03/05/2025 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB101 | |
| HB77|| HB97|| HB106 | |
| Adjourn |
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 101 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 77 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 106 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 97 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE JUDICIARY STANDING COMMITTEE
March 5, 2025
1:04 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Andrew Gray, Chair
Representative Chuck Kopp, Vice Chair
Representative Ted Eischeid
Representative Genevieve Mina
Representative Sarah Vance
Representative Mia Costello
Representative Jubilee Underwood
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE BILL NO. 101
"An Act relating to civil claims by victims of sexual abuse to a
minor; relating to homicide; relating to assault in the third
degree; relating to stalking; relating to sexual abuse of a
minor; relating to enticement of a minor; relating to
endangering the welfare of a child; relating to indecent
exposure; relating to sending an explicit image of a minor;
relating to solicitation or production of an indecent picture of
a minor; relating to distribution of indecent material to
minors; relating to the testimony of children in criminal
proceedings; relating to sentencing; and providing for an
effective date."
- MOVED CSHB 101(JUD) OUT OF COMMITTEE
HOUSE BILL NO. 77
"An Act making the theft of mail or an article within mail theft
in the second degree."
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE BILL NO. 97
"An Act relating to theft; relating to organized retail theft;
relating to property crimes; relating to aggravating factors at
sentencing; establishing a statewide marketplace facilitator
sales tax; and establishing the organized retail theft fund in
the general fund."
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE BILL NO. 106
"An Act relating to organized theft; relating to theft of
medical records and medical information; relating to mail theft;
and providing for an effective date."
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 101
SHORT TITLE: CRIMES AGAINST MINORS
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) GRAY
02/12/25 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/12/25 (H) JUD, FIN
02/17/25 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
02/17/25 (H) Heard & Held
02/17/25 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
02/24/25 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
02/24/25 (H) Heard & Held
02/24/25 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
03/05/25 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
BILL: HB 77
SHORT TITLE: MAIL THEFT
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) COULOMBE
01/31/25 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/31/25 (H) JUD, FIN
02/21/25 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
02/21/25 (H) Heard & Held
02/21/25 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
03/05/25 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
BILL: HB 97
SHORT TITLE: ORG. RETAIL THEFT/FUND;MKTPLACE SALES TAX
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) FIELDS
02/12/25 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/12/25 (H) JUD, FIN
02/26/25 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
02/26/25 (H) Heard & Held
02/26/25 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
03/05/25 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
BILL: HB 106
SHORT TITLE: THEFT: ORGANIZED; MED. RECORDS; MAIL
SPONSOR(s): RULES BY REQUEST OF THE GOVERNOR
02/14/25 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/14/25 (H) JUD, FIN
02/24/25 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
02/24/25 (H) Heard & Held
02/24/25 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
03/05/25 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
WITNESS REGISTER
BOB BALLINGER, Staff
Representative Sarah Vance
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Offered an explanation of Amendment 1 to HB
101 on behalf of Representative Vance, prime sponsor.
JOHN SKIDMORE, Deputy Attorney General
Criminal Division, Department of Law
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Offered a comparison of HB 77, HB 97, and
HB 106.
RYAN SHELDON, Staff
Representative Julie Coulombe
Alaska State Legislature
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing on HB
77, HB 97, and HB 106, on behalf of Representative Coulombe,
prime sponsor of HB 77.
REPRESENTATIVE ZACK FIELDS
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: As the prime sponsor of HB 97, answered
questions during the hearing on HB 77, HB 97, and HB 106.
EVAN ANDERSON, Staff
Representative Zack Fields
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing on HB
77, HB 97, and HB 106, on behalf of Representative Fields, prime
sponsor.
ROBERT MACKEY, representing self
Eagle River, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 77.
MARIAH MENDOZA, retail Security Director
Anchorage 5th Avenue Mall
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 97.
ROSE FELICIANO, Executive Director of Washington/Northwest
TechNet
Olympia, Washington
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 97.
NATHAN WERNER, Captain
Fairbanks Police Department
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 97.
DAVE CAVITT, Owner
Furniture Enterprises of Alaska
Eagle River, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 97.
ACTION NARRATIVE
1:04:55 PM
CHAIR ANDREW GRAY called the House Judiciary Standing Committee
meeting to order at 1:04 p.m. Representatives Underwood, Mina,
Eischeid, Vance, and Gray were present at the call to order.
Representatives Costello and Kopp arrived as the meeting was in
progress.
HB 101-CRIMES AGAINST MINORS
1:06:18 PM
CHAIR GRAY announced that the first order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 101, "An Act relating to civil claims by victims
of sexual abuse to a minor; relating to homicide; relating to
assault in the third degree; relating to stalking; relating to
sexual abuse of a minor; relating to enticement of a minor;
relating to endangering the welfare of a child; relating to
indecent exposure; relating to sending an explicit image of a
minor; relating to solicitation or production of an indecent
picture of a minor; relating to distribution of indecent
material to minors; relating to the testimony of children in
criminal proceedings; relating to sentencing; and providing for
an effective date."
1:06:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE moved to adopt Amendment 1 to HB 101,
labeled 34-LS0451\A.3, C. Radford, 3/4/25, which read:
Page 4, line 14:
Following "child":
Insert "who is"
Following the second occurrence of "age":
Insert "and at least two years younger than the
offender"
Page 7, line 15:
Delete "A person"
Insert "An offender [A PERSON]"
Delete the second occurrence of "person"
Insert "offender [PERSON]"
Page 7, line 19, following "age":
Insert "and at least four years younger than the
offender"
Page 7, line 20:
Delete the first occurrence of "person"
Insert "offender [PERSON]"
Page 7, line 21, following "age":
Insert "and at least four years younger than the
offender"
Page 7, following line 25:
Insert a new bill section to read:
"* Sec. 12. AS 11.41.452(e) is amended to read:
(e) Enticement of a minor is a class A felony if
the offender [DEFENDANT] was, at the time of the
offense, required to register as a sex offender or
child kidnapper under AS 12.63 or a similar law of
another jurisdiction."
Renumber the following bill sections accordingly.
Page 9, line 21:
Delete "A person"
Insert "An offender [A PERSON]"
Page 9, line 23:
Delete "person"
Insert "offender [PERSON]"
Page 9, line 26:
Delete "that"
Insert "who [THAT]"
Delete "person"
Insert "offender [PERSON]"
Following "age":
Insert "and at least four years younger than the
offender"
Page 9, line 28:
Delete the second occurrence of "person"
Insert "offender [PERSON]"
Page 9, line 29, following "age":
Insert "and at least four years younger than the
offender"
Page 9, line 30:
Delete "person"
Insert "offender [PERSON]"
Page 10, following line 23:
Insert a new bill section to read:
"* Sec. 22. AS 11.61.128(e) is amended to read:
(e) Distribution of indecent material to minors
is a class B felony if the offender [DEFENDANT] was,
at the time of the offense, required to register as a
sex offender or child kidnapper under AS 12.63 or a
similar law of another jurisdiction."
Renumber the following bill sections accordingly.
Page 22, following line 29:
Insert a new paragraph to read:
"(12) AS 11.41.452(e), as amended by sec.
12 of this Act;"
Renumber the following paragraphs accordingly.
Page 22, line 30:
Delete "sec. 12"
Insert "sec. 13"
Page 22, line 31:
Delete "sec. 13"
Insert "sec. 14"
Page 23, line 1:
Delete "sec. 14"
Insert "sec. 15"
Page 23, line 2:
Delete "sec. 15"
Insert "sec. 16"
Page 23, line 3:
Delete "sec. 16"
Insert "sec. 17"
Page 23, line 4:
Delete "sec. 17"
Insert "sec. 18"
Page 23, line 5:
Delete "sec. 18"
Insert "sec. 19"
Page 23, line 6:
Delete "sec. 19"
Insert "sec. 20"
Page 23, line 7:
Delete "sec. 20"
Insert "sec. 21"
Page 23, following line 7:
Insert a new paragraph to read:
"(22) AS 11.61.128(e), as amended by sec.
22 of this Act;"
Renumber the following paragraphs accordingly.
Page 23, line 8:
Delete "sec. 21"
Insert "sec. 23"
Page 23, line 9:
Delete "sec. 22"
Insert "sec. 24"
Page 23, line 10:
Delete "sec. 23"
Insert "sec. 25"
Page 23, line 11:
Delete "sec. 24"
Insert "sec. 26"
Page 23, line 12:
Delete "sec. 25"
Insert "sec. 27"
Page 23, line 13:
Delete "sec. 26"
Insert "sec. 28"
Page 23, line 14:
Delete "sec. 27"
Insert "sec. 29"
REPRESENTATIVE MINA objected for the purpose of discussion.
1:06:55 PM
BOB BALLINGER, Staff, Representative Sarah Vance, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of Representative Vance, prime sponsor,
stated that in trying to stay consistent with current code,
Amendment 1 would incorporate the two-year age gap that was
"built in" with regard to increasing the age of consent from 16
to 18 years old. It would also replace "person" with "offender"
in several places and make necessary conforming changes.
1:10:32 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EISCHEID sought to confirm that in essence,
Amendment 1 would take the Romeo and Juliet exemption and change
the current proposed four-year age gap to two years.
MR. BALLINGER responded yes, but only in certain sections. He
explained that the Romeo and Juliet exemption is four years for
consent; however, instead of incorporating that, the bill would
use the current two-year gap "that was there because of the 16-
year-old difference."
1:11:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MINA removed her objection. There being no
further objection, Amendment 1 was adopted.
1:12:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP moved to report HB 101, as amended, out of
committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying
fiscal notes.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE objected for the purpose of discussion.
She said her focus is on the vulnerability of youth and people
who take advantage of them. She said the bill would have a
great impact on many young people who feel like they lack a
strong legal defense in court. She opined that the simplicity
of the bill would help people wrap their mind around it and
expressed her hope that this year, the legislature would provide
justice for minors with a law that stands behind them. She
removed her objection.
CHAIR GRAY objected. He reiterated that the intent of the bill
is to provide protections for vulnerable 16- and 17-year-olds
who are particularly vulnerable to predators because of the
current age of consent in Alaska. He explained that Amendment 1
would ensure that HB 101 would not inadvertently create new
crimes. He shared his belief that passing the bill would be one
of the most important steps to protecting 16- and 17-year-olds
from abuse in Alaska.
1:15:31 PM
CHAIR GRAY removed his objection. There being no further
objection, CSHB 101(JUD) was reported out of the House Judiciary
Standing Committee. He authorized Legislative Legal services to
make any necessary or conforming changes.
1:16:01 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 1:16 p.m. to 1:20 p.m.
HB 77-MAIL THEFT
HB 97-ORG. RETAIL THEFT/FUND;MKTPLACE SALES TAX
HB 106-THEFT: ORGANIZED; MED. RECORDS; MAIL
1:20:21 PM
CHAIR GRAY announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 77, "An Act making the theft of mail or an
article within mail theft in the second degree" and HOUSE BILL
NO. 97, "An Act relating to theft; relating to organized retail
theft; relating to property crimes; relating to aggravating
factors at sentencing; establishing a statewide marketplace
facilitator sales tax; and establishing the organized retail
theft fund in the general fund" and HOUSE BILL NO. 106, "An Act
relating to organized theft; relating to theft of medical
records and medical information; relating to mail theft; and
providing for an effective date." [Before the committee,
adopted as the working document on 2/21/25, was the proposed
committee substitute (CS) for HB 77, Version 34-LS0144\H, C.
Radford, 2/20/25 ("Version H").]
1:20:53 PM
JOHN SKIDMORE, Deputy Attorney General, Criminal Division,
Department of Law (DOL), offered a comparison of HB 77 and HB
106 from a document, titled "HB 77 HB 97 HB 106 Comparisons"
[included in the committee packet], which read as follows
[original punctuation provided]:
Comparison of HB 77 and HB 106
•Mail Theft:
O HB 77 expands theft in the second degree to
include all types of mail, making it a class C
felony regardless of value.
O HB 106 includes mail theft under theft in the
third degree, making it a class A misdemeanor.
•Medical Records:
O HB 106 establishes that theft in the second
degree includes the theft of medical records or
other medical information, making it a class C
felony.
O HB 77 does not address medical records.
•Organized Theft:
O HB 106 establishes the crime of organized
theft, where a person commits theft in
coordination with three or more individuals who
have committed or attempted multiple violations
of AS 11.46.120 or 11.46.130. Organized theft is
classified as a class A felony.
O HB 77 does not include provisions for organized
theft.
•Clarifications & Exemptions:
O HB 77 defines mail to include private mail
delivery services and exempts agencies acting in
their official duties.
O HB 106 does not provide similar exemptions. No
specific definition but common meaning of "mail"
likely excludes FedEx/UPS.
1:25:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MINA observed that private mail delivery services
like FedEx and United Parcel Service (UPS) aren't included in HB
106 and asked whether the decision not to define "mail" was an
oversight by the department.
MR. SKIDMORE responded that it was not an intentional omission.
He reminded the committee that under current law, the severity
of mail theft is determined by the contents of the stolen
package and its dollar value. He added that the decision to
define "mail" would be a policy call for the committee to make.
1:27:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE COSTELLO referenced her personal experience with
mail theft and suggested that the committee may want to consider
that criminals are using people's homes as a delivery point for
merchandise that they stole using the homeowner's identity or
credit card.
1:28:23 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked about deed fraud or home title theft,
which is the illegal transfer of property. She asked whether
this issue could be included in the bill.
MR. SKIDMORE said the fraudulent conveyance of a deed is in a
different section of statute, AS 11.46.505, and considered
forgery in the second degree. He added that the transfer of a
deed is a separate issue.
1:32:38 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease 1:32 p.m.
1:33:33 PM
CHAIR GRAY explained that the purpose of today's hearing is to
offer a side-by-side comparison of HB 106, HB 97, and HB 77 to
give a clear understanding of three similar bills. He asked Mr.
Sheldon to explain why HB 77 would raise the penalty for mail
theft to a class C felony.
1:35:11 PM
RYAN SHELDON, Staff, Representative Julie Coulombe, said the
goal is to give Alaskans a "steppingstone tool" and
differentiate the designation between possession, mail theft,
and identity theft with an escalation in penalty from a class A
misdemeanor to a class C felony to a class B felony.
1:37:19 PM
REPRESENTATIVE UNDERWOOD asked how the bill compares to federal
penalties.
MR. SHELDON said federally, [mail theft] is a class C felony
without the escalation, which includes a $250,000 fine and up to
5 years in prison. In contrast, Alaska levies a fine of $50,000
and up to 5 years in prison.
CHAIR GRAY asked whether stealing Door Dash would be considered
a felony under HB 77.
MR. SHELDON answered no, a food order would not constitute a
mail delivery.
CHAIR GRAY sought to confirm that federal statutes contain the
definition of mail that's used in HB 106, which does not include
UPS and FedEx.
MR. SHELDON responded yes.
1:40:41 PM
MR. SKIDMORE offered a comparison of HB 97 and HB 106 from a
document, titled "HB 77 HB 97 HB 106 Comparisons" [included in
the committee packet], which read as follows [original
punctuation provided]:
Comparison of HB 97 and HB 106
•Organized Theft:
O HB 97 establishes "organized retail theft,"
which applies to retail theft conducted as part
of a coordinated plan over two or more occasions.
O HB 106 establishes "organized theft," where a
person commits felony level theft in coordination
with three or more people.
•Number of People Required in "organized theft":
O HB 97 requires two or more people to coordinate
for organized retail theft.
O HB 106 requires three or more people for
organized theft.
•Scope:
O HB 97 focuses specifically on retail theft,
including acts such as concealing merchandise,
altering price tags, or transferring merchandise
between containers.
O HB 106 applies more broadly to felony theft
committed for the benefit of or in association
with a group, beyond just retail settings.
•Theft in the First Degree:
O HB 97 lowers the threshold for theft in the
first degree from $25,000 to $20,000.
O HB 106 does not change the monetary thresholds
for theft in the first degree.
•Theft in the Second Degree:
O HB 97 lowers the threshold for theft in the
second degree from $750 to $500 on the low end
and from $25,000 to $20,000 on the high end.
O HB 106 expands theft in the second degree to
include medical records but does not change the
monetary thresholds.
•Theft in the Third Degree:
O HB 97 lowers the threshold from $250 to $200 on
the low end and from $750 to $500 on the high
end.
O HB 106 includes mail theft under theft in the
third degree but does not change monetary
thresholds.
•Theft in the Fourth Degree:
O HB 97 lowers the threshold for theft in the
fourth degree from under $250 to under $200.
O HB 106 does not change theft in the fourth
degree.
•Other Changes in HB 97:
O HB 97 changes the threshold for the crime of
concealment of merchandise in various degrees.
O HB 97 modifies the threshold for criminal
simulation.
O HB 97 establishes a marketplace facilitator
tax.
O HB 106 does not address these issues.
1:47:00 PM
CHAIR GRAY asked when the price thresholds in HB 97 were last
modified.
MR. SKIDMORE estimated 6 years ago.
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP shared his understanding that HB 97 would
establish a Retail Theft Fund, similar to the Restorative
Justice Fund, that would fund law enforcement.
1:48:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked how changes to the price threshold
would impact the legal system.
MR. SKIDMORE said the change in dollar values would only affect
the classification or level of punishment.
1:50:11 PM
[Due to technical difficulties, sound was lost briefly.]
1:54:27 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE questioned the purpose behind HB 97.
1:54:31 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ZACK FIELDS, Alaska State Legislature, as prime
sponsor, explained that the rise in retail crime coincides with
the rise in high volume digital marketplaces, like Facebook
Marketplace and Amazon. He said the user fee proposed in HB 97
is designed to ensure that there are resources in local law
enforcement to combat theft driven by the shift to online
marketplaces. He added that understaffed police departments
only have the capacity to react to crime and lack the ability to
break up criminal networks.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked who would collect the tax and how it
would be returned to municipal public safety.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS reiterated that the bill would implement
be a user fee to address public safety issues, not a broad-based
tax. From the designated fund, the money would be appropriated
proportional to the respective jurisdictions.
1:57:19 PM
REPRESENTATIVE COSTELLO asked why HB 97 was introduced.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS said he had been disturbed by the closing
of small or medium sized businesses in Anchorage and the
inability for them to prevent excessive levels of theft, even
with a more robust law enforcement presence. Overall, he said
the bill was primarily driven by observations in the Anchorage
business community.
1:59:29 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MINA in trying to better understand the scope of
retail theft and how it impacts closure of small businesses,
asked whether local businesses had been surveyed on their
reasons for closing.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS stated that Nordstrom's midtown branch in
Anchorage reported a loss to theft that's 10 times higher than
the national average. He shared further anecdotal examples from
local businesses that have experienced organized retail theft
(ORT) and deferred to his staff, Evan Anderson, to elaborate.
2:01:07 PM
EVAN ANDERSON, Staff, Representative Zack Fields, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of Representative Fields, prime sponsor,
th
spoke to the issue at the Anchorage 5 Avenue Mall where
Nordstrom had closed and reported that JCPenney experienced a 50
percent shrink rate until they decided to permanently close the
th
public entrance on 5 Avenue.
2:02:50 PM
CHAIR GRAY opened public testimony on HB 77.
2:03:42 PM
ROBERT MACKEY, representing self, testified in support of HB 77.
Shared a personal anecdote involving a stolen paycheck. He said
society is just learning the value of their digital self, and
that "taking the next step" would help defend citizens who are
not fully prepared and look to the legislature to provide
guardrails. He opined that the bill would be a step towards
helping law enforcement protect citizens from these types of
crimes.
CHAIR GRAY closed public testimony on HB 77 and opened public
testimony on HB 97.
2:05:56 PM
MARIAH MENDOZA, retail Security Director, Anchorage 5th Avenue
Mall, testified in support of HB 97. She said theft groups are
far more experienced compared to past years and are emboldened
with the knowledge of the crime's threshold limits. Because
they know what they can get away with and that they will be
cited and released, thieves are coming in multiple times per day
to steal targeted items like designer sunglasses. She stated
her belief that the bill would be beneficial because it would
make criminals aware that there would be consequences for their
actions.
2:09:44 PM
ROSE FELICIANO, Executive Director of Washington/Northwest,
TechNet, testified in opposition to HB 97. She opined that the
tax proposed in the bill would be discriminatory to the online
marketplaces that she represents. In addition, she expressed
concern that the fund would not be dedicated to ORT. Instead,
she suggested that a task force on organized retail crime would
be an effective tool that a number of other states had
implemented. She reiterated her belief that a tax on
marketplace dollars would be discriminatory and urged the
committee to oppose the bill.
2:11:46 PM
NATHAN WERNER, Captain, Fairbanks Police Department, testified
in support of HB 97. Overall he had observed an inability to
hold people accountable for these crimes and assumed that by
reducing the thresholds, the bill intends to increase
accountability. He shared statistics on the increasing theft
levels and shared his experience combatting ORT. He opined that
if passed, the bill would be impactful.
2:15:57 PM
DAVE CAVITT, Owner, Furniture Enterprises of Alaska, testified
in support of HB 97. He shared his personal experience with an
employee that stole $250,000 in inventory for a resale furniture
store and was not charged with a crime. He expressed his hope
that the bill would help prevent something similar from
happening to another Alaska business.
2:19:03 PM
CHAIR GRAY closed public testimony on HB 97. He opened public
testimony on HB 106. After ascertaining that no one wished to
testify, he closed public testimony.
[HB 77, HB 97, and HB 106 were held over.]
2:21:22 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Judiciary Standing Committee meeting was adjourned at 2:21 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 77 HB 97 HB 106 Comparisons.pdf |
HJUD 3/5/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 77 HB 97 HB 106 |
| HB 77 HB 97 HB 106 Comparisons.pdf |
HJUD 3/5/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 77 |
| HB 77 HB 97 HB 106 Comparisons.pdf |
HJUD 3/5/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB 101 Amendment 1.pdf |
HJUD 3/5/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 101 |
| HB 101 FN Court System.pdf |
HJUD 3/5/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 101 |
| HB 101 FN Family and Community Services.pdf |
HJUD 3/5/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 101 |
| HB 101 FN DPS Integrated Victim Assistance.pdf |
HJUD 3/5/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 101 |
| HB 101 FN Law Criminal Division.pdf |
HJUD 3/5/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 101 |
| HB 101 FN Department of Correctins.pdf |
HJUD 3/5/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 101 |
| HB 101 FN Admin Office of Public Advocacy.pdf |
HJUD 3/5/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 101 |
| HB 101 FN Troopers.pdf |
HJUD 3/5/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 101 |
| HB 101 FN Admin Public Defender Agency.pdf |
HJUD 3/5/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 101 |