HB 154-FISHERY BUS. TAX/FISHERIES RES. LAND. TAX    CHAIRMAN TORGERSON announced HB 154 to be up for consideration. REPRESENTATIVE SCALZI, prime sponsor, said the fisheries business tax is set up so that processors will collect the tax during the year, hold it and pay it to the state on April 1 of the following year. He explained: They're allowed to hold that tax so they can pay their fishermen and sell their pack before they are financially solvent. In doing so, they give a security to the state of Alaska of either three times the amount of lienable property in the amount of taxes they collected the year before or a bond in that amount. This works fine for canneries and large processors who have a lot of real property as assets, but after the advent of IFQs we have new buyers - a fish processor who operates an option block for some type of quick sales of fish. In doing so, they generate a lot of money and a lot of raw fish tax, sometimes in excess of half million dollars. To do this under current statutes, they have to bond for that money for the next year. Even though they haven't collected any, if they had a half million dollars worth of taxes collected the previous year, they have to bond for half a million dollars or have three times that amount in lienable property, which would be $1.5 million. These fish buyers don't have that kind of assets. They operate with a computer, an office, a few cell phones. They operate on a very small margin, but they are very valuable to the industry right now. We have produced a very high price for halibut and sable fish since IFQs and with the long season we have, they are very valuable to the industry. When we have higher fish prices, we also have higher fisheries business tax. I went to the Department of Revenue to see how we could make this work and they were very cooperative in designing something that they felt would secure the State of Alaska, which would be to allow these fish buyers to pay their raw fish tax on a 30-day allotment. So, if they pay as they go, the Department of Revenue has no problem with that. For a bond, they will have to issue a $50,000 bond or have $100,000 in lienable property. MR. CHUCK HARLEMERT, Division of Tax, Department of Revenue (DOR), supported HB 154. CHAIRMAN TORGERSON indicated there were no further questions and that he would hold the bill for a quorum. He announced an at-ease from 6:37 to 6:39 p.m. HB 154-FISHERY BUS. TAX/FISHERIES RES. LAND. TAX  CHAIRMAN TORGERSON announced that a quorum was present and they would take up HB 154. SENATOR TAYLOR moved to pass HB 154 from committee with individual recommendations. There were no objections and it was so ordered.