Legislature(2019 - 2020)DAVIS 106

03/17/2020 03:00 PM House HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

Audio Topic
03:22:26 PM Start
03:22:57 PM Confirmation Hearing(s): State Medical Board
03:48:20 PM HB267
04:21:11 PM HB255
05:18:52 PM Adjourn
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
-- Delayed to 3:15 pm --
+ Consideration of Governor's Appointees: TELECONFERENCED
State Medical Board - Christopher Gay,
Sarah Bigelow Hood
-- Public Testimony --
Heard & Held
-- Testimony <Invitation Only> --
Heard & Held
-- Testimony <Invitation Only> --
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
                    ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE                                                                                  
      HOUSE HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES STANDING COMMITTEE                                                                     
                         March 17, 2020                                                                                         
                           3:22 p.m.                                                                                            
MEMBERS PRESENT                                                                                                               
Representative Tiffany Zulkosky, Chair                                                                                          
Representative Ivy Spohnholz, Vice Chair                                                                                        
Representative Matt Claman                                                                                                      
Representative Harriet Drummond                                                                                                 
Representative Geran Tarr                                                                                                       
Representative Sharon Jackson (via teleconference)                                                                              
MEMBERS ABSENT                                                                                                                
Representative Lance Pruitt                                                                                                     
COMMITTEE CALENDAR                                                                                                            
CONFIRMATION HEARING(S):                                                                                                        
State Medical Board                                                                                                           
     Christopher Gay - Anchorage                                                                                                
     Sarah Bigelow Hood - Anchorage                                                                                             
     David Boswell - Fairbanks                                                                                                  
     - CONFIRMATION(S) ADVANCED                                                                                                 
HOUSE BILL NO. 267                                                                                                              
"An Act relating to short-term health care insurance; and                                                                       
providing for an effective date."                                                                                               
     - HEARD & HELD                                                                                                             
HOUSE BILL NO. 255                                                                                                              
"An Act relating to a waiver of work requirements or time limits                                                                
in the food stamp program; and providing for an effective date."                                                                
     - HEARD & HELD                                                                                                             
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION                                                                                                     
BILL: HB 267                                                                                                                  
SHORT TITLE: SHORT-TERM HEALTH CARE INSURANCE                                                                                   
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) ZULKOSKY                                                                                          
02/21/20       (H)       READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS                                                                        
02/21/20       (H)       HSS, L&C                                                                                               
03/17/20       (H)       HSS AT 3:00 PM DAVIS 106                                                                               
BILL: HB 255                                                                                                                  
SHORT TITLE: FOOD STAMPS; WORK REQS; TIME LIMITS                                                                                
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) JOSEPHSON                                                                                         
02/19/20       (H)       READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS                                                                        
02/19/20       (H)       HSS                                                                                                    
03/17/20       (H)       HSS AT 3:00 PM DAVIS 106                                                                               
WITNESS REGISTER                                                                                                              
CHRISTOPHER GAY, M.D., Appointee                                                                                                
State Medical Board                                                                                                             
Anchorage, Alaska                                                                                                               
POSITION STATEMENT:  Testified as appointee to the State Medical                                                              
SARAH BIGELOW HOOD, Appointee                                                                                                   
State Medical Board                                                                                                             
Anchorage, Alaska                                                                                                               
POSITION STATEMENT:  Testified as appointee to the State Medical                                                              
JULIA BUSCHMANN, Staff                                                                                                          
Representative Tiffany Zulkosky                                                                                                 
Alaska State Legislature                                                                                                        
Juneau, Alaska                                                                                                                  
POSITION STATEMENT:  Presented the committee substitute (CS) for                                                              
HB 267, Version S, on behalf of Representative Zulkosky, prime                                                                  
sponsor, with the use of a PowerPoint presentation.                                                                             
SARAH LUECK, Policy Analyst                                                                                                     
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities                                                                                          
Washington, D.C.                                                                                                                
POSITION STATEMENT:  Testified and answered questions during the                                                              
hearing on HB 267.                                                                                                              
LORI WING-HEIER, Director                                                                                                       
Anchorage Office                                                                                                                
Division of Insurance                                                                                                           
Department  of  Commerce,   Community  and  Economic  Development                                                               
Anchorage, Alaska                                                                                                               
POSITION  STATEMENT:   Answered  questions during  hearing on  HB
ELISE SORUM-BIRK, Staff                                                                                                         
Representative Andy Josephson                                                                                                   
Alaska State Legislature                                                                                                        
Juneau, Alaska                                                                                                                  
POSITION   STATEMENT:      Presented   HB  255   on   behalf   of                                                             
Representative  Josephson,  prime  sponsor,  with the  use  of  a                                                               
PowerPoint presentation.                                                                                                        
SHAWNDA O'BRIEN, Director                                                                                                       
Division of Public Assistance (DPA)                                                                                             
Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS)                                                                                 
Juneau, Alaska                                                                                                                  
POSITION STATEMENT:  Answered questions  during the hearing on HB
REPRESENTATIVE ANDY JOSEPHSON                                                                                                   
Alaska State Legislature                                                                                                        
Juneau, Alaska                                                                                                                  
POSITION STATEMENT:  Provided  information and answered questions                                                             
during the hearing on HB 255, as prime sponsor.                                                                                 
CARA DURR, Director of Public Engagement                                                                                        
Food Bank of Alaska                                                                                                             
Anchorage, Alaska                                                                                                               
POSITION STATEMENT:  Testified during hearing on HB 255.                                                                      
ED BOLEN, Senior Policy Analyst                                                                                                 
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities                                                                                          
Washington, D.C.                                                                                                                
POSITION  STATEMENT:   Testified  and  answered questions  during                                                             
hearing on HB 255.                                                                                                              
ACTION NARRATIVE                                                                                                              
3:22:26 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  TIFFANY  ZULKOSKY  called  the  House  Health  and  Social                                                             
Services  Standing  Committee  meeting  to  order  at  3:22  p.m.                                                               
Representatives  Zulkosky,  Spohnholz,  Tarr, and  Drummond  were                                                               
present at the call to  order.  Representative Claman arrived and                                                               
Representative  Jackson   joined  (via  teleconference)   as  the                                                               
meeting was in progress.                                                                                                        
^CONFIRMATION HEARING(S): State Medical Board                                                                                 
          CONFIRMATION HEARING(S): State Medical Board                                                                      
3:22:57 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR ZULKOSKY announced  that the first order  of business would                                                               
be  confirmation hearings  for appointment  to the  State Medical                                                               
3:23:31 PM                                                                                                                    
CHRISTOPHER GAY,  M.D., Appointee,  State Medical  Board, relayed                                                               
that  he founded  the Alaska  Center  for Pain  Relief; with  its                                                               
primary focus to help patients  manage pain and minimize reliance                                                               
on opioids.   He maintained his interest in serving  on the State                                                               
Medical Board was to be  involved in drafting regulations related                                                               
to opioid  education for providers who  were prescribing opioids,                                                               
to assist  in drafting  regulations for  prescription monitoring,                                                               
and to review  cases regarding opioid prescriptions.   He offered                                                               
his interest  stemmed from  wanting to  ensure the  providers who                                                               
treated his  family were the  best and would  not be a  danger to                                                               
society.   He expressed his  belief he  would bring a  useful and                                                               
unique  prospective  to  the  board   given  his  background  and                                                               
specialty in  interventional pain  management; many of  the cases                                                               
that  came   up  regarding  licensing  were   related  to  opioid                                                               
management; and the  regulations for licensing in  the state were                                                               
also related to opioid management.    He has practiced in several                                                               
other states and, therefore, brought diversity to the board.                                                                    
3:25:29 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  SPOHNHOLZ asked  why  he moved  from Virginia  to                                                               
DR. GAY shared one  of his mentors had moved to  Alaska.  He said                                                               
he worked for  one of the largest pain practices  in the country;                                                               
the larger  it got the  less control he  had over his  ability to                                                               
practice  the way  he  wanted.   He stated  he  was attracted  to                                                               
Alaska due  to the change of  pace, the people, and  the practice                                                               
3:26:43 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  SPOHNHOLZ asked  about his  interest in  managing                                                               
pain  and  minimizing the  use  of  opioids.    She asked  for  a                                                               
description of the evidence-based strategies  he used to help his                                                               
patients manage pain  and how use of the  strategies would inform                                                               
his work on the State Medical Board.                                                                                            
DR. GAY replied "balance" was the  key to the management of pain;                                                               
no one treatment could effectively  treat pain, but a combination                                                               
of treatments.   He  mentioned working  with other  specialties -                                                               
physical  therapy,   chiropractic  treatment,   acupuncture,  and                                                               
biofeedback.   He said  what he  added to  the equation  were his                                                               
interventions in  trying to address the  underlying issue causing                                                               
the  pain  or limiting  mobility  and  function.   He  maintained                                                               
relying  too heavily  on one  modality -  specifically opioids  -                                                               
often caused  the most  issues; when  opioids were  combined with                                                               
the other modalities, patients' use  of opioids may be reduced or                                                               
eliminated.  Some  patients were motivated not to  be on opioids,                                                               
and some may never have relied on  opioids.  His goal was to keep                                                               
them  off opioids  and keep  them  functional without  them.   He                                                               
stated his  goal [for  serving on  the board]  was to  ensure the                                                               
state's  guidelines  were  not   too  onerous;  the  prescription                                                               
monitoring program  was reviewed by patients  and physicians; and                                                               
information   was  used   to   make   informed  decisions   about                                                               
appropriate therapies.                                                                                                          
3:28:48 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR ZULKOSKY  stated the  State Medical  Board had  a statewide                                                               
reach  and by  statute, as  many geographical  areas as  possible                                                               
were  represented on  the board  with  diversity in  backgrounds.                                                               
She  asked  about  his familiarity  with  rural  communities  off                                                               
Alaska's  road system  and the  health care  organizations within                                                               
those communities.                                                                                                              
DR. GAY recognized  that rural communities had  many challenges -                                                               
one being access  to care.  He said  unfortunately that challenge                                                               
caused some  physicians to  rely heavily  on one  modality versus                                                               
another.   He  stated  his practice  had  investigated and  tried                                                               
telehealth.    He maintained  it  was  more challenging  for  the                                                               
providers  in the  community when  the specialties  were lacking.                                                               
He offered  the state had  led the  way in telehealth  going back                                                               
ten years;  trained providers in  the community worked  under the                                                               
supervision of  remote providers  to deliver  care.   He asserted                                                               
the  State  Medical  Board's  role was  to  ensure  statutes  and                                                               
guidelines included the situation in rural communities.                                                                         
CHAIR  ZULKOSKY   relayed  most   of  the  hub   communities  had                                                               
sophisticated tribal health  facilities providing a comprehensive                                                               
scope of  health services.   She asked what his  relationship was                                                               
with providers serving in the hub community hospital settings.                                                                  
DR. GAY  answered he had  not had  any connections with  them; he                                                               
would like to  explore doing so; he suggested  the possibility of                                                               
informing providers  about the services  that could  be available                                                               
to rural residents.                                                                                                             
3:32:04 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  ZULKOSKY relayed  the committee  had heard  testimony from                                                               
young leaders - in Anchorage,  Juneau, and Fairbanks - in support                                                               
of  making medically  accurate  age-appropriate sexual  education                                                               
accessible to Alaska students.   She asked for his prospective as                                                               
a  provider  on  making  such  information  available  to  Alaska                                                               
DR. GAY answered, "It would of  course depend on a certain number                                                               
of  things."    He  posed  the questions:    Who  is  making  the                                                               
guidelines?   What  is age-appropriate?   What  is being  taught?                                                               
Are   religious  preferences   and  cultural   sensitivity  being                                                               
followed?  He  said that the answer  was not an easy  one, but in                                                               
select situations  in which all  these issues are  considered, he                                                               
would be potentially supportive.                                                                                                
CHAIR ZULKOSKY  asked Dr. Gay to  define ethical, unprofessional,                                                               
or dishonorable conduct of medical  providers, particularly as it                                                               
related to women's or reproductive health.                                                                                      
DR.  GAY replied  the first  definition would  be to  respect the                                                               
wishes  of  the women.    He  offered Alaska  limited  government                                                               
interference  into daily  life  activities; therefore,  regarding                                                               
reproductive  health,  it would  be  an  individual decision  for                                                               
women to determine what happened to  their bodies.  He said there                                                               
were many experts  on the subject, and if the  board had to craft                                                               
regulations on  the issue,  he would want  to hear  opinions from                                                               
all sides and perspectives.                                                                                                     
3:34:43 PM                                                                                                                    
SARAH BIGELOW HOOD, Appointee, State  Medical Board, relayed that                                                               
she  was  born  and  raised  in  Juneau,  was  married  with  two                                                               
children, and  currently worked in  family medicine.   She stated                                                               
she applied  to be on the  State Medical Board so  she could work                                                               
with other providers to ensure  Alaska residents were being cared                                                               
for by  competent providers.   She reviewed her  professional and                                                               
volunteer  experience:   10  years  with  the Alaska  Academy  of                                                               
Physician   Assistants   (AKAPA);   10  years   as   the   Alaska                                                               
representative to  the American  Academy of  Physician Assistants                                                               
(AAPA);  and  17 years'  practice  in  family medicine  and  pain                                                               
management.   She stated with  her history in the  medical field,                                                               
she had a  strong understanding of the collaborative  role of the                                                               
physician assistant  (PA) in the  medical field.  She  said prior                                                               
to  entering the  medical  field,  she worked  for  the State  of                                                               
Alaska  for  about   12  years  in  human   resources  and  labor                                                               
relations.     During   that  time,   she   developed  a   strong                                                               
understanding of  investigations and  reviewing facts  leading to                                                               
accurate and  fair conclusions.   She  offered her  combined work                                                               
history would be an asset to the State Medical Board.                                                                           
3:36:23 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ asked  Ms. Hood why she  wanted to serve                                                               
on the State Medical Board.                                                                                                     
MS. HOOD shared she had followed  board activity over the past 10                                                               
years  and  felt there  was  a  lack of  communication  regarding                                                               
issues  seen in  the  medical  community and  how  to prevent  or                                                               
correct certain  practices.  She  maintained with  her experience                                                               
and  background she  could bridge  the  gap and  ensure that  PAs                                                               
served in a  capacity that was best-fitting  and most appropriate                                                               
for the medical community.                                                                                                      
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ asked for more  detail on the issues and                                                               
communication gaps that the appointee wished to address.                                                                        
MS. HOOD offered  one issue was the  Prescription Drug Monitoring                                                               
Program (PDMP) database; she was  supportive of the database; she                                                               
believed use of  the database by providers should  be required to                                                               
ensure  prescribing was  done appropriately.    With the  current                                                               
opioid crisis, the database should  be more tightly monitored and                                                               
used to protect patients.                                                                                                       
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ  agreed with that sentiment.   She asked                                                               
for clarification of  Ms. Hood's testimony that there  was a lack                                                               
of communication.                                                                                                               
MS. HOOD answered  in the past ten years, a  PA school was opened                                                               
in  Anchorage;  there were  about  24  graduates annually.    She                                                               
communicated with the  graduates as a preceptor.   She maintained                                                               
when asked, many  students had a lack of understanding  of the PA                                                               
board, the  PA community,  the State Medical  Board, the  role of                                                               
PAs, MDs, and advanced practice  registered nurses (APRNs) in the                                                               
community and their affect on the  public.  She maintained if the                                                               
students  were  educated earlier  in  their  careers, they  would                                                               
carry  an understanding  forward  throughout  their careers  with                                                               
more benefit to patients.                                                                                                       
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ  shared she worked at  the University of                                                               
Alaska  Anchorage (UAA)  College of  Health when  the PA  program                                                               
began  in Alaska.   She  mentioned  it was  well established  and                                                               
successful in graduating PAs.                                                                                                   
3:39:59 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR ZULKOSKY  asked Ms. Hood  about her familiarity  with rural                                                               
communities off Alaska's road system  and the health systems that                                                               
provided services to those communities.                                                                                         
MS. HOOD replied she grew up in  Juneau and had spent 30 years in                                                               
that  community,  which is  off  the  road  system.   She  shared                                                               
experiences  her  family had  with  two  children with  difficult                                                               
medical conditions and limited access  to health care.  Currently                                                               
in Anchorage  she worked with  patients coming from  remote sites                                                               
through the  Disability During Unemployment  (DDU) program  or to                                                               
the pain clinic where she works.   She maintained there were many                                                               
challenges  - not  just regarding  access to  care but  regarding                                                               
access to  knowledge for providers  in remote sites.   She worked                                                               
in journal clubs - both with her job  and on the side - to try to                                                               
disseminate  information on  latest treatments,  medications, and                                                               
informational  websites.   She  said  patients needing  follow-up                                                               
care were limited  due to the expense of travel,  lack of funding                                                               
for travel, and family situations.                                                                                              
CHAIR  ZULKOSKY   asked  what   experience  Ms.  Hood   had  with                                                               
licensures  of applicants,  disciplinary  sanctions, and  license                                                               
renewals as they related to rural health care system providers.                                                                 
MS. HOOD responded she worked  in the [Bartlett Regional Hospital                                                               
(BRH)]  emergency   department  in   Juneau  and  on   the  Kenai                                                               
Peninsula.   She has  coordinated the  annual PA  conference and,                                                               
therefore,  has been  in  contact with  many  PAs throughout  the                                                               
state.  She relayed she has  brought questions from PAs at remote                                                               
sites to  the "state board"  to be addressed.   She said  she was                                                               
also  the   contact  regarding  pain  management;   she  educated                                                               
providers on  the appropriate prescription  of opioids.   She was                                                               
the contact for access to the [Alaska] Academy of PAs as well.                                                                  
CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked Ms. Hood  to define ethical, unprofessional,                                                               
or dishonorable conduct of medical  providers, particularly as it                                                               
related to women's or reproductive health.                                                                                      
MS. HOOD  answered respect  of women's  wishes was  top priority.                                                               
She expressed  that her responsibility  was to abide by  the oath                                                               
[of medical providers]  to do no harm, to inform  patients of all                                                               
options regardless of personal belief, and to ensure safety.                                                                    
3:43:52 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  ZULKOSKY  opened public  testimony  on  the State  Medical                                                               
Board confirmation  hearing.  After  ascertaining that  there was                                                               
no one who wished to testify, she closed public testimony.                                                                      
3:44:16 PM                                                                                                                    
The committee took a brief at-ease.                                                                                             
3:44:41 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR ZULKOSKY moved to advance  the confirmations of Christopher                                                               
Gay, Sarah  Bigelow Hood,  and David  Boswell, appointees  to the                                                               
State Medical Board,  to a joint session of the  House and Senate                                                               
for  consideration.   [The confirmation  hearing for  Mr. Boswell                                                               
was held  during the  House Health  and Social  Services Standing                                                               
Committee meeting of March 12,  2020.]  There being no objection,                                                               
the confirmations were advanced.                                                                                                
CHAIR  ZULKOSKY  moved  to advance  the  confirmations  of  Anita                                                               
Halterman  and  Rhonda Boyles,  appointees  to  the Alaska  State                                                               
Mental  Health Trust  Authority  Board of  Trustees,  to a  joint                                                               
session  of  the  House  and  Senate  for  consideration.    [The                                                               
confirmation hearings for Ms. Halterman  and Ms. Boyles were held                                                               
during the  House Health and  Social Services  Standing Committee                                                               
meeting  of March  12,  2020.]   There  being  no objection,  the                                                               
confirmations were advanced.                                                                                                    
CHAIR  ZULKOSKY reminded  members signing  the reports  regarding                                                               
appointments  to  boards  and commissions  in  no  way  reflected                                                               
individual members'  approval or  disapproval of  the appointees,                                                               
and   the  nominations   were  merely   forwarded  to   the  full                                                               
legislature for confirmation or rejection.                                                                                      
3:45:32 PM                                                                                                                    
The committee took an at-ease from 3:45 p.m. to 3:48 p.m.                                                                       
[Chair Zulkosky passed the gavel to Vice Chair Spohnholz.]                                                                      
            HB 267-SHORT-TERM HEALTH CARE INSURANCE                                                                         
3:48:20 PM                                                                                                                    
VICE CHAIR  SPOHNHOLZ announced that  the next order  of business                                                               
would  be HOUSE  BILL NO.  267,  "An Act  relating to  short-term                                                               
health care insurance; and providing for an effective date."                                                                    
3:48:26 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND  moved to adopt the  committee substitute                                                               
(CS)  for HB  267,  Version 31-LS1521\S,  Marx,  3/10/20, as  the                                                               
working document.                                                                                                               
VICE CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ objected for discussion purposes.                                                                          
3:48:50 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY,  as prime sponsor of  HB 267, introduced                                                               
the CS for HB 267, Version S, as follows:                                                                                       
     This  legislation seeks  to enact  consumer protections                                                                    
     for  Alaskans insured  by  short-term limited  duration                                                                    
     (STLD)  health insurance  plans.   This bill,  from our                                                                    
     perspective, is narrow and seeks  to remedy the lack of                                                                    
     protections  in  Alaska  related to  short-term  health                                                                    
     insurance.   In the  last two  years, many  states have                                                                    
     enacted  similar  protections   for  consumers.    This                                                                    
     legislation seeks to bring  similar standards to Alaska                                                                    
     and ensure  that Alaskans  are no  longer put  at undue                                                                    
     risk for significant financial  hardship posed by these                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY  added that  Version S  reflected changes                                                               
suggested by the Division of  Insurance, [Department of Commerce,                                                               
Community  &   Economic  Development  (DCCED)].     The  proposed                                                               
legislation had  a zero fiscal  note offering the  opportunity to                                                               
protect consumers at no cost to the State of Alaska.                                                                            
3:50:32 PM                                                                                                                    
JULIA BUSCHMANN,  Staff, Representative Tiffany  Zulkosky, Alaska                                                               
State Legislature,  on behalf  of Representative  Zulkosky, prime                                                               
sponsor  of HB  267,  presented  Version S,  with  the  use of  a                                                               
PowerPoint  presentation.    She  began with  slide  2,  entitled                                                               
"Short-Term Limited Duration Health Insurance," which read:                                                                     
     ? Intended to fill a temporary gap in health coverage.                                                                     
          ?  Prior   to  October   2018,  STLD   plans  were                                                                    
          permitted for a maximum of 90 days.                                                                                   
          ?  STLD   plans  offer  lower  premiums   and  are                                                                    
          advertised as  an affordable alternative  to plans                                                                    
          that,  while more  expensive, offer  comprehensive                                                                    
          essential coverage.                                                                                                   
       ? The fine print: These plans do not meet federal                                                                      
     qualifications for minimum essential coverage.                                                                             
          ? They  do not provide coverage  for the Essential                                                                    
          Health Benefits, the 10  categories of health care                                                                    
          that federal law deems essential.                                                                                     
          ?  They are  able to  charge more  for those  with                                                                    
          pre-existing conditions.                                                                                              
          ? They  can deny  an individual's enrollment  in a                                                                    
          health  plan  due  to their  health  status,  age,                                                                    
          gender,  or  other  factors that  may  affect  the                                                                    
          purchaser's use of insurance.                                                                                         
MS. BUSCHMANN added that STLD  plans, also referred to as "short-                                                               
term  plans"  or  "short-term insurance,"  were  defined  by  the                                                               
federal government as insurance  coverage with an expiration date                                                               
of less  than 12  months -  a definition in  place for  nearly 20                                                               
years.   In 2016, STLDs were  redefined as lasting up  to 90 days                                                               
with  no renewals.   She  said Alaska  statutes currently  lacked                                                               
consumer  protections  for  individuals  with  short-term  plans;                                                               
short-term  insurance  was  not  required  by  statute  to  cover                                                               
services that  were otherwise mandated by  health insurance, such                                                               
as  infant hearing  screening, telemedicine,  diabetes equipment,                                                               
mammograms,   and  screenings   for  colorectal,   prostate,  and                                                               
cervical cancers.   The plans  could exclude coverage  for entire                                                               
categories of  benefits, charge higher  premiums based  on health                                                               
status, exclude  coverage for preexisting conditions,  and impose                                                               
annual  limits.    They had  significantly  higher  out-of-pocket                                                               
cost-sharing  than  other  plans   available  on  the  individual                                                               
market.    She  concluded  that  while the  plans  were  sold  as                                                               
individual  health  coverage,  they  very  often  did  not  cover                                                               
3:52:37 PM                                                                                                                    
MS. BUSCHMANN  turned to slide  3, entitled  "Federal Rule-Making                                                               
Finalized in October 2018," which read:                                                                                         
     ? The final rule amended the definition of short-term                                                                      
     limited duration insurance:                                                                                                
          ? Lengthening plan duration to 364 days                                                                               
          ?  Increasing renewal  options to  permit a  total                                                                    
          coverage period of 36 months                                                                                          
     ? Possible impacts noted in the federal rule:                                                                              
          ? "Reduced  access to some services  and providers                                                                  
          for  some  consumers  who  switch  from  available                                                                    
          individual  market  plans   and  possibly  reduced                                                                  
          choice   for   individuals    remaining   in   the                                                                  
          individual market risk pools."                                                                                        
          ? "Potential  increase in out-of-pocket  costs for                                                                    
          some  consumers,  possibly  leading  to  financial                                                                  
          ?  "Potential increase  in  uncompensated care  by                                                                  
MS.  BUSCHMANN  referred  to  the  graph  on  slide  4,  entitled                                                               
"Estimated   Costs  Between   Plans       six  months   following                                                               
diagnosis,"  to point  out the  high out-of-pocket  costs to  the                                                               
consumer  associated with  the new  rule.   The estimates  on the                                                               
graph  showed the  differences in  costs between  Affordable Care                                                               
Act (ACA) [the U.S. comprehensive  health care reform law enacted                                                               
in March 2010],  compliant plans, and STLD plans.   She explained                                                               
that the graph  demonstrated the possible cost  for an individual                                                               
with a six-month  plan, the possible cost for  an individual with                                                               
a three-month  plan including  costs from  loss of  coverage, and                                                               
the  risk  of  allowing  plans that  did  not  cover  preexisting                                                               
conditions.   If an individual's  three-month plan ended  and was                                                               
renewed  while the  person  still  required [medical]  treatment,                                                               
short-term plans  could exclude coverage for  services associated                                                               
with  a condition  through  medical underwriting.    She gave  an                                                               
example:   If  the  individual's preexisting  condition was  high                                                               
blood pressure,  and the  person had  a stroke  as a  result, the                                                               
insurer  could refuse  to pay  for any  treatment related  to the                                                               
stroke, even if at the time the person had short-term insurance.                                                                
3:54:15 PM                                                                                                                    
MS. BUSCHMANN moved on to  slide 5, entitled "Prevalence of State                                                               
Regulations    January 2020," which  illustrated by way of  a map                                                               
that 32  states and  the District of  Columbia had  regulated the                                                               
STLD plans:   in  8 states  STLD plans  were banned  or precluded                                                               
based  on longstanding  requirements; some  states had  chosen to                                                               
limit plan  duration to 90 days  or six months; other  states had                                                               
opted for  a full year including  renewals.  She referred  to the                                                               
handout in  the committee packet entitled  "Duration and renewals                                                               
of 2019  Short Term Medical  plans by state," for  greater detail                                                               
on state  policies.   She relayed  that on  slide 5,  states were                                                               
categorized  by  permitted  length  of  plan  duration,  but  she                                                               
suggested  that there  were other  policy areas  in which  states                                                               
could enact consumer protections.                                                                                               
MS.  BUSCHMANN   referred  to  slide  6,   entitled  "State-level                                                               
policies that have since been enacted," which read:                                                                             
     ? Limit initial plan duration                                                                                              
     ? Limit number of renewals                                                                                                 
     ? Limit maximum duration                                                                                                   
     ? Limited availability                                                                                                     
     ? Coverage for pre-existing conditions                                                                                     
      ? Some states have opted to require coverage for pre-                                                                     
     existing conditions only upon plan renewal                                                                                 
     ? Coverage for essential health benefits                                                                                   
     ? Required notice to the consumer specifying that STLD                                                                     
      plans do not qualify as providing minimum essential                                                                       
MS.  BUSCHMANN  relayed  that  it   was  possible  to  limit  the                                                               
availability of the  plans:  some states didn't allow  them to be                                                               
purchased during  the open  enrollment period  - the  period when                                                               
people  could purchase  plans  on the  federal  marketplace -  or                                                               
during an  individual special  enrollment period;  Maine required                                                               
that short-term plans  be purchased in person, and  there were no                                                               
short-term plans being sold in Maine currently.                                                                                 
MS. BUSCHMANN continued by saying  states had required short-term                                                               
plans  covered certain  services:    Indiana required  short-term                                                               
plans  cover   emergency  services;  the  District   of  Columbia                                                               
requires  that  plans  cover  services sought  in  the  prior  12                                                               
months,  if related  to  a preexisting  condition.   Some  states                                                               
require  that  the  insurer  provide a  notice  to  the  consumer                                                               
relaying that  it might medically  underwrite the policy  and not                                                               
cover certain services  that do not qualify  as minimum essential                                                               
3:56:07 PM                                                                                                                    
MS. BUSCHMANN turned  to slide 7, entitled "Features  of HB 267,"                                                               
which read:                                                                                                                     
     ? Defined  Duration: The initial  term may not  be more                                                                    
     than 90 days, which conforms  with the duration of STLD                                                                    
     plans currently sold in Alaska.                                                                                            
     ?  Limited Renewal:  An individual  can  renew an  STLD                                                                    
     plan once.                                                                                                                 
     ? Required  Coverage for Essential Health  Benefits and                                                                    
     Pre-Existing  Conditions: A  plan  must  cover the  ten                                                                    
     essential  health benefits  and services  related to  a                                                                    
     pre-existing condition.                                                                                                    
     ?  Limited Availability:  STLD plans  may only  be sold                                                                    
     outside  of the  federal marketplace's  open enrollment                                                                    
     period or an individual's special enrollment period.                                                                       
MS. BUSCHMANN added  that the provision under the  last bullet on                                                               
the slide  is important because  it required that a  person would                                                               
not be  purchasing inherently temporary insurance  - a short-term                                                               
plan -  when he/she had  the opportunity to  purchase longer-term                                                               
insurance that provides comprehensive coverage.                                                                                 
MS. BUSCHMANN moved  on to slide 8, entitled  "Summary of Changes                                                               
for Proposed CS HB 267," which read in part:                                                                                    
     ?  Limited Renewal:  An individual  can  renew an  STLD                                                                    
     plan twice.                                                                                                                
       ? Required Coverage for Emergency Services: A plan                                                                       
        must, at a minimum, cover ambulatory, emergency,                                                                        
     hospitalization, and laboratory services.                                                                                  
     ? Protections for Pre-Existing  Conditions: A plan must                                                                    
     provide  coverage  for  services associated  with  pre-                                                                    
     existing  conditions  if  an  individual  renews  their                                                                    
3:57:30 PM                                                                                                                    
VICE CHAIR  SPOHNHOLZ referred to  the third bullet on  the slide                                                               
and asked what the reasoning was for that provision.                                                                            
3:57:56 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  ZULKOSKY  explained Director  [Lori]  Wing-Heier,                                                               
[Division  of   Insurance,  DCCED]  had  relayed   some  Alaskans                                                               
reported  they  lost  [health insurance]  coverage  or  had  high                                                               
medical bills, because at the end  of 90 days, their policies had                                                               
to be underwritten; any new  medical conditions identified in the                                                               
initial 90-day window were excluded  from coverage.  For example,                                                               
an Alaskan  had a  leg injury during  the initial  90-day period;                                                               
when the  individual had  surgery on the  leg during  a different                                                               
90-day period,  he/she was  told it  was a  preexisting condition                                                               
and the  cost would  not be  reimbursed.   The consumer  was then                                                               
responsible for the entirety of the coverage being denied.                                                                      
MS. BUSCHMANN continued with slide 8, which read in part:                                                                       
      ? Increase in the Cost-Sharing Provision: A plan can                                                                      
      allow up to $10,000 for self-only coverage and up to                                                                      
     $19,500 for family coverage.                                                                                               
MS. BUSCHMANN  explained that the  cost-sharing was  increased to                                                               
reflect  that  lower premium  plans  tend  to have  higher  cost-                                                               
3:59:15 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  ZULKOSKY drew  the committee's  attention to  the                                                               
handout  in  the  committee  packet  describing  the  STLD  plans                                                               
offered in Alaska.                                                                                                              
MS.  BUSCHMANN  reported  there   were  two  insurance  companies                                                               
allowed to issue  plans in Alaska - Moda  Health and Independence                                                               
American  Insurance Company  (IAIC).   The plans  on the  handout                                                               
were those of IAIC.                                                                                                             
3:59:47 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY  referred to the  plans on the  handout -                                                               
offered in  Juneau, Bethel, and  Anchorage.  She pointed  out the                                                               
disparity  between the  premiums for  a  female and  those for  a                                                               
male,  even though  pre-natal care  and prescriptions  drugs were                                                               
not covered.   She relayed that  a female paying for  a STLD plan                                                               
is paying $132 per month for  the least expensive option, or just                                                               
over $1,500 per year; the  deductible is $10,000; the coinsurance                                                               
rate  is 50  percent after  the deductible  is paid.   She  said,                                                               
"Essentially while this  is being marketed and sold  in Alaska as                                                               
being a health care coverage  option, it's essentially not really                                                               
covering Alaskans who are paying  several thousand dollars a year                                                               
to  receive   this  coverage."     She   stated  that   with  the                                                               
understanding that  there are Alaskans  who may experience  a gap                                                               
in  insurance coverage  and  need a  short-term  plan until  they                                                               
could  purchase more  comprehensive coverage,  the intent  of the                                                               
proposed legislation was to put  parameters around these plans to                                                               
ensure Alaskans are not exposed to an undue cost burden.                                                                        
4:01:51 PM                                                                                                                    
VICE  CHAIR  SPOHNHOLZ asked  why  the  insurance cost  more  for                                                               
women,  considering the  typical additional  coverages for  women                                                               
like reproductive health care were not covered under the plans.                                                                 
4:02:27 PM                                                                                                                    
SARAH  LUECK,  Policy  Analyst,   Center  on  Budget  and  Policy                                                               
Priorities, offered her belief that  younger women tended to seek                                                               
more  health  care.   She  acknowledged  that  without  maternity                                                               
coverage  and prescription  drug  coverage, it  was difficult  to                                                               
understand the  disparity between  women and men  regarding cost.                                                               
She said  the higher rates  for women reflected practices  of the                                                               
private insurance  market before ACA  and opined that  the short-                                                               
term plans adopted these practices because they can do so.                                                                      
VICE  CHAIR  SPOHNHOLZ  asserted  any woman  would  maintain  the                                                               
reason young women use health care  more than men is because they                                                               
are using  birth control to  prevent pregnancies or  because they                                                               
are pregnant;  therefore, if those  services are not  covered, it                                                               
makes no sense that health care would cost more.                                                                                
4:04:20 PM                                                                                                                    
MS. LUECK relayed that having  observed the changes in the short-                                                               
term  plans and  the  development  of the  market  over the  past                                                               
couple years as the federal rules  have changed, she has heard of                                                               
situations in which  people have been harmed under  these plans -                                                               
with expensive  claims not covered.   She explained  the consumer                                                               
may understand  the plan  was not as  good as  private individual                                                               
market insurance;  however, the  surprises for the  consumer were                                                               
not  just  with   benefits  not  being  covered,   but  with  the                                                               
preexisting exclusions, for  which the insurers had  a great deal                                                               
of latitude.   There  have been  cases in  which claims  were not                                                               
covered due  to some health  condition in the person's  past that                                                               
is not  readily recognized  by the person  to be  associated with                                                               
the present claim.   The result is  a "bait-and-switch" situation                                                               
for  the  consumer in  which  the  person  has an  expensive  and                                                               
unexpected  catastrophic incident  occur and  discovers that  the                                                               
"catastrophic" insurance does not cover it.                                                                                     
MS.  LUECK offered  that  the data  available  from the  National                                                               
Association of Insurance Commissioners  (NAIC) shows that many of                                                               
the plans are popular nationwide;  they have a medical loss ratio                                                               
(MLR)  of about  40-50 percent.    The MLR  is a  measure of  the                                                               
percentage of the  premiums that a health plan  spends on medical                                                               
claims.  In  the regular individual insurance market,  there is a                                                               
requirement  for  insurers not  only  to  cover essential  health                                                               
benefits (EHB)  and preexisting conditions,  and to rate  men and                                                               
women  the same,  but to  spend a  minimum portion  of the  money                                                               
collected from  consumers on  actual medical  care -  80 percent.                                                               
The  short-term market  insurers  are not  under  the 80  percent                                                               
requirement and, therefore, spend much less.                                                                                    
MS. LUECK  concluded, "People  may feel, when  they buy  a short-                                                               
term plan, that  they're getting a good deal or  that it's better                                                               
than nothing."   If they are healthy and young,  they may be able                                                               
to  find a  plan  that costs  a few  hundred  dollars per  month;                                                               
however, it  may be  too much  of an  expense for  the protection                                                               
they are getting and the risk of financial harm.                                                                                
4:08:19 PM                                                                                                                    
VICE  CHAIR  SPOHNHOLZ  asked  for clarification  of  MLR.    She                                                               
expressed her understanding  that it is the amount  of funds paid                                                               
as premium that are used to pay for care.                                                                                       
MS.  LUECK answered,  "Exactly."   She explained  that it  is the                                                               
portion of the premiums of the  entire group of consumers that is                                                               
used for medical care.  She stated  that the rest of the money is                                                               
used  by the  insurer for  overhead, administrative  costs, chief                                                               
executive officer (CEO)  salary, and profit.   She further stated                                                               
that in  the regular individual  insurance market,  the companies                                                               
were  required to  spend 80  percent of  the premiums  on medical                                                               
care and quality  improvement; the remaining 20  percent could be                                                               
used for overhead,  CEO salary, and profit.   She maintained that                                                               
this  requirement   incentivized  companies  to  not   price  the                                                               
insurance plans too high.                                                                                                       
MS. LUECK continued by describing  the short-term plans - without                                                               
the  80  percent  requirement:   Administrative  costs  were  not                                                               
limited as much.  Short-term  plans permitted underwriting, which                                                               
the  regular   individual  insurance   market  did   not  permit.                                                               
Underwriting is  an expensive service;  it involves  looking into                                                               
the medical  records of a consumer,  examining medical histories,                                                               
speaking  with physicians,  and determining  if the  consumer was                                                               
honest and  fully disclosed medical conditions  upon application.                                                               
She said that  medical underwriting involved a  broker and broker                                                               
commission.   The result  is that the  short-term plans  are much                                                               
more expensive than the ACA plans.                                                                                              
4:11:03 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY  confirmed for Vice Chair  Spohnholz that                                                               
Moda and  IAIC are the  two insurance companies that  offered the                                                               
short-term plans, and  Moda is just now getting  into the market.                                                               
She relayed  there was an  interest among insurance  companies to                                                               
expand into the  short-term insurance market in  Alaska, which is                                                               
why it was important to establish consumer protections.                                                                         
VICE  CHAIR  SPOHNHOLZ  asked whether  the  proposed  legislation                                                               
provided a limit for the MLR.                                                                                                   
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY  answered that there is  not currently an                                                               
MLR [limit];  however, there  is precedence  in other  states and                                                               
would be considered for Alaska.                                                                                                 
4:12:28 PM                                                                                                                    
VICE CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ asked for comment  on the proper role of the                                                               
short-term  plan and  the array  of  options for  health care  in                                                               
LORI   WING-HEIER,  Director,   Anchorage  Office,   Division  of                                                               
Insurance,  Department   of  Commerce,  Community   and  Economic                                                               
Development  (DCCED), answered  short-term  plans  did not  offer                                                               
very good coverage.   She maintained there was a  need for short-                                                               
term plans in the event of a  "gap" in coverage.  She pointed out                                                               
that  currently many  people were  suddenly without  jobs due  to                                                               
COVID-19 [a novel  coronavirus disease].  She  mentioned the U.S.                                                               
Consolidated  Omnibus Reconciliation  Act (COBRA)  was an  option                                                               
for some  people but is  extremely expensive.  She  offered other                                                               
reasons for suddenly  losing health insurance - a  divorce or the                                                               
death  of a  spouse.   She  maintained that  the short-term  plan                                                               
provided  a  stopgap  measure  until  a  person  could  determine                                                               
his/her next  step - employee benefits,  the individual insurance                                                               
market, [U.S.  Centers for Medicare and  Medicaid Services (CMS),                                                               
U.S.  Department  of Health  and  Social  Services (HSS)]  health                                                               
insurance  programs ("Medicaid")  and ("Medicare"),  or something                                                               
VICE  CHAIR  SPOHNHOLZ  offered her  understanding  that  in  the                                                               
regular  insurance  market, Alaska  managed  the  MLR; she  asked                                                               
whether   there  were   other   states  that   managed  the   MLR                                                               
MS.  WING-HEIER answered  that  the  MLR [of  80  percent] was  a                                                               
provision of  ACA; all states  in that  market must comply.   She                                                               
mentioned that in  August 2019, Primera [Blue  Cross] sent checks                                                               
to its consumers, because it had  not met the 80 percent MLR and,                                                               
therefore, was required to refund the  money.  She added that all                                                               
insurers must  do the same under  the ACA for the  individual and                                                               
small group markets.                                                                                                            
VICE CHAIR  SPOHNHOLZ asked  whether any  states had  limited the                                                               
MLR on short-term limited plans.                                                                                                
MS. WING-HEIER replied, "Not that I'm  aware of."  She offered to                                                               
provide that information.                                                                                                       
REPRESENTATIVE  ZULKOSKY   offered  to  provide  a   document  to                                                               
committee members  showing all state-level actions  on STLD plans                                                               
in  a  side-by-side   comparison.    She  said   there  were  MLR                                                               
restrictions in  the following states:   Delaware at  60 percent;                                                               
Kansas at  60 percent; Maine  at 50  percent; North Dakota  at 55                                                               
percent; and Vermont at 80 percent.                                                                                             
VICE  CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ  expressed that  it was  troubling that  50                                                               
percent  of a  person's premium  for  a short-term  plan was  not                                                               
being spent  on health care; a  50 percent profit on  health care                                                               
was  excessive.   She mentioned  the  rate differentials  between                                                               
women  and  men were  concerning,  as  the  plans did  not  cover                                                               
reproductive health care.  She asked for comment on that issue.                                                                 
4:17:02 PM                                                                                                                    
MS.  WING-HEIER replied  that she  shared that  concern; however,                                                               
the actuarial data indicated that  young women are more expensive                                                               
in terms of health care.                                                                                                        
VICE CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ asked whether  the expense difference is due                                                               
to health  care providers giving  young women an annual  exam and                                                               
MS. WING-HEIER said that could very well be.                                                                                    
VICE CHAIR  SPOHNHOLZ related  an anecdote:   She saw  her health                                                               
care provider  more frequently than  her husband because  she was                                                               
responsible  for the  reproductive  health care  for her  family.                                                               
With an  annual exam, she received  inoculations and preventative                                                               
care; but to save money, her husband did not.                                                                                   
4:18:20 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE   TARR   asked   whether   establishing   an   MLR                                                               
restriction would create an administrative burden.                                                                              
MS. WING-HEIER  said it  would for  plans that  are underwritten.                                                               
She described the increased administrative  burden:  There are no                                                               
questions   about  preexisting   conditions   on   an  ACA   plan                                                               
application, but  there are on the  short-term plan applications.                                                               
For processing  claims, the short-term plan  application would be                                                               
reviewed  more  thoroughly  to  determine  whether  there  was  a                                                               
preexisting condition that disqualified the claim.                                                                              
4:19:44 PM                                                                                                                    
The committee took a brief at-ease.                                                                                             
[Vice Chair Spohnholz returned the gavel to Chair Zulkosky.]                                                                    
4:19:54 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  SPOHNHOLZ removed  her  objection  to Version  S.                                                               
There being  no further objection,  Version S was adopted  as the                                                               
working document.                                                                                                               
CHAIR ZULKOSKY indicated that HB 267 would be held over.                                                                        
           HB 255-FOOD STAMPS; WORK REQS; TIME LIMITS                                                                       
4:21:11 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR ZULKOSKY announced  that the final order  of business would                                                               
be  HOUSE BILL  NO. 255,  "An Act  relating to  a waiver  of work                                                               
requirements  or  time limits  in  the  food stamp  program;  and                                                               
providing for an effective date."                                                                                               
The committee took a brief at-ease.                                                                                             
4:21:32 PM                                                                                                                    
ELISE  SORUM-BIRK, Staff,  Representative Andy  Josephson, Alaska                                                               
State Legislature,  on behalf of Representative  Josephson, prime                                                               
sponsor  of  HB  255,  relayed  the  proposed  legislation  would                                                               
address Supplemental Nutrition  Assistance Program (SNAP) waivers                                                               
for able-bodied  adults without  dependents -  specifically time-                                                               
limit waivers.   She  turned to  slide 1,  entitled "Goals  of HB
255," which read:                                                                                                               
     ?  Ensure that  Alaska is  seeking the  broadest waiver                                                                    
     possible under federal law                                                                                                 
     ? Ensure  that Alaska is approving  the broadest waiver                                                                    
     possible under law                                                                                                         
     ? Ensuring that vulnerable  Alaskans have the food they                                                                    
     need to be healthy                                                                                                         
4:23:07 PM                                                                                                                    
MS. SORUM-BIRK moved on to slide  2, entitled "What is SNAP ABAWD                                                               
work requirement," which read:                                                                                                  
     Under  the  Supplemental Nutrition  Assistance  Program                                                                    
     (SNAP), also  known as food stamps,  Able Bodied Adults                                                                    
     Without  Dependents   (ABAWD)  are  required   to  meet                                                                    
     specific  work requirement  of 80  hours  per month  to                                                                    
     qualify for benefits.                                                                                                      
     There is a  3-month time limit per 3  years on benefits                                                                    
     if the work requirement isn't met.                                                                                         
MS.  SORUM-BIRK  explained  that  SNAP  stands  for  Supplemental                                                               
Nutrition Assistance Program and is  also known as "food stamps."                                                               
She  said  that  ABAWD  stands  for  Able  Bodied  Adult  Without                                                               
Dependents; it  is someone  between 18  and 49  years old  who is                                                               
healthy and capable of working according to federal law.                                                                        
MS. SORUM-BIRK referred to slide  3, entitled "Waivers SNAP ABAWD                                                               
Time Limits to Work Requirements," which read:                                                                                  
     Since  the time  limits enactment  in 1996  states have                                                                    
     been able  to apply  for waivers in  areas of  low work                                                                    
     Additionally states  can exempt  up to 12%  of caseload                                                                    
     who are  ineligible for benefits (extending  time limit                                                                    
     1 additional month)                                                                                                        
     Alaska  and Guam  lost  statewide  waivers between  4th                                                                    
     quarter of 2019 and 1st quarter of 2020                                                                                    
4:24:38 PM                                                                                                                    
MS. SORUM-BIRK  continued with slide  4, entitled  "CBPP- History                                                               
of ABAWD  Waivers from 1998 to  2019."  The graphic  on the slide                                                               
was published  by the Center  for Budget Policies  and Priorities                                                               
(CBPP) and can  be found on its website.   The slide demonstrated                                                               
the history of  states acquiring waivers from  1998 through 2019.                                                               
She pointed  out from the  graph that during that  period, Alaska                                                               
was mostly  without any waivers.   She mentioned that  Alaska has                                                               
consistently  qualified  for  a   statewide  waiver  due  to  its                                                               
challenges in employment.                                                                                                       
4:25:31 PM                                                                                                                    
MS.  SORUM-BIRK  turned to  slide  5,  entitled "Why  has  Alaska                                                               
always qualified?" which read:                                                                                                  
     Consistently High Unemployment                                                                                             
     ?    Alaska   has    consistently   met    unemployment                                                                    
     requirements under the previous federal rule                                                                               
     ?  Most   areas  of  Alaska  can   still  meet  federal                                                                    
     requirements under the new rule                                                                                            
     Lack of Traditional Job Opportunities                                                                                      
     ? Rural communities with less cash economy                                                                                 
       ? Highly seasonal workforce in many sectors of the                                                                       
4:26:19 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  SPOHNHOLZ asked  for  a description  of the  rule                                                               
recently   enacted   by   the   [President   Donald   J.]   Trump                                                               
MS.  SORUM-BIRK  stated the  new  rule  changed the  unemployment                                                               
requirements that  a state could  use [to qualify for  a waiver].                                                               
It set  the unemployment  rate at  10 percent  or higher,  or for                                                               
alternate waivers,  a base of 6  percent or 20 percent  above the                                                               
national average  unemployment rate,  whichever is greater.   She                                                               
said  that  in  Alaska,  most  of the  state  met  the  6-percent                                                               
requirement.   She offered  that Alaska  has transitioned  to the                                                               
new  rule; however,  the new  rule is  not effective  until April                                                               
[2020], and  as of [March  13, 2020], implementation of  the rule                                                               
has  been  temporarily  halted   under  a  nationwide  injunction                                                               
[issued  by  the   U.S.  District  Court  for   the  District  of                                                               
MS. SORUM-BIRK moved on to  slide 6, entitled "Which States might                                                               
be  Impacted Most?"  which shows  the results  of an  analysis by                                                               
[Wolfram]  Mathematica depicting  the states  that would  be most                                                               
impacted by  the new U.S.  Department of Agriculture  (USDA) SNAP                                                               
waiver rule.   She  pointed out  that Alaska  would be  among the                                                               
most   impacted  states   with  53-77   percent  of   ABAWD  SNAP                                                               
participants affected by the new waiver rule.                                                                                   
4:28:37 PM                                                                                                                    
MS.  SORUM-BIRK  moved on  to  slide  7, entitled  "ABAWD  Waiver                                                               
Timeline for Alaska," to provide  clarification on the history of                                                               
the waiver and actions on the  national level.  In 1964, the Food                                                               
Stamp  Program  was  codified  in  federal  law.    Many  changes                                                               
occurred to  the program  between 1964  and 1996.   In  1996, the                                                               
ABAWD  work  requirement became  part  of  federal law  with  the                                                               
passage  of  the  Personal Responsibility  and  Work  Opportunity                                                               
Reconciliation Act  (PRWORA).   In 2008,  the Food  Stamp Program                                                               
was  renamed the  Supplemental Nutrition  Assistance Program,  or                                                               
SNAP.  In 2010 the  American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)                                                               
waived  SNAP  work  requirements  nationally  and  broadened  the                                                               
eligibility for all states to  receive waivers.  Between 2010 and                                                               
2016, the waivers were suspended nationwide.                                                                                    
MS.  SORUM-BIRK  relayed  that  in 2016,  the  time  limits  were                                                               
reinstated.   In 2018, an  overhaul of  the SNAP program  was put                                                               
forward in  the U.S.  Agriculture and Nutrition  Act of  2018, or                                                               
the  "Farm  Bill,"  but the  proposed  tightening  measures  were                                                               
rejected  by  the  U.S.  Congress.    Despite  rejection  of  the                                                               
measures,  the Trump  administration put  forward a  new rule  in                                                               
February 2019 revising  the conditions under which  USDA would be                                                               
able to  waive ABAWD  time limits.   It  also limited  how states                                                               
could  choose metrics  and  define geographical  areas.   It  was                                                               
under this  rule that  the 10  percent and  6 percent  were first                                                               
discussed.  Attorneys general from  around the nation and a group                                                               
of U.S. Senators wrote letters in opposition to the rule.                                                                       
MS.  SORUM-BIRK continued  by saying  that in  October 2019,  the                                                               
[Governor  Mike] Dunleavy  administration began  implementing the                                                               
new rule  at the  state level  using the 10  percent metric.   In                                                               
December 2019,  the Trump Administration  rule was  finalized and                                                               
set to go  into effect in April  2020.  In January  2020 once the                                                               
rule was finalized, a coalition of  states and New York City sued                                                               
the Trump administration over the new  rule.  Just a few days ago                                                               
[U.S.  District  Court  Judge  Beryl  Howell]  blocked  the  rule                                                               
temporarily; he cited the pandemic in the opinion.                                                                              
4:32:49 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked how [the new rule] impacted Alaskans.                                                                      
MS. SORUM-BIRK  said that it  is estimated that  6,917 vulnerable                                                               
Alaskans  who participated  in the  SNAP program  have lost  SNAP                                                               
benefits due to  the rule change.  They are  individuals who were                                                               
in  the ABAWD  category and  lived  in geographic  areas that  no                                                               
longer qualified for the waiver.   She referred to the handout in                                                               
the committee  packet, entitled  "SNAP Helps 1  in 11  Workers in                                                               
Alaska Put Food on the Table," and pointed out that about one-                                                                  
third of  the Alaskans who were  dependent on SNAP worked  in the                                                               
service industry.  Those individuals  were already at high risk -                                                               
with little job security and difficulty meeting the 20-hour-a-                                                                  
week minimum for working.                                                                                                       
4:34:37 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  ZULKOSKY asked  what  the geographic  spread  was for  the                                                               
nearly 7,000  Alaskans who had  lost SNAP benefits under  the new                                                               
4:35:10 PM                                                                                                                    
SHAWNDA O'BRIEN,  Director, Division of Public  Assistance (DPA),                                                               
Department  of Health  and Social  Services  (DHSS), relayed  the                                                               
areas of the state included  in the waiver effective October 2019                                                               
were  the  Bethel  Census  Area,   Bristol  Bay  Borough,  Denali                                                               
Borough,  Haines Borough,  Hoonah-Angoon  Census Area,  Kusilvak,                                                               
Lake and  Peninsula Borough, Nome  Census Area,  Northwest Arctic                                                               
Borough, Petersburg  Borough, Prince of Wales-Hyder  Census Area,                                                               
Southeast  Fairbanks Census  Area, Skagway  Municipality, Valdez-                                                               
Cordova Census Area, Wrangell City  and Borough, Yakutat City and                                                               
Borough,  and Yukon-Koyukuk  Census Area.   The  total number  of                                                               
individuals [affected by  the waiver] for all  those locations is                                                               
approximately  2,000; the  data was  constantly changing  because                                                               
the population  of people  being served  significantly fluctuated                                                               
each  month.   At  any point  in time  that  number might  change                                                               
depending  upon  when  the data  was  collected,  the  population                                                               
included in the data search,  and whatever additional information                                                               
the individuals provided  to the division to  further exempt them                                                               
from being  considered ABAWD.  At  the time the waiver  went into                                                               
effect  in  October 2019,  the  division  calculated about  7,500                                                               
individuals to be ABAWD.                                                                                                        
CHAIR ZULKOSKY  asked Ms. O'Brien  to provide the  committee with                                                               
the comprehensive  list of communities  currently waived  and the                                                               
numbers cited.                                                                                                                  
MS.  O'BRIEN  agreed and  offered  to  share information  on  the                                                               
waiver  for  which  the  division  has  asked  permission  to  be                                                               
effective April  1.   She also offered  to provide  the committee                                                               
with  the department's  plan in  terms of  the COVID-19  [a novel                                                               
coronavirus  disease] response;  it involved  language to  exempt                                                               
all participants of  the SNAP program from  work requirements due                                                               
to significant job losses in many communities.                                                                                  
4:38:34 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE TARR asked  for clarification as to  the number of                                                               
individuals affected by the rule change.                                                                                        
MS. O'BRIEN responded that when  the data was queried in October,                                                               
about 7,500  individuals were identified  and notified  that they                                                               
would   be  required   to  participate   in  ABAWD   work-related                                                               
requirements.  She reiterated that the numbers changed monthly.                                                                 
REPRESENTATIVE  TARR  asked  for  clarification  on  the  "2,000"                                                               
number  Ms. O'Brien  cited and  clarification  on the  "boroughs"                                                               
versus "census areas" in the listing of areas of the state.                                                                     
MS.  O'BRIEN  replied  that  about  2,000  individuals  were  not                                                               
required  to participate  [in the  new rule]  due to  the waiver;                                                               
without the  October waiver exempting  those areas of  the state,                                                               
there would have  been about 2,000 more individuals  added to the                                                               
7,500.  The waiver effective  April 1 would have exempted another                                                               
900 individuals.                                                                                                                
MS. O'BRIEN  stated she was  not able to explain  the terminology                                                               
or  differentiate  between  census  areas and  boroughs;  it  was                                                               
determined by the census process  within the U.S. Bureau of Labor                                                               
Statistics (BLS) [U.S. Department of Labor (USDOL)].                                                                            
4:41:48 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE TARR asked for  confirmation of her understanding:                                                               
the October 1 deadline prompted  notices sent to 7,500 people who                                                               
would be  required to  participate; that  number would  have been                                                               
9,500; however,  2,000 were identified  as not being  required to                                                               
participate;  another waiver  was  requested for  April 1,  which                                                               
would  exempt   an  additional  900;  therefore,   900  would  be                                                               
subtracted from 7,500.                                                                                                          
MS. O'BRIEN answered, "Correct."                                                                                                
4:42:30 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ  asked for confirmation that  in October                                                               
2019, 7,500  ABAWD were notified  that they would be  required to                                                               
work and potentially not eligible for SNAP.                                                                                     
MS. O'BRIEN concurred.                                                                                                          
REPRESENTATIVE  SPOHNHOLZ asked  how many  people were  no longer                                                               
eligible for SNAP benefits in November.                                                                                         
MS.   O'BRIEN  answered   that   as  a   result   of  the   ABAWD                                                               
implementation,  none.   She explained  that November  would have                                                               
been the  first month of  the three months  of benefits in  a 36-                                                               
month time frame; individuals would  not have lost benefits until                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE  SPOHNHOLZ  asked  how  many  of  the  7,500  were                                                               
eligible for SNAP in January.                                                                                                   
MS. O'BRIEN stated that she would  ask staff to query the data to                                                               
determine  the  number of  individuals  who  lost benefits  as  a                                                               
result  of the  rule change;  she added  some individuals  closed                                                               
cases for other reasons.                                                                                                        
4:45:09 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  ZULKOSKY  referred to  the  March  2020 injunction  citing                                                               
COVID-19  concerns  and  asked  for the  effective  date  of  the                                                               
MS.  SORUM-BIRK offered  her  belief that  the  decision did  not                                                               
apply retroactively but  from the point of  the decision forward.                                                               
She offered to confirm that information for the committee.                                                                      
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ  asked Ms. O'Brien to  provide the total                                                               
number of  SNAP-eligible people  in every  month of  the calendar                                                               
years 2019 and 2020.                                                                                                            
MS. O'BRIEN agreed to provide that information.                                                                                 
4:47:10 PM                                                                                                                    
MS. SORUM-BIRK clarified that "6,917"  was the estimate put forth                                                               
by the  Dunleavy administration  in August  2019 to  quantify the                                                               
number of SNAP recipients who would  be required to meet the work                                                               
requirements  under  the  new  rule starting  in  October.    The                                                               
information came  from the Anchorage  Daily News  article [August                                                               
12, 2019] included in the committee packet.                                                                                     
MS. SORUM-BIRK continued with  the PowerPoint presentation, slide                                                               
8, entitled "COVID-19 and SNAP," which read:                                                                                    
     ? Economic uncertainty is increasing dramatically                                                                          
     ? Many low wage jobs will be hit hardest (for example-                                                                     
      roughly 1/3 of SNAP recipients in Alaska work in the                                                                      
     service industry)                                                                                                          
         ? Forcing needy families to go to crowded food                                                                         
     pantries or soup kitchens would increase spread of the                                                                     
MS. SORUM-BIRK added that the intent of  HB 255 was to make it as                                                               
easy as  possible for people  to receive SNAP benefits  when they                                                               
needed food.  She reiterated  the federal judge cited COVID-19 as                                                               
one of the reasons for blocking the federal rule.                                                                               
4:48:50 PM                                                                                                                    
MS. SORUM-BIRK  reviewed slide 9, entitled  "Sectional Analysis,"                                                               
which read:                                                                                                                     
     Section 1: Amends AS 47.25.975  to add a new subsection                                                                  
     outlining requirements that DHSS:                                                                                          
     Must request,  accept, and attempt  to renew  or extend                                                                    
     federal waivers relating to  work requirements and time                                                                    
     limits for  ABAWDs to the maximum  extent allowed under                                                                    
     federal law in all geographical areas of the state.                                                                        
     Must implement  ABAWD waivers  approved by  the federal                                                                    
     government to the maximum  allowable extent outlined in                                                                    
     each waiver.                                                                                                               
     May  not create  more  stringent  work requirements  or                                                                    
     time  limits  for  ABAWDs than  those  outlined  in  an                                                                    
     accepted waiver.                                                                                                           
     Section 2: Adds a new  section to the uncodified law of                                                                  
     the State of Alaska  requiring that DHSS promptly apply                                                                    
     to  the   federal  government  for  a   waiver  if  the                                                                    
     department determines  that the waiver is  necessary to                                                                    
     implement the  policy changes outlined in  Section 1 of                                                                    
     this Act.                                                                                                                  
     Section  3 and  Section  4: Relate  to the  conditional                                                                  
     effective date of this Act.                                                                                                
4:50:42 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  ANDY  JOSEPHSON,  Alaska  State  Legislature,  as                                                               
prime sponsor  of HB 255,  shared that  the issue was  brought to                                                               
his attention  by the  Alaska Food  Coalition, and  he recognized                                                               
the  need for  the legislature  to set  a different  path through                                                               
legislation.   He maintained  that the  position of  the Dunleavy                                                               
administration regarding SNAP benefit  waivers was more stringent                                                               
than that of the Trump  administration; the governor's policy was                                                               
to not  seek any possible  waiver.  Even before  COVID-19, Alaska                                                               
was  the 50th  state in  employment.   He maintained  that Alaska                                                               
should seek every opportunity to  receive waivers as allowed.  He                                                               
acknowledged   the  philosophical   viewpoint  of   the  Dunleavy                                                               
administration  - the  belief that  not  receiving SNAP  benefits                                                               
would force  people into  seeking employment.   He  asserted that                                                               
the difficulty  was that  often the  employment was  seasonal and                                                               
inadequate.   Many of  the recipients  were service  workers who,                                                               
even though  employed, still needed  the assistance  because they                                                               
did not get paid enough.  He  stated there was a class of workers                                                               
who were most vulnerable; businesses  were closing in response to                                                               
the COVID-19  pandemic; and  those workers  cannot telework.   He                                                               
emphasized   the  proposed   legislation  was   timely;  it   was                                                               
consistent with the  [HCR 17] focus on need [passed  in the House                                                               
on 3/17/20]; and it was critical.                                                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON  referred to the state's  opportunity to                                                               
identify  the most  favorable  period for  waiver;  that is,  the                                                               
months with the highest rate  of unemployment.  He suggested that                                                               
the  administration did  not advocate  for SNAP  beneficiaries in                                                               
that way.   He  said that  the communities  of Anchorage  and the                                                               
Matanuska-Susitna  Valley (Mat-Su)  were the  ones that  stood to                                                               
benefit from  the proposed  legislation.   He offered  his belief                                                               
that it  should be the  policy of the  state to seek  the waivers                                                               
available.   Other state policies  reflected a  similar approach.                                                               
He quoted  U.S. Senator Mitt  Romney:  "While expansions  of paid                                                               
leave,  unemployment insurance,  and SNAP  benefits are  crucial,                                                               
the check  will help  fill the  gaps for  Americans that  may not                                                               
quickly navigate different government options."                                                                                 
4:56:10 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR ZULKOSKY opened invited testimony  during the hearing on HB
4:56:29 PM                                                                                                                    
CARA DURR,  Director of Public  Engagement, Food Bank  of Alaska,                                                               
relayed that staff  at the Food Bank of Alaska  understand what a                                                               
critical  role SNAP  plays in  fighting  hunger in  Alaska.   For                                                               
every meal  provided by the  Feeding America national  network of                                                               
food  banks, SNAP  provided  nine meals.    Her organization  was                                                               
concerned with  any policy that  restricted access to  SNAP, such                                                               
as is  the case with  time limits.   When people lose  SNAP, they                                                               
turned to the already burdened  food bank network; the food banks                                                               
try but cannot  fill that gap.  The Food  Bank of Alaska supports                                                               
the goal  of helping low  income Alaskans  who can find  work and                                                               
keep a  job; however, restrictions  on access  to SNAP is  not an                                                               
effective way to attain that goal;  it is instead a punitive work                                                               
requirement.   Studies  have shown  that existing  mandatory work                                                               
requirements  in  SNAP  and other  programs,  such  as  Temporary                                                               
Assistance to Needy  Families (TANF), are ineffective.   She said                                                               
that TANF work requirements - in  place since 1996 - have yielded                                                               
little  or  no  long-term  positive   impacts  on  employment  or                                                               
MS. DURR continued  by saying that most people  who received SNAP                                                               
benefits  and can  work, do  work.   In many  ways SNAP  supports                                                               
work; when  people have  their basic needs  met, they  are better                                                               
prepared for  the workforce.   Time spent visiting  food pantries                                                               
is time  that could be  spent looking for  work or working.   She                                                               
offered that  many SNAP recipients  are working in  low-wage jobs                                                               
with unpredictable  hours.  For  people whose hours  are reduced,                                                               
who get  sick, or  who have  a sick child,  SNAP benefits  are at                                                               
risk.   She maintained that  many people  who are subject  to the                                                               
new rule who are not working  are not unemployed by choice.  Many                                                               
of those  subject to the  additional work  requirements struggled                                                               
to find work even  when the job market was healthy.   Lack of job                                                               
skills, living in  a rural area with few or  no jobs, undiagnosed                                                               
health conditions  or disabilities  are few  of the  reasons that                                                               
individuals  may not  work.   She said  that being  deemed "able-                                                               
bodied" does not mean job-ready,  and cutting a vulnerable person                                                               
off food assistance does not make them any more employable.                                                                     
MS.  DURR  relayed  that  while   there  are  allowed  individual                                                               
exemptions - such  as having a disability,  being medically unfit                                                               
for work, or receiving unemployment  benefits - and the state has                                                               
a low  bar for  meeting them, the  recipients need  to understand                                                               
enough about the rule to request the exemptions.                                                                                
MS.  DURR  stated  that  at  the Alaska  Food  Bank,  staff  have                                                               
received calls from  individuals who have lost  benefits; in most                                                               
cases the  individuals were  very confused  about the  policy and                                                               
why  they had  lost benefits.   The  confusion is  not unique  to                                                               
Alaska and is not  a reflection on the work of DPA  but is due to                                                               
the complexity of the rule.                                                                                                     
MS. DURR offered that currently  there are Alaskans who have lost                                                               
SNAP due  to the  new rule who,  instead of being  able to  buy a                                                               
small  amount of  emergency grocery  supplies, are  now going  to                                                               
crowded food  pantries and soup  kitchens to  get food.   As more                                                               
Alaskans lose  jobs and directives  to stay home increase,  it is                                                               
not  reasonable  to  expect  someone to  find  a  job  currently.                                                               
Alaska  needs to  plan for  the possibility  that the  [COVID-19]                                                               
situation will  intensify, which may  force closures of  the food                                                               
distribution  centers.   She said  that while  no one  could have                                                               
predicted the  current situation, clearly Alaska  needs to ensure                                                               
that SNAP can easily respond to  disasters of this sort.  Without                                                               
policy change,  those who have  lost benefits would be  unable to                                                               
requalify for SNAP; many workers who  have lost hours or jobs may                                                               
only qualify  for a short time.   She maintained SNAP  will be an                                                               
incredibly  important  resource  to  the many  Alaskans  who  are                                                               
struggling from the economic fallout  from COVID-19 in the short-                                                               
and long-term.  She expressed her  hope the program could be made                                                               
accessible to everyone who needed it.   She said she is confident                                                               
the state  will seek a variety  of ways to expand  access to SNAP                                                               
in  consideration of  COVID-19.   The  situation underscored  the                                                               
need to maintain SNAP flexibility at all times.                                                                                 
MS. DURR noted  in conclusion that SNAP benefits  are 100 percent                                                               
federally  funded; every  $1  spent in  SNAP  generated $1.70  in                                                               
local  economic activity;  SNAP injected  nearly $200  million in                                                               
federal  dollars  into  Alaska's   economy.    She  said,  "Let's                                                               
maximize  access  to  this  important   program  by  seeking  all                                                               
available  waivers  from  the  time  limit,  which  will  benefit                                                               
struggling Alaskans and our state economy."                                                                                     
5:01:50 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ referred to people  coming in to DPA for                                                               
interviews  and application  processing,  which  could present  a                                                               
concern  regarding  transmission  of  COVID-19  for  clients  and                                                               
employees.  She  asked what processes the division  will adopt to                                                               
ensure that people  can get access to  benefits without increased                                                               
risk of spreading COVID-19.                                                                                                     
5:02:41 PM                                                                                                                    
MS. O'BRIEN replied  that as many agencies are,  the division had                                                               
been  working hard  to  balance  the need  to  protect staff  and                                                               
clients with  the delivery of services.   She stated that  it was                                                               
especially  challenging  for  DPA:   because  of  the  number  of                                                               
homeless  individuals who  have no  other means  of communicating                                                               
with  the  division,  the  office cannot  close  its  lobbies  or                                                               
restrict   access.     She  described   solutions  that   DPA  is                                                               
implementing to  limit the need  for people to visit  the office:                                                               
working  with  federal  partners   to  use  telephonic  interview                                                               
options  and  asking  for   permission  to  extend  certification                                                               
deadlines.   For example, DPA  is seeking for approval  to extend                                                               
SNAP certifications for a period  of six months for March, April,                                                               
May, and  June benefits.   She said  that staff will  reassess as                                                               
operations  progress.    She  offered  that  TANF,  Adult  Public                                                               
Assistance  (APA),   Senior  Benefits,  and  [U.S.   Centers  for                                                               
Medicare and  Medicaid Services (CMS), U.S.  Department of Health                                                               
and Social Services (HSS)]  health insurance program ("Medicaid")                                                               
will be  aligned as much  as possible  to minimize the  impact to                                                               
clients and  staff.  She  added that she anticipated  an increase                                                               
in  the  number  of  individuals   coming  to  the  division  for                                                               
assistance  as a  result  of  job loss  and  other  issues.   She                                                               
mentioned that  changes were occurring rapidly  and guidance from                                                               
federal  partners  was  coming  to  the  division  hourly.    She                                                               
concluded that  together with federal partners,  the division was                                                               
acting as  quickly and  as thoughtfully as  possible to  meet the                                                               
needs of all Alaskans.                                                                                                          
5:05:42 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE   SPOHNHOLZ  asked   about   the  possibility   of                                                               
increasing the  use of online  applications and  using technology                                                               
to increase access and reduce in-person contact.                                                                                
MS.  O'BRIEN answered  that there  is an  online application  for                                                               
Medicaid   through  "myAlaska.gov"   or  through   the  federally                                                               
facilitated  marketplace; application  for other  benefits cannot                                                               
be  submitted  online;  however,  applications  can  be  accessed                                                               
online,  printed   out,  and   submitted  through   scanning  the                                                               
application and  emailing it  to the office  or dropping  it off.                                                               
She  added that  the division  is  seeking to  get permission  to                                                               
accept telephone  signatures so that individuals  may be assisted                                                               
over  the telephone  while  at  home.   She  maintained that  the                                                               
division is looking  for ways to accept  documentation outside of                                                               
normal practices.                                                                                                               
5:08:11 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE   SPOHNHOLZ  stated   she  was   surprised  online                                                               
applications were  not possible  for public  assistance benefits.                                                               
She offered having that capability  would save time and money, as                                                               
well as be useful for both clients and employees.                                                                               
MS. O'BRIEN  responded that the  division has been  exploring the                                                               
possibility of  an online application  with vendors.   In Alaska,                                                               
most of the  programs can be applied for in  one application; the                                                               
division has reached  out to other states  that have successfully                                                               
made  available   an  online  application.     She   stated  that                                                               
technology  is  a challenge  in  Alaska  due to  its  information                                                               
technology (IT)  resources; the division  has other IT  needs and                                                               
must  prioritize use  of  those  resources.   She  said that  the                                                               
online application  is a priority,  but the division  must engage                                                               
with several external stakeholders to accomplish it.                                                                            
5:09:46 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE TARR commented  that procedures involving printing                                                               
an  application and  then scanning  and emailing  it presented  a                                                               
very limiting option  for many people who did  not have Internet,                                                               
a printer, and/or a scanner.   She said that someone could take a                                                               
photograph  of  the  application  with a  smartphone,  [a  multi-                                                               
purpose mobile telephone with internet  access], but not everyone                                                               
had  smartphones.   She asked  that the  division consider  other                                                               
ways  for receiving  applications  so that  these  people do  not                                                               
"slip through the  cracks."  She maintained that she  has been in                                                               
hundreds  of  homes  in  her  district that  do  not  have  these                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE  TARR  asked  whether  Ms.  O'Brien's  mention  of                                                               
"permission to accept telephone  signatures" refers to permission                                                               
from  the individual  applicant,  permission from  the state,  or                                                               
permission from the federal government.                                                                                         
MS.  O'BRIEN  responded  that  for   the  Medicaid  program,  the                                                               
division had permission to accept  telephonic signatures; but for                                                               
programs like SNAP, the division  did not have federal permission                                                               
to  accept telephonic  signatures.   She maintained  the division                                                               
was working with  its federal partners, and  the federal partners                                                               
had been  responsive and cooperative  in helping DPA  address its                                                               
challenges.   She acknowledged that Alaska  had rural challenges,                                                               
as well as challenges regarding  individuals who did not have the                                                               
capability to  print or  access the internet.   She  offered that                                                               
DPA could mail applications to  individuals, and it is working on                                                               
options  for   taking  information  over  the   telephone.    She                                                               
mentioned that  staffing is a  concern as well, and  the division                                                               
is trying to dedicate resources appropriately for stability.                                                                    
5:12:52 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked for comment on  the new federal rule and why                                                               
Alaska's  use  of  the  10  percent  unemployment  rate  [as  the                                                               
requirement for a waiver] is more restrictive.                                                                                  
5:13:13 PM                                                                                                                    
ED  BOLEN, Senior  Policy Analyst,  Center on  Budget and  Policy                                                               
Priorities, responded  that the  proposed legislation  would give                                                               
Alaska  an   important  guide  for  addressing   access  to  food                                                               
assistance for  very poor unemployed  workers.  He said  SNAP was                                                               
historically  the second  most  effective  response to  worsening                                                               
economic  circumstances;   unemployment  insurance   offered  the                                                               
quickest response.  He relayed  that Secretary of Treasury [Steve                                                               
Mnuchin] just  expressed his concern  that the  unemployment rate                                                               
may spike to  20 percent.  "The current policy  in Alaska - where                                                               
the state would  only request waivers of this time  limit for ...                                                               
ABAWDs  ... if  unemployment  is  over 10  percent  - means  that                                                               
because there  is this look-back  period that was  mentioned, the                                                               
state  would essentially  identify areas  where unemployment  was                                                               
over 10 percent for at least 12  months."  He offered that by the                                                               
time  that  happened, the  recession  would  have almost  passed.                                                               
Almost  every  other  state,  without the  restriction  of  a  10                                                               
percent  requirement of  unemployment before  requesting waivers,                                                               
would  be  able  to  identify  areas  where  unemployment  spikes                                                               
quickly  and at  lower rates.   He  said, "If  their unemployment                                                               
rate is currently  6 percent and then it spikes  up, that's a lot                                                               
of  low-income workers  losing jobs."   States  would be  able to                                                               
identify areas  in which  they could  request waivers  and ensure                                                               
that  people have  access to  food  while they  were looking  for                                                               
work.   He  opined that  HB  255 would  address what  could be  a                                                               
sudden  and  worsening impact  on  low-income  people in  service                                                               
industry jobs who would likely be affected.                                                                                     
5:15:56 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND echoed the  comments regarding the access                                                               
of low-income individuals  to computers.  She  mentioned that the                                                               
libraries are closed in Anchorage;  many services are provided in                                                               
libraries, such as the social  worker stationed at the library to                                                               
answer  questions from  homeless people.   She  offered that  not                                                               
only  do  people  lack  the  equipment  necessary  to  submit  an                                                               
application, but many lack the  sophistication to fill out a form                                                               
on a  smartphone; that is, if  one has a smartphone  and the form                                                               
can be filled out on a smartphone.                                                                                              
5:17:55 PM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON  encouraged the committee to  advance HB
255 as  soon as  possible.   He offered that  it would  be widely                                                               
supported and, unfortunately, has become especially important.                                                                  
5:18:22 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR ZULKOSKY indicated that HB 255 would be held over.                                                                        
5:18:52 PM                                                                                                                    
There being no  further business before the  committee, the House                                                               
Health  and  Social  Services   Standing  Committee  meeting  was                                                               
adjourned at 5:19 p.m.                                                                                                          

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
HB 255 Sponsor Statement 3.3.20.pdf HHSS 3/17/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 255
HB 255 Sectional Analysis 3.3.20.pdf HHSS 3/17/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 255
HB 255 version A.PDF HHSS 3/17/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 255
HB 255 Fiscal Note HSS.pdf HHSS 3/17/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 255
HB 255 Supporting Documents.pdf HHSS 3/17/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 255
HB 267 ver.S Work Draft.pdf HHSS 3/17/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 267
HB 267 ver.S Sponsor Statement.pdf HHSS 3/17/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 267
HB 267 ver.S Sectional Analysis.pdf HHSS 3/17/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 267
HB 267 Summary of Changes Version U to Version S.pdf HHSS 3/17/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 267
HB 267 Fiscal Note DCCED.pdf HHSS 3/17/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 267
HB 267 Handout_Patient Implications Brief.pdf HHSS 3/17/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 267
HB 267 Handout_State STLD Policies.pdf HHSS 3/17/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 267
HB 267 Handout_STLD Plans Offered in Alaska.pdf HHSS 3/17/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 267
Christopher Gay Resume_Redacted.pdf HHSS 3/17/2020 3:00:00 PM
Governor's Appointees to State Medical Board
State Medical Board Sarah Bidelow Hood.pdf HHSS 3/17/2020 3:00:00 PM
Governor's Appointees to State Medical Board
HB 255 PPT.pdf HHSS 3/17/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 255
HB 267 ver.S PowerPoint.pdf HHSS 3/17/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 267
HB 255 Supporting Document- CBPP Factsheet on Workers 3.17.20.pdf HHSS 3/17/2020 3:00:00 PM
HB 255