SL&C 2/15/96 SB 254 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE: PANEL & DEFINITIONS  SENATOR KELLY announced SB 254 to be up for consideration. SUSAN COX, Department of Law, said there are two purposes to this bill which clarifies what they believe to be existing law. However, they have found sometimes that when a suit is filed against a health care provider, and the State is the defendant the question arises whether the malpractice action can or should be referred to an expert advisory panel. Present statute, AS 955.536 as currently worded does not distinguish between cases brought against governmental entities or others. In most cases the court has referred these cases to an expert advisory panel. So they believe sections two and three merely clarify existing law so the issue does not have to basically waste time being argued in court. There has been one time when the court has refused to send a malpractice case to an expert advisory panel simply on the basis that the State was named as a defendant - although the case did involve malpractice. Section 4 would revise the definition of health care provider. Initially they sought to include physician assistant in the definition. They get occasional malpractice cases brought against the Department of Corrections where care is often provided by physician assistants. There is a question of whether those malpractice actions can be referred to an expert advisory panel. The definition is now extremely broad, but for some reason physician assistants are not included. SENATOR SALO moved to pass SB 254 from Committee with individual recommendations. There were no objections and it was so ordered. SENATOR KELLY noted that there was a $0 fiscal note and it has additional referrals to the Judiciary and Finance Committees.