HB 20: ELECTRICAL SERVICE EXTENSION FUND GRANTS CHAIRMAN OLBERG called an at ease from 2:38 to 2:40 p.m. REPRESENTATIVE CURT MENARD, PRIME SPONSOR OF HB 20, began by testifying, "I was involved in the legislation that set up the small electric grant fund (Title 44.83.370) a few years ago which was a 60/40 match... One of the things that upset me with the way we structured the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) fund, was that the Executive Director makes the total grant applications. ...Under this bill (HB 20), the AEA directors would make the decision after receiving the recommendation from the executive director. It would also require the directors to state, in writing, the reasons for awarding or denying applications." REPRESENTATIVE MENARD then read his sponsor statement into the record. (A copy of this sponsor statement may be found in the House Community and Regional Affairs Committee Room, Capitol 110, and after the adjournment of the second session of the 18th Alaska State Legislature, in the Legislative Reference Library.) He added, "My contention is: I feel homesteaders that are on generators on the end of a line have every bit as equal access to that fund as a large commercial development. All I want is a level playing field." Number 242 REPRESENTATIVE TOOHEY pointed out she probably has a conflict of interest because she "lives on a road, seven miles out" and has no electricity. She then asked, "Does this include municipal property?" REPRESENTATIVE MENARD was unsure. CHAIRMAN OLBERG said, "Almost by definition, this is going to be people beyond the end of the line. It isn't going to be folks in town." Number 288 REPRESENTATIVE DAVIES said, "I don't have any problem with requiring the directors to consider a cost benefit analysis, but I think oftentimes public policy considerations come into play where the right thing to do is not necessarily the one that's most cost effective." He added, "I wonder if you would consider a friendly amendment to modify that in such a way that it said they shall give consideration to this, but not necessarily give priority to them." REPRESENTATIVE MENARD explained in detail the financial mechanisms involved with HB 20. CHAIRMAN OLBERG said, "You're suggesting that if we eliminate the lowest costs per customer criteria, we need some other?" Number 352 REPRESENTATIVE MENARD said, "Your eight customers would have to get together with your utility. You'd have to have all your eight customers willing to sign up for it. The utility would give you the estimate on what it would cost. They would tell you what your forty percent is. You'd have to divide that forty percent up..." REPRESENTATIVE DAVIES said, "My concern is that there are many varying circumstances around the state, and if we happen to have a circumstance where there's only five people at the end of one particular line... I'm just wondering if we can allow the board of directors some (discretion)." CHAIRMAN OLBERG said, "I'm on record as suggesting that you can't pass a piece of legislation in the state of Alaska that's equitable throughout the state." Number 409 REPRESENTATIVE DAVIES MOVED that HB 20 be passed out of committee with individual recommendations. There were no objections, and the MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT CHAIRMAN OLBERG adjourned the meeting at 2:40 p.m.