Legislature(2019 - 2020)SENATE FINANCE 532

03/17/2020 09:00 AM FINANCE

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ HB 122 FUNTER BAY MARINE PARK: UNANGAN CEMETERY TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Public Testimony --
**Please Note: All Public Testimony Will be via
Telephone Only. No In-Person Testimony.
From Juneau: 586-9085, Anchorage: 563-9085
Outside Juneau or Anchorage: 844-586-9085
Written Testimony Will be Accepted at:
finance.committee@akleg.gov
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled: TELECONFERENCED
+= SB 152 APPROP: OPERATING BUDGET/LOANS/FUNDS TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+= SB 30 COLLEGE CREDIT FOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSSB 30(FIN) Out of Committee
+= SB 47 PHYSICAL/OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY BD/PRACTICE TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSSB 47(FIN) Out of Committee
+= SB 55 TEMP. APPOINTMENTS TO COURT OF APPEALS TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSSB 55(2d JUD) Out of Committee
+= SB 137 EXTEND BOARD OF PAROLE TELECONFERENCED
Moved SB 137 Out of Committee
+= SB 150 INTENSIVE MGMT SURCHARGE/REPEAL TERM DATE TELECONFERENCED
Moved SB 150 Out of Committee
                 SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE                                                                                       
                      March 17, 2020                                                                                            
                         9:12 a.m.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
9:12:43 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CALL TO ORDER                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stedman   called  the  Senate   Finance  Committee                                                                    
meeting to order at 9:12 a.m.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MEMBERS PRESENT                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Senator Natasha von Imhof, Co-Chair                                                                                             
Senator Bert Stedman, Co-Chair                                                                                                  
Senator Click Bishop                                                                                                            
Senator Lyman Hoffman                                                                                                           
Senator Donny Olson                                                                                                             
Senator Bill Wielechowski                                                                                                       
Senator David Wilson                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
MEMBERS ABSENT                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
None                                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
ALSO PRESENT                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Pete  Ecklund, Staff,  Senator  Bert  Stedman; David  Scott,                                                                    
Staff,  Senator Bert  Stedman; Jane  Conway, Staff,  Senator                                                                    
Cathy  Giessel;  Juli  Lucky,  Staff,  Senator  Natasha  von                                                                    
Imhof;  Senator Gary  Stevens, Sponsor;  Tim Lamkin,  Staff,                                                                    
Senator Gary Stevens; Representative Sara Hannan, Sponsor.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
PRESENT VIA TELECONFERENCE                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Paul   Layer,  Vice   President,  Academics,   Students  and                                                                    
Research,    University    of   Alaska;    Preston    Kroes,                                                                    
Superintendent,  Division of  Parks and  Outdoor Recreation,                                                                    
Department  of  Natural  Resources; Ricky  Gease,  Director,                                                                    
Division  of Parks  and  Outdoor  Recreation, Department  of                                                                    
Natural Resources.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
SUMMARY                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
SB 30     COLLEGE CREDIT FOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
          CSSB 30(FIN) was REPORTED out  of committee with a                                                                    
          "do pass" recommendation  and with one forthcoming                                                                    
          indeterminate fiscal note  from the University and                                                                    
          one new  zero fiscal  note from the  Department of                                                                    
          Education and Early Development.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
SB 47     PHYSICAL/OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY BD/PRACTICE                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
          CSSB 47(FIN) was REPORTED out  of committee with a                                                                    
          "no  recommendation" recommendation  and with  one                                                                    
          previously  published   fiscal  impact   note:  FN                                                                    
          1(CED).                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
SB 55     TEMP. APPOINTMENTS TO COURT OF APPEALS                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
          CSSB  55(2d JUD)  was  REPORTED  out of  committee                                                                    
          with  a  "do  pass" recommendation  and  with  one                                                                    
          previously  published   fiscal  impact   note:  FN                                                                    
          2(AJS).                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
SB 137    EXTEND BOARD OF PAROLE                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
          SB 137  was REPORTED out  of committee with  a "do                                                                    
          pass"  recommendation  and   with  one  previously                                                                    
         published fiscal impact note: FN 1(COR).                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
SB 150    INTENSIVE MGMT SURCHARGE/REPEAL TERM DATE                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
          SB 150  was REPORTED out  of committee with  a "do                                                                    
          pass"  recommendation  and   with  one  previously                                                                    
          published zero fiscal note: FN 1(DFG).                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
SB 152    APPROP: OPERATING BUDGET/LOANS/FUNDS                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
          SB  152  was  HEARD  and  HELD  in  committee  for                                                                    
          further consideration.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
HB 122    FUNTER BAY MARINE PARK: UNANGAN CEMETERY                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
          HB  122  was  HEARD  and  HELD  in  committee  for                                                                    
          further consideration.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
SENATE BILL NO. 152                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
     "An Act making appropriations for the operating and                                                                        
     loan program expenses of state government and for                                                                          
     certain    programs;    capitalizing   funds;    making                                                                    
     appropriations under art.  IX, sec. 17(c), Constitution                                                                    
     of the State of  Alaska, from the constitutional budget                                                                    
    reserve fund; and providing for an effective date."                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
9:13:56 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stedman noted that the  first hearing of SB 152 was                                                                    
on February 27.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair von  Imhof made  a motion.  [The motion  was redone                                                                    
shortly after.]                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
9:14:53 AM                                                                                                                    
AT EASE                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
9:15:14 AM                                                                                                                    
RECONVENED                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair   Stedman  clarified   that  there   had  been   an                                                                    
inadvertent  error and  Co-Chair von  Imhof would  re-do the                                                                    
motion.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  von  Imhof  MOVED   to  ADOPT  proposed  committee                                                                    
substitute  for  SB  152,  Work  Draft  31-GS2197\U  (Bruce,                                                                    
3/16/20).                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stedman OBJECTED for discussion.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
9:15:44 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
PETE  ECKLUND, STAFF,  SENATOR BERT  STEDMAN, informed  that                                                                    
the  Committee  Substitute  (CS) being  considered  was  the                                                                    
governor's  introduced version  of the  bill, re-drafted  in                                                                    
the  style  of  the   Legislative  Legal  Services  and  the                                                                    
Legislative Finance Division, which  was different than that                                                                    
of the  Department of Law.  He furthered that  some sections                                                                    
of the  bill were reordered  but the bill  was substantively                                                                    
the same. He informed that  the Senate was completing budget                                                                    
subcommittee  close-outs  and  the  following  Monday  there                                                                    
would  be a  forthcoming CS  for  the House  version of  the                                                                    
operating   budget.  He   qualified   that  for   comparison                                                                    
purposes, it was  easier for the public to  track changes if                                                                    
the committee adopted the version being considered.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stedman  asked for a  review of eight items  in the                                                                    
bill that were worthy of attention.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Mr. Ecklund addressed a Summary of Changes document (copy                                                                       
on file):                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
   1. Title: Add "supplemental appropriations.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
   2. The lead-in  language  in  section 1  on  page  2  was                                                                  
     modified  to the  legislature's standard  language that                                                                    
     appears in  both HB  205 and HB  206 and  that includes                                                                    
     the  addition  of  this sentence,  "A  department-wide,                                                                    
     agency-wide, or  branch-wide unallocated  reduction set                                                                    
     out  in  this  section   may  be  allocated  among  the                                                                    
     appropriations   made   in   this   section   to   that                                                                    
     department, agency, or branch                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
   3. Section 8   (page  50,  starting  line   21):  Reorder                                                                  
     sections  so that  royalty deposits  are first.  Reword                                                                    
     section (c) so that the  net amount to the general fund                                                                    
     is shown rather than the entire POMV draw.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
   4. Section 19(e) (page  57, line  7): Reword  to simplify                                                                  
     since  UA  is the  only  named  recipient. Because  the                                                                    
     Governor did  not include the appropriations  for DOTPF                                                                    
     and AEA  debt, the previous  formatting with a  list of                                                                    
     projects is unnecessary.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
9:19:00 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Mr. Ecklund continued to address the changes in the CS:                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
   5. Section 21(w) (page 65, line 10): Add fiscal year that                                                                  
     the revenue will be collected.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
   6. Section 22(l) (page 66, line 14):  Add "unexpended and                                                                  
     unobligated" to clarify  that existing fund obligations                                                                    
     are not affected by this appropriation.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
   7. Section 25(g) (page 71, line 18): Change  2020 to 2019                                                                  
     to correct error in Governor's bill.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
   8. Section 28 (page 72, line 8): Update references due to                                                                  
     reordering of sections.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
9:19:58 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stedman WITHDREW  his  OBJECTION.  There being  NO                                                                    
further OBJECTION, it was so ordered.  The CS for SB 152 was                                                                    
adopted.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stedman  commented that the bill  was conformed for                                                                    
clarity, so that when the  operating budget was put together                                                                    
by  members  there  would  be a  clear  comparison  for  the                                                                    
public.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
9:20:51 AM                                                                                                                    
AT EASE                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
9:21:23 AM                                                                                                                    
RECONVENED                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stedman  reminded  that   there  would  be  public                                                                    
testimony on  the operating budget  the following  two days.                                                                    
He set the bill aside for further review.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
[Co-Chair Stedman handed the gavel to Co-Chair von Imhof]                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
9:22:05 AM                                                                                                                    
AT EASE                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
9:23:19 AM                                                                                                                    
RECONVENED                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
SENATE BILL NO. 55                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
     "An Act relating to judges of the court of appeals;                                                                        
     and providing for an effective date."                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
9:23:28 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair von Imhof  read the title of the  bill. She relayed                                                                    
that  the committee  heard  the  bill on  March  12 and  had                                                                    
reviewed  the  fiscal  note.  Her  office  had  received  no                                                                    
amendments.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stedman MOVED  to report  CSSB 55(2d  JUD) out  of                                                                    
Committee   with   individual    recommendations   and   the                                                                    
accompanying fiscal notes. There  being NO OBJECTION, it was                                                                    
so ordered.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
CSSB 55(2d  JUD) was  REPORTED out of  committee with  a "do                                                                    
pass"  recommendation  and  with  one  previously  published                                                                    
fiscal impact note: FN 2(AJS).                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
SENATE BILL NO. 137                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
     "An Act extending the termination date of the Board of                                                                     
     Parole; and providing for an effective date."                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
9:24:26 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair von Imhof  read the title of the  bill. She relayed                                                                    
that the  committee heard  the bill on  March 11,  had heard                                                                    
public  testimony, and  had reviewed  the  fiscal note.  Her                                                                    
office had received no amendments.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stedman  MOVED to  report SB  137 out  of Committee                                                                    
with individual recommendations  and the accompanying fiscal                                                                    
note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
SB  137 was  REPORTED  out  of committee  with  a "do  pass"                                                                    
recommendation  and  with  one previously  published  fiscal                                                                    
impact note: FN 1(COR).                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
SENATE BILL NO. 150                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
     "An Act repealing the termination date for the                                                                             
     intensive management hunting license surcharge."                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
9:25:27 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair von Imhof  read the title of the  bill. She relayed                                                                    
that the committee heard the  bill on March 12, heard public                                                                    
testimony, and had reviewed the  fiscal note. Her office had                                                                    
received no  amendments. She  understood that  all questions                                                                    
about the bill had been answered.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stedman  MOVED to  report SB  150 out  of Committee                                                                    
with individual recommendations  and the accompanying fiscal                                                                    
note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
SB  150 was  REPORTED  out  of committee  with  a "do  pass"                                                                    
recommendation  and  with   one  previously  published  zero                                                                    
fiscal note: FN 1(DFG).                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
SENATE BILL NO. 47                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
     "An  Act relating  to the  State  Physical Therapy  and                                                                    
     Occupational  Therapy Board;  relating to  the practice                                                                    
     of physical  therapy; and relating  to the  practice of                                                                    
     occupational therapy."                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
9:26:28 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair von Imhof  read the title of the  bill. She relayed                                                                    
that  the committee  heard the  bill on  February 24,  2020.                                                                    
There  had  been  concerns  expressed  at  the  meeting  and                                                                    
committee staff  had worked with stakeholders  on a proposed                                                                    
solution.  There was  a Committee  Substitute  (CS) for  the                                                                    
committee's consideration.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
DAVID  SCOTT, STAFF,  SENATOR  BERT  STEDMAN, discussed  the                                                                    
changes to  the bill. He noted  that the CS was  version "G"                                                                    
and read  from an Explanation  of Changes document  (copy on                                                                    
file):                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
     Section    11    has    been    amended    to    remove                                                                    
     "Physiotherapist"   from   the  penalty   for   falsely                                                                    
     claiming to be a physical therapist.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
     Specifically, on  page 8,  line 1  "Physiotherapist" is                                                                    
     removed.                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
     The   term  physiotherapy   is   a   broad  term   that                                                                    
     encompasses   the  scope   of  practice   of  different                                                                    
     healthcare  professions. For  instance, it  is used  by                                                                    
     chiropractors and  can be found in  the regulations for                                                                    
     the  Board of  Chiropractic Examiners:  12 AAC  Chapter                                                                    
     16. To reduce confusion, "physiotherapist" is removed.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Mr. Scott informed that stakeholders  had been a part of the                                                                    
proposed changes  to the  bill, and there  was no  change to                                                                    
the fiscal note.                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
9:28:14 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
JANE  CONWAY, STAFF,  SENATOR CATHY  GIESSEL, discussed  the                                                                    
changes to  the bill.  She reiterated  that the  sponsor had                                                                    
worked through a  few different amendments to  the bill, and                                                                    
the one presented by Mr.  Scott was the most satisfactory to                                                                    
all  parties.  The sponsor  felt  that  the  CS was  a  good                                                                    
compromise.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair   Stedman  MOVED   to   ADOPT  proposed   committee                                                                    
substitute  for  SB  47,  Work  Draft  31-LS0109\G  (Fisher,                                                                    
3/12/20). There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
9:29:36 AM                                                                                                                    
AT EASE                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
9:30:01 AM                                                                                                                    
RECONVENED                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair von  Imhof reiterated  that the  CS did  not change                                                                    
the fiscal impact of the bill.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stedman  MOVED  to  report  CSSB  47(FIN)  out  of                                                                    
Committee   with   individual    recommendations   and   the                                                                    
accompanying fiscal  note. There being NO  OBJECTION, it was                                                                    
so ordered.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
CSSB  47(FIN)  was REPORTED  out  of  committee with  a  "no                                                                    
recommendation"  recommendation  and   with  one  previously                                                                    
published fiscal impact note: FN 1(CED).                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
SENATE BILL NO. 30                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
     "An Act establishing the middle college program for                                                                        
     public school students; and relating to the powers of                                                                      
     the University of Alaska."                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
9:30:48 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair von Imhof relayed that  the committee had heard the                                                                    
bill on  March 6. There was  a CS and one  amendment for the                                                                    
committee's consideration.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
JULI LUCKY, STAFF, SENATOR NATASHA  VON IMHOF, discussed the                                                                    
changes  to the  bill.  She informed  that proposed  changes                                                                    
were  also  discussed by  the  sponsor's  office during  the                                                                    
initial presentation of  the bill, and the  CS was developed                                                                    
by the sponsor for the consideration of the committee.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Ms.  Lucky  addressed  an Explanation  of  Changes  document                                                                    
(copy on file):                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
     Adds  language   to  clarify  that  credits   shall  be                                                                    
     "applicable toward  pursuit of a degree  or certificate                                                                    
     at" the University of Alaska.  [P2, Lines 18-19 and P4,                                                                    
     Line 23]                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
     Replaces   the    requirement   that    all   districts                                                                    
     participate in the program with language requiring the                                                                     
     University of  Alaska to make the  program available to                                                                    
     district  s that  have eligible  students  who want  to                                                                    
     participate. [P2, Lines 20-22]                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Lucky noted that the University had submitted an                                                                            
indeterminate fiscal note and would be submitting a new                                                                         
revised fiscal note as a result of the language changes.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Lucky continued to address the proposed changes to the                                                                      
bill:                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
     Adds references  to parents to AS  14.30.780 (d), which                                                                    
     requires  districts to  provide  information about  the                                                                    
     Alaska Middle College Program. [P3, Lines 3-5]                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
     Clarifies that  courses can be held  at other alternate                                                                    
     locations, not just high  schools. The requirements for                                                                    
     courses held  in other locations  did not  change. [P3,                                                                    
     lines 22-23]                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
     Allows a  student to take  up to 15  credits (increased                                                                    
     from 12) per semester. [P4, line 3]                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
     Changes effective date to July 1, 2021.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
     Removes  prohibition  against students  paying  tuition                                                                    
     and other costs.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
     Other technical  changes to  clarify intent  that don't                                                                    
     change the effect of the legislation.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Lucky  reiterated that the  changes would require  a new                                                                    
fiscal note,  which would  remain indeterminate.  The fiscal                                                                    
note from the Department  of Education and Early Development                                                                    
was a zero fiscal note and would still apply.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
9:34:28 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Lucky addressed Conceptual Amendment 1 (copy on file):                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
     INTENT OF  AMENDMENT: Require, as  part of  the program                                                                    
     information  provided to  students and  parents by  the                                                                    
     school district,  whether a failing  grade on  a course                                                                    
     offered through the Alaska  Middle College Program will                                                                    
   appear on the student's official college transcript.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
     Suggested Language:                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
     Page 3, line 16, following "program" Insert ",                                                                             
     including whether a failed course will appear on the                                                                       
     student's official college transcript"                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Lucky explained  that the issue had come  up in previous                                                                    
meetings  regarding the  middle college  concept. There  had                                                                    
been   concern   that    students   would   understand   the                                                                    
implications of failing  a class in middle  college, and the                                                                    
amendment  would ensure  that  the information  be clear  to                                                                    
parents and students signing up for the program.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
9:35:15 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair von Imhof noted that  the sponsor and his staff was                                                                    
present to offer perspective on the CS and the amendment.                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
9:35:43 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  GARY STEVENS,  SPONSOR, expressed  his appreciation                                                                    
to  the  committee.  He  thought   the  bill  was  extremely                                                                    
important for the University and the students of Alaska.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
TIM LAMKIN,  STAFF, SENATOR GARY STEVENS,  remarked that the                                                                    
CS  was the  result of  a fair  amount of  work between  the                                                                    
University and  school districts  over the  previous several                                                                    
months. The CS was agreeable to the sponsor.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Mr.  Lamkin addressed  Conceptual  Amendment 1.  He did  not                                                                    
characterize  the amendment  as  "unfriendly." He  continued                                                                    
that the statute as written  was intended to be flexible and                                                                    
create a model for the  diverse demands and interests of the                                                                    
state's school districts. The  Memorandums of Agreement that                                                                    
were  in existence  provided  for  academic counseling,  and                                                                    
involvement  of teachers  and  parents  for identifying  the                                                                    
rigors of college level work  as well as the consequences of                                                                    
failure. He thought the amendment  could be unnecessary, but                                                                    
it was not unfriendly.                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  von  Imhof thought  the  amendment  was trying  to                                                                    
clarify  that  when  a  person  took  a  college  class  and                                                                    
received  a  grade,  the  grade  would  be  present  on  the                                                                    
transcript and would follow a  student throughout her or his                                                                    
academic  career.  She  thought  it was  important  for  the                                                                    
information to be shared.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
9:38:04 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Senator Stevens understood Co-Chair  von Imhof's remarks. He                                                                    
mentioned  his  own  transcripts from  college.  He  thought                                                                    
there would  be a lot of  work for the students  in the high                                                                    
school before they would be  allowed to take a college-level                                                                    
course.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
9:38:48 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Bishop  noted  that  Co-Chair  von  Imhof  was  the                                                                    
sponsor of the amendment.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  von Imhof  stated that  the committee  would adopt                                                                    
the CS and then address the amendment.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Senator Bishop asked if Co-Chair  von Imhof had authored the                                                                    
amendment.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  von  Imhof  stated  that  the  amendment  was  not                                                                    
authored by her personally.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Senator Bishop wanted  to have clarity on the  intent of the                                                                    
amendment.  He referenced  Senator  Stevens' comments  about                                                                    
his  transcript, and  thought  students  do better  academic                                                                    
work  as  time went  on.  He  asked  if  the intent  of  the                                                                    
amendment  was to  make clear  that  the college-level  work                                                                    
would be on a permanent transcript.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair von  Imhof said "yes." She  suggested the committee                                                                    
adopt the CS, and then have  staff speak to the amendment in                                                                    
greater detail.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
9:40:23 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair   Stedman  MOVED   to   ADOPT  proposed   committee                                                                    
substitute  for SB  30,  Work  Draft 31-LS0052\E  (Caouette,                                                                    
3/4/20). There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
9:40:48 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Lucky stated  that the concept behind  the amendment had                                                                    
been  brought up  in previous  hearings. She  explained that                                                                    
the  amendment  would add  to  the  notification to  parents                                                                    
whether  or not  the course  grade would  go on  a student's                                                                    
permanent transcript.  There had been a  concern in previous                                                                    
committees that  high school  students would  not understand                                                                    
the  implications  of  a  permanent  transcript.  There  was                                                                    
already  a   notification  requirement  in  the   bill.  The                                                                    
amendment  did not  require any  change other  than parental                                                                    
notification that  a course grade  would or would not  be on                                                                    
the student's permanent transcript.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Lucky  continued to address the  proposed amendment. She                                                                    
explained  that  there would  be  a  lot of  counseling  for                                                                    
students participating  in the program. The  amendment would                                                                    
provide the  information before a student  made the decision                                                                    
to  be part  of the  program. She  continued that  whether a                                                                    
course appeared  or not on  a student's transcript  would be                                                                    
made clear in the MOU  between the University and the school                                                                    
districts.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
9:43:14 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Senator Bishop thought the amendment  came down to informing                                                                    
students they were "in the big leagues."                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Ms.  Lucky   agreed  with  Senator  Bishop's   remarks.  She                                                                    
furthered   that  students   would  learn   the  information                                                                    
throughout the  process of deciding  to take the  class, but                                                                    
the   additional  written   information   proposed  by   the                                                                    
amendment would not present a burden.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
9:43:54 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Wilson  was  not  sure if  the  amendment  was  too                                                                    
specific. He  addressed number 6 on  page 3 of the  bill. He                                                                    
thought  the  bill  was  broad   enough.  He  discussed  the                                                                    
withdrawal  option at  universities.  He  was concerned  the                                                                    
amendment might be too prescriptive.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair von Imhof  noted that the University  was online to                                                                    
give testimony and could address the amendment.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
9:44:58 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
PAUL   LAYER,  VICE   PRESIDENT,  ACADEMICS,   STUDENTS  AND                                                                    
RESEARCH,   UNIVERSITY  OF   ALASKA  (via   teleconference),                                                                    
relayed that the University of  Alaska (UA) advised students                                                                    
of  consequences to  a permanent  record, as  well as  dates                                                                    
such  as a  withdrawal  date. He  furthered that  University                                                                    
staff  worked  with  counselors and  teachers  in  the  high                                                                    
schools  to ensure  that students  were  aware of  important                                                                    
dates.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
[Senator Olson entered the meeting 9:45:50]                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair von Imhof  asked if Mr. Layer could  comment on the                                                                    
proposed amendment.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Mr. Layer stated  that UA did not object to  the language in                                                                    
the amendment.  He reiterated that  the UA  already informed                                                                    
students and parents of the information.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
9:46:39 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Lucky  added the clarification that  the amendment would                                                                    
not change any contract  between the student and university,                                                                    
nor  the MOU  between  UA and  the  district. The  amendment                                                                    
would  simply  require  that the  information  sent  by  the                                                                    
district include the proposed language about transcripts.                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stedman  commented that for parents  that had never                                                                    
been to college, the information may be new.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
9:47:40 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stedman MOVED  to  ADOPT  Conceptual Amendment  1.                                                                    
There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair von Imhof  noted that the fiscal note  for DEED was                                                                    
still accurate,  but the fiscal  note from UA would  need to                                                                    
be revised.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stedman  MOVED  to  report  CSSB  30(FIN)  out  of                                                                    
Committee   with   individual    recommendations   and   the                                                                    
accompanying fiscal notes. There  being NO OBJECTION, it was                                                                    
so ordered.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
CSSB 30(FIN) was REPORTED out  of committee with a "do pass"                                                                    
recommendation  and   with  one   forthcoming  indeterminate                                                                    
fiscal  note from  the University  and one  new zero  fiscal                                                                    
note   from   the   Department  of   Education   and   Early                                                                    
Development.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
HOUSE BILL NO. 122 am                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
     "An Act relating to the  Funter Bay marine park unit of                                                                    
     the state  park system;  relating to protection  of the                                                                    
     social  and  historical  significance  of  the  Unangax                                                                    
     cemetery located  in Funter Bay  and providing  for the                                                                    
     amendment  of the  management plan  for the  Funter Bay                                                                    
     marine  park  unit;  and  providing  for  an  effective                                                                    
     date."                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
9:49:03 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair von Imhof  read the title of the  bill. She relayed                                                                    
that the committee was hearing the bill for the first time.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
9:49:33 AM                                                                                                                    
AT EASE                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
9:50:03 AM                                                                                                                    
RECONVENED                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE   SARA    HANNAN,   SPONSOR,    addressed   a                                                                    
presentation  entitled "HB  122  - FUNTER  BAY MARINE  PARK:                                                                    
UNANGAN CEMETARY" (copy on file).                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Representative Hannan showed slide 2, "HB 122 will":                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
     ? Provide protection of the  Unangan Cemetery in Funter                                                                    
     Bay for future generations;                                                                                                
     ?  Transfer cemetery  site  and  surrounding area  from                                                                    
     Division  of  Land  Mining  and   Water  (DNR)  to  the                                                                    
     Division of Parks and Recreation (DNR) - ;                                                                                 
     ? Transferred  land will become part  of, and continued                                                                    
     to be maintained  by, as part of the  Funter Bay Marine                                                                    
     Park.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
9:51:05 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Hannan turned to slide  3, which showed a map                                                                    
of Juneau and  the surrounding area. She  explained that the                                                                    
area of the  park was located on the  Mansfield Peninsula of                                                                    
Admiralty Island, which by air  was about 15 miles west. She                                                                    
explained that  the cemetary started  with World War  II. On                                                                    
June  3 and  4 of  1942,  the Japanese  attacked the  United                                                                    
States Naval  Base at Dutch  Harbor. On  June 7 and  June 8,                                                                    
the Japanese  invaded Kiska, where U.S.  Navy personnel were                                                                    
captured.  The  Japanese  also   invaded  Attu,  and  Native                                                                    
residents were  captured and retained  until the end  of the                                                                    
war.                                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
Representative Hannan  continued to  discuss the  history of                                                                    
the area. She cited that  by June 12, the commanding general                                                                    
for  Alaska had  issued orders  to begin  removing Alaskans,                                                                    
starting with  residents of St.  Paul and St. George  in the                                                                    
Pribilof  Islands.   The  military   was  ordered   to  burn                                                                    
dwellings  in advance  of  the  enemy's movement.  Villagers                                                                    
were forced to  evacuate on short notice. On  June 16, 1942,                                                                    
560 residents of  St. Paul and St. George  were evacuated by                                                                    
ship. The  villagers were  taken across  the Gulf  of Alaska                                                                    
and left  at an  abandoned cannery and  mine site  in Funter                                                                    
Bay.                                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
9:52:37 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Hannan looked at slide  6, which showed a map                                                                    
of Southeast Alaska  from Prince of Wales  Island to Juneau.                                                                    
She detailed  that there were additional  voyages from other                                                                    
villages and  a total of  six relocation camps. The  camp at                                                                    
Funter Bay had  the highest death rate. The  cannery had not                                                                    
been  operational for  a decade  before  the residents  were                                                                    
left there  and was not intended  for year-round occupation.                                                                    
She discussed the deplorable  conditions with limited access                                                                    
to  fresh  water, medicine,  and  food.  She continued  that                                                                    
there were technically  two camps in Funter  Bay that shared                                                                    
one cemetery.                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
9:53:23 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Hannan  reviewed  slide 5,  which  showed  a                                                                    
photograph of a grave and a photograph of building ruins:                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
     Old Bunk House used for housing (above).                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
     Head stone of 18 month old child that died at camp                                                                         
     (left).                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Hannan  discussed slide 6, which  also showed                                                                    
a map  of the area. She  explained that there were  30 known                                                                    
grave sites  in the  cemetery, but  it was  understood there                                                                    
were many unmarked graves. She  explained that the issue was                                                                    
78  years in  the  making, and  people  whose families  were                                                                    
buried there had been asking  for the protection of the land                                                                    
for decades.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
9:54:51 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Hannan explained  that other relocation camps                                                                    
in Southeast Alaska were located  closer to communities. The                                                                    
Killisnoo property  near Angoon  also had a  cemetery, which                                                                    
was on  private land. She  explained that concerns  had been                                                                    
escalated  when  seven  years   previously,  access  to  the                                                                    
Killisnoo cemetery  had been truncated  by the  new property                                                                    
owners.  Families of  relatives buried  in Funter  Bay asked                                                                    
for protections in order to  continue to visit gravesites in                                                                    
Funter Bay.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Hannan  showed  slide 4,  which  showed  the                                                                    
state park that was created  by former Senator Frank Zharoff                                                                    
in 1983. The land was  a marine park that included tidelands                                                                    
and  uplands, but  was mostly  the protected  waterways. She                                                                    
pointed out the  delineation on the map,  and identified the                                                                    
cemetery. She explained that  the transfer would incorporate                                                                    
the remainder of the state  parcel that existed as an island                                                                    
between the two parklands that existed.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
9:55:45 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Senator Wilson  asked if the  bill would close off  the area                                                                    
in question,  or if the  intent was for  cultural protection                                                                    
and upkeep of the area.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Representative Hannan explained that  the bill did not close                                                                    
off  the area,  nor was  there intent  to develop.  The bill                                                                    
would prevent development and the  sale for mining purposes.                                                                    
She  explained that  there was  currently no  development at                                                                    
the state park,  and most people that  visited stayed aboard                                                                    
vessels.  She described  that the  parcel with  the cemetery                                                                    
was a dark  and dreary swampy lowland and  was not typically                                                                    
used  for  hunting or  foraging.  The  lands were  not  well                                                                    
maintained, and the families  seeking the protection desired                                                                    
the land and public access be secured.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
9:57:18 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Senator Olson  asked the sponsor  how the bill  would affect                                                                    
owners of private property in Funter Bay.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Hannan specified  that  the  bill would  not                                                                    
change  any  private  property  land  holdings  nor  did  it                                                                    
restrict  access. The  parcel was  adjacent to  the property                                                                    
that was formerly the cannery.  She thought the property was                                                                    
owned by Reed Stoops, who  had submitted a letter of support                                                                    
for the  bill. There were  about six landowners in  front of                                                                    
the  cemetery,  and  the  other  large  stretch  of  private                                                                    
property was on  the opposite side of the bay  where the old                                                                    
mine was.  Private property rights  and access would  not be                                                                    
changed by the  park expansion, and the  properties were not                                                                    
in the parcel.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
9:58:23 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Olson asked  if any  of the  adjacent private  land                                                                    
owners had voiced any objection to the bill.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Hannan answered in the negative.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  von Imhof  asked if  the  private landowners  were                                                                    
free to  develop the  land surrounding  the cemetery  in any                                                                    
way that was desired.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Representative Hannan answered in the affirmative.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
9:58:42 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stedman observed two islands  on the map on slide 4                                                                    
that looked as if they  were colored yellow for inclusion in                                                                    
the park  expansion. He  also asked  if there  were proposed                                                                    
changes to submerged lands.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Representative Hannan deferred the  question to the Division                                                                    
of Parks and Outdoor Recreation.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Olson had  a question  about private  ownership. He                                                                    
thought   there  were   conditions  existing   when  private                                                                    
ownership was given.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
9:59:44 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stedman   repeated  his  question   regarding  the                                                                    
islands shown  on the  map on  slide 4 -  one island  in the                                                                    
back of the  bay and a smaller island to  the west. He asked                                                                    
why the islands would be included in the park designation.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
PRESTON  KROES,   SUPERINTENDENT,  DIVISION  OF   PARKS  AND                                                                    
OUTDOOR  RECREATION, DEPARTMENT  OF  NATURAL RESOURCES  (via                                                                    
teleconference), explained  that although the  yellow shaded                                                                    
area  on the  map showed  a  peninsula that  only became  an                                                                    
island at  an extremely  high tide.  The pensinsula  was all                                                                    
that remained  of the  Division of  Mining, Land,  and Water                                                                    
(DMLW) property.  The division had determined  that it would                                                                    
relinquish all  of the  parcel instead  of just  keeping the                                                                    
two  small islands,  which would  have  become a  management                                                                    
challenge.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stedman  asked  why the  state  did  not  consider                                                                    
selling the islands.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
Mr. Kroes thought the question  would be better addressed by                                                                    
DMLW. The  parcel was currently managed  for recreation, and                                                                    
was designated to be managed  as the adjacent parklands were                                                                    
managed.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stedman  asked how many  parcels were  virtually in                                                                    
holdings in the proposed park expansion.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Kroes  stated that  private land  was excluded  from the                                                                    
parcel. There were  six to eight landowners  nearby, many of                                                                    
whom  had  spoken  in  support   of  the  bill  in  previous                                                                    
hearings.  The  parcels  would remain  in  status  quo  with                                                                    
regard to lease or ownership.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
10:03:05 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stedman  asked about  the islands  to the  west. He                                                                    
asked if the islands were already in the park.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Mr.  Kroes answered  in the  affirmative.  He mentioned  the                                                                    
Kitten Islands.  He mentioned there was  two smaller islands                                                                    
within the bay that were  currently part of the state marine                                                                    
park.                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
10:03:38 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Senator Wielechowski  understood that the Division  of Parks                                                                    
and Outdoor Recreation supported the bill.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Mr. Kroes  stated that the  division supported the  bill. He                                                                    
had  been  approached  by the  group  Friends  of  Admiralty                                                                    
Island,  which included  decedents of  people that  had been                                                                    
interned in Funter Bay. The  group wanted to maintain access                                                                    
for descendants in  the future. He stated  that the division                                                                    
and stakeholders supported the bill.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
10:04:40 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair von Imhof asked about  allowable use of the private                                                                    
land  parcels  around the  proposed  park,  per comments  by                                                                    
Senator Olson.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Mr.  Kroes restated  that the  parcels  were staying  as-is,                                                                    
were not  included in  the land  exchange, and  with current                                                                    
ownership conditions  remaining intact. He did  not know how                                                                    
many separate parcels there were  but there was no impact to                                                                    
the parcels.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
10:05:46 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
RICKY  GEASE,  DIRECTOR,  DIVISION   OF  PARKS  AND  OUTDOOR                                                                    
RECREATION,   DEPARTMENT    OF   NATURAL    RESOURCES   (via                                                                    
teleconference),   testified   that   Alaska   State   Parks                                                                    
supported the  bill. The agency  had been working  with many                                                                    
organizations  and  individuals  to  find a  better  way  to                                                                    
manage and  protect the  historical and  cultural resources.                                                                    
He explained  that currently the  DMLW land was  managed for                                                                    
recreation and not  for mineral or   timber resources. There                                                                    
parks   division  had   an   inter-agency  land   management                                                                    
agreement with the  DLWD to manage the  lands for recreation                                                                    
as  units  of the  park.  He  thought  it was  important  to                                                                    
remember  that  while most  of  the  area where  there  were                                                                    
graves  there  were  markers, there  was  most  likely  also                                                                    
adjacent  areas with  unmarked graves,  and  the bill  would                                                                    
protect the area in perpetuity.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Mr. Gease  continued his  testimony. He  stated it  had been                                                                    
his and the  agencies privilege to coordinate  and work with                                                                    
a  diverse  group  of  interested  parties.  The  department                                                                    
supported protection  for the  cemetery, and  in recognition                                                                    
of the  hardship imposed on  the people from St.  George and                                                                    
St. Paul in  Funter Bay during World War II.  He thought the                                                                    
land would be  easier to manage under one  agency within the                                                                    
Department of Natural Resources.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  von  Imhof asked  if  Mr.  Gease had  any  further                                                                    
comments on the bill.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Mr.  Gease  thought all  the  topics  had been  covered.  He                                                                    
remarked that  the two previous  hearings on the  bill there                                                                    
had been  direct descendants  from St.  Paul and  St. George                                                                    
present,  including  elders  that travelled  to  attend.  He                                                                    
emphasized  that there  was great  support for  the bill  to                                                                    
ensure protection of the cemetery area.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
10:08:57 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stedman  did not  think there  was any  interest in                                                                    
hindering the  cemetery. He was appalled  that an individual                                                                    
in Angoon was prohibiting access  to a cemetery. He pondered                                                                    
that the  individual was  not from the  area. He  noted that                                                                    
much  of Southeast  was a  park, and  there was  very little                                                                    
private or  state land within  the Tongass  National Forest.                                                                    
He was concerned with  over-restricting development and also                                                                    
with losing  cultural and heritage  sites. He  thought there                                                                    
was not  a lot  of cultural  sites that  were not  known. He                                                                    
supported  protecting the  cemetery.  His  only concern  was                                                                    
about the  island and wondered why  it was not up  for sale.                                                                    
He wanted  to suggest that  the committee review  the access                                                                    
issue to the cemetery near Angoon.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
10:11:03 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair von Imhof OPENED public testimony.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair von Imhof CLOSED public testimony.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stedman  reviewed  FN  2 from  the  Department  of                                                                    
Natural Resources,  OMB Component  3001. He relayed  that it                                                                    
was a  zero fiscal note.  He commented that the  note should                                                                    
have been negative,  because money was left on  the table by                                                                    
not selling the island.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair von Imhof set the  bill aside. She asked members to                                                                    
contact her office with any concerns or amendments.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
HB  122  was  HEARD  and   HELD  in  committee  for  further                                                                    
consideration.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair von  Imhof was  unsure about  the schedule  for the                                                                    
afternoon meeting.   The following  day the  committee would                                                                    
hear public testimony on the operating and capital budgets.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
ADJOURNMENT                                                                                                                   
10:12:48 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
The meeting was adjourned at 10:12 a.m.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
HB 122 Sponsor Statement 1.28.2020.pdf SFIN 3/17/2020 9:00:00 AM
HB 122
HB 122 Sectional Analysis Version U.A 1.28.2020.pdf SFIN 3/17/2020 9:00:00 AM
HB 122
HB 122 Explanation of Changes V. U.A 1.28.2020.pdf SFIN 3/17/2020 9:00:00 AM
SRES 2/5/2020 3:30:00 PM
HB 122
HB 122 Written Testimony Received By 2.17.2020.pdf SFIN 3/17/2020 9:00:00 AM
HB 122
HB 122 Presentation by Rep. Hannan-Senate.pdf SFIN 3/17/2020 9:00:00 AM
HB 122
SB 30 Work Draft v. E Amendment #1 SFIN 3.17.2020.pdf SFIN 3/17/2020 9:00:00 AM
SB 30
SB 30 Work Draft v. E Explanation.pdf SFIN 3/17/2020 9:00:00 AM
SB 30
SB 30_Middle-Colleges_Bill-Text_Version E.pdf SFIN 3/17/2020 9:00:00 AM
SB 30
SB 47 Work Draft v. G Explanation of Changes.pdf SFIN 3/17/2020 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
SB 47 Work Draft v. G.pdf SFIN 3/17/2020 9:00:00 AM
SB 47
HB 122 Funter Bay Boundary Maps.pdf SFIN 3/17/2020 9:00:00 AM
HB 122
HB 122 Public Testimony Stoops.pdf SFIN 3/17/2020 9:00:00 AM
HB 122
SB 152 Work Draft version U.pdf SFIN 3/17/2020 9:00:00 AM
SB 152
SB 152 CS 0 walkthrough version U final.pdf SFIN 3/17/2020 9:00:00 AM
SB 152
HB 205 - SB 154 Knight Public Testimony.pdf SFIN 3/17/2020 9:00:00 AM
HB 205
SB 154