Legislature(2021 - 2022)GRUENBERG 120
04/15/2022 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearings Alaska Police Standards Council | |
| HB5 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 5 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE JUDICIARY STANDING COMMITTEE
April 15, 2022
1:07 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Matt Claman, Chair
Representative Harriet Drummond
Representative Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins
Representative David Eastman
Representative Christopher Kurka
Representative Liz Snyder, Vice Chair
MEMBERS ABSENT
Representative Sarah Vance
OTHER LEGISLATORS PRESENT
Representative Geran Tarr
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
CONFIRMATION HEARING(S):
Alaska Police Standards Council
Jeff Brown - Utqiagvik
Michael Craig - Anchorage
David Knapp - Palmer
David Ross - Kenai
- CONFIRMATION(S) ADVANCED
SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 5
"An Act relating to sexual abuse of a minor; relating to sexual
assault; relating to the code of military justice; relating to
consent; relating to the testing of sexual assault examination
kits; and providing for an effective date."
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 5
SHORT TITLE: SEXUAL ASSAULT; DEF. OF "CONSENT"
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) TARR
02/18/21 (H) PREFILE RELEASED 1/8/21
02/18/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/18/21 (H) STA, JUD
03/26/21 (H) SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE INTRODUCED
03/26/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/26/21 (H) STA, JUD
03/27/21 (H) STA AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
03/27/21 (H) Heard & Held
03/27/21 (H) MINUTE(STA)
04/13/21 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
04/13/21 (H) Heard & Held
04/13/21 (H) MINUTE(STA)
04/20/21 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
04/20/21 (H) Heard & Held
04/20/21 (H) MINUTE(STA)
04/27/21 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
04/27/21 (H) Heard & Held
04/27/21 (H) MINUTE(STA)
04/29/21 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
04/29/21 (H) Scheduled but Not Heard
05/04/21 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
05/04/21 (H) Moved CSSSHB 5(STA) Out of Committee
05/04/21 (H) MINUTE(STA)
05/06/21 (H) STA RPT CS(STA) 1DP 5AM
05/06/21 (H) DP: TARR
05/06/21 (H) AM: VANCE, STORY, EASTMAN, KAUFMAN,
KREISS-TOMKINS
05/06/21 (H) FIN REFERRAL ADDED AFTER JUD
03/04/22 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
03/04/22 (H) Heard & Held
03/04/22 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
03/09/22 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
03/09/22 (H) Heard & Held
03/09/22 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
03/30/22 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
03/30/22 (H) Heard & Held
03/30/22 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
04/13/22 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
04/13/22 (H) Heard & Held
04/13/22 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
04/15/22 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
WITNESS REGISTER
JEFF BROWN, Appointee
Alaska Police Standards Council
Utqiagvik, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as an appointee to the Alaska
Police Standards Council.
MICHAEL CRAIG, Appointee
Alaska Police Standards Council
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as an appointee to the Alaska
Police Standards Council.
DAVID KNAPP, Appointee
Alaska Police Standards Council
Palmer, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as an appointee to the Alaska
Police Standards Council.
DAVID ROSS, Appointee
Alaska Police Standards Council
Kenai, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as an appointee to the Alaska
Police Standards Council.
KATIE BOTZ, representing self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 5.
CASS POOK, representing self
Sitka, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 5.
MICHAEL PATTERSON, representing self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 5.
JANICE PARK, representing self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 5.
JESSICA STOSSEL, Interim Executive Director
Center for Nonviolent Living
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 5.
JENNIFER BROWN, representing self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 5.
DEBRA O'GARA, Senior Policy Specialist
Alaska Native Women's Resource Center
Petersburg, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 5.
JENNIFER MITCHELL, representing self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 5.
BRENDA STANFILL, Executive Director
Alaska Network on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 5.
LAUREE MORTON, representing self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 5.
PHILLIP MOSER, representing self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 5.
ACTION NARRATIVE
1:07:30 PM
CHAIR MATT CLAMAN called the House Judiciary Standing Committee
meeting to order at 1:07 p.m. Representatives Eastman, Kreiss-
Tomkins, Drummond, Kurka, Snyder, and Claman were present at the
call to order.
^CONFIRMATION HEARINGS Alaska Police Standards Council
CONFIRMATION HEARINGS Alaska Police Standards Council
1:08:18 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that the first order of business would be
the confirmation hearings on the governor's appointees to the
Alaska Police Standards Council.
1:08:37 PM
JEFF BROWN, Appointee, Alaska Police Standards Council (APSC),
shared that he began his law enforcement career over 20 years
ago and has served in various capacities. He now serves as the
chief of police for the North Slope Borough Police Department.
He stated that his varied experience has given him a unique and
well-rounded perspective on law enforcement, making him well-
suited to carry out the council's mission. He thanked the
committee members.
1:09:35 PM
MR. BROWN, in response to Chair Claman, stated that he is a
newly appointed member to APSC, subject to confirmation.
1:10:14 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN questioned how the council could improve
police force recruitment and retention.
1:10:33 PM
MR. BROWN responded that recruitment and retention are two
different subjects. In terms of recruitment, he said, it is
difficult to find qualified applicants, because all of the
departments are competing within the same applicant pool. He
suggested targeting areas in the Lower 48 which "are not so
friendly towards law enforcement." He expressed the opinion
that communities in Alaska support law enforcement, and,
oftentimes, officers are looking for this support. In terms of
retention, he suggested that the ongoing standard of training
throughout the state be continued, as the standard equips
departments with professionalism and dedication. He stated that
new recruits are looking for this standard, so it needs to be
developed continually throughout the state. He suggested that
benefits also need to be targeted.
1:12:39 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN stated that he has received queries from
former military police who are considering a civilian law
enforcement career. He pointed out that these individuals have
experienced difficulties. He questioned whether the council has
considered changing the standards for military service
experience [so that it could translate easier into civilian law
enforcement service].
1:13:19 PM
MR. BROWN replied that the definition of military police
officers and the definition of state peace officers are two very
different things. He stated that military police patrol
officers potentially have skills; however, he suggested that
individuals should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to
determine whether their experience meets the qualifications of a
peace officer. He stated that there is a wide variety of
military police duties. In example, he stated that guarding a
gate is different from investigating a crime.
1:14:57 PM
VICE CHAIR SNYDER referred to a recent "unfortunate" event
concerning an autistic individual [and the police]. She
commented that [police enforcement] could use more training in
de-escalation tactics. She questioned the role of council in
reducing these types of incidences.
1:15:46 PM
MR. BROWN responded that officers in his department are trained
in de-escalation techniques based on federal training standards.
He said these strategies are taught in the academy to new
recruits; however, older officers, who have not been in the
academy for some time, would benefit from ongoing training. He
stated that creating standardized, in-service training has been
the subject of conversations and suggested that the council
could address this. He recommended this should be well thought
out and not a "knee-jerk reaction." He recognized the
difference in the training of officers in remote communities
versus those on the road system. He emphasized that the role of
APSC is to make sure whatever is implemented is well thought
out.
1:17:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN questioned whether homeschool graduates
should be treated differently during the [police officer]
recruiting process.
1:17:57 PM
MR. BROWN responded that there are at least two homeschool
graduates in his department. He stated that there is a standard
of education met through homeschooling, so there should be no
need to treat these individuals any differently. He pointed out
that these individuals in his department have been there for
some time and described them as very astute with unique
backgrounds and perspectives.
1:19:11 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN asked whether retirement plans, specifically the
existence of pensions, have affected recruitment and retention.
1:19:30 PM
MR. BROWN responded that he is a member of Tier III and
recognizes the benefits of this, especially in relation to those
who are members of Tier IV. He stated that anything the state
can do, including using a targeted goal, to incentivize
employees to stay in the state would be beneficial. He
explained that 75 percent of his department will be eligible for
retirement within the next three years, and these individuals
are all Tier III members. He said that there are not many Tier
IV members, adding that "they seem to come and go a lot more
frequently."
1:21:10 PM
MICHAEL CRAIG, Appointee, Alaska Police Standards Council,
shared that he has been in Alaska since 1963. He stated that he
currently works for the Alyeska Pipeline Service Company, and he
has worked on the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System since 1983. He
stated that now he works as an employee-concerns coordinator,
where he conducts investigations and does conflict resolution.
He expressed the opinion this would be consistent with part of
the council's duties. He stated he has been a member of APSC
since 2017 and is seeking reappointment.
1:22:23 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN, in relation to the North Slope and law
enforcement, questioned the model of having employees who are
out of state residents but travel for regular employment to
Alaska.
MR. CRAIG responded that in his work he has only been a liaison
with state and federal law enforcement. In terms of law
enforcement, he stated that he does not have an answer for the
question. He continued that the people who work on the pipeline
are predominately Alaska residents, and his preference would be
that all the positions be filled with Alaska residents, but when
employment pools shrink, employers must look elsewhere.
1:24:21 PM
DAVID KNAPP, Appointee, Alaska Police Standards Council, stated
that he is pending reappointment to the council after completing
a four-year term. He shared that he is a correctional officer
with the Alaska Department of Corrections (DOC). He stated that
he has worked for DOC for 17 years. For the last 5 years his
assignment has been with the prisoner transportation unit. In
this capacity he manages the prisoner telephone system, monitors
gang activity, and supervises the canine unit. He added that he
also teaches a class on gangs at the academy and assists with
firearms instruction.
1:25:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked whether there are any urgent needs
that the council should address over the next few years.
1:26:07 PM
MR. KNAPP responded that there is a backlog of regulations
proposed during the COVID-19 pandemic, and addressing this is
the number one issue.
1:26:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER questioned how the council could
contribute to the ways the state responds to Alaskans in need.
1:27:27 PM
MR. KNAPP responded that the council should evolve training in
respect to the changing standards. He stated that law
enforcement has been having more contact with mentally ill
people, including individuals with drug-induced psychosis. He
advised that the council should continue to provide guidance and
training for these rapidly changing issues.
1:28:16 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN questioned how retention and recruitment of law
enforcement officers is affected by the lack of a pension.
1:28:29 PM
MR. KNAPP responded that the issue is important. He stated that
throughout his career he has seen hundreds of correctional
officers leave after meeting the five-year vestment requirement.
1:29:07 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN questioned whether proceedings against
law enforcement, including complaints brought to the council,
have been conducted in an efficient manner.
MR. KNAPP stated that in his experience the process is
streamlined. He acknowledged that delays would be because of
legal representation, not the council.
1:30:20 PM
DAVID ROSS, Appointee, Alaska Police Standards Council, stated
he was appointed to be one of the four designated police chiefs
on APSC. He shared that he has lived in Kenai since 1971 and
has worked at the Kenai Police Department for 21 years. He has
worked in every aspect of the department, including the position
of chief for the last 6 years. He expressed anticipation
concerning his role on the council, as it would be an
opportunity to help address the need for professional and well-
trained law enforcement in Alaska.
1:31:10 PM
MR. ROSS, in response to Chair Claman, stated that his is a new
appointment, pending confirmation.
1:31:28 PM
MR. ROSS, in response to Representative Eastman, said that the
council needs to develop and maintain good hiring practices for
law enforcement professionals. To ensure the "right" people are
in law enforcement, he said, there needs to be good systems to
certify and de-certify officers. He added that quality ongoing
training should be provided.
1:32:23 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN questioned how retention and recruitment of law
enforcement officers is affected by the lack of a pension.
MR. ROSS responded that this is a challenge, as the pension
system does play a role, especially concerning retention. He
said that many at his agency are Tier III members, nearing
retirement, creating an experience gap. He expressed the
opinion that setting a goal for longevity with a pension system
would benefit Tier IV members, as they do not seem to be
staying. In response to Chair Claman, he stated that he is a
Tier III member.
1:33:53 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN opened public testimony on the appointees to the
Alaska Police Standards Council. After ascertaining that there
was no one who wished to testify, he closed public testimony.
1:34:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN thanked the applicants for volunteering
their service. He stated that he receives regular feedback from
constituents who are interested in becoming law enforcement, but
face challenges. He stated that retention of officers is an
issue, and he welcomes any comments which would help.
1:36:00 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND complimented the appointees on their
service to communities and organizations.
1:36:29 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN noted that the appointees included experienced and
new members, and the blend has created a good discussion.
1:37:00 PM
VICE CHAIR SNYDER stated that the House Judiciary Standing
Committee has reviewed the qualifications for the governor's
appointees and recommends that the following names be forwarded
to a joint session for consideration: Jeff Brown, Michael Craig,
David Knapp, and David Cross, appointees to the Police Standards
Council. She reminded the committee that this does not reflect
intent by any of the members to vote for or against these
individuals during any further sessions for the purposes of
confirmation.
HB 5-SEXUAL ASSAULT; DEF. OF "CONSENT"
1:38:00 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that the final order of business would be
SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 5, "An Act relating to
sexual abuse of a minor; relating to sexual assault; relating to
the code of military justice; relating to consent; relating to
the testing of sexual assault examination kits; and providing
for an effective date." [Before the committee was CSSSHB
5(STA).]
1:38:13 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN opened public testimony on HB 5.
1:38:55 PM
KATIE BOTZ, representing self, testified in support of HB 5.
She thanked the sponsors but expressed frustration with the way
the committee has been handling HB 5. She stated that she is a
survivor of sexual assault, and in the past two years she has
advocated for the passage of the proposed legislation. She
said, "One or more members of this committee has continued to
ignore me. One or more members of this committee has continued
to silence me." She voiced the opinion that some of the
committee members do not care about victims of abuse.
Referencing her own experience, she stated that she wants a
better outcome for other [victims] in the state. She requested
that an amendment deadline be set for April 18, 2022, so the
bill can be passed out of committee. She said that actions
speak louder than words, and HB 5 is a step in the right
direction for keeping victims safe.
1:41:55 PM
CASS POOK, representing self, testified in support of HB 5. She
shared that she is pursuing a degree in social work and
currently is in an internship at [Sitkans Against Family
Violence]. She urged the committee to move HB 5 as soon as
possible. In reference to childhood trauma, she brought to the
attention of the committee the Adverse Childhood Experiences
Study and the National Child Traumatic Stress Network.
1:43:12 PM
MICHAEL PATTERSON, representing self, testified in support of HB
5. He stated that the rampant occurrence of sexual assault is
"such a detriment to the state, that I don't understand why it
is taking so long to move HB 5 out of this committee." He
expressed the opinion that the proposed legislation is not being
moved out of committee because of personal reasons, not
necessarily legislative ones. He suggested that the [proposed
legislation] would not solve the problem, but it would be a step
in the right direction. He said the bill has been in the
[legislative] process "for years." He expressed confusion about
why the definition of consent has not been modernized. He
questioned how it could be said that "we live in a healthy,
functional society in Alaska." He suggested that there is a
loophole in the law which allows attackers to not be convicted.
1:46:01 PM
JANICE PARK, representing self, testified in support of HB 5 and
its passage out of committee. She shared her and her
granddaughter's experience with sexual assault.
1:49:02 PM
JESSICA STOSSEL, Interim Executive Director, Center for
Nonviolent Living, testified in support of moving HB 5 out of
committee as soon as possible. She stated the bill is a step in
the right direction for all Alaskans and victims of sexual
assault. She stated that she has worked with victims for the
last 23 years.
1:50:32 PM
JENNIFER BROWN, representing self, shared that she identifies as
a survivor of sexual assault and works for Standing Together
Against Rape (STAR). From her personal and professional
experience, she expressed the opinion that justice for victims
of sexual assault is rare because it is too difficult to reach
prosecution. She stated that HB 5 is a step in the right
direction.
1:51:54 PM
DEBRA O'GARA, Senior Policy Specialist, Alaska Native Women's
Resource Center, testified in support of HB 5. Addressing
statistics on rape, she stated that 21 percent of women in the
country have reported that they have been a victim of attempted
or committed rape, with most of these occurring before the
victim turns 25 years old. She said that 47 percent of sexual
assaults in Alaska involve Alaska Native women and girls. She
stated that the recorded rapes in Alaska are twice the national
average, but this does not include unreported cases. She
expressed the belief that sexual assault numbers in Alaska are
low because rape kits are not being processed. She acknowledged
that this problem is being resolved. She added that reported
sexual assault numbers are low because there is a distrust of
law enforcement. She said that in some areas of Alaska law
enforcement are known to be aggressive, unhelpful, and
insensitive. She added that investigations are slow, and for
the cases that make it to prosecution, this process is also
slow. She argued that law enforcement and DOL need to
understand how rape affects the victim. Comparing rape to
murder, she said, "It kills a part of the victim." She urged
the members to pass the bill out of committee so it can move
through the system.
1:54:42 PM
JENNIFER MITCHELL, representing self, testified in support of HB
5. She shared that she worked for seven years as a victim
advocate at STAR. She said part of her job included being
present for physical exams and helping victims through the
criminal justice system. She said, "I've been through more
sexual assault reports than I can count." From her experience,
she estimated that most of the cases turned down for prosecution
would be prosecuted under the proposed legislation. She
expressed the opinion that Alaska has a major problem with
sexual assault, and holding people accountable would be a
positive step forward. She shared that she worked with victims
of sexual assault by fraud, whose cases were not prosecuted.
She concluded by urging the committee to pass the bill.
1:56:30 PM
BRENDA STANFILL, Executive Director, Alaska Network on Domestic
Violence and Sexual Assault, testified in support of passing HB
5 out of committee. She stated that HB 5 addresses four
problematic areas in the current sexual assault laws and
processes. First, she stated that the law requires the use of
force. She said this does not reflect current social norms, as
youth today are being educated about consent, permission, and
pressure. She said that, rather than the requirement of marks
on a victim's body to prove lack of consent, the proposed
legislation would require the accused to prove consent. The
second problem with the current legislation is it does not
criminalize adults engaging with 16- and 17-year-old
individuals, which is the age targeted for sex work grooming.
As the next point, she stated that rape by fraud is not
recognized. For the final point she addressed the time allowed
to process rape kits. She stated that an important part of the
proposed legislation would be the reduction of time allowed for
crime labs to process rape kits. She stated that DPS has
related this is an achievable goal. She argued that speeding up
the forensic testing would move rapist off the streets quicker.
She recognized that the four changes to the sexual assault laws
would not "fix" the current system, but changes are needed. She
also referenced the lack of prosecutions, the need for more
public safety officers, and the extensive time delays for
trials. She said, in general, there is not enough prevention.
1:59:25 PM
LAUREE MORTON, representing self, testified in support of HB 5.
She shared that she has lived through sexual assault. She
discussed the historic origin of the word "rape," referencing
that in the past women had been viewed as property. She stated
that in the early- to mid-20th century the narrative had been
that only a stranger would commit rape, and if women stayed
home, they were safe. She continued that, as attitudes changed,
it was seen that girls deserved [to be raped] if they were in
the wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong dress or
attitude. As society has progressed, she said, people are now
more aware that rapists can be friends or family members;
however, victims are still required to not just say "no," but to
say, "hell no." She explained, if there is not enough evidence
of force, the victim did not fight hard enough, and the crime is
not prosecutable. She said, "We should be uncomfortable with
that." She argued that the [proposed legislation] is not meant
to make prosecution easier; "it is meant to make it right." She
insisted that it is time [the definition of consent be updated.]
She requested that the legislation be moved out of committee.
2:02:06 PM
PHILLIP MOSER, representing self, testified in support of HB 5;
however, he expressed the belief that there should be a stronger
definition of consent. He urged that HB 5 be moved from
committee.
2:03:41 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN, after ascertaining that there was no one else who
wished to testify, closed public testimony on HB 5.
[HB 5 was held over.]
2:04:57 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Judiciary Standing Committee meeting was adjourned at 2:05 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Alaska Police Standards Council Appointment - Jeff Brown Resume 4.15.2022.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM |
|
| Alaska Police Standards Council Appointment - Jeff Brown APSC Interest Letter 4.15.2022.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM |
|
| Alaska Police Standards Council Appointment - Michael Craig Application 4.15.2022.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM |
|
| Alaska Police Standards Council Appointment - David Knapp Application 4.15.2022.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM |
|
| Alaska Police Standards Council Appointment - David Ross Application 4.15.2022.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM |
|
| Alaska Police Standards Council Appointment - David Ross Resume 4.15.2022.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB 5 v. W 5.6.2021.PDF |
HJUD 3/4/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/9/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/30/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 5 |
| HB 5 Sponsor Statement 2.23.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/4/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/9/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/30/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM HSTA 3/27/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 5 |
| HB 5 Sectional Analysis v. W 5.6.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/4/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/9/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/30/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 5 |
| HB 5 Explanation of Changes v. G to v. W 5.5.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/4/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/9/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/30/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 5 |
| HB 5 Supporting Document - Articles, Age and Offender Table for SAM 1 and SAM 2, and Consent Tabular Analysis 2.4.2022.pdf |
HJUD 3/4/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/9/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/30/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 5 |
| HB 5 Supporting Document - Letters Received as of 4.14.2022.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 5 |
| HB 5 Supporting Document - Testimony Received as of 4.14.2022.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 5 |
| HB 5 Opposing Document - Letters Received as of 4.26.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/4/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/9/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/30/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 5 |
| HB 5 Fiscal Note DOA-OPA 2.25.2022.pdf |
HJUD 3/4/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/9/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/30/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 5 |
| HB 5 Fiscal Note DOA-PDA 2.25.2022.pdf |
HJUD 3/4/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/9/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/30/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 5 |
| HB 5 Fiscal Note DOC-IDO 2.26.2022.pdf |
HJUD 3/4/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/9/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/30/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 5 |
| HB 5 Fiscal Note LAW-CRIM 2.25.2022.pdf |
HJUD 3/4/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/9/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/30/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 5 |
| HB 5 Fiscal Note JUD-ACS 3.2.2022.pdf |
HJUD 3/4/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/9/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/30/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/15/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 5 |