Legislature(2021 - 2022)GRUENBERG 120
05/17/2021 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB122 | |
| SB65 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 122 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 65 | TELECONFERENCED | |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE JUDICIARY STANDING COMMITTEE
May 17, 2021
1:36 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Matt Claman, Chair
Representative Liz Snyder, Vice Chair
Representative Harriet Drummond
Representative Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins
Representative David Eastman
Representative Christopher Kurka
Representative Sarah Vance
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
SENATE BILL NO. 122
"An Act relating to the definition of 'victim.'"
- MOVED HCS SB 122(JUD) OUT OF COMMITTEE
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 65(JUD)
"An Act relating to immunity for consulting physicians,
podiatrists, osteopaths, advanced practice registered nurses,
physician assistants, chiropractors, dentists, optometrists, and
pharmacists."
- MOVED HCS CSSB 65(JUD) OUT OF COMMITTEE
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: SB 122
SHORT TITLE: VICTIM DEFINITION
SPONSOR(s): SENATOR(s) REINBOLD
04/07/21 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
04/07/21 (S) JUD
04/14/21 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
04/14/21 (S) Heard & Held
04/14/21 (S) MINUTE(JUD)
04/19/21 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
04/19/21 (S) Scheduled but Not Heard
04/21/21 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
04/21/21 (S) Heard & Held
04/21/21 (S) MINUTE(JUD)
04/23/21 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
04/23/21 (S) <Bill Hearing Canceled>
04/26/21 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
04/26/21 (S) Moved SB 122 Out of Committee
04/26/21 (S) MINUTE(JUD)
04/28/21 (S) JUD RPT 5DP
04/28/21 (S) DP: HOLLAND, MYERS, HUGHES, SHOWER,
KIEHL
05/05/21 (S) TRANSMITTED TO (H)
05/05/21 (S) VERSION: SB 122
05/06/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
05/06/21 (H) JUD
05/10/21 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
05/10/21 (H) -- MEETING CANCELED --
05/12/21 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
05/12/21 (H) Heard & Held
05/12/21 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
05/14/21 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
05/14/21 (H) Heard & Held
05/14/21 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
05/15/21 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
05/15/21 (H) -- MEETING CANCELED --
05/17/21 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
BILL: SB 65
SHORT TITLE: LIABILITY CONSULTING HEALTH CARE PROVIDER
SPONSOR(s): SENATOR(s) KIEHL
02/03/21 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/03/21 (S) HSS, JUD
02/16/21 (S) HSS AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
02/16/21 (S) Heard & Held
02/16/21 (S) MINUTE(HSS)
02/18/21 (S) HSS AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
02/18/21 (S) Moved CSSB 65(HSS) Out of Committee
02/18/21 (S) MINUTE(HSS)
02/19/21 (S) HSS RPT CS 3DP 1NR NEW TITLE
02/19/21 (S) DP: WILSON, BEGICH, HUGHES
02/19/21 (S) NR: REINBOLD
03/05/21 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/05/21 (S) -- MEETING CANCELED --
03/08/21 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/08/21 (S) Heard & Held
03/08/21 (S) MINUTE(JUD)
03/12/21 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/12/21 (S) Heard & Held
03/12/21 (S) MINUTE(JUD)
03/31/21 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/31/21 (S) Moved CSSB 65(JUD) Out of Committee
03/31/21 (S) MINUTE(JUD)
04/03/21 (S) JUD RPT CS 3DP 2NR NEW TITLE
04/03/21 (S) DP: KIEHL, HUGHES, MYERS
04/03/21 (S) NR: REINBOLD, SHOWER
04/12/21 (S) TRANSMITTED TO (H)
04/12/21 (S) VERSION: CSSB 65(JUD)
04/14/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
04/14/21 (H) HSS, JUD
04/27/21 (H) HSS AT 3:00 PM DAVIS 106
04/27/21 (H) Heard & Held
04/27/21 (H) MINUTE(HSS)
04/29/21 (H) HSS AT 3:00 PM DAVIS 106
04/29/21 (H) -- MEETING CANCELED --
05/04/21 (H) HSS AT 3:00 PM DAVIS 106
05/04/21 (H) Moved HCS CSSB 65(HSS) Out of Committee
05/04/21 (H) MINUTE(HSS)
05/05/21 (H) HSS RPT HCS(HSS) NEW TITLE 4DP 2NR
05/05/21 (H) DP: MCCARTY, SPOHNHOLZ, SNYDER,
ZULKOSKY
05/05/21 (H) NR: PRAX, KURKA
05/05/21 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
05/05/21 (H) Heard & Held
05/05/21 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
05/17/21 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
WITNESS REGISTER
TAYLOR WINSTON, Director
Office of Victims' Rights
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the hearing on SB 122.
SENATOR JESSE KIEHL
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: As prime sponsor, presented SB 65.
ACTION NARRATIVE
1:36:47 PM
CHAIR MATT CLAMAN called the House Judiciary Standing Committee
meeting to order at 1:36 p.m. Representatives Kurka, Vance,
Drummond, Snyder, Kreiss-Tompkins, and Claman were present at
the call to order. Representative Eastman arrived as the
meeting was in progress.
SB 122-VICTIM DEFINITION
1:37:29 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that the first order of business would be
SENATE BILL NO. 122, "An Act relating to the definition of
'victim.'"
CHAIR CLAMAN stated that Legislative Legal & Research services
was authorized to make any technical or conforming changes to
the bill.
1:38:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA moved Amendment 2 labeled 32-LS0422\B.2,
Dunmire, 5/15/21, which read:
Page 1, line 5, following "perpetrated;":
Insert "or"
Page 1, line 7:
Delete "or"
Insert "[OR]"
Following "incapacitated":
Insert ", or dead"
Page 1, line 9:
Delete "; or"
Insert "or who was living in a spousal relationship
with the person specified in (A) of this paragraph
when the person died; [OR]"
Page 1, line 10:
Delete "adult"
Insert "[ADULT]"
Following "child":
Insert ", brother, sister, grandparent, grandchild"
Page 1, line 11, following "person;":
Insert "or
(iii) any other interested person, as may be
designated by a person having authority in law to do
so"
Page 1, line 12, through page 2, line 4:
Delete all material and insert:
"[(C) ONE OF THE FOLLOWING, NOT THE PERPETRATOR, IF
THE PERSON SPECIFIED IN (A) OF THIS PARAGRAPH IS DEAD:
(i) A PERSON LIVING IN A SPOUSAL RELATIONSHIP WITH
THE DECEASED BEFORE THE DECEASED DIED;
(ii) AN ADULT CHILD, PARENT, BROTHER, SISTER,
GRANDPARENT, OR GRANDCHILD OF THE DECEASED; OR
(iii) ANY OTHER INTERESTED PERSON, AS MAY BE
DESIGNATED BY A PERSON HAVING AUTHORITY IN LAW TO DO
SO]."
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER objected.
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA explained that the intent of Amendment 2
would be to consolidate the definitions of victims listed in the
proposed bill.
CHAIR CLAMAN referred to a message from the General Counsel of
the Alaska Court System which conveyed that, under 12.45.015,
introduction of the victim and criminal defendant to the jury,
and that, under subsection (a), during jury selection and part
of an opening statement at trial, a trial attorney may introduce
the victim and defendant to the jury, and it had expressed
concern that Amendment 2 could subject very young victims to a
jury in the midst of a criminal trial.
1:40:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER asked whether a youth may or may not be
called to trial under currently law.
CHAIR CLAMAN answered that this Amendment 2 would not pertain to
testimony at a trial but to the introduction of a victim during
a jury trial.
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER suggested that there had been disagreement
of whether it would be appropriate to allow introduction of
minor victims during trial.
CHAIR CLAMAN allowed that there exists a very different
perspective between matters concerning a victim at age 15 and a
victim at age 3.
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER asked whether the proposed amendment would
compel a minor to testify at trial.
CHAIR CLAMAN answered that the statute contained the word "may"
and that a larger concern would be a hypothetical situation in
which the picture of a baby who may have been impacted [by an
alleged crime] was presented during jury selection and could be
prejudicial to the trial process.
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA characterized the concerns brought forth by
the court system were valid and suggested that the same concern
would exist with the underlying bill. He noted that brothers
and sisters who may or may not be adults should be included as
victims.
CHAIR CLAMAN stated that he would not speak on behalf of the
General Counsel for the Alaska Court System but speculated that,
if she were present to offer testimony, might suggest that the
question of Amendment 2 would be one of a policy decision by the
legislature.
1:44:44 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 1:44 p.m. to 1:45 p.m.
1:46:03 PM
TAYLOR WINSTON, Director, Office of Victims' Rights, stated that
the existing definition of victim consists of three separate
sets of victims and the court system had pointed out potential
difficulties in merging them. She stated that additional issues
that may have not been vetted and contemplated may exist should
the three sets be combined.
CHAIR CLAMAN asked whether the Office of Victims' Rights
supported the proposed amendment, which Ms. Winston answered
that it did not support the proposed amendment.
1:48:21 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked whether there existed a benefit to
allowing adult siblings to qualify as victims.
MS. WINSTON answered that it was her belief that it would
diminish existing rights and explained that in a homicide, all
family members are affected and that an individual's minor
status should not preclude him/her from victim status.
1:49:18 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER asked whether the Office of Victims'
Rights did not support the proposed amendment solely because it
had not been fully vetted by the organization or based on its
merits.
MS. WINSTON allowed that ample time to review the potential
impacts of the proposed amendment but stated that, in her
professional experience, no issues had arisen due to the three
separate groups of victims and suggested that ongoing
discussions or examination of other areas of law may still be
appropriate.
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA asked the reason for a qualifying
difference between victims defined in subsections (b) and in (c)
and suggested that minor children should be included as victims
in subsection (c).
MS. WINSTON answered that the original intent of SB 122 differed
from that which was trying to be gained through amendments. She
stated that all victims are defined in subsection (a) and that
victims identified under (b)(i) and (b)(ii) could have victims
rights expanded to include minors due to an exception that may
be made due to an individual's minor status or incapacity, and
the bill would allow an adult individual to advocate on the
minor's behalf. She allowed that other areas of law may exist
that the change to definition could exist to achieve the stated
goals of the amendment, she stated her belief that there could
be unintended consequences should the amendment be adopted and
HB 122 pass.
1:56:35 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA stated that he considered the amendment
reasonable and potential scenarios existed where adult and minor
children should be defined as victims.
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER maintained her objection to the motion to
adopt Amendment 2.
1:57:58 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Kurka, Snyder,
Kreiss-Tomkins, and Eastman voted in favor of Amendment 2 to SB
122. Representatives Vance, Drummond, and Claman voted against
it. Therefore, Amendment 2 was adopted by a vote of 4-3. SB
122, as amended, was before the committee.
1:59:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN expressed his appreciation to the bill
sponsor to examine the existing statute to include additional
victims.
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA expressed his support for SB 122.
2:01:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER moved to report SB 122, as amended, out of
committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying
fiscal notes. There being no objection, HCS SB 122(JUD) was
reported out of the House Judiciary Standing Committee.
2:02:10 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN recessed the House Judiciary Standing Committee
meeting to a call of the chair.
6:17:06 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN called the House Judiciary Standing Committee
meeting back to order at 6:17 p.m. Representatives Eastman,
Drummond, Snyder, and Claman were present at the call back to
order. Representatives Kreiss-Tomkins and Kurka arrived as the
meeting was in progress.
SB 65-LIABILITY CONSULTING HEALTH CARE PROVIDER
6:17:18 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that the final order of business would be
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 65(JUD), "An Act relating to immunity for
consulting physicians, podiatrists, osteopaths, advanced
practice registered nurses, physician assistants, chiropractors,
dentists, optometrists, and pharmacists." [Before the committee
was HCS CSSB 65(HSS).]
CHAIR CLAMAN referred to Mason's Manual section 1.2 that
emphasizes orderly and businesslike consideration of questions
before the body to eliminate confusion and waste of time and
effort.
CHAIR CLAMAN stated that the bill had been introduced to address
potential ambiguity in Alaska medical malpractice law as it
pertains to "curbside consults" where a medical professional may
consult with another medical professional who has no
doctor/patient relationship with the patient receiving
treatment. He referred to the State of Minnesota court case
Warren v. Dinter had raised the question whether a
doctor/patient relationship must exist for liability to be
established in a medical malpractice claim. He referred to
three Alaska Supreme Court Cases, M.A v the United States
(1998), Smith v. Radecke (2010), and Cornelison v. TIG Insurance
(2016) may have left ambiguity whether the doctor/patient
relationship must exist in a malpractice claim, SB 65 seeks to
remedy that ambiguity. He stated that multiple amendments may
have detracted from the bill sponsor's intent of the bill. He
stated that adding the physician/patient requirement to the
medical malpractice statute, AS 09.55.540, would remove
ambiguity that may exist in court opinions and in statute and
uses fewer words. He suggested it would result in fewer
lawsuits and less confusion among providers and patients.
6:21:13 PM
SENATOR JESSE KIEHL, Alaska State Legislature, stated that the
fundamental purpose of SB 65 was elegantly restated via the
proposed committee substitute before the committee, despite
being a significantly different approach than the initial draft
of SB 65. He added that the committee substitute would remove
the question of whether a medical professional may be held
liable for medical malpractice outside of a doctor/patient
relationship and it would maintain focus on medical malpractice
liability. He stated his appreciation for the committee
substitute's limitation to parties to a malpractice lawsuit and
would not permit non-party participation. He expressed his
support for the adoption of the committee substitute.
6:24:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER moved to adopt the committee substitute
labeled 32-LS0002\R, Fisher, 5/17/21. There being no objection,
the work draft was adopted.
6:26:07 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS expressed his appreciation of the
elegance and precision arrived at in cooperation with the bill's
sponsor within the committee substitute.
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER stated that she had observed the
deliberation of SB 65 that had taken place in the House Health
and Social Services Standing Committee and lauded the solution
put forth in the committee substitute, which she also
characterized as elegant.
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA lauded the brevity of the committee
substitute and asked what prompted eliminating the consideration
of "duty of care" that had been addressed in the underlying
bill.
CHAIR CLAMAN reiterated the opening comments that he had offered
during the introduction of the committee substitute.
CHAIR CLAMAN shared that the committee substitute reflected the
clarity that was required to address concerns brought by members
of the medical profession that they could be sued by an
individual who is not his/her patient.
6:30:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER moved to report CS for HCS CSSB 65(HSS),
Version ..., out of committee with individual recommendations
and the accompanying fiscal notes. There being no objection,
HCS CSSB 65(JUD) was reported out of the House Judiciary
Standing Committee.
6:31:36 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Judiciary Standing Committee meeting was adjourned at 6:32 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 122 v. B 4.7.2021.PDF |
HJUD 5/10/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/12/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 122 |
| SB 122 Sponsor Statement v. B.pdf |
HJUD 5/10/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/12/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM SJUD 4/21/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 122 |
| SB 122 Sectional Analysis v. B.pdf |
HJUD 5/10/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/12/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM SJUD 4/21/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 122 |
| SB 122 v. B Amendment #2 HJUD 5.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 122 |
| SB 122 Fiscal Note LAW-CRIM 4.9.2021.pdf |
HJUD 5/10/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/12/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 122 |
| SB 65 Work Draft Committee Substitute v. R 5.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Sponsor Statement 2.4.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 5/4/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 5/5/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM SHSS 2/16/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Supporting Document - Letters Received by 5.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Amend Letters and Testimony Received by 5.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Additional Document - AMA Article When Is a Patient-Physician Relationship Established (Distributed by HJUD Committee).pdf |
HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Fiscal Note LAW-CIV 2.12.2021.pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Amendments HJUD (No Action Taken).pdf |
HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 122 v. B Amendment #2 HJUD Final Vote 5.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 122 |