HOUSE BILL NO. 51 "An Act relating to the Department of Environmental Conservation." Representative Davies provided members with a package of 1 amendments for HB 51 (copy on file). Representative Davies MOVED to adopt Amendment 13. Representative Mulder OBJECTED. Amendment 13 would delete the existing language on page 4, line 24 through page 5, line 2 and insert new language. Representative Davies explained that Amendment 13 would set in place a new set of conditions. Amendment 13 defines the terms; water quality criteria, standards, natural conditions, and background condition. He stated that the definitions were taken from a letter by Michelle Brown, Commissioner, Department of Environmental Conservation. He maintained that definitions of these terms are inconsistent in the bill. "Water quality criteria" are defined as scientific information regarding the maximum concentrations of specific chemicals or other pollutants in water which are consistent with the protection of aquatic life or human health. "Natural condition" would mean the condition of a water body before human impact. He noted that the State adopts criteria used by the Environmental Protection Agency. He maintained that the State does not have the scientific apparatus to perform the research necessary to establish criteria independently. He explained that the definitions in Amendment 13 provide the basis for other amendments. Representative Davies noted that Amendment 13 was not reviewed by the Legal Services Division, Legislative Affairs Agency. Co-Chair Hanley asked the rationale of including "legally enforceable state-established requirements" in the definition of "standards". Representative Davies noted that the language was used by the Department of Environmental Conservation. Representative Davies pointed out that a "standard" is something that is legally enforceable. Co- Chair Hanley noted that "standards" are state-established requirements. He questioned if "legally enforceable" is necessary under law. Representative Rokeberg objected to Amendment 13. He observed that he had not had sufficient time to review the amendments. Discussion ensued regarding further review of the amendments. Representative Grussendorf suggested that the legislation be reviewed in subcommittee. Representative Rokeberg urged Committee action. Representative Mulder requested review by the Legal Services Agency. Representative Rokeberg noted that Amendment 13 is conceptual. He suggested the amendment may have drafting problems. Co-Chair Therriault observed that members would like time to further review the proposed amendments. HB 51 was HELD in Committee for further consideration.