HOUSE BILL NO. 245 "An Act relating to licensure as an optometrist; establishing a retired status optometrist license; and providing for an effective date." 1:38:06 PM KACI SCHROEDER, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE BILL THOMAS, SPONSOR, explained that the legislation would create uniform licensure for Alaskan optometrists. Currently, the state has three levels of licensure: low, medium, and high. The Alaska State Board of Optometry would like everyone licensed at the highest level. Optometry school students already graduate with credentials to practice at the highest level and most optometrists in the state have upgraded themselves to the level as well. The provision would also allow a person to easily transfer from retired to active status. Ms. Schroeder added that optometrists who do not want to upgrade themselves and are currently licensed at the lower two levels would be grandfathered in; they would receive a restricted license to practice optometry at their education level. She noted that most states have already implemented similar legislation. JILL MATHESON, CHAIR, ALASKA STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRY, spoke in support of the bill. The board wanted everyone at the same level to reduce confusion among the public and other health care providers. She noted that the board had requested the legislation. Co-Chair Stoltze recalled that the issue had been contentious in the past. Representative Fairclough pointed to page 1, line 12 and asked how the bill recognizes a school or college. Ms. Matheson replied that there is technical language in the bill stipulating that schools must be approved by the American Optometric Association. She detailed that there are fifteen qualifying schools in the United States and two in Canada. 1:43:27 PM Co-Chair Stoltze addressed the fiscal note. Vice-Chair Thomas MOVED to report HB 245 out of Committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal note. Co-Chair Stoltze OBJECTED for discussion. Representative Fairclough asked whether there was a limit to the number of times a person could retake the exam. Ms. Matheson answered that the exam referred to was the law exam for the state regulations and statutes. She did not recall anyone taking the exam again; it was not specified in the bill. She presumed that a person could retake the exam an unlimited amount of times. Co-Chair Stoltze WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO further OBJECTION, it was so ordered. HB 245 was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with attached new zero note by the Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development. 1:46:18 PM AT EASE 1:49:20 PM RECONVENED