HB 22 - INVESTIGATIONS BY MUNICIPAL ASSESSOR Number 292 CO-CHAIRMAN HALCRO announced the next order of business before the committee as HOUSE BILL NO. 22, "An Act relating to investigations of property by a municipal assessor or the assessor's agent; and providing for an effective date." Co-Chairman Halcro called a brief at-ease from 9:05 a.m. to 9:07 a.m. REPRESENTATIVE OGAN, sponsor of HB 22, informed the committee that the proposed committee substitute (CS) includes language addressing the concerns brought out at the previous hearing. CO-CHAIRMAN HARRIS moved to adopt CSHB 22(CRA), Version LS0191\G Cook dated 2/3/99, as the working document before the committee. REPRESENTATIVE OGAN referred the committee to page 1, line 9 paragraph (1) which is new language reading, "if the structure is under construction and not yet occupied;". On page 1, line 11, the word "actual" was inserted before "possession". Representative Ogan believed that language protected the right to privacy as well as due process. CO-CHAIRMAN HALCRO noted that the requirement of written permission was not included in the proposed CS. REPRESENTATIVE OGAN agreed and explained that he did not sense at the last hearing that the members or the assessors supported written permission. Number 346 REPRESENTATIVE MURKOWSKI inquired as to the meaning of "actual possession", especially regarding a tenant situation. She asked if the assessors had an opinion on this language. REPRESENTATIVE OGAN said that he had not discussed the language with the assessors. Under the constitution the right to privacy extends to renters as well as owners. Representative Ogan believed that a renter should have the right to refuse access to the dwelling. If the owner of the property wants the assessor to enter the property, then the owner can contact the assessor and encourage the use of a court order to enter. Number 380 STEVE VAN SANT, State Assessor, Department of Community & Regional Affairs, emphasized the industry policy that when an assessor is refused entry the assessor leaves. Mr. Van Sant did not have a problem with the "actual possession" language. In response to Co-Chairman Harris, Mr. Van Sant said that he had seen the proposed CS and did not have a problem with that. Number 412 REPRESENTATIVE DYSON moved to report CSHB 22(CRA) out of committee with individual recommendations. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CO-CHAIRMAN HALCRO noted that HB 22 was given an additional referral to House Judiciary.