Legislature(2019 - 2020)SENATE FINANCE 532
02/05/2020 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| University of Alaska | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE
UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING
February 5, 2020
9:01 a.m.
9:01:30 AM
CALL TO ORDER
Senator Hoffman called the Senate Finance Committee meeting
to order at 9:01 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Natasha von Imhof, Co-Chair
Senator Bert Stedman, Co-Chair
Senator Click Bishop
Senator Lyman Hoffman
Senator Donny Olson
Senator Bill Wielechowski
MEMBERS ABSENT
Senator David Wilson
ALSO PRESENT
James Johnson, President, University of Alaska; Senator
Gary Stevens; Senator Cathy Giessel.
SUMMARY
^UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA
NOTE: THIS MEETING WAS CONSIDERED A UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA
SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING
9:04:19 AM
Senator Bishop noted the importance of the University of
Alaska (UA), and the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF)
impact on the local economy. He hoped that there could be a
positive move forward in Fairbanks for the future.
Senator Hoffman acknowledged Senators Stevens and Giessel.
JAMES JOHNSON, PRESIDENT, UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA, noted the
UA interns working in the various legislative offices. He
thanked the committee for their work with those interns.
President Johnson discussed the presentation, "University
of Alaska; Legislative Update; Senate Finance Committee and
University Operating Budget Subcommittee" (copy on file).
He highlighted slide 3, "Introduction":
State funding cuts from FY 2014 to FY 2019and the
threat of a 41 percent cut in FY 2020have challenged
the university's ability to serve its constitutional
mission for the people of Alaska.
Led by the Board of Regents, the University is facing
the challenge, committed to its mission, to lower
operating expenses, and to investing in programs and
initiatives that serve our students and contribute to
Alaska's future by:
? Developing and diversifying our economy
? Preparing Alaskans for jobs in Alaska
? Conducting research to solve real problems and
create new opportunities
? Increasing educational success through
enrollment and completion
President Johnson addressed slide 5, "Three-Part Mission":
? Education
Delivering academic instruction, career and
technical training
? Research
Advancing innovation and discovery through
academic and scientific research
? Service
Sharing knowledge to address Alaska's community
needs
President Johnson discussed slide 6, "Serving All Alaskans;
Three Universities - One System":
? 1 legal and financial entity
? 3 separately accredited universities
? 13 community campuses
? 16,700 FTE Students, 24,900 total
? 92 percent of all Alaska higher education
Affordable: less than $7,200 (3rd most in US)
? Debt at graduation: 46 percent (2nd lowest)
? Student's cost share: 28 percent (5th lowest)
Source: ACPE's 2020 Alaska Education Almanac
9:11:39 AM
President Johnson looked at slide 7, "Strategic Goals":
? Contribute to Alaska's Economic Development
? Increase STEM graduates and invention disclosures
? Provide Alaska with a Skilled Workforce
? Increase UA's share of teacher hires and double
health professionals
? Grow our World Class Research
? Stay number 1 in Arctic Research and increase
research expenditures
? Increase Degree Attainment
? Increase enrollment and completions
? Operate More Cost Effectively
? Decrease cost per completion and increase completion
rate
President Johnson addressed slide 8, "Structure":
? One legal, constitutional, and financial entity;
three separately accredited universities with a
governing Board and system office
? Current structure is the result of consolidation of
11 separately accredited community colleges in 1987
? That 2-year effort met strong resistance, spawned
legislation, litigation, arbitration and a voter
initiative?and it increased integration and reduced
cost
? System office supports Regents, provides cost
effective system wide services, and focuses
universities on Alaska's statewide priorities
? Non-duplicated system functions include IT, audit,
labor relations, financial/tax reporting, government
relations, debt, treasury, payroll, risk management,
general counsel, procurement, and health/benefits
administration
? University Foundation, Land Management Office, and
Education Trust of Alaska are largely self-funded
Co-Chair von Imhof noted the first bullet on the slide. She
noted that there was a question about UAA losing its
accreditation. She wondered whether there was a discussion
about whether all of the campuses could use the one
accreditation.
President Johnson replied in the affirmative. He stated
that the discussion would occur again in the upcoming
spring.
9:15:05 AM
Co-Chair von Imhof appreciated that the Board of Regents
would be examining the issue. She noted that the
accreditation process was extensive and costly. She felt
that streamlining the process to cover the three major
university campuses might be a significant cost savings to
the university.
President Johnson explained the two different types of
accreditation. He shared that there was "specialized
accreditation", which applied to specific programs. He
announced that there was also "institutional
accreditation", which accredits UAA as an entire entity. He
noted that those accreditations were very strong.
President Johnson looked at slide 9, "Accreditation":
? UA universities receive their institutional
accreditation from the Northwest Commission on
Colleges and Universities (NWCCU)
? Board took a number of steps in consideration of
legislative intent to move to a single institutional
accreditation
? Board directed UA president to develop plan for
evaluating options
? Convened group of state leaders for advice
Held workshops across the system and provided
opportunities for input from faculty, staff, students
and the public
? Conducted extensive public opinion survey 3,900
participants
? Even split between those favoring "uniqueness" and
those favoring "integration"
? Established working group to engage NWCCU and U.S.
Dept. of Education on issues and timelines
On Oct 7, after full consideration, Board ceased
consideration of a single accreditation until UAF
secures its NWCCU accreditation renewal in 2021
? All three universities (including community
campuses) are fully accredited
President Johnson highlighted slide 10, "Statewide
Footprint":
? University is largest landlord in State Government
? Are there assets that can be closed, sold or
eliminated? YES!
Senator Bishop requested a brief update on the combined
heat and power plant, and its anticipated annual savings.
President Johnson replied that he had seem emission coming
from the plant, so it was operational. He noted that, with
any very large complex operation may show some delays and
repairs. He explained that the cost overrun was 3 percent,
so it was perfectly reasonable given the length of how long
it took to build the facility. He agreed to provide further
information about the cost savings related to the building.
9:20:16 AM
Senator Hoffman thanked former Senate President Kelly for
spearheading the efforts for the power plant.
Co-Chair von Imhof wondered whether there was a list of
priorities for the backlog paydown of $50 million.
President Johnson replied in the affirmative.
Co-Chair von Imhof wondered whether there was an outline of
what could be expected in the future.
President Johnson clarified the question. He wondered
whether there was an element of statute that could be
changed to enable action.
Co-Chair von Imhof restated her question. She wondered
whether there was a list of assets that showed whether
university-owned buildings would be leased or sold for
other non-university use. She specifically wondered if the
DMV operations in a university building, were the result of
the building being sold.
President Johnson replied that it was a lease agreement. He
shared that there were current conversations about state
co-uses of some buildings. He remarked that it was a value
across the state. He stressed that there was a constant
examination for ways to monetize the university assets.
President Johnson discussed slide 11, "Significant
Activity":
? FY20 Legislature includes budget intent language for
Board to consider single accreditation
? Aug 13 Board of Regents signs 3-year Compact
Agreement with Governor
? Aug 20 Board terminates Exigency Declaration
? Sep 26 NWCCU expresses concern over governance and
accreditation
? Oct 7 Board ceases consideration of single
accreditation and statewide expedited academic program
reviews
? Oct 18 Universities begin campus level expedited
academic program reviews
? Oct 30 Board responds to NWCCU concerns
? Nov 1 NWCCU confirms UA on "right path" on
governance and accreditation
? Nov 22 Board responds to FY20 legislative intent
regarding single accreditation
? Dec 3 Board transmits report to Governor and
Legislature per Compact Agreement
? Dec 9 Board initiates policy audit clarifying roles
and responsibilities
? Jan 17 Board approves 2020 work plan, 5 percent
tuition increase for 2020, including $1.5M of
increased financial aid
? Feb 20 Board review of strategic goals and status of
policy review
Senator Hoffman acknowledged former Bethel senator and
former chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Senator
John Binkley
9:24:55 AM
President Johnson addressed slide 13, "2020 Legislative
Priorities":
Operating Budget
? Year 2 compact funding - $277M
? Single appropriation structure
? Capital Budget
? $50M Deferred Maintenance (backlog exceeds
$1.2B)
? $2.5M Alaska Earthquake Center (USArray)
? Debt Service Relief
? Significant fixed operating cost - $28M
annually ($22.5 UGF)
? Principal outstanding - $297M
President Johnson discussed slide 14, "2020 Legislative
Priorities":
? Technical Vocational Education Program (TVEP)
? Program expires this year (June 2020)
? Funded through payroll deductions $12.4M in
FY20
? Funds high-demand career and technical training
? UA receives 45 percent of program dollars $5.6M
in FY20
Dual Enrollment
? Expansion of High School/College enrollment
? Alaska Higher Education Investment Fund
? Alaska Performance Scholarship (APS) Program:
$12M
? Alaska Education Grant (AEG): $6M
? WWAMI Medical School Program: $3M
Senator Hoffman requested the effectiveness of the
Technical Vocational Education Program (TVEP).
President Johnson replied that the program was extremely
effective because it was strongly tied to workforce needs
and the Workforce Investment Board. He stated that it
allowed for the ability to be very nimble, and responsive
to changing workforce needs.
9:30:05 AM
President Johnson looked at slide 16, "3-Year Budget
Compact":
? Agreement between Board and Governor Dunleavy
August 13
? $70M (22 percent) reduction over 3-Yrs versus
single-year cut of $134M (41 percent)
? FY20 $302M (Down $25M or 7.6 percent from FY19)
? FY21 $277M (Down $25M or 8.3 percent from FY20)
? FY22 $257M (Down $20M or 7.2 percent from FY21)
? Best negotiated option for the University of Alaska
? Reduces cumulative 2020-2022 cut from $405M to $145M
? Requires a tremendous internal effort to meet
reduced funding levels
? Secured Governor's support for single appropriation
and other important priorities: AEG and APS
scholarship, WWAMI medical school funding, dual
enrollment and land grant initiative
? UA agreed to cost savings and revenue enhancement
initiatives
Senator Hoffman noted that the Compact was signed between
the Board of Regents and the Office of the Governor. He
explained that the legislature was the appropriating body,
and determined the level of funding for all agencies,
including the university.
Senator Wielechowski queried the impacts to student
enrollment and faculty from the previous year's "debacle."
President Johnson replied that the budget reductions
starting in FY 16 had a negative impact on enrollment,
employment, morale, and numbers. He stated that the number
would be presented in the slides. He remarked that the
impacted number of those on the payroll was 1,727 people.
Co-Chair Stedman felt that it was important to understand
the number of checks through payroll that were submitted to
individuals. He stressed that it showed the information as
related to the employee count.
President Johnson pointed to slide 17, "Funding History and
Projection." He stated that the slide reflected the compact
agreement. He understood that the legislature had the
appropriating power, but the slide showed that the Compact
agreement was in effect. He noted the red portion that
showed the reductions. He remarked that it reflected
enrollment declines, morale declines, and the challenge in
investing in new programs and initiatives to meet the
changing needs. He stressed that the most important aspect
of the slide was the cumulative impact of the desire to
invest and change strategies.
9:35:41 AM
President Johnson looked at slide 18, "Funding History and
Projection by MAU." He remarked that the slide showed the
funding history and projections by each academic unit of
the University. He noted that UAA had been reduced by 31.4
percent; UAF had been reduced by 30.5 percent; UAS by 27.4
percent; and the statewide administration by 47.7 percent.
He shared the percentages of each academic unit with the
UGF: UAA was 36 percent; UAF was 49 percent; UAS was 8.5
percent; and statewide was 6 percent. He stressed that
while the three universities were very different, UAF
received support for research, for debt, rural mission, and
higher utility cost. He remarked that UAA's community
campuses received support from local governments.
President Johnson highlighted slide 19, "3-Yr Compact
Budget Plan." He pointed out that in addition to the
reductions, there were also significant investments in
strategic initiatives and compensation. He shared that in
FY 20, the faculty and staff received modest compensation
increases based on the national averages. He stressed that
it was not at an aspirational level, but was a phased-in
approach. He remarked that he also wanted a 1 percent
compensation adjustment to meet the cost of living
standard. He felt that the universities needed to invest in
the economic drivers such as workforce development and
research.
Senator Hoffman recalled that the governor had expressed an
attempt to educate the children. He noted the current
legislation referred to at "The Alaska Reads Act." He
queried the university's attempt to train Alaska's teachers
to be prepared to look at the Alaska Reads Act to improve
education among the young children.
President Johnson replied that the head of the Alaska
College of Education was working closely with the
commissioner of the Department of Education and Early
Development (DEED) to contribute through the teacher
education programs and the continuing education programs of
those teachers. He did not believe that there was a current
curriculum or an analysis of the financial impact on the
university system.
Senator Hoffman remarked that the committee would receive a
fiscal note on that bill in the upcoming days.
9:40:14 AM
Senator Bishop remarked that most people only saw the
surface reductions, but there were major conversations
about the importance of several programs. He stressed that
the Compact was not prioritized by the legislature, and
that the legislature would have its say in the process.
Senator Wielechowski wanted to know the impact to the
state's economy and business communities. He wondered
whether the funding cuts to the university would create
more jobs in the private sector.
President Johnson replied that there was anecdotal
information about the negative effect of the reductions on
the economy, particularly among the highly skilled faculty
and staff. He stressed that there was not comparable
employment in Alaska for those individuals, so they would
probably leave the state. He remarked that he had met with
many people who showed significant concern about a
reduction in purchasing and consumption, as a result of the
funding cuts to the university.
President Johnson discussed slide 20, "Budget Impacts":
? Student support and administrative services have
borne large share of $76M reduction over last 6 years
? HR and procurement restructuring and
integration
Headcount reductions due to attrition and
terminations
? KUAC Radio/TV Base Funding Reduction
? Fairbanks Administrative Services Building Sale
? Chugach Eagle River Building Lease Non-Renewal
? Kenai Peninsula College Residential Housing
Paused
? $45M additional reduction over FY21-22 will
necessitate significant impacts to academic programs
? Universities aggressively working to achieve FY20
cuts while conducting academic and administrative
program reviews
President Johnson displayed slide 21, "Academic Program
Reviews":
? Board directed UA president to have universities
conduct academic program reviews
? University reviews are underway
? In March 2020, chancellors will provide
recommendations to the president regarding reduction,
consolidation or discontinuation of any programs
? Board must approve any program changes and is
expected to consider recommendations in June 2020
? Teach out obligations and faculty notice periods may
mean financial savings are not achieved until FY22
9:45:33 AM
Co-Chair von Imhof noted the conversations about the number
of academic concentrations offered by the university as a
whole. She wondered whether the university would show a
core streamlining, to focus on the big industries in the
state versus some of the humanities. She wondered whether
the university could work more closely with other job
training centers to take over some of the job training.
President Johnson replied in the affirmative. He explained
that the Board of Regents had set up criteria to address
downsizing. He explained that, in addition to the goals and
standard practices, there was a focus on the demand from
students and employers. He remarked that there was analysis
of workforce data and the needs in the industries in the
state. That data was part of what went into determining the
continuation of certain programs. He stressed that the same
criteria applied to those who were studying the humanities.
he explained that there were many history majors who worked
for corporations. He also stated that there were many
English majors who were doing important things for the
economy.
9:50:13 AM
Senator Bishop stressed that the state had a connected
career and technical education plan that the university,
DEED, and the Department of Labor and Workforce Development
(DLWD) were each a signatory. He felt that they should all
be working in tandem to execute the goals. He remarked that
there should be a target of the high impact legacy industry
jobs because they were the workforce. He stressed that
there should be workforce development initiatives in those
targeted industries for the legislature's approval for
expenditure funds.
President Johnson looked at slide 22, "FY20 Budget
Allocation." He remarked that the slide showed the
breakdown of allocations for the FY 20 budget. He noted the
reduction of $25 million, and how it was distributed across
the three universities. He noted that UAS was not reduced
in UGF, because of the double-appropriation structure. He
pointed to the $2.3 million, which was a shared cost
allocation. He explained that all three of the universities
did not bear all of their costs. He remarked that the $2.3
million paid for the legal, financial, and IT costs at UAS.
He stated that the reductions were allocated on a prorated
basis, and then there was an explanation of the
investments. He explained that the compensation market was
distributed according to the need at each university in
order to fill the gap at each institution. The Title 9
funding was intended to "step up" the capacity to comply
with federal requirements.
President Johnson pointed to slide 23, "FY21 Budget
Proposed." He remarked that it assumed a single
appropriation. He explained each line in the slide and
stressed that the investments were still up for approval
from the Board.
President Johnson discussed slide 25, "Operating Revenue by
Type and Source." He noted that in FY 19 showed a total of
$818 million of sources revenues, which was a two and a
half times multiplier in the state's university. He noted
that there was a substantial restricted amount. He remarked
that the freedoms for spending were limited to the
restricted programs. He noted the example of research,
which had limited and restricted amounts.
9:55:44 AM
Senator Bishop felt that the slide could show the direct
and indirect economic benefit to the state on all funds.
Senator Hoffman asked that the information be provided to
the committee.
President Johnson agreed to provide that information.
President Johnson highlighted slide 26, "Operating
Expenditures by Category." The largest revenue source was
student tuition and fees. He noted the core elements and
detail of the expenditures.
President Johnson discussed slide 27, "Key Data:
Enrollment." He felt that Senator Wielechowski was
anticipating the slide. He noted the slope down since 2010,
and noted the peak budget year of FY 11.
10:00:06 AM
Co-Chair Stedman looked at the current enrollment and
wondered whether there was an acceleration on the downside
of the headcount.
President Johnson responded that there will be a steep
slope in the upcoming year, because of the effects of the
year prior.
Co-Chair Stedman felt that, looking back a couple of
slides, there was an allocation dealing with the proposed
reduction to split the $25 million. He remarked that the
percentage of enrollment matched the percentage split on
the dollars. He wondered how the allocations were split on
the components, and whether it was a coincidence that the
number lined up with the headcount.
President Johnson replied that the UGF reduction
distribution was based solely on the UGF portion received
by that institution. He explained that if a unit received
25 percent of the system's UGF than it would bear that same
percentage of reduction. He noted that further reductions
and investment decisions were not done pro rata.
Co-Chair Stedman noted that the downturn acceleration might
suppose that all the components would decrease at a
significant rate.
President Johnson replied that it was a real concern. He
remarked that there was a focus on how to allocate
different resources more strategically across the system,
and how the universities would stem that decline.
10:05:40 AM
Co-Chair Stedman remarked that he wanted the university to
explain the geographic component, which was out of the
legislature's control. He understood that there were new
budget realities, but felt that the geographic component
would help to give a "soft landing" to the university.
Senator Bishop commented that there were many things that
were not seen, which helped double the engineer graduates.
He felt that it would be interesting to see the trend
broken down by discipline.
President Johnson recalled that, if there was data prior to
2010, there would be positive slopes for UGF appropriations
and enrollment.
Co-Chair Stedman was struggling with the alarming drop of
37 percent for UAS in 2011, versus almost 28 percent in the
other two campuses. He requested a broader breakdown of the
numbers in the rural campuses.
Senator Hoffman noted the request. He stressed that the
legislature was the appropriating body.
Senator Wielechowski felt that it would be helpful to have
percentages of students were enrolling in outside
universities and colleges. He wanted to know why students
were not enrolling in the university.
President Johnson replied that, in general, students were
not enrolling anywhere. He stated that he would provide
more information. He felt that the biggest challenge in
Alaska was not those that were leaving the state, but
rather was Alaska was not perusing any form of higher
education.
10:11:12 AM
Co-Chair Stedman remarked that the numbers needed to be
rechecked, because he had concluded different numbers in
his calculations.
President Johnson looked at slide 28, "Key Data: Tuition."
He stated that tuition rates were broken out by resident to
non-resident, and undergraduate and graduate tuition. He
explained that the tuition was competitive with the western
states. He noted that, even with the tuition increase, it
was still below the average of the 15 comparable states.
President Johnson discussed slide 29, "Key Data: Tuition
and Fees." He remarked that the tuition for the community
colleges was substantially higher than the other comparable
states. The Board had been tasked to examine those high
tuition rates.
President Johnson addressed slide 30, "Key Data:
Workforce":
?UA has 1,727 fewer employees than five years ago
? Since FY15 total workforce has been reduced 21
percent
?MAPTS and K-12 Outreach moved from statewide to
campus
? Regular employees (leadership, faculty and staff)
are down 18 percent and temporary employees (adjunct,
student and temp staff) down 24 percent
? Reductions have been achieved through a combination
of attrition, retirement, ending term contracts, and
eliminating or leaving positions vacant
President Johnson looked at slide 31, "Key Data: Turnover":
? Overall Average Turnover Rate at UA from FY15 to
FY20 was 14.1 percent
? According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (2019)
annual turnover rate across all industries in the US
ranges between 15 percent and 19 percent
? FY20 to date, we have exceeded FY19 in turnover of
administrators and are nearing the FY19 totals for
staff and faculty
President Johnson discussed slide 32, "Key Data: Voluntary
Turnover":
? Voluntary turnover includes retirements, departures
for other opportunities, and other categories such as
medical necessity
? The overall average voluntary turnover rate for all
employees in the University of Alaska System from FY15
to FY19 was 11.1 percent
Comparable Peer Institutions: 7 percent Weber State
Univ and 9 percent West Florida Univ
10:15:20 AM
President Johnson looked at slide 34, "Debt Profile and
Context":
? Annual Debt Service = $28 million (UGF component is
$22.5 million)
? Principal Outstanding = $297 million
? Debt service is 5 percent of UA's unrestricted
revenues, and has increased as revenue (UGF and
Tuition) decline
? Fixed costs reduce management's capacity to make
strategic reductions as revenues decline
? Examples of debt-financed projects: UAF Power Plant,
UAF Engineering Building, Deferred Maintenance
President Johnson discussed slide 35, "Debt Profile and
Context":
? Credit rating downgrades in Fall 2019, due to large
UGF cuts and negative enrollment trends
? Moody's rating: Baa1 with Negative Outlook
? Standard and Poor's rating: A+ with Stable Outlook
? Lower credit ratings make new debt more expensive
and refinancing less viable
? Continued financial headwinds: UGF and Tuition
? All of the above limit UA's debt capacity
President Johnson highlighted slide 36, "Debt by Major
Administrative Unit." He noted the annual debt service, the
outstanding principal, the remaining debt service, and the
maturity dates of each project.
Senator Hoffman queried the interest rate on each debt.
President Johnson agreed to provide that information.
Senator Bishop noted the conversations with the ratings
agencies, and asked whether there was an indication of what
could enhance the university's rating.
President Johnson replied in the affirmative and explained
that the biggest factor in increasing the rating would be
time.
President Johnson discussed slide 38, "Total Annual Debt
Service." The debts were broken out by each university.
10:20:10 AM
President Johnson pointed to slide 39, "Total UA Debt
Outstanding." He remarked that the slide showed out to FY
45, and the summary of the outstanding debt.
President Johnson displayed slide 40, "Debt: Key
Takeaways":
? UA's debt service is a significant fixed cost: $28m,
or
5 percent of unrestricted revenues
? Fixed costs reduce management's capacity to make
strategic reductions as revenues decline
? UA's has limited capacity for new debt
? Debt relief, in the form of principal payoff or debt
service reimbursement, is a prudent financial move
? Debt relief would strengthen UA's financial
position, and increase its capacity to respond to
current and future revenue pressures
President Johnson highlighted slide 42, "Conclusion":
The University of Alaska appreciates your support as
we move forward, committed to serving our mission, to
lower operating expenses, and to invest in the
programs and initiatives that provide opportunities
for our students and contribute to Alaska's future by:
? Developing and diversifying our economy
? Preparing Alaskans for jobs in Alaska
Conducting research to solve real problems and
create new opportunities
Increasing educational success through
enrollment and completion
Senator Bishop thanked President Johnson for the
presentation. He remarked that he was looking forward to
the future of the university. He hoped to build upon a
proactive data set and research, and instruments to improve
the university. He wanted to work together to decrease the
turmoil. He remarked that it was a painful process, but
hoped to commit to the lessons learned moving forward.
Senator Hoffman felt that the finance committee had been a
friend of the university, and tried to get adequate funding
to best meet the needs of Alaska. He looked forward to the
additional meetings on the subject.
Senator Hoffman discussed the following day's agenda.
ADJOURNMENT
10:23:59 AM
The meeting was adjourned at 10:23 a.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 08 13 UA-SOA-Compact.pdf |
SFIN 2/5/2020 9:00:00 AM |
SB 152 |
| 2019 09 26 NWCCU Letter.pdf |
SFIN 2/5/2020 9:00:00 AM |
SB 152 |
| 2019 09 13 Gov Dunleavy AK Delegation Land Grand Ltr.pdf |
SFIN 2/5/2020 9:00:00 AM |
SB 152 |
| 2019 10 30 UA BOR Chair Davies Response to NWCCU wChancellors Reports.pdf |
SFIN 2/5/2020 9:00:00 AM |
SB 152 |
| 2019 11 01 NWCCU Response to UA BOR Chancellors.pdf |
SFIN 2/5/2020 9:00:00 AM |
SB 152 |
| 2019 11 22 Buretta to Ms. Sanders Response to the Legislative Intent Language.pdf |
SFIN 2/5/2020 9:00:00 AM |
SB 152 |
| 2019 12 03 Buretta to Gov Dunleavy_FY20 Compact Report.pdf |
SFIN 2/5/2020 9:00:00 AM |
SB 152 |
| 2020 02 05 UA Senate Finance Committee Final.pdf |
SFIN 2/5/2020 9:00:00 AM |
SB 152 |
| Legislative Finance UA Allocation summary.pdf |
SFIN 2/5/2020 9:00:00 AM |
SB 152 |
| FY2021 Capital -DM-RR.pdf |
SFIN 2/5/2020 9:00:00 AM |
SB 153 |