02/07/2018 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Presentation(s): Alyeska Pipeline Service Company | |
| HB217 | |
| Adjourn |
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 217 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE RESOURCES STANDING COMMITTEE
February 7, 2018
1:46 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Andy Josephson, Co-Chair
Representative Geran Tarr, Co-Chair
Representative John Lincoln
Representative Harriet Drummond
Representative Justin Parish
Representative Chris Birch
Representative DeLena Johnson
Representative George Rauscher
Representative David Talerico
MEMBERS ABSENT
Representative Mike Chenault (alternate)
Representative Chris Tuck (alternate)
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
PRESENTATION(S): ALYESKA PIPELINE SERVICE COMPANY
- HEARD
HOUSE BILL NO. 217
"An Act relating to the Alaska Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act;
relating to the sale of milk, milk products, raw milk, and raw
milk products; and providing for an effective date."
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 217
SHORT TITLE: RAW MILK SALES; FOOD EXEMPT FROM REGS
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) TARR
04/07/17 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
04/07/17 (H) RES, FIN
04/12/17 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
04/12/17 (H) Scheduled but Not Heard
04/13/17 (H) RES AT 5:00 PM BARNES 124
04/13/17 (H) -- Continued from 4/12/17 --
04/14/17 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
04/14/17 (H) <Bill Hearing Postponed>
04/17/17 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
04/17/17 (H) Heard & Held
04/17/17 (H) MINUTE(RES)
01/31/18 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
01/31/18 (H) Heard & Held
01/31/18 (H) MINUTE(RES)
02/07/18 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
WITNESS REGISTER
TOM BARRETT, President
Alyeska Pipeline Service Company
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Provided a PowerPoint presentation
entitled, "Voyage Plan Marine Services Contract Transition
Winter 2018 Update."
ANDRES MORALES, Director
Ship Escort/Response Vessel System
Alyeska Pipeline Service Company
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during a presentation by
Alyeska Pipeline Service Company.
DIANA RHOADES, Staff
Representative Geran Tarr
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: On behalf of Representative Tarr, sponsor,
provided a sectional analysis of the committee substitute for HB
217, Version J.
BRYCE WRIGLEY, President
Alaska Farm Bureau, Inc.
Delta Junction, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support during the hearing of
HB 217.
PATRICIA GRISWOLD
Grandma's Gardens
Delta Junction, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the hearing of HB 217.
ART GRISWOLD
Delta Junction, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Provided comments on topics not pertinent
to CSHB 217, Version J.
MATTHEW BATES
Delta Junction, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Provided comments on topics not pertinent
to CSHB 217, Version J, and spoke in support of one provision of
the bill.
DANNY CONSENSTEIN, Spokesperson
Alaska Food Policy Council
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in general support during the
hearing of HB 217.
JOHANNA HERRON, Coordinator
Marketing, Alaska Grown & Farm to School
Division of Agriculture
Department of Natural Resources
Palmer, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the hearing of HB 217.
ACTION NARRATIVE
1:46:51 PM
CO-CHAIR GERAN TARR called the House Resources Standing
Committee meeting to order at 1:46 p.m. Representatives Tarr,
Birch, Parish, Talerico, Drummond, Rauscher, Lincoln, and
Josephson were present at the call to order. Representative
Johnson arrived as the meeting was in progress.
^PRESENTATION(S): Alyeska Pipeline Service Company
PRESENTATION(S): Alyeska Pipeline Service Company
1:47:49 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR announced that the first order of business would
be a presentation by the Alyeska Pipeline Service Company
related to the transition from Crowley to Edison Chouest
Offshore for Prince William Sound and Valdez Marine Terminal
Prevention and Response.
1:48:29 PM
TOM BARRETT, President, Alyeska Pipeline Service Company (APSC),
provided a PowerPoint presentation entitled, "Voyage Plan Marine
Services Contract Transition Winter 2018 Update," dated 2/7/18,
and brief background information on the presenters. Mr. Barrett
informed the committee APSC seeks to position its systems of
pipeline, terminal, and the Ship Escort/Response Vessel System
(SERVS), with new and more capable equipment with the intent to
create durable assets for the next 20-40 years. Since last
year, APSC is continuing the process of transition and wishes to
relate to the committee a sense of the upcoming activity. As an
aside, he advised [on 2/3/18] there was a small spill at the
terminal due to an ice plug with approximately 150 gallons
spilled into a concrete deck and spread by high winds. He said
valves may need to be replaced, but replacements are not
available currently, and further described the possible cause of
the spill and the difficult weather conditions during the
response. Mr. Barrett directed attention to the PowerPoint
presentation which discussed the transition of marine services
from Crowley Maritime Corporation (Crowley) to Edison Chouest
Offshore (ECO). Slide 2 displayed a new barge that will be one
of the largest oil spill barges in the world. [APSC] provides
escort and response services in accordance with spill
agreements, and contingency plans, filed with the state and the
U.S. Coast Guard (USCG). Slide 3 displayed a tanker escort that
escorts laden tankers. The tanker escorts are regulated by USCG
and the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and
demonstrate their capabilities through approximately 75 drills
per year to ensure the readiness of equipment and staff. Slide
4 illustrated an approximate transition schedule, and he pointed
out the transition process began in 2016, including the
construction of vessels and the recruiting and training of
personnel. Mr. Barrett noted Crowley has been very cooperative,
and ECO personnel have begun observing operations, which will
continue. He spoke highly of ECO equipment and capabilities and
further described training procedures. The regulatory approval
process is ongoing with an amended terminal contingency plan, a
filed tanker contingency plan, and responses to comments or
concerns from the public and the state. All parties have a
common goal to facilitate a smooth transition and to maintain
and improve the best escort and response system in the world,
which is prepared to deal with a contingency or response ranging
from fishing vessel traffic to a tanker that has lost power.
Mr. Barrett advised the system is safer than it has ever been
due to fewer tankers transiting and that tankers now have double
hulls.
1:56:55 PM
MR. BARRETT continued to slide 5, noting that the transition
team is working seven days per week, twenty-four hours per day
along with a full staff managing operations: vessels are under
construction; training is underway; ECO is participating; there
is stakeholder engagement with various contractors and vendors.
Transition guiding principles were listed as follows:
obligations to protect the environment, resources, and culture;
move oil safely with zero incidents and immediate response if
necessary (slide 6). He described the recent events associated
with a tsunami alert. The final principle is APSC's value for
transparent partnerships with regulators and stakeholders, many
of whom live in Prince William Sound (slide 6). Transition
objectives were listed as follows: flawless operation; ECO
vessels will exceed the current fleet; maintain full compliance
with regulatory requirements (slide 7). Slide 8 displayed new
escort tugs that have 20 percent more power and that are of a
standard design to enhance flexibility for crews and operations.
He pointed out improved equipment that is provided on the new
escort tugs.
2:00:55 PM
ANDRES MORALES, Director, SERVS, APSC, advised more powerful
escort tugs are important when tugs are towing tankers or
stopping vessels. Also, modern equipment allows a vessel master
to focus on operating the vessel.
2:01:41 PM
MR. BARRETT noted one existing APSC barge is 50 years old.
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH asked for the methods that connect an
escort tug to a tanker.
MR. MORALES said a tether line from a constant-tension wench
connects to the stern of the tanker; the tether is large and
stronger than steel cable. The escort and tanker remain
tethered when close to shore, and the tanker is released when
further out at sea.
There followed brief questions and answers related to the
vessels pictured on slides 8, 9, and 10.
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON related the Prince William Sound Regional
Citizens' Advisory Council (RCAC) believes the transition is an
overall improvement in equipment, but expressed concern about
training and operations. Further, a naval architect suggested
bow thrusters would aid in the maneuverability of escort tugs.
He asked whether Crowley or ECO tugs have bow thrusters.
MR. BARRETT said [ECO] tugs do not. He opined ECO tugs are
designed to function at the speed of the escorted tankers and
the "bow thruster approach could interfere with the ability of
the skeg ... and you'd lose power."
2:06:47 PM
MR. MORALES related bow thrusters are useful at 0-2 knots but
the lowest speed during an escort is 6 knots; other marine
architects advised "it would actually, probably, diminish your
ability to effectively respond."
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON further related Prince William Citizens'
Regional RCAC's core concern about testing during winter
conditions such as high seas and high winds. He questioned
whether DEC also maintains concerns and asked for a response in
this regard.
MR. BARRETT said APSC works closely with citizens'
organizations, but he would seriously question the rationale on
this issue with citizens and with DEC; in fact, the Prince
William Sound RCAC is misinformed about "how emergency response
training works." He noted his 35 years of experience in USCG,
which is one of the premier lifesaving organizations in the
world in difficult conditions. However, USCG doesn't train in
dangerous conditions but builds capability and proficiency
training in controlled conditions. He cautioned training in
uncontrollable conditions presents a higher risk to life, and he
gave several examples of risks to personnel under various
scenarios. The fundamental training construct is to "train your
people, you have them practice ... and then you trust them." He
acknowledged the public bears adverse consequences of increased
risk; however, APSC crews are working every day and will
respond. Training in the varied conditions of Prince William
Sound with large vessels holds inherent dangers. Mr. Barrett
pointed out national firefighter training standards prohibit
firefighters from training in uncontrolled conditions. He
opined the highest value is in crews and APSC must measure the
risks and consequences of training.
MR. MORALES agreed, adding his experience is that a tanker
losing power, or shut down, creates a tremendous risk.
MR. BARRETT restated he did not understand the rationale of
opposing organizations and further explained using simulators as
training is a well-known science.
2:17:22 PM
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON related 10 months ago, DEC expressed concern
about substantial design deficiencies in the Chouest fleet. He
remarked:
Specifically, DEC reported that Alyeska may not be
conducting model testing, simulator testing, and
numerical testing, or full-scale testing based on
Prince William Sound or Gulf of Alaska conditions.
They also expressed desire to see proof that there was
satisfactory demonstration of system performance.
MR. BARRETT explained tugs use computer-based design which is
more accurate than model testing. Based on reports from DEC,
APSC ordered model testing on the tugs in order to validate the
accuracy of the computer program; tests are complete, and
results will be available soon. Further, all tugs must be
classified for escort service by USCG which requires additional
testing and standards; in fact, APSC will not accept vessels
without escort certifications and certifications by the American
Bureau of Shipping (ABS). After sea trials, tug performance
will be demonstrated in Prince William Sound. He assured the
committee "the computer-based design is actually the way the
industry is headed ...."
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON continued:
The press report from [DEC's] press person was that
without a demonstration of satisfactory system
performance they wouldn't let you pass through
Hinchinbrook, fully laden.
MR. BARRETT said the contingency plan requires APSC demonstrate
a stop by the escorts of the largest tanker, which will be of a
BP vessel. He advised when the tugs arrive in March and June,
APSC will provide the demonstration of "practice slows."
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON asked for the source of the report quoted
by Co-Chair Josephson.
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON said the article was from the Alaska Dispatch
News, March 2017, and offered to provide a copy.
2:22:07 PM
MR. BARRETT clarified the source of the article was a report -
written by Robert Allen, a marine design consultant - chartered
by the Prince William Sound RCAC. [APSC] reviewed the report
and found useful aspects. He noted when industry makes
improvements, sometimes laws and regulations do not manage
changes easily. For example, computer-based design is more
accurate and reliable than tank tests, and the [marine] industry
is transitioning to performance-based standards; technology is
moving fast, and it is hard to keep up.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON stated APSC has an exemplary record
regarding environmental concerns.
MR. BARRETT said under difficult conditions APSC seeks
operational excellence.
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH asked whether tipping tests are used on
large vessels.
MR. BARRETT explained stability is tested as part of the ABS
certification process.
MR. MORALES added there are large tanks that simulate an ocean
and use models.
MR. BARRETT continued to slide 10 which pictured and described
general purpose tugs. Slide 12 pictured oil spill response
barges and he described safety features such as skimmers and
deluge pumps for snow removal. Slide 13 pictured escort work
boats that are built by Bayweld in Homer. Slides 14-15 pictured
training highlights. He advised the average experience level of
incoming captains is over 20 years, and related their
observations of the transition. Slides 17-19 pictured
stakeholders, fishing vessel training, and a large barge. Mr.
Barrett offered to respond to questions anytime.
2:30:57 PM
MR. MORALES, in response to Representative Drummond, said the
barge shown on slide 19 is used for near shore response and will
be part of the fleet.
MR. BARRETT, in response to Representative Rauscher, explained
the cycle time of a ship varies from 9-16 days.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON asked for an opinion on [proposed bill HB
322].
MR. BARRETT said he will review the bill, especially as related
to some of the definitions. [APSC] handles ballast water and
saltwater and he questioned whether the bill includes ballast
water and saltwater in the definition of produced water.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON requested a response from APSC on HB 322.
MR. BARRETT, in response to Co-Chair Josephson, clarified APSC
flushes some of its lines with saltwater. Flushed saltwater,
storm water, and ballast water are processed by a treatment
facility in large volumes; ballast water incorporates a small
amount of oil.
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON asked:
If the statute refers to a fine of say, $500 for x
number of gallons, and that statute was written close
to 30 years ago or more, can you see the merit in
maybe updating the statute ...?
MR. BARRETT gave an example of a small spill that cost APSC $2.5
million and said his answer is that [APSC] is motivated by
prevention and the cost of cleanup. In further response to Co-
Chair Josephson, he clarified $2.5 million was APSC's cost to
clean up the spill.
HB 217-RAW MILK SALES; FOOD EXEMPT FROM REGS
2:38:21 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 217, "An Act relating to the Alaska Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act; relating to the sale of milk, milk
products, raw milk, and raw milk products; and providing for an
effective date."
2:39:06 PM
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON moved to adopt the committee substitute (CS)
for HB 217, 30-LS0593\J, Wayne, 2/6/18, as the working document.
CO-CHAIR TARR objected for discussion purposes.
2:39:31 PM
DIANA RHOADES, Staff, Representative Geran Tarr, Alaska State
Legislature, informed the committee CSHB 217 [Version J] adds
provisions from HB 46 - which moved out of the House Resources
Standing Committee [3/22/17] - , would allow the commissioner of
the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to sell promotional
merchandise related to the Alaska Grown logo, and encourages the
state, schools, and municipalities to purchase Alaska Grown
agricultural and fisheries products at a required 7 percent
preference and up to a 15 percent preference. Another change in
HB 217 brought by the committee substitute is the removal of the
section related to raw milk sales; however, CSHB 217 maintains
the provisions to increase farmers' direct-to-consumer sales by
implementing the food freedom movement.
MS. RHOADES paraphrased from the following sponsor statement
[original punctuation provided]:
Section 1 Establishes Short Title as Alaska Food
Freedom Act
Concerns about states enforcing the federal Food
Safety Modernization Act prompted farmers across the
country, including Alaska, to pass laws to guarantee
the freedom of farmers to sell directly to end
consumers without overwhelming government regulations.
Section 2 Amends powers of Commissioner of Department
of Natural Resources to sell promotional merchandise
related to the Alaska Grown logo
Allows the Division of Agriculture within the
Department of Natural Resources to issue a license and
charge a license fee for the sale of promotional
merchandise related to the Alaska Grown logo. The
commissioner shall price the merchandise in a manner
that ensures a reasonable monetary return to the
state. It is encouraged that the merchandise be
manufactured in the US and is procured from either an
Alaska bidder or a person that employs Alaska prison
inmates.
Section 3 Amends Food, Drugs and Cosmetic Act's
Prohibited Acts Section, to allow exemptions from
licensing for some in-state food production
Allows direct sales from farmers to consumers for
certain Alaska Grown food and food products with
appropriate labeling; allows online sales of value-
added food products; defines farmers' markets.
Section 4 Rewrites municipal procurement code
preference for Alaska Grown agricultural products
If receiving state money, a municipality is currently
required to purchase Alaska Grown agriculture products
if they are priced not more than seven percent above a
similar product harvested outside the state; this
would give flexibility to purchase the product if
priced not more than 15 percent above a similar
product harvested outside the state.
Section 5 - Rewrites municipal procurement code
preference for Alaska-grown fisheries products
If receiving state money, a municipality is currently
required to purchase Alaska Grown seafood products if
they are priced not more than seven percent above a
similar product harvested outside the state; this
would give flexibility to purchase the product if
priced not more than 15 percent above a similar
product harvested outside the state.
CSHB217 (J) Alaska Food Freedom Act Sectional Analysis
2.7.18 Page 2
Section 6 Amends municipal solicitation procedure
for procurement code preference for Alaska-grown
agricultural and fisheries products
If receiving state money, a solicitation by a
municipality for the purchase of Alaska Grown
agriculture and seafood products must include written
notice that these products must follow the rules of
Section 4 and 5. Further, if they don't purchase
Alaska Grown products, the municipal officer shall
certify in writing the reasons why Alaska Grown
products were not purchased.
Section 7 - Amends state preferences for Alaska Grown
agricultural products
When agricultural products are purchased by the state
or by a school district that receives state money,
they are currently required to purchase Alaska Grown
products if they are priced not more than seven
percent above a similar product harvested outside the
state; this would give flexibility to purchase the
product if priced not more than 15 percent above a
similar product harvested outside the state.
Section 8 - Amends state preferences for Alaska Grown
fisheries products
If fisheries products are purchased by the state or by
a school district that receives state money, they are
currently required to purchase Alaska Grown products
if they are priced not more than seven percent above a
similar product harvested outside the state; this
gives flexibility to purchase the product if priced
not more than 15 percent above a similar product
harvested outside the state.
Section 9 - Amends state solicitation procedure for
procurement preferences for Alaska Grown fisheries and
agricultural products
If receiving state money, a solicitation by a state or
school district for the purchase of Alaska Grown
agriculture and seafood products must include written
notice that these products must follow the rules of
Sections 7 and 8. Further, if they don't purchase
Alaska Grown products, the officer responsible shall
certify in writing the reasons why Alaska Grown
products were not purchased.
Section 10 Amends Public Finance Fiscal Procedures
Act to collect fees
Allows the commissioner of the Department of Natural
Resources to collect fees for Alaska Grown promotional
merchandise.
Section 11 Effective date
2:43:25 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR removed her objection. There being no further
objection, Version J was before the committee.
CO-CHAIR TARR opened public testimony.
2:44:12 PM
BRYCE WRIGLEY, President, Alaska Farm Bureau, Inc., said the
Alaska Farm Bureau strongly supports all efforts to expand
agricultural opportunities in Alaska because as a young state,
Alaska has not had the opportunity to build an infrastructure
and establish policies to help farmers grow their businesses.
In fact, Alaska imports approximately 95 percent of its food,
and residents only have a 3- to 5-day supply of most food items
in grocery stores. Bills like HB 217 would improve agricultural
policies and increase access and options for consumers and
farmers. Mr. Wrigley reported the Alaska $5 Alaska Grown
Challenge is a tool to increase the visibility of Alaska Grown
products, and the bill would strengthen the product preference
program which would allow farmers to increase production and
serve additional markets. [CSHB 217] provides receipt authority
for a revenue stream in support of Alaska Grown marketing
materials. Further, good agricultural policies are important
because they will increase opportunities to get local products
to market, will build the agricultural industry, will increase
food security, and will create jobs in the rural farming
industry.
2:47:16 PM
PATRICIA GRISWOLD, Grandma's Gardens, informed the committee
Grandma's Gardens is a greenhouse and garden business. She
related she is familiar with state regulations on the labeling
of products such as jams and fresh produce, and commented on
items not on the agenda.
2:49:55 PM
ART GRISWOLD provided comments on topics not pertinent to CSHB
217.
2:51:28 PM
There followed a brief discussion of topics not pertinent to
CSHB 217.
2:54:43 PM
MATTHEW BATES provided comments on topics not pertinent to CSHB
217, and spoke in support of the provision in CSHB 217 related
to Alaska Grown.
2:56:32 PM
DANNY CONSENSTEIN, Representative, Alaska Food Policy Council
(AFPC), said AFPC is a coalition of Alaskans striving to create
a healthier, more secure, and more self-reliant Alaska by
improving its food system. [AFPC] represents farmers,
fishermen, food businesses, schools, government agencies,
nonprofits, subsistence users, and consumers in Alaska. He said
AFPC is pleased that the legislature is now recognizing food
issues are a priority. HB 217 recognizes the critical role
played by farmers markets - and other direct sales to consumers
- to create a market for agricultural and fishing businesses.
In fact, AFPC sees opportunities to create jobs and to diversify
the economy by supporting food-related small businesses and
retain some of the $1.9 billion that is spent on imported food.
In 2014, AFPC published a report that revealed $1 out of $5
earned by Alaska farmers is earned through direct sales, and the
direct sales market is growing; at this time annual direct sales
are $2.2 million annually. Mr. Constantine explained large
industrial-scale agribusiness is not necessary to achieve the
goal of more Alaskans eating Alaska Grown food, and he provided
an example. He also expressed support for state procurement of
local products.
3:03:02 PM
JOHANNA HERRON, Coordinator, Marketing, Alaska Grown & Farm to
School, Division of Agriculture, DNR, regarding the receipt
authority [provision in CSHB 217], informed the committee the
division has historically had to find federal funding to provide
marketing supplies to farmers; however, farmers have expressed
interest in buying supplies wholesale from the division.
3:03:56 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR announced public testimony for HB 217 remained
open.
HB 217 was held over.
3:04:28 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Resources Standing Committee meeting was adjourned at 3:04 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB217 Version A 4.16.17.PDF |
HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/7/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/14/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 217 |
| HB217 Supporting Document - Sponsor Presentation - Alaska Food Freedom 1-31-18.pdf |
HRES 1/31/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/7/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/14/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 217 |
| HB217 Supporting Document - Benefits of Farmers Markets 2017 1.30.18.pdf |
HRES 1/31/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/7/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/14/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 217 |
| HB217 Supporting Document - Article Natural News 4.16.17.pdf |
HRES 1/31/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/7/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/14/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 217 |
| HB217 Supporting Document - Alaska Chamber Endorses Food Freedom 10.12.17.pdf |
HRES 1/31/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/7/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 217 |
| HB217 Fiscal Note - DEC-EH 1.26.18.pdf |
HRES 1/31/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/7/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 217 |
| HB217 Fiscal Note - DEC-EHL 1.26.18.pdf |
HRES 1/31/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/7/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 217 |
| HB217 New Sponsor Statement - Alaska Food Freedom 1.30.18.pdf |
HRES 1/31/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/7/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/14/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 217 |
| HB217 Supporting Document - Building Food Security in Alaska 7.28.14.pdf |
HRES 2/7/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/14/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 217 |
| HB217 Supporting Document - 2017+AFPC-infographic 2.7.18.pdf |
HRES 2/7/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/14/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 217 |
| HRES Alyeska Barrett Remarks 2.7.18.pdf |
HRES 2/7/2018 1:00:00 PM |
Alyeska |
| HB217 (CS) Version J 2.6.18.pdf |
HRES 2/7/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 217 |
| HB217 CS Version J - Sectional Analysis 2.7.18.pdf |
HRES 2/7/2018 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 217 |
| HRES Alyeska - Barrett Slide Presentation 2.7.18.pdf |
HRES 2/7/2018 1:00:00 PM |
Alyeska |