer. The legislation increases the penalty and creates a new felony category for more serious violations. There are approximately 20 states that have made fleeing a police office a felony offense. There being NO OBJECTION, Amendment 1 was adopted. (Tape Change, HFC 98 - 140, Side 2) In response to a question by Representative Grussendorf, Mr. Stockard clarified that a person must knowingly elude a police officer. The police officer's vehicle must be marked appropriately so that a reasonable person would recognize it as a law enforcement vehicle. If the officer is not operating a vehicle they must be in a clearly recognizable uniform. Mr. Hornaday pointed out that there is a definition of "knowingly" in AS 81.900. Representative Mulder asked if the legislation would act as a deterrent. Mr. Stockard observed that the Anchorage Police Department feels that it would be a deterrent. The Department of Public Safety is less certain. He explained that officers would include information about the law in their school presentation. Co-Chair Therriault asked if forfeiture of the vehicle was considered as a deterrent. Mr. Hornaday stressed that forfeiture is difficult to enforce. Representative Davies asked if persons in an emergency situation would be charged with eluding a police officer. Mr. Stockard emphasized that generally persons in an emergency situation will stop because they want the police to assist them. Representative Grussendorf spoke in support of the legislation. Representative Mulder MOVED to report CSHB 405 (FIN) out of Committee with the accompanying fiscal notes. CSHB 405 (FIN) was REPORTED out of Committee with "no recommendation" and with four fiscal impact notes, one by the Department of Corrections, one by the Alaska Court System, one by the Department of Administration, and one by the Department of Law dated 3/9/98.