Legislature(2019 - 2020)GRUENBERG 120
04/16/2019 01:00 PM House MILITARY & VETERANS' AFFAIRS
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB109 | |
| HB113 | |
| HB93 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 93 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 109 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 113 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON MILITARY AND VETERANS' AFFAIRS
April 16, 2019
1:03 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Gabrielle LeDoux, Chair
Representative Chris Tuck, Vice Chair
Representative Chuck Kopp
Representative Geran Tarr
Representative Steve Thompson
Representative Sharon Jackson
Representative George Rauscher
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE BILL NO. 109
"An Act relating to residency requirements for public school
enrollment for certain children of active duty military
members."
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE BILL NO. 113
"An Act relating to employment preferences for spouses and
children of veterans, disabled veterans, former prisoners of
war, members of the national guard, and deceased service
members."
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE BILL NO. 93
"An Act relating to temporary courtesy licenses for certain
nonresident professionals; and relating to the Department of
Commerce, Community, and Economic Development."
- MOVED HB 93 OUT OF COMMITTEE
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 109
SHORT TITLE: MILITARY CHILDREN SCHOOL RESIDENCY WAIVER
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) LEDOUX
03/25/19 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/25/19 (H) MLV, EDC
04/09/19 (H) MLV AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
04/09/19 (H) -- MEETING CANCELED --
04/11/19 (H) MLV AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
04/11/19 (H) -- MEETING CANCELED --
04/16/19 (H) MLV AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
BILL: HB 113
SHORT TITLE: MILITARY FAMILY EMPLOYMENT PREFERENCE
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) JACKSON
03/27/19 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/27/19 (H) MLV, L&C
04/16/19 (H) MLV AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
BILL: HB 93
SHORT TITLE: MILITARY SPOUSE COURTESY LICENSE
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) TUCK
03/13/19 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/13/19 (H) MLV, L&C
04/02/19 (H) MLV AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
04/02/19 (H) Heard & Held
04/02/19 (H) MINUTE(MLV)
04/04/19 (H) MLV AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
04/04/19 (H) -- MEETING CANCELED --
04/09/19 (H) MLV AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
04/09/19 (H) -- MEETING CANCELED --
04/16/19 (H) MLV AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
WITNESS REGISTER
TAMMIE PERREAULT, Regional Liaison
Defense-State Liaison Office
Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense
Department of Defense
Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 102 and answered
questions from the committee.
HEIDI TESHNER, Director
Finance and Support Services Division
Department of Education & Early Development
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing on HB
109.
JAMIE ALLARD
Eagle River, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 109.
VERDIE BOWEN, Director
Office of Veterans Affairs
Department of Military & Veterans' Affairs
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 109.
ERICK CORDERO GIORGANA, Staff
Representative Sharon Jackson
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: On behalf of Representative Jackson, prime
sponsor, introduced HB 113 and presented the sectional analysis
of the committee substitute for HB 113, version U.
VERDIE BOWEN, Director
Office of Veterans Affairs
Department of Military & Veterans' Affairs
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions and testified in support
during the hearing on HB 113.
TERRE GALE, Director
Division of Labor Standards and Safety
Department of Labor & Workforce Development
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered a question during the hearing on
HB 113.
DANA MANCIAGLI, President
DM Consult
Bellevue, Washington
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 113.
JAMIE ALLARD
Eagle River, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 113.
ACTION NARRATIVE
1:03:52 PM
CHAIR GABRIELLE LEDOUX called the House Special Committee on
Military and Veterans' Affairs meeting to order at 1:03 p.m.
Representatives Thompson, Jackson, Tuck, Rauscher, and LeDoux
were present at the call to order. Representatives Kopp and
Tarr arrived as the meeting was in progress.
The committee took a brief at-ease.
[Chair LeDoux passed the Gavel to Vice Chair Tuck].
HB 109-MILITARY CHILDREN SCHOOL RESIDENCY WAIVER
1:06:00 PM
VICE CHAIR TUCK announced that the first order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 109, "An Act relating to residency
requirements for public school enrollment for certain children
of active duty military members."
1:06:21 PM
CHAIR LEDOUX, as prime sponsor of HB 109, introduced the bill
and read the following sponsor statement [original punctuation
provided]:
House Bill 109 seeks to allow military children with
residency outside of the state, but with documentation
of a pending military relocation to the state, access
to preliminary registration, enrollment, or
application to a school district at the time that the
process is open to the general student population.
Proof of residency is temporarily waived until the
student begins school. Once the student begins school
their parent or guardian has ten (10) days to provide
proof of residency in the school district.
This is important to military school children,
especially those in high school. Often classes are
filled during the preliminary registration of the
students already registered in that school district.
For military students who are high school juniors or
seniors, and are transferring to a new school
district, they may need to take a specific class to
complete their requirements. This bill is also
important to those students wishing to attend a
Charter School through lottery or otherwise, as these
schools often fill up quickly and there are deadlines
for entering the lottery.
1:09:39 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP, referencing page 1, line 11, suggested
removing the 10-day limit on providing proof of residency in the
school district in case it creates a problem for the transferee.
He also proposed inserting the words, "or intended residence,"
for those who have a future deployment date and want to get a
head start on enrolling their child in a school that's located
in the appropriate district. He added that he supported the
intent of the bill.
CHAIR LEDOUX offered her understanding that a student can enroll
and provide records after arrival.
1:12:24 PM
TAMMIE PERREAULT, Regional Liaison, Defense-State Liaison
Office, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Department
of Defense, opined that the language of the bill provides
flexibility to school districts because it isn't compulsorily.
If it takes longer than 10 days for the family to show proof of
residency there is no negative outcome.
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP noted that relocating can be hectic for a
military family, especially with small children. He reiterated
that setting a time limit could be problematic for the family.
1:17:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JACKSON said she appreciates the current bill and
cautioned against changing the language to remove the 10-day
limit, as that gives plenty of time to provide records.
1:19:18 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER stated that wants to ensure that the
current bill works with all the options offered by school
districts.
CHAIR LEDOUX acknowledged that she had discussed the current
bill with the association of school boards.
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER asked how HB 109 makes the enrollment
process easier.
CHAIR LEDOUX stated that when the military orders are received
the family can preregister their children in school even if they
aren't physically in the state yet, which allows them to be
eligible for charter school lotteries, specific classes, and
more.
1:22:48 PM
VICE CHAIR TUCK added that depending on the time of year, the
family may have missed the deadline for charter schools;
however, if they know where they are moving, they can
preregister and take advantage of those opportunities ahead of
time.
CHAIR LEDOUX, referring to subsection 1 (g), suggested requiring
that the family show a copy of their transfer orders when
registering the child in school.
1:24:52 PM
MS. PERREAULT said she entrusted the committee to provide
whatever clarity on this specific statute that they deem
necessary in the bill.
1:26:01 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP emphasized that HB 109 addresses an
important issue by making it easier for military families to
register their children in school. He directed attention to the
first paragraph and said that it needs more clarity. He agreed
that requiring the families to show a copy of the military order
could help clarify the intent of advanced registration.
1:27:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR expressed concern about the annual student
count date in October. She asked if a child transferring from
out of state under these conditions would be included.
CHAIR LEDOUX acknowledged the concern; however, she likened the
scenario to a family that registers their child and then moves
out of state.
VICE CHAIR TUCK, in response to Representative Tarr, said that
in that the base student allocation is dependent on the Average
Daily Membership (ADM), which occurs in October. He pointed out
that if an individual is moving up from a different state and
has preregistered then the school district can include them in
the ADM. He stated that that he was unsure how often transfer
orders get cancelled, adding that it would be the same as any
family, military or not, deciding to move out of state.
VICE CHAIR TUCK directed attention to page 2, subparagraph (C),
and suggested it be broken up into two sections, thereby adding
another subparagraph, "(D)," for the phrase, "or off-base
military housing."
1:31:45 PM
MS. PERREAULT acknowledged that it could written with an "or" to
add greater clarity. Relative to head count, she said that
preregistered children will be treated as though they are
already in Alaska based on the transfer orders, which are rarely
changed. She noted that in September there will be a better
sense of the actual head count.
1:35:24 PM
HEIDI TESHNER, Director, Finance and Support Services Division,
Department of Education & Early Development, offered that Alaska
has a 20-day count period that always ends the fourth week of
October. She said that as long as a student is enrolled, they
are included in the ADM for the funding formula.
VICE CHAIR TUCK added that any late enrollment won't be counted
until the next year. He asked if that is correct.
MS. TESHNER answered yes, noting that there is only one count
period per year.
CHAIR LEDOUX asked if the students must be present on the day of
the count to be included.
MS. TESHNER explained that Alaska's ADM is based on enrollment,
or "membership", rather than attendance. She stated that
students can be absent during the count period and will still
count towards that membership.
MS. TESHNER, in response to a question from Representative
Jackson, said that no adjustment is made after the count is
reported, adding that it's normal for districts to gain and lose
students during the year.
1:38:14 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR asked Ms. Teshner to restate when the annual
count period takes place.
MS. TESHNER said it's a 20-day count period that always ends the
fourth Friday in October
1:38:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON established a scenario in which a kid
can't get into a certain biology class that he or she needs in
order to graduate. He indicated that there could be problems
for students trying to enroll in specific classes.
VICE CHAIR TUCK sought clarification on how often transfer
orders change and whether families are informed of their
destination.
1:41:07 PM
MS. PERREAULT explained that, ideally, the family will receive a
Request for Orders (RFO) in January or February, which discloses
where they are going. Orders are received in April or May - 60
to 90 days in advance of their departure date. The families get
two weeks to find housing and most know the situation in advance
of the move. She stated that families will know whether there
will be on-base housing available to them and if not, there are
online resources to help identify housing locations.
VICE CHAIR TUCK sought clarification on the timeframe for which
transferring families can acquire housing.
MS. PERREAULT stated that it depends on the family's situation;
some families may not know their final housing location until
they arrive on the ground while others know it well in advance.
1:46:07 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP, directing attention to page 1, lines 10-11,
suggested changing it to, "The parent of the student shall
provide to the school district a copy of the military order
showing proof of residence within 10 days of the student' first
day of attendance." He explained that if the 10-day deadline
started after the first day of attendance it would allow the
family time to figure out their housing situation and show proof
of residency.
VICE CHAIR TUCK noted that it's a two-part process they are
implementing - notifying the school of enrollment and providing
proof of residency. He agreed that allowing 10 days from when
the student first attends school would be more comfortable.
1:49:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR remarked that it's more important than just
notifying the district, it's about allowing families to register
their children in school so they can select the right classes,
join sports teams, and more.
CHAIR LEDOUX highlighted the three changes that were suggested:
clarify that transfers can be from one military base to another
and not exclusively from out of state; require a copy of the
military orders be provided to the school district; and allow
the family 10 days from the student's first day of attendance in
school to provide proof of residency.
1:51:34 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JACKSON cautioned against requiring the provision
of military orders in case the orders are late or they change
the transfer location.
CHAIR LEDOUX surmised that proof of pending military orders
would suffice.
VICE CHAIR TUCK directed attention back to page 2, subparagraph
(C), and suggested that, "or off base military housing," be made
into its own subparagraph, "(D)".
CHAIR LEDOUX sought clarification on the reasons for
subparagraphs (B) and (C).
1:54:38 PM
MS. PERREAULT answered, "no comment." She said that if leaving
that section with less specifics meets the statutory
requirements then it's appropriate.
1:54:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP agreed that because residence is
"exhaustively established in state statute for a number of other
things," removing those sections would be a good idea to reduce
the chance of conflict.
1:56:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR surmised that with so many single option
charter schools in Anchorage, HB 109 would be a benefit to
military families that would otherwise be at a disadvantage
since enrollment in those schools are selected by lottery. She
thanked the sponsor for bringing it forward.
1:56:43 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 1:56 p.m. to 1:57 p.m.
[Vice Chair Tuck returned the gavel to Chair LeDoux.]
1:57:46 PM
CHAIR LEDOUX opened public testimony.
1:58:45 PM
MS. PERREAULT informed the committee that she had already
provided written testimony [included in the committee packet] in
support of HB 109. She opined that it would have a positive
effect on the educational experience of military families. It
would ensure that high school and special needs students get the
classes they need, as well as help charter school students. On
behalf of the U.S. Department of Defense, she urged members to
move the bill out of committee.
REPRESENTATIVE TARR asked if the 10,000 school age military
children that Ms. Perreault mentioned range from ages 5-18 and,
if so, how many are younger than that.
2:02:07 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease.
2:02:18 PM
MS. PERREAULT replied there are approximately 9,800 K-12
students. she said she was unsure how many were under age 5;
however, she would be in touch with that data.
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK commented that the military does a good job
of covering the 0-5 years of age through their Heroes at Home
program, which is for parents and teachers.
2:04:44 PM
JAMIE ALLARD informed the committee that she is both a military
spouse and veteran. She disclosed that she works for
Commissioner Sacks at the Department of Military & Veterans'
Affairs (DMVA); however, she is testifying on her own behalf.
She stated that active duty National Guard move regularly every
three years and the current bill would help them register their
children in school. She reflected on her family's own
experience arriving in Alaska in 2010, noting that they lived in
a hotel for 90 days with two young daughters and had to enroll
her 5-year-old in private school. If she had longer than 10
days to provide documentation, she said, it would have been
beneficial. She expressed her support for the bill and said it
would be helpful.
CHAIR LEDOUX asked if the DMVA has an official position on bill.
MS. ALLARD indicated that her supervisor encourages it.
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER asked if the military provides any kind
of support for families who receive orders that have children.
MS. ALLARD replied that the military always supports their
veterans and families; nonetheless, they must be self-
sufficient. She added that the Judge Advocates Office, which is
the legal representation for military personnel, could always
issue a letter in lieu of orders.
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON questioned whether active duty National
Guard are considered active duty military members.
MS. ALLARD answered yes.
REPRESENTATIVE JACKSON suggested changing the language to
include "National Guard."
2:11:01 PM
VERDIE BOWEN, Director, Office of Veterans Affairs, Department
of Military and Veterans' Affairs, informed the committee that
the DMVA is in full support of HB 109. He said that the hardest
part about military transfers is the transition of children from
one school to another. He said this bill is greatly needed to
make the playing field fair.
2:13:08 PM
CHAIR LEDOUX, after ascertaining no one further wished to
testify, closed public testimony on HB 109.
2:13:34 PM
[HB 109 was held over.]
2:14:29 PM
The committee took a brief at ease at 2:14 p.m.
HB 113-MILITARY FAMILY EMPLOYMENT PREFERENCE
2:15:45 PM
CHAIR LEDOUX announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 113, "An Act relating to employment preferences
for spouses and children of veterans, disabled veterans, former
prisoners of war, members of the national guard, and deceased
service members."
2:16:22 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease.
2:16:35 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK moved to adopt the proposed committee
substitute (CS) for HB 113, labeled 31-LS0715\U, Wayne, 4/15/19,
as the working draft.
2:16:50 PM
CHAIR LEDOUX objected for the purpose of discussion.
2:17:23 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JACKSON, prime sponsor of HB 113, paraphrased
parts of the sponsor statement [included in the committee
packet], which read in its entirety as follows [original
punctuation provided]:
The purpose of House Bill 113 is to allow hiring
preferences to military spouses and dependent children
in the State of Alaska and the private sector.
Military families fall into two categories: Blue Star
or Gold Star Families. Blue Star families are military
spouses and dependents of active service members and
veterans. Gold Star families are usually spouses and
children of a deceased service members while in active
duty.
In Alaska, veterans with a disability receive a 10
point/or 10% hiring preference and service members
transitioning receive a 5 point/5% preference. Current
law allows for either automatic interviews or points
on a test if a test is required. HB 113 would extend
these benefits to spouses and dependents.
A recent report from the Department of Defense found
that a quarter of military spouses are unemployed or
underemployed. There are several efforts being done in
all 50 states, but Alaska is one of the few states
that do not give employment preferences to military
spouses HB113 would also make Alaska the first state
to support Gold Star Families. There are roughly
151,881 military dependents out of 68 thousand active
members according to the Alaska Department of Military
& Veteran Affairs.
This is a small but significant way to honor our
service members and their families, who often fall
under the cracks while also making a sacrifice to
serve their country.
2:20:42 PM
ERICK CORDERO GIORGANA, Staff, Representative Sharon Jackson,
Alaska State Legislature, explained that HB 113 extends current
hiring preferences to military and Blue Star spouses and
dependents, and to Gold Star spouses and dependents. A Gold
Star is a military member who died in active duty, while a Blue
Star is an active duty service member or veteran. He stated
that military spouses are among the highest unemployed group in
the United States despite their education or experience. He
said that this is often due to gaps in their resume and the
instability of constantly relocating. Under Alaska's current
law, service members who are applying for a job get a 5-point
hiring preference, while veterans with disabilities get a 10-
point preference - HB 113 will extend these benefits to spouses
and dependents. If the employer can't assign points because
they don't use the hiring rubric that results in a numerical
score, then the benefit will be the guarantee of an interview.
He noted that 24 other states currently provide veterans'
preference to spouses or surviving spouses.
2:24:26 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JACKSON noted that current statutes allow the
state and private employers the ability to give hiring
preferences to veterans and members of the National Guard;
however, the statutes do not extend those preferences to
military spouses or dependents. She added that the current bill
would "extend our work pool and give the opportunity for
military spouses to integrate more in our communities."
2:25:47 PM
MR. CORDERO GIORGANA addressed the changes from the original
bill. He said, "the original bill did not spell out active
service members in the section that expands the benefits to
spouses and families," adding that the CS makes that clear. The
CS also clarifies active service members or veterans who
identify as disabled. He further noted that Legislative Legal
Services, Legislative Affairs Agency, made changes to amend the
State Personnel Act [AS 39.25] to reference definitions in HB
113 for consistency.
MR CORDERO GIORGANA turned attention to the sectional analysis
of the CS for HB 113, version U. He stated that section 1 does
not prohibit a private employer from having hiring preferences
for persons described in Section 2 of this bill. Section 2
repeals and reenacts the current statute by adding definitions
removed from Section 1 for clarity. This section does not
prohibit a private employer from having hiring preferences to
active-military, veterans and families. This section adds
language to include spouses and dependent children of deceased
service members to the list. Section 3 amends the State
Personnel Act to reference definitions as stated in Section 4 of
this bill for consistency. Section 4 amends the employment
preference for veterans or former prisoners of war by adding new
language to include families of an active-duty service member,
veteran, or former prisoner of war. He said, "this section
clarifies the type of preference given the hiring process and
whether the applicant is disabled or not." Section 5 clarifies
that a person may receive an employment preference under only
one of the categories described in sections 3 and 4. A person
may use the preference without limitation when being considered
for a position for which persons who are not currently state
employees are being considered. If the recruitment for a
position is limited to state employees, preference under (a) or
(c) of this section may not be counted. Section 6 states that
this bill does not involve interpreting amendments of a
collective bargaining agreement and makes a reference to
subsection (a) of Section 4. Section 7 defines a dependent
child as anyone age 0-19 years old or up to age 23 if they are a
full-time student at an accredited educational or technical
institution that is recognized by the Alaska Department of
Education and Early Development. Finally, section 8 removes
language that has been included in section 4.
2:30:26 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK asked why they decided on age 23 for
dependents when healthcare can continue for a "child" up to the
age of 26.
REPRESENTATIVE JACKSON offered her understanding that "according
to the statutes it covers a child up to 23 as long as they are
in college."
MR. CORDERO GIORGANA explained that healthcare provisions are
federal, adding that in Alaska the age is usually 23. He
further noted that the state also provides educational benefits
to Gold Star families by waiving their tuition and fees if they
want to enroll in the state education system.
2:31:41 PM
CHAIR LEDOUX removed her objection. There being no further
objection, Version U was before the committee.
REPRESENTATIVE TARR returned attention to the definition of a
dependent child and asked if it excluded stepchildren.
MR. CORDERO GIORGANA replied that, currently, the language does
not include stepchildren.
REPRESENTATIVE JACKSON offered her understanding that the DD 214
[U.S. Department of Defense Certificate of Release or Discharge
from Active Duty] lists dependents without distinction.
2:33:10 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR suggested extending the definition of
dependent to include trade schools or apprenticeships.
2:34:43 PM
VERDIE BOWEN, Director, Office of Veterans Affairs, Department
of Military & Veterans' Affairs, explained that any programs
including trades or on-the-job training that are certified
through the post-secondary institution would be included in this
bill.
2:35:18 PM
CHAIR LEDOUX opened public testimony.
2:36:58 PM
MR. BOWEN expressed his full support of HB 113. He stated that
the hiring preferences will provide a benefit to both Blue Star
and Gold Star military families by getting them a job interview.
He said it will show them that the state cares about the
sacrifices they made.
2:40:24 PM
TERRE GALE, Director, Division of Labor Standards and Safety,
Department of Labor & Workforce Development, noted that, because
its voluntary, there will be no direct fiscal impact on the
division of Labor Standards and Safety, Department of Labor &
Workforce Development (DLWD).
2:40:58 PM
DANA MANCIAGLI, President, DM Consult, informed the committee
that she is a national expert on "the military spouse plight"
and expressed her support for HB 113. She stated that the
military community has been left behind in terms of their
unemployment and underemployment statistics and gave a
description of the numbers that support this statement.
2:46:20 PM
JAMIE ALLARD gave a short description of her educational
background and experience working with military spouses and
teaching them how to get jobs. She suggested including part-
time students in the current bill to allow them to receive
employment benefits, noting that some kids can't take a full
class schedule and work at the same time.
2:48:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR asked if problems are intensifying for
military spouses because of the military's active engagement in
the Middle East for the last 20 years.
MS. ALLARD mentioned that she was in the military in the 1990s
during Desert Storm and stated that they faced the same ongoing
problems because of constant relocation and deployed family
members.
CHAIR LEDOUX closed public testimony.
[HB 113 was held over.]
HB 93-MILITARY SPOUSE COURTESY LICENSE
2:50:42 PM
CHAIR LEDOUX announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 93, "An Act relating to temporary courtesy
licenses for certain nonresident professionals; and relating to
the Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic
Development."
2:51:24 PM
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON moved to report HB 93 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
notes. There being no objection, HB 93 was reported from the
House Special Committee on Military and Veterans' Affairs.
2:52:18 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Special Committee on Military and Veterans' Affairs meeting was
adjourned at [2:52] p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB0109A.PDF |
HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/23/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 109 |
| HB 109 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HMLV 4/9/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 109 |
| HB 109 Sectional.pdf |
HMLV 4/9/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 109 |
| HB 109 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HMLV 4/9/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 109 |
| DoD HB109 Letter of Support.pdf |
HMLV 4/9/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 109 |
| HB 113 Version U.pdf |
HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/23/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 113 |
| HB 113A.pdf |
HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/23/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 113 |
| HB 113 Sponsor Statement 4.8.2019.pdf |
HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/23/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 113 |
| HB 113 Sectional Analisys 4.8.2019.pdf |
HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/23/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 113 |
| Fiscal Note.pdf |
HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB 113 Summary of Changes.pdf |
HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/23/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 113 |
| HB 113 Backup Document Military Families Are Struggling to Make Ends Meet - The Atlantic 4.8.19.pdf |
HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/23/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 113 |
| HB 113 Reference Document 2018 Blue Star Family Survey -Executive-Summary 4.8.19.pdf |
HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/23/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 113 |
| HB 113 Reference Document - Column The Military Spouse Employment Plight 4.8.19.pdf |
HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/23/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 113 |
| HB 113 Reference Document 2018 Military Family Lifestyle Survey 4.8.19.pdf |
HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/23/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 113 |
| HB 113 Reference Document Office of People Analytics Survey 2017 4.8.19..pdf |
HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/23/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 113 |
| HB 113 Reference Document Office of the US President Military Spouses 4.8.19..pdf |
HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/23/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 113 |
| HB 113 Backup Document NCSL veterans' state hiring preference 4.8.19.pdf |
HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/23/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 113 |
| The Blue Star and Gold Star Families Act.pdf |
HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| The Blue Star and Gold Star Families Act.pdf |
HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/23/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 113 |
| HB113 Sectional for CS 4.16.2019.pdf |
HMLV 4/16/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/23/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 113 |