HOUSE BILL NO. 488 "An Act relating to the Alaska Royalty Oil and Gas Development Advisory Board." REPRESENTATIVE JERRY SANDERS stated that fuel prices have a definite retardant effect on the economic development and quality of living in Alaska. Alaska refiners strongly influence regional prices through company-owned retail outlets and distributors. Refiners are attempting to replace independent retail outlets and distributors with company operated outlets to solidify their control over prices. Neither capacity nor availability of supply is a determining factor in the cost of fuel in Alaska. Representative Sanders stated that Alaskans would not bear the high prices if they had an alternative. Representative Sanders advised that the Alaska Royalty Oil and Gas Development Advisory Board would be charged to protect the public under the Alaska Statutes from high fuel prices. Representative Sanders continued, HB 488 would change the Board's makeup by increasing the public membership. The objectives of the bill are: ? Replace the Commissioner of Revenue with the Commissioner of the Department of Community and Regional Affairs (DCRA); ? Raise the number of voting members from five to seven; and ? Change the number of members with petroleum related backgrounds from three to one. Currently, all public members are required to have a petroleum-related background, which limits the number of people who can serve on the board. CAROL CARROLL, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, noted that the Department is neutral on the legislation. There is a concern with the replacement of the Commissioner of the Department of Revenue by the Commissioner of the Department of Community and Regional Affairs. The Commissioner of Revenue has a lot of knowledge on how these revenues impact the State. She noted that the Administration would prefer that the Commissioner of Revenue be on the Board in addition to the Commissioner of DCRA. Co-Chair Therriault recommended deleting language on Page 2, Line 5, "transportation, sale" which would address the legislation's intent. Representative Sanders stated that change would be "okay". Co-Chair Therriault MOVED that language change as Amendment #1. Co-Chair Hanley suggested that the language stay as currently written, in order to avoid a conflict. He pointed out that if the intent was not to include those people with a vested interest in the fuel business on the board, the language should remain as originally written. Co-Chair Therriault WITHDREW Amendment #1. There being NO OBJECTION, it was withdrawn. Representative G. Davis asked how the Board would protect the people of the State from high oil prices. Ms. Carroll explained that when the Department is in the process of negotiating with enterprises such as MAPCO, they take into consideration the price, although, do not make any determinations on the retail price of gas. It is one of the criteria used in selling royalty oil. There are multiple lists of criteria which the State considers, one of which is price. Representative Sanders added that oil refiners must consider price or supplied benefits to the citizens. He concluded that HB 488 would create a new body not directly involved in the industry to consider these concerns. Representative G. Davis spoke in favor of keeping the Commissioner of the Department of Revenue involved in the process. Representative Sanders reflected, from testimony received from the Commissioner of Revenue, he has little to do with the contract. Representative Sanders noted that his staff was responsible for all decisions. He commented that he was not against the Commissioner of Revenue being on the Committee. Co-Chair Therriault pointed out that the Commissioner would most likely be involved in negotiations on the actual sale. He remarked that making this change would not exclude the Commissioner of Revenue from being involved in the drafting of proposed contracts. Representative Kohring observed that there are inappropriate circumstances being placed on the consumer, noting that there is a monopoly on the market with only two refiners in the State. He cautioned not to restrict the industry in the State, but instead, to encourage a more competitive environment. Representative Foster MOVED to report HB 488 out of Committee with individual recommendations and with the accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. HB 488 was reported out of Committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with a fiscal note by the Department of Natural Resources.