Legislature(2023 - 2024)BUTROVICH 205
04/17/2024 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Presentation: Next Generation Mineral Assessments in Alaska | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
SENATE RESOURCES STANDING COMMITTEE
April 17, 2024
3:31 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Click Bishop, Co-Chair
Senator Cathy Giessel, Co-Chair
Senator Bill Wielechowski, Vice Chair
Senator Scott Kawasaki
Senator James Kaufman
Senator Forrest Dunbar
Senator Matt Claman
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
PRESENTATION: NEXT GENERATION MINERAL ASSESSMENTS IN ALASKA
- HEARD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
No previous action to record
WITNESS REGISTER
ERIN WHITNEY
Director
Arctic Energy Office
U.S. Department of Energy
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered the presentation Next Generation
Mineral Assessments in Alaska.
PAUL MCKINLEY
Joint Hydrogen Advisor
Arctic Energy Office
U.S. Department of Energy
Alaska Center for Energy & Power
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the presentation
Next Generation Mineral Assessments in Alaska.
ACTION NARRATIVE
3:31:17 PM
CO-CHAIR CATHY GIESSEL called the Senate Resources Standing
Committee meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. Present at the call to
order were Senators Wielechowski, Kaufman, Kawasaki, Dunbar, and
Co-Chair Giessel. Senator Claman and Co-Chair Bishop arrived
thereafter.
^Presentation: Next Generation Mineral Assessments in Alaska
PRESENTATION: NEXT GENERATION MINERAL ASSESSMENTS IN ALASKA
3:31:57 PM
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL announced the consideration of a presentation
titled, "Next Generation Mineral Assessments in Alaska."
3:32:23 PM
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL announced invited testimony.
3:33:43 PM
ERIN WHITNEY, Director, Arctic Energy Office, U.S. Department of
Energy, Anchorage, Alaska, delivered the presentation Next
Generation Mineral Assessments in Alaska.
3:33:53 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP joined the meeting.
3:34:42 PM
MS. WHITNEY advanced to slide 2 and described the Arctic Energy
Office:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Who We Are, What We Do & How We Can Help
A team with expertise in:
• Engineering
• International affairs
• Science and research
• Military and government relations
• Tribal consultations
• Communications
Our main objectives:
• Collaborate with Arctic stakeholders
• Advance Arctic energy transitions in remote and
rural communities
• Ensure tribal voices are heard
• Connect Arctic entities and residents with
government resources
• Ensure national security
MS. WHITNEY gave a brief overview of her work in the energy
field. She briefly described the work done by the Arctic Energy
Office, which is the only regional office of the Department of
Energy in Alaska. She described the Arctic Energy Office as a
portal into the Department of Energy (DOE), to guide visits and
direct questions. She said the team covers the three pillars of
DOE - science, energy, and security. She added that DOE reports
directly to the undersecretary for science and innovation.
3:36:47 PM
SENATOR CLAMAN joined the meeting.
3:36:56 PM
MS. WHITNEY advanced to slide 3 and provided an overview of
hydrogen opportunities in Alaska:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Alaska Hydrogen Opportunities Report (April 2024)
• Follows publication of U.S. National Clean
Hydrogen Strategy & Roadmap (June 2023)
• Alaska has the potential to make progress in a
number of hydrogen ecosystem components,
including:
• Hydrogen production from both vast renewable
energy potential as well as natural gas
resources combined with carbon capture;
• Seasonal energy storage for Alaskan
communities;
• Storage in depleted oil and gas reservoirs
to enable affordable delivery of hydrogen at
scale.
• Near-term demonstrations will help pave the way.
MS. WHITNEY said that the hydrogen working group is a joint
effort between AEO and the University of Alaska Fairbanks
(UAF). She explained how to access the Alaska Hydrogen
Opportunities Report and described how the report was
compiled.
3:39:42 PM
MS. WHITNEY advanced to slide 4 and spoke to the report
structure:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Report Structure
• Executive Summary
• Background: Why Hydrogen? Why Now? Why Alaska?
• Alaska's Current Energy Production and Use
• Alaska's Hydrogen Production Potential and
Derivatives
• Alaska's Storage, Transmission, and Distribution
Potential
• Alaska's Potential Hydrogen Markets and End-Use
Applications
• Factors Affecting Hydrogen Opportunities in
Alaska
• Alaska's Key Opportunities and Next Steps
MS. WHITNEY provided examples of hydrogen uses and its
applications. She invited members to follow up for more
detailed information.
3:40:59 PM
MS. WHITNEY advanced to slide 5 and explained the chemistry
of hydrogen molecules. She listed a variety of long-chain
hydrocarbons. She commented that liquid fuels provide many
advantages in terms of energy density. She noted that
ammonia is a hydrogen derivative that could be considered
as a transportable liquid fuel.
MS. WHITNEY moved to slide 6 and stated that hydrogen is
intriguing due to its physical properties. She explained
that hydrogen has a low volumetric energy density She
compared the volumetric energy density of hydrogen with
other fuels, including diesel and petrol. She acknowledged
that these have high energy density; however, she explained
that while hydrogen has a comparatively low volumetric
density, it has a high gravimetric density (density by
mass). She stated that this makes it a "hero" in the energy
world and noted that the cost to make hydrogen is
decreasing.
3:44:41 PM
MS. WHITNEY advanced to slide 7 and explained hydrogen
colors:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Hydrogen Colors (not used so much anymore)
• Gray hydrogen uses fossil fuels and produces
carbon dioxide as a byproduct
• Blue hydrogen captures and stores most of the
carbon dioxide output
• Green hydrogen's byproduct is oxygen
MS. WHITNEY noted that there are roughly ten different colors of
hydrogen and those listed are the most common. She added that
currently, hydrogen is most often referred to as "clean" versus
"conventional" hydrogen. She said that the majority of the
earth's hydrogen is gray hydrogen. She pointed out that green
hydrogen is "clean hydrogen" and explained the process of
creating this form of hydrogen. She said that blue hydrogen
(also considered a form of "clean" hydrogen) is derived from
fossil fuels and explained how the carbon dioxide is removed and
stored so that it does not impact earth's atmosphere. She
commented that power of "clean hydrogen" is found in the variety
of energy sources from which these molecules can be made and
briefly discussed this process.
3:46:56 PM
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL asked about white hydrogen or "naturally
occurring" hydrogen.
3:47:05 PM
MS. WHITNEY replied that "white hydrogen" or "naturally
occurring hydrogen" is also called "geologic hydrogen" and has
received quite a bit of press within the past year. She noted
that, while it is not included in the report, she participated
in a panel at Arctic Encounter discussing this type of hydrogen.
She explained that white hydrogen comes from naturally occurring
sources and can also be created under simulation. The Department
of Energy is investing (roughly $20 million) into exploration of
natural hydrogen sources. She explained that there are
potentially large deposits of naturally occurring hydrogen
around the world. She commented that there is a naturally
occurring hydrogen well in Africa that is providing electricity
for a community. She stated that United States Geological Survey
(USGS) is mapping the United States to determine where these
might occur. She added that AEO is working hard to ensure that
this mapping is done in Alaska, as Alaska seems to have the
necessary geologic conditions to produce natural hydrogen.
3:49:16 PM
MS. WHITNEY advanced to slide 8 and elaborated on the big
picture:
[Original punctuation provided.]
The Big Picture
On February 28th, 2022, the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) released its latest report under
the Sixth Assessment cycle.
One of the key takeaways:
It is critical that we try to stay below 1.5 degrees
warming.
• If global warming exceeds 1.5 degrees Celsius in
the coming decades or later, then many human and
natural systems may face additional severe risks
compared to remaining below 1.5 degrees Celsius.
MS. WHITNEY briefly discussed the impacts that CO2 emissions are
having on the climate. She emphasized the importance of finding
fuel sources that do not emit CO2 and pointed out that hydrogen
is one path toward realizing this goal. She noted that many
companies around the world are committed to this goal. She
commented that, for those who do not share these climate-related
concerns, hydrogen is another fuel to add to the list of energy
resources and thus can act as a path toward energy diversity.
She stated that energy diversity is akin to energy security and
opined that for this reason, it is worthy of consideration.
3:50:48 PM
MS. WHITNEY advanced to slide 9 and explained that one key
driver supporting hydrogen research and use - from an emissions
standpoint - is that it can be used in sectors of the world's
economy that are difficult to "de-carbonize." The industrial,
transportation, and agricultural sectors (among others)
currently depend primarily on natural gas for their high
hydrogen requirements - which results in high CO2 emissions.
Considering alternative, hydrogen-based fuels can end CO2
emissions.
3:51:56 PM
MS. WHITNEY advanced to slide 10 and gave an overview of energy
in Alaska. She commented that this sets the stage for
understanding the resources available in Alaska for potential
hydrogen production. She explained the British thermal unit
(Btu) measurement and why it was used. She stated that one
trillion Btu (TBtu) is equivalent to two million mid-sized
vehicles running for one hour.
3:53:45 PM
SENATOR CLAMAN asked her to repeat the data to contextualize the
value of TBtu.
3:53:58 PM
MS. WHITNEY repeated the data that demonstrates the value of a
TBtu. She said that this measurement (Btu) is often seen on
natural gas heating bills and contrasted this with electric
bills, which measure in kilowatt hours (kWh). She directed
attention to the graph on slide 10 and explained that Alaska's
statewide electricity consumption is roughly 50 TBtu. Statewide
energy consumption is close to 700 TBtu. She noted that the
latter includes petroleum, natural gas, and renewable energy.
She said that statewide energy production is 1330 TBtu (this
includes crude oil, natural gas, coal, and renewable energy).
She stated that this data is taken from Energy Information
Association (EIA) and Alaska Oil and Gas Association (AOGA)
reports from 2021. She stated that North Slope reinjected gas is
3088 TBtu and contrasted this with the proposed Alaska natural
gas pipeline, which is roughly 1200 TBtu. She opined that it is
helpful to consider these numbers in order to understand the
scale of energy production and demands in the state.
3:56:51 PM
MS. WHITNEY advanced to slide 11 and discussed Alaska's untapped
renewable energy potential. She directed attention to the bar
graph on the left and compared Alaska's energy consumption to US
energy consumption. She pointed out that energy is consumed in
order to make energy. She then directed attention to the bar
graph on the right and noted that while Alaska has large coal
reserves, it is not included in the graph. She briefly discussed
the various forms of energy shown on the graph and noted that
these are maximum amounts, which gives an idea of the potential
for each.
3:59:57 PM
MS. WHITNEY advanced to slide 12 and explained the Energy
Earthshots portfolio. She said DOE has eight Earthshots, which
represent goals for various technologies. For example, for both
floating offshore wind and advanced geothermal, the target is to
reduce the cost to the equivalent of 4-5 cents/kWh within the
next decade. She compared this to energy from the Alaska
Railbelt, which averages 20-25 cents/kWh. She noted that this
amount is higher in rural areas. She acknowledged that the
Earthshot targets are ambitious; however, they are based on
extensive modeling. She shared her belief that the resources and
investments DOE is making in these areas greatly increase the
likelihood of achieving these goals. She noted that Earthshots
that would potentially benefit Alaska are circled (i.e. floating
offshore wind, enhanced geothermal, clean fuels and products,
and hydrogen). She clarified that Alaska stands to benefit from
lower costs in these areas. She commented that developing
Alaska's resources would benefit Alaskan energy costs and its
export economy. She added that geothermal and wind resources
could be used to make hydrogen, which would be a way of
marketizing and transporting energy resources to otherwise
unrealizable markets.
4:02:34 PM
MS. WHITNEY advanced to slide 13 and discussed the potential for
hydrogen exports to other countries. She stated that the slide
shows hydrogen demand by 2030 (negative numbers indicate
hydrogen imports). She added that Germany, Japan, and South
Korea are both projected require imported hydrogen and surmised
that this is a potential commerce pathway.
4:03:50 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked about the process of creating
hydrogen and wondered why Alaska has this opportunity while
hydrogen cannot be created in the aforementioned countries and
must therefore be imported.
4:04:17 PM
MS. WHITNEY replied that Alaska has the potential to create
hydrogen due to its land and energy resources. This includes
wind, geothermal, and fossil fuel resources. She explained that
these could be used to make blue hydrogen (from fossil fuel
sources combined with CO2 capture) or green hydrogen from non-
fossil fuel sources.
4:05:30 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked for additional information on the
type of land. He surmised that AEO is considering harnessing
wind to create hydrogen and asked how this might work in rural
Alaska.
4:05:55 PM
MS. WHITNEY replied that this brings up issues of land ownership
and consideration of where the best site would be located. She
offered an example of a wind farm in the Aleutian Islands and
explained how this would work to create hydrogen.
4:07:04 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said that this is helpful and added that he
is considering the advantages Alaska has - and how these might
be put to use.
4:07:15 PM
SENATOR CLAMAN asked if there are places using hydrogen to
produce energy.
4:07:31 PM
MS. WHITNEY replied not in Alaska.
4:07:48 PM
MS. WHITNEY advanced to slide 15 and discussed the hydrogen
possibilities in Alaska. She explained how hydrogen is created
from fossil fuel sources and non-fossil fuel sources; hydrogen
can then be converted into carrier fuels. She described the
various ways hydrogen can be used as an energy source. She said
that a hydrogen fuel cell generates power that can be used to
power vehicles and to generate electricity. She noted that
hydrogen can be combusted in hydrogen engines and can be used to
produce heat. She explained how hydrogen can be mixed with other
fuels such as natural gas, which would extend the reserves. She
noted that there are applications across the state. She stated
that AEO is holding meetings in various communities to discuss
hydrogen use potential. She said that, to drive a hydrogen
economy, hydrogen export (within the US and/or internationally)
should be considered.
4:11:35 PM
SENATOR CLAMAN commented that hydrogen seems to have more small-
scale uses that are, in many ways, more efficient due to their
size.
4:11:55 PM
MS. WHITNEY clarified that hydrogen also has large scale uses,
including converting hydrogen to ammonia, sustainable aviation
fuel, and methanol. She briefly described these.
4:13:06 PM
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL commented that the Ted Stevens International
Airport is the fourth largest cargo airport in the world. She
asked about Australia's use of hydrogen for marine
transportation. She shared her understanding that Hawaii is
blending hydrogen with gasoline and asked for confirmation.
4:13:43 PM
MS. WHITNEY shared her understanding that Australia is utilizing
hydrogen for microgrid use. She noted that Australia is using
its solar, tidal, and wind resources to generate hydrogen. With
respect to Hawaii, she confirmed that hydrogen is being combined
with natural gas. She stated that Hawaii's model is successful
and is one that Alaska could follow. She said that the Alaska
Sustainability Conference would have representatives from both
Australia and Hawaii. She offered to follow up with additional
information at a later time.
4:15:22 PM
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL referred to slide 13 and conveyed that she has
spoken to a company that would be interested in generating
hydrogen in Alaska for export. She commented that this is an
economic driver with exciting potential. She noted that
permitting is a big consideration for a project of this size.
4:16:22 PM
MS. WHITNEY said that this is very exciting and added that DOE
is in close communication with the company in question.
4:16:42 PM
MS. WHITNEY advanced to slide 14 and discussed hydrogen and
carbon dioxide sequestration potentials:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Hydrogen and Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Potentials
• Maximum hydrogen storage potential is
approximately 552 MMT based on the current North
Slope's total oil and gas storage potential
• Approximately 1,200,000 MMT CO2 sequestration
potential statewide in all possible formations,
including oil and gas reservoirs, coal seams,
saline aquifer sandstones
MS. WHITNEY said that it is important to consider CO2 if Alaska
wants to produce hydrogen from fossil fuel sources and is also
committed to a net-zero emissions.
4:18:02 PM
MS. WHITNEY advanced to slide 16 and offered concluding
thoughts:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Concluding Thoughts
Alaska is an energy producing state
• We currently produce twice as much energy as we
consume
• Energy production is energy-intense
Alaska has vast untapped energy production potential
• Renewable energy projects are economical now
• As costs of emerging technology come down
(Earthshots), will Alaska be ready to develop its
resources?
• Pilot projects are critical to building capacity
and proving technology in Alaska
• Hydrogen can be key to bringing stranded
renewables to market
Energy projects create jobs
• Alaska's oil and gas sector will be critical to
building projects and infrastructure
• New jobs! wind turbines, solar installers, and
more
• Old jobs! pipelines, permitting, operations,
safety, fuel production, others
4:20:40 PM
MS. WHITNEY advanced to slide 17 and discussed various avenues
for developing hydrogen projects in the state.
[Original punctuation provided.]
What's Next for Alaska's Hydrogen Future?
Develop an Alaska hydrogen strategy and roadmap
• Evaluate policy opportunities to create state-
level incentives for hydrogen production,
transmission, storage, distribution, and use
• Create a database with planned clean hydrogen
projects in Alaska
• Connect off-takers, producers and stakeholders in
the state and other states and provinces
• Align Alaska's energy goals and strategic assets
in meeting global market demand
Begin demonstrating hydrogen technologies in Alaska
• Support feasibility studies and pilot project
demonstrations at local/rural and grid/Railbelt
scales
• Create a pipeline ecosystem for demonstration
projects to establish proof of concept
• Identify sites where ample renewable resources
coincide with geologic storage for hydrogen and
perform site assessments and economic feasibility
analyses
• Use demonstration projects to create hands-on
workforce development programs associated with
energy transition and hydrogen ecosystem skills
Advance state-level programs required to support key
elements of the clean hydrogen value chain including
CCS
4:23:33 PM
MS. WHITNEY advanced to slide 18 and provided contact
information for the Arctic Energy Office.
4:24:09 PM
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL noted that there are additional slides in the
presentation.
MS. WHITNEY explained that these slides contain supplementary
information. She suggested that she could either go over these
or leave them for members to go over at their leisure.
4:24:47 PM
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL indicated that she would like to move on to
other invited testifiers who may have comments.
4:25:02 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI referred to slide 5 and asked for
confirmation that the goal is to create hydrogen (H2). He asked
what process is used and how much energy is required.
4:25:32 PM
MS. WHITNEY replied that water can be electrolyzed to create
green hydrogen and briefly described this process. She deferred
the question regarding the energy requirements.
4:26:17 PM
PAUL MCKINLEY, Joint Hydrogen Advisor, Arctic Energy Office,
U.S. Department of Energy, Alaska Center for Energy & Power,
Fairbanks, Alaska, answered that it is about 55 kWh per kilogram
(kg).
4:26:43 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked for this to be put into the context
of natural gas and asked how many thousand cubic feet (mcf) of
natural gas would be required to make a unit of hydrogen.
4:27:05 PM
MS. WHITNEY asked for confirmation that the question is how many
mcf would be required to make one kg of hydrogen.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI replied yes.
MS. WHITNEY deferred the question and added that if a sufficient
calculation could not be provided during the meeting, she would
provide this to the committee at a later time.
4:27:44 PM
MR. MKINLEY said that without a direct number per kg of
hydrogen, natural gas power plants operate around 30 to 40
percent efficiencies. He explained that - whatever the nominal
value of natural gas - 30 percent of the energy content goes to
electricity, which can then be converted into hydrogen.
4:28:31 PM
MS. WHITNEY reiterated that a more detailed answer could be
provided at a later time.
4:28:41 PM
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL directed attention to slide 7 and wondered
about the gasifier/reformer versus an electrolyzer to produce
various forms of hydrogen. She briefly described her
understanding of the different processes and said that the
gasifier seems more expensive due to the necessary CO2 capture.
4:29:16 PM
MS. WHITNEY replied that electrolyzer prices are decreasing,
though this equipment is still relatively expensive. She noted
that there are currently 45Q tax credits for carbon capture. She
suggested that there is substantial revenue to be made from
these taxes and offered to follow-up with additional
information.
4:29:52 PM
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL said that this is a key part of the carbon
capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) bill that will be
before the committee in the coming days.
4:29:59 PM
SENATOR DUNBAR asked - in terms of efficiency - how far off the
electrolyzer technology is from using hydrogen to fuel
electrolysis. He asked if it would ever be possible for hydrogen
to produce enough energy to fuel this process.
MS. WHITNEY asked if he is referring to something akin to a
perpetual motion machine.
4:30:43 PM
SENATOR DUNBAR replied that a perpetual motion machine is
impossible; however, in this case the hydrogen can act as a fuel
that could potentially power the electrolyzer. He noted that an
external fuel source would be required to provide the water
necessary to fuel electrolysis. He argued that otherwise, they
are using more efficient forms of energy (e.g. natural gas) to
run an electrolyzer and create a less efficient form of energy
(hydrogen). He acknowledged that hydrogen would be
transportable. He rephrased his question and asked whether
hydrogen ever produces enough energy to run the electrolyzer.
4:31:38 PM
MS. WHITNEY asked for confirmation that the question is whether
hydrogen can potentially be used to fuel the electrolyzer to
make more hydrogen.
SENATOR DUNBAR replied yes.
MS. WHITNEY explained that there is an efficiency loss each time
an electrolyzer runs. She referred to earlier data regarding
natural gas combustion efficiency to make electricity, which is
around 30 percent. She shared her understanding that
electrolyzer efficiency is 40 or 50 percent. She pointed out
that none of these processes is 100 percent efficient. She
shared her understanding that the question is whether hydrogen
could be used to power the electrolyzer with enough hydrogen
left over to use and transport. She surmised that the scale of
the system would need to be considered.
4:32:52 PM
SENATOR DUNBAR wondered how far this self-perpetuating
technology is from becoming a possibility. He noted that
petroleum and other transportable fuels have a high energy
output, but it is either difficult or impossible to make more.
He opined that hydrogen is unique and exciting because it can be
made from water.
4:33:47 PM
MS. WHITNEY deferred the question.
4:34:25 PM
MR. MCKINLEY expressed his understanding that the question is
whether hydrogen compares to wind, solar, petroleum, or coal in
terms of energy generation. He explained that hydrogen is an
energy carrier, rather than a fuel source. Therefore, fuel will
always be required for hydrogen production. He stated that
hydrogen is useful in situations where there is no way to
transport or store energy. He offered the example of ammonia
production for overseas markets and commented that hydrogen
production could be considered worthwhile in this case. He
briefly described how hydrogen can be used to store energy long
term. He emphasized that, with hydrogen, the end-use application
determines its usefulness rather than whether the hydrogen is
efficient.
4:36:46 PM
SENATOR KAWASAKI inquired about the safety of transporting
hydrogen and using it as an energy source.
4:37:11 PM
MS. WHITNEY explained that hydrogen derivatives such as ammonia
or methanol (i.e. as liquid fuel) are much easier - and safer -
to transport than a compressed gas. She noted that Maersk
Shipping has committed to making the switch to methanol as a
fuel source within the next 10-20 years and indicated that
methanol is as safe as gasoline. She briefly discussed the
safety concerns when dealing with compressed hydrogen and
indicated that there are safe ways to "seed" natural gas with
hydrogen (as is being done in Hawaii).
4:38:57 PM
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL asked what kind of water is necessary to
produce hydrogen. She wondered if salt water could be used or if
desalination would be necessary.
4:39:16 PM
MS. WHITNEY replied that producing hydrogen requires a level of
purity and invited Mr. McKinley to comment.
4:39:30 PM
MR. MCKINLEY explained that there is ongoing research regarding
desalination opportunities for electrolysis, particularly in
offshore wind projects. He added that most electrolysis
companies are equipped to use tap water (which has been run
through reverse osmosis treatment device) to make hydrogen. He
explained that most conventional water supplies are sufficient
for use, providing there are no unforeseen contaminants. He
noted that low water quality impacts electrolysis stacks;
therefore, tests should be done prior to utilizing the water for
this purpose.
4:41:05 PM
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL commented that Fairbanks water contains a large
amount of minerals; therefore, Fairbanks may not be the best
location for this.
4:42:06 PM
There being no further business to come before the committee,
Co-Chair Giessel adjourned the Senate Resources Standing
Committee meeting at 4:42 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Alaska Hydrogen Opportunities SRES Presentation 4.17.24.pdf |
SRES 4/17/2024 3:30:00 PM |
|
| Alaska Hydrogen Opportunities Report_SRES 4.17.24.pdf |
SRES 4/17/2024 3:30:00 PM |
|
| Alaska Hydogen Response to SRES 04.17.24.pdf |
SRES 4/17/2024 3:30:00 PM |