Legislature(1999 - 2000)
02/08/1999 05:06 PM House FSH
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON FISHERIES
February 8, 1999
5:06 p.m.
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
PRESENTATION: OVERVIEW OF ALASKA SEAFOOD MARKETING INSTITUTE AND
SEAFOOD MARKETS
CHAIRMAN BILL HUDSON called the House Special Committee on
Fisheries meeting to order at 5:06 p.m. Members present at the
call to order were Representatives Hudson, Dyson, Harris, Morgan,
Kapsner and Smalley. Also present was Representative Austerman.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
BARBARA BELKNAP, Executive Director, Alaska Seafood Marketing
Institute (ASMI), presented a brief overview of ASMI and its
programs. She explained that ASMI is fully funded by the industry
and receives no general fund dollars. ASMI works with food service
and retail outlets to promote consumption of all varieties of
Alaskan seafood. They attempt to build relationships with the
decision-makers; for example, ASMI sponsors a three-day seminar for
executive chefs at the Culinary Institute of America, which has
garnered thousands of promotions throughout the country.
MS. BELKNAP, in response to questions from committee members
regarding farmed salmon, indicated that farmed salmon outsells wild
product in the United States. Alaska finds itself in the position
of developing a market in the U.S., since most of our product has
gone overseas. She noted that some places like Europe and Japan
are becoming more concerned about the "artificial" aspects of
farmed salmon. There is an increasing trend toward natural
products. ASMI is about to start a major campaign to show Alaskan
salmon is not endangered. She noted that there are two
misconceptions about salmon: one is that all salmon is farmed, and
the other is that there are no wild salmon left.
MS. BELKNAP addressed questions from the committee regarding ASMI's
financial resources. She noted that the biggest challenge is
getting consumers to choose seafood, and then, by extension,
Alaskan seafood. The United States is primarily a nation of beef
and chicken eaters. ASMI recently received a $5 million federal
grant which has helped bolster their budget. It is still much
smaller than our competitors; for example, Norway spends $20
million per year on their marketing effort. The State of Alaska
withdrew general funds when the 1% assessment went into effect, but
continued providing $500,000 in matching funds for a federal
program until three years ago.
SANDRO LANE, Owner, Taku Fisheries and Taku Smokeries, and ERIC
NORMAN, General Manager, Taku Fisheries, operate a small
value-added company called Taku Smokeries and a medium-sized
processing facility, Taku Fisheries. Mr. Lane stated that he did
not see value-added as being a volume business. He noted that
there is a price differential between wild and farmed fish. He
felt it is even more difficult to compete against that price
differential when you "add value" because of additional labor
costs.
MR. LANE stated, in response to questions regarding the oversupply
of farmed fish and the decline in the Asian markets, that the
greater problem has been an oversupply of farmed fish. The Asian
economy has declined, but it seems to have bottomed out. The
oversupply of farmed fish has required him to reorganize his
business. Fifteen years ago, Taku Smokeries did the majority of
its business on the wholesale market and only a small portion
through retail. As it became obvious that they could not compete
with the increased production and lower costs of farmed fish, they
now do almost all of their business through their local retail
store and mail order. Mr. Lane also stated that he had filled out
several questionnaires for the Federal Trade Commission regarding
unfair trade practices by Chilean farmed salmon producers, but he
has not heard anything from them.
MR. LANE was asked about new product development, and he noted that
he was able to take advantage of a federal program for small
businesses; however, he did not believe the State of Alaska offered
a comparable program. He also stated that there is a great deal of
capital and risk involved in developing a new product, which makes
it even more difficult for small companies to get the necessary
financial backing.
MR. LANE discussed quality issues and the need to improve
management of the resource to maximize quality and value. He
stated that he had discussions with the Alaska Department of Fish
and Game (ADF&G) regarding managing for quality. He felt that
ADF&G would continue doing things the same way because it is the
way it has always been done.
REPRESENTATIVE MORGAN asked a question regarding the effects of a
federal takeover of subsistence fisheries on commercial fisheries.
Neither witness felt qualified to answer, but Mr. Norman did not
think there would be much of an impact.
COMMITTEE ACTION
The committee took no action.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 6:06 p.m.
NOTE:
Due to a mechanical malfunction, no tape is available for this
meeting.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|