HB 255-HOME RULE VILLAGES CO-CHAIRMAN HARRIS announced that the first order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 255, "An Act relating to villages; and providing for an effective date." Number 0099 REPRESENTATIVE DYSON, speaking as the sponsor of HB 255, pointed out that the committee should have a report from the subcommittee on HB 255, which had a spirited discussion with regard to the name of this new category. The subcommittee determined that the most descriptive and user-friendly title would be a "home rule community." He informed the committee that Tamara Cook, Director, Legislative Legal and Research Services, had the opinion that a community is defined as fitting under the category of city. Therefore, the name would pass the constitutional test, although it will require some work. REPRESENTATIVE DYSON informed members that the Attorney General's representative did not have strong objections. Kevin Ritchie, Executive Director, Alaska Municipal League, felt that the phrase "home rule" was widely used, with a recognized meaning nationwide. Therefore, the subcommittee liked the term "home rule community" that was in the proposed committee substitute (CS), Version H [1-LS1000\H, Cook, 1/24/00], which was before the committee at the last hearing. Number 0295 REPRESENTATIVE KOOKESH recalled that the subcommittee had reviewed seven or eight possible names. The subcommittee had tried to fit in the word "city." However, people in rural Alaska do not want to be known as a city. The name "home rule community" was the name that seemed to satisfy the dislike of the word "city" by rural communities while recognizing that "city" is mentioned in the constitution. REPRESENTATIVE MURKOWSKI noted that at the last committee meeting she had requested an opinion from Ms. Cook. With the input received from Ms. Cook at the subcommittee meeting and the memorandum attached to the subcommittee report, Representative Murkowski said she was satisfied. Number 0468 REPRESENTATIVE DYSON moved to report CSHB 255, version 1- LS1000\H, Cook, 1/24/00, out of committee with individual recommendations. There being no objection, it was so ordered and CSHB 255(CRA) was reported from the House Community and Regional Affairs Standing Committee.