03/24/2009 03:00 PM House ENERGY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HJR25 | |
| HB31 | |
| Adjourn |
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| *+ | HJR 25 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 31 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON ENERGY
March 24, 2009
3:52 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Charisse Millett, Co-Chair
Representative Nancy Dahlstrom
Representative Kyle Johansen
Representative Jay Ramras
Representative Chris Tuck
MEMBERS ABSENT
Representative Bryce Edgmon, Co-Chair
Representative Pete Petersen
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 25, Urging the United States Congress
to classify hydroelectric power as a renewable and alternative
energy source.
- MOVED CSHJR 25 (ENE) OUT OF COMMITTEE
HOUSE BILL NO. 31, "An Act relating to net energy metering for
retail electricity suppliers and customers; and providing for an
effective date."
- HEARD AND HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HJR 25
SHORT TITLE: HYDROELECTRIC POWER; RENEWABLE ENERGY
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) THOMAS
03/13/09 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/13/09 (H) ENE, RES
03/24/09 (H) ENE AT 3:00 PM BARNES 124
BILL: HB 31
SHORT TITLE: NET ENERGY METERING
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) OLSON
01/20/09 (H) PREFILE RELEASED 1/9/09
01/20/09 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/20/09 (H) ENE, L&C
03/24/09 (H) ENE AT 3:00 PM BARNES 124
WITNESS REGISTER
REPRESENTATIVE WILLIAM "BILL" THOMAS, JR.
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented HJR 25 as the sponsor.
KACI SCHROEDER-HOTCH, Staff
Representative William "Bill" Thomas, Jr.
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing on
HJR 25.
CLAY KOPLIN, Manager
Cordova Electric Cooperative
Cordova, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HJR 25, as amended.
HAP SYMMONDS, Chairman
Board of Directors
Cordova Electric Cooperative;
Representative
Ocean Beauty Seafood
Cordova, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HJR 25.
ROBERT GRIMM, CEO
Alaska Power & Telephone
Port Townsend, Washington
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HJR 25.
DOUGLAS OTT, Hydro Program Manager
Alaska Energy Authority (AEA)
Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority (AIDEA) and
Alaska Energy Authority (AEA)
Department of Commerce, Community, & Economic Development
(DCCED)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HJR 25.
JAMES HEMSATH, Deputy Director for Development
Alaska Industrial Development & Export Energy Authority (AIDEA)
and the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA)
Department of Commerce, Community, & Economic Development
(DCCED)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of the committee
substitute for HJR 25.
JERRY MEDINA, Administrative Officer
Inside Passage Electric Cooperative (IPEC)
Auke Bay, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HJR 25.
REPRESENTATIVE KURT OLSON
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: As the sponsor. explained the origins of HB
31.
JENNIFER SENETTE, Staff
Representative Kurt Olson
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented HB 31 on behalf of Representative
Kurt Olson, sponsor.
ERIC MUEHLING
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the hearing on HB 31.
MARK MASTELLER
Mat-Su, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the hearing on HB 31.
JIM ADAMS
Nome, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 31.
PETER MCKAY
Kenai, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the hearing on HB 31.
MIKE O'MEARA
Representative
Homer Electric Association Members Forum (HEA Members Forum)
Homer, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the hearing on HB 31.
MARGARET ADSIT, Energy Coordinator
Alaska Center for the Environment (ACE)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the hearing on HB 31.
DAVE GARDNER, Vice President
Marketing & Member Services
Golden Valley Electric Association (GVEA)
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition of HB 31.
ROBERT REAGAN, Rates & Tariffs Supervisor
Anchorage Municipal Light & Power (ML&P),
Municipality of Anchorage
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 31.
DEAN THOMPSON, Attorney-at-Law
Kemppel, Huffman & Ellis
Representative, Alaska Power Association (APA)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Representing the Alaska Power Association,
testified in opposition to HB 31.
ACTION NARRATIVE
3:52:38 PM
CO-CHAIR CHARISSE MILLETT called the House Special Committee on
Energy meeting to order at 3:52 p.m. Present at the call to
order were Representatives Tuck, Dahlstrom, Ramras, Johansen,
and Millett.
HJR 25-HYDROELECTRIC POWER; RENEWABLE ENERGY
CO-CHAIR MILLETT announced that the first order of business
would be HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 25, Urging the United States
Congress to classify hydroelectric power as a renewable and
alternative energy source.
3:52:52 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WILLIAM "BILL" THOMAS, JR., Alaska State
Legislature, sponsor, presented HJR 25 that urges Congress to
clarify hydroelectric (hydro) power as renewable. He said the
federal government does not recognize hydro power as renewable,
probably because, in the Lower 48, hydroelectric power usually
involves building a large dam that blocks a valley. In Alaska,
however, there are high glacial creeks and streams that can be a
source of energy with very little, or no, impact on the
environment. Representative Thomas informed the committee he
has five hydro generators in his district that are located high
enough so there is no impact to salmon streams. He advised that
if there is a favorable response to the resolution from the
federal government, it will be possible to use further
legislation to obtain matching funds from federal renewable
energy funding sources.
3:54:55 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN moved to adopt the committee substitute
(CS) for HJR 25, Version E, as the working document.
KACI SCHROEDER-HOTCH, Staff to Representative Thomas, Alaska
State Legislature, presented the proposed changes to the
resolution. The first change, on page 2, line 2, was the
deletion of the references to specific areas of the state and
the insertion of "entire state." The second change was in
response to a request by the Alaska Industrial Development &
Export Authority (AIDEA) for the deletion of the word "dam" on
page 2, lines 4-5.
3:56:14 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DAHLSTROM asked whether the sponsor wants the
resolution sent to the President also.
REPRESENTATIVE THOMAS said yes.
3:57:06 PM
CLAY KOPLIN, Manager, Cordova Electric Cooperative, informed the
committee that because hydro is not considered a renewable
source of energy, it is left out of funding opportunities at the
federal level. Ironically, the upfront cost of hydro is similar
to wind, but the life of hydro infrastructure is 50 to 100
years; therefore, hydro is the best solution for many parts of
the state. He praised Representative Thomas and the work of the
special committees on energy.
3:58:42 PM
HAP SYMMONDS, Chairman, Board of Directors, Cordova Electric
Cooperative; Representative, Ocean Beauty Seafood, opined the
resolution is long overdue. He asked whether the proposed
deletion on line 5 was "require little or no dam construction
and."
CO-CHAIR MILLETT said yes.
MR. SYMMONDS restated his support.
3:59:58 PM
ROBERT GRIMM, CEO, Alaska Power & Telephone, voiced his strong
support of the resolution. His firm began in 1995 using 1
percent renewable fuel and 99 percent fossil fuel; presently,
the company uses 31 percent fossil fuel and 68 percent renewable
fuel. He noted that all of the renewable sources of energy now
used by his company are hydro, although hydro does not meet the
current definition of renewable; in fact, there is no provision
of federal [funding] for new hydro. This is especially a
problem for a young state, like Alaska, that does not have much
of an existing hydro system. Finally, he opined the passage of
this resolution "would show some leadership ...."
4:02:02 PM
DOUGLAS OTT, Hydro Program Manager, Alaska Energy Authority
(AEA), Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority (AIDEA)
and Alaska Energy Authority (AEA), Department of Commerce,
Community, & Economic Development (DCCED), stated his support
for the resolution and that its passage would promote the
development of hydro power in the state.
4:02:38 PM
JAMES HEMSATH, Deputy Director for Development, Alaska
Industrial Development & Export Authority (AIDEA) and Alaska
Energy Authority (AEA), Department of Commerce, Community, &
Economic Development (DCCED), expressed his support for the
committee substitute for HJR 25 and explained his agency was
concerned that the wording in the resolution, prior to the
change proposed by the CS, would eliminate the potential
development of a large hydro power plant in Alaska.
4:03:32 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAMRAS expressed his concern for halibut.
4:03:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE THOMAS responded.
4:04:13 PM
JERRY MEDINA, Administrative Officer, Inside Passage Electric
Cooperative (IPEC), read the following statement [original
punctuation provided]:
Hydropower is a clean, domestic, and renewable energy
source, that does not consume more water than is
produced by nature. According the Energy Information
Administration, of the renewable energy sources that
generate electricity, hydropower is the most often
used. It accounted for 6 percent of total U.S.
electricity generation and 71 percent of generation
from renewables in 2007.
Among the advantages of hydropower are low operating
costs, because the fuel, water, comes free of charge.
This contributes to provide inexpensive electricity,
because no fossil fuels are required to produce the
electricity, and the earth naturally replenishes the
"fuel" supply. Hydropower is also one of the most
efficient ways to generate electricity; modern
turbines can convert as much as 90 % of the available
energy into electricity. Hydropower energy produces
no greenhouse gases or other air pollution and leaves
behind no waste. And, unlike other energy sources
such as fossil fuel, water is not destroyed during the
production of electricity - it can be reused for other
purposes.
Hydropower energy is very abundant in Southeast
Alaska. Since water is a naturally recurring domestic
product and is not subject to the whims of foreign
suppliers, there is no worry of unstable fuel prices,
fuel spillage or contamination issues, transportation
concerns, or national security issues.
Water is one of our most valuable resources, and
hydropower makes use of this renewable treasure.
Hydroelectric power plants do not use up resources to
create electricity nor do they pollute the air, land,
or water.
4:05:32 PM
CO-CHAIR MILLETT closed public testimony.
4:05:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DAHLSTROM offered a conceptual amendment to page
2, line 16, that renumbered lines 16-21, and on page 2, line 16,
inserted "Honorable Barack H. Obama, President of the United
States;" after the word "the." There being no objection,
Conceptual Amendment 1 was adopted.
4:06:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK offered an amendment on behalf of
Representative Petersen. The purpose of the amendment was to
strengthen the resolution specifically for Alaska, in light of
the fact that Alaska has ample water supplies and hydro is a
well-accepted renewable resource in Alaska. Conceptual
Amendment 2 read:
WHEREAS regions in the United States outside of Alaska
have limited water supplies and water sources that can
lead to classifying hydroelectric power as
nonrenewable, but all areas of Alaska have ample water
supplies that are capable of providing a renewable
energy source for hydroelectric projects in the state.
4:07:26 PM
CO-CHAIR MILLETT objected for the purpose of discussion.
4:07:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN requested a written copy of the
amendment.
4:08:24 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 4:08 p.m. to 4:09 p.m.
4:09:32 PM
Co-Chair Millett called the committee back to order at 4:09 p.m.
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK withdrew Conceptual Amendment 2.
4:09:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE THOMAS stated his objection to Conceptual
Amendment 2 was that a resolution specific to Alaska may prevent
other states with similar issues "to get onboard."
4:10:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN appreciated the leadership shown by
Representative Thomas for hydro across Alaska.
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK agreed and added that hydro is definitely
renewable.
4:11:32 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DAHLSTROM moved CSHJR 25, Version E, with
Conceptual Amendment 1, and attached zero fiscal note and
individual recommendations. There being no objection, CSHJR
25(ENE) was moved out of committee with individual
recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes.
HB 31-NET ENERGY METERING
4:12:08 PM
CO-CHAIR MILLETT announced that the final order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 31, "An Act relating to net energy
metering for retail electricity suppliers and customers; and
providing for an effective date."
4:12:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KURT OLSON, Alaska State Legislature, informed
the committee that HB 31 was a rewrite of a bill that died
during the 25th legislative session.
4:13:07 PM
JENNIFER SENETTE, Staff to Representative Kurt Olson, Alaska
State Legislature, informed the committee net metering is a
method of metering energy consumed and produced at a home or
business that has its own source of renewable energy. In its
simplest form, net metering employs a standard electrical meter
that records power going back from a household or business onto
the electrical grid, and going from the electrical grid to the
household or business. Thus, when excess power is being
generated by the household facility the excess power goes to the
utility, the meter runs backward, and credits are earned for the
consumer. At other times, power runs to the household and the
meter runs normally. She continued to explain that at the end
of the billing period, the customer pays for the net consumption
of power. The proposed legislation is an arrangement whereby
customers can offset part of the cost of their consumption of
power. In addition, excess energy is flowing to the grid. Ms.
Senette pointed out that the bill eliminates the need for the
consumer to purchase a new meter, as the existing meters can be
used, and also eliminates the need for storage batteries. These
two factors are important in order to keep the installation of a
household renewable system economic. She reviewed the key
points of HB 31; Part (b) addresses the rates of the credits
generated when a consumer puts excess energy back out onto the
grid, and Part (c) addresses the rates at which the consumer can
sell credits back to the retailer. In addition, Part (d)
specifies that retailers organized as a cooperative are exempt,
but can "opt in." She explained that the fiscal note reflects
the cost of the addition of one more position at the Regulatory
Commission of Alaska (RCA). Ms. Senette further explained that
although 44 states allow net metering, each state has a
different policy; thus the RCA declined to adopt federal net
metering standards because the other systems are inappropriate
for Alaska. The biggest difference between legislation in other
states is how each state credits the excess energy that is put
back onto the grid. She concluded that HB 31 encourages
Alaskans to invest in small scale renewable energy systems by
allowing them to generate credits.
4:20:43 PM
REPRESENTATIVE OLSON observed that this bill is a pre-file: in
fact, the RCA has opened two dockets on this subject thus he
requested that the committee hold the bill until the RCA issues
its decisions.
4:21:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAMRAS noted his conflict of interest, as he is
an alternate energy producer.
4:21:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN asked whether a municipal utility enjoys
the opt-in provision available to cooperatives.
4:22:30 PM
MS. SENETTE was unsure.
4:22:39 PM
ERIC MUEHLING informed the committee he produces solar electric
power by a 10.5 kilowatt solar array that is connected to the
local utility grid and that prevents the release of 1,000 pounds
of CO2 gas into the atmosphere each month. Mr. Muehling pointed
out that his local utility, GVEA, burns coal for much of the
electricity used in Fairbanks. He said he strongly supports net
metering; in fact, the legislation for net metering in most
states allows the utility to pay the retail price for power and
this is a powerful incentive for renewable power generation.
This incentive serves the public good and is a public service as
it avoids putting CO2 gas into the atmosphere. He acknowledged
there will be opposition to net metering from public utilities,
who now pay only one-half of the value of the power. The
present system is a disincentive to conservation, discouraging
to solar producers, and "plain wrong." Mr. Muehling opined the
net effect of net metering on an electric utility is similar to
the effect of electric energy conservation; for example,
utilities encourage the use of fluorescent light bulbs, but
reward customers that use higher levels of kilowatt hours. He
stated that he strongly supported net metering; however, he
asked whether HB 31 was for residential alternative producers
only and how the legislation will determine intent. Also, he
suggested the proposed Sec. 42.45.047 (a)(5) should allow
cooperatives to "opt out" instead of "opt in."
4:27:05 PM
MARK MASTELLER stated he was a resident of Mat-Su where there
are abundant sources of renewable energy. He stated his support
for net metering legislation because it will improve energy
security and stimulate economic development; in fact, he opined
there will be an increase in local economic development after
stable net metering is established. Regarding HB 31, he stated
he was glad there was not an aggregate limit on the amount of
net metering allowed, and he also supported the aspect of an
annual accounting period. He suggested the maximum kilowatt
size should be increased from 25 kilowatts to 100 kilowatts and
that electric cooperatives and those that already use renewable
sources should not be exempted.
4:29:53 PM
JIM ADAMS expressed his belief that this bill is an incentive
for alternate power sources and he supported any incentive to
reduce the dependence on diesel powered fuel generation.
4:30:57 PM
PETER MCKAY stated he is an advocate for distributed generation,
homeowner-generated energy, and the homeowner's easy
interconnection with their retail electrical supplier via a
single bi-directional meter. Mr. McKay has been an active
participant in RCA docket R 06-005 since 2006, and he opined the
time for net metering in Alaska is now: however, it will require
coordination between the legislative and regulatory branches of
the state government. He stated that one of his concerns about
HB 31 is the treatment of surplus energy by negotiated purchase
power rates; for example, a contract with an utility that
specifies both a time and an amount. There is also the option
of a nonfirm rate that is a contract for an unspecified time and
amount, and an "avoided cost" rate that is basically the cost of
fuel. The bill proposes a firm power rate; however, he
expressed his preference for "a retail credit that's rolled over
to a full year, and then ... [the customer will] pay that price
at the end of the annual settling-up period." The RCA proposed
to essentially give "avoided cost" for a credit; therefore,
there must be reconciliation between the RCA and the proposed
legislation. Mr. McKay then pointed out the exemption of
electrical cooperatives in HB 31 clearly discriminates against
customers who buy power from the Homer Electric Association
(HEA). He suggested that everyone should have the same
opportunity to put home-generated electricity back onto the
grid. In addition, the 25 kilowatt limit will discourage future
power generation by larger industrial or small commercial
customers, and he encouraged expanding the limit to 100
kilowatts.
4:38:01 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAMRAS related GVEA is a cooperative and has an
obligation to provide the cheapest rates to users; thus it is
adamant that it not pass the cost of hooking up net metering
onto its rate payers. Secondly, he suggested Mr. McKay should
look at the Sustainable Natural Alternative Power (SNAP) program
in effect at GVEA and in Chelan County, Washington.
4:39:41 PM
MIKE O'MEARA stated he represented the Homer Electric
Association Members Forum (HEA Members Forum), an ad hoc group
of 350 HEA members who support movement away from fossil fuels
and toward renewable fuels. The HEA Members Forum advocates for
net metering standards that can provide savings on energy costs,
reduce the demand for power from the utility, create jobs, and
supply clean energy to the grid. Regarding HB 31, the Members
Forum supports an annual accounting period over a monthly
accounting period due to variances in weather patterns. The
Members Forum opposes the exemption of electrical cooperatives
and crediting based on the negotiated firm power rate; in fact,
it prefers crediting in kilowatt hours. Further, the Members
Forum supports an increase in the limit on participation by
kilowatt hours from 25 to 100 kilowatt hours, and encourages
final language that will establish true net metering for all
Railbelt utilities in a timely manner. Mr. O'Meara acknowledged
that HEA is attempting to initiate a SNAP program; however, SNAP
programs over time do not provide the dependable payback that
net metering will thus are not an adequate replacement for net
metering.
4:44:35 PM
MARGARET ADSIT, Energy Coordinator, Alaska Center for the
Environment (ACE), informed the committee ACE is a not-for-
profit environmental educational advocacy organization founded
in 1971. Her organization has 6,000 members and its energy
vision is to inspire individuals, businesses, and government
entities to think about renewable energy, energy efficiency, and
energy conservation. The ACE supports establishing statewide
net energy standards; however, she recommended removing the
provision in HB 31 that exempts cooperatives from participation.
Ms. Adsit said this provision will waste time and undermine the
net metering work underway at the RCA. She concluded that ACE
supports the development of net metering in the state, provided
that it occurs in a timely fashion that allows for an even
application of net metering across the Railbelt.
4:47:31 PM
DAVE GARDNER, Vice President, Marketing & Member Services, GVEA,
informed the committee GVEA has successfully encouraged power
producers' participation through the SNAP program. This program
meets the needs of the cooperative and its members better than
net metering. Because SNAP is voluntary and self-supporting,
it does not "cross-subsidize" costs for producers by other
members. In addition, SNAP producers share the funds collected
from SNAP contributors, thus GVEA's program compensates SNAP
producers at a higher rate than they would receive through net
metering programs. Mr. Gardner observed that GVEA is
participating in RCA's net metering and interconnection
standards workshops and believes that if the state were to
adopt net metering and interconnection standards legislation,
the RCA should be the agency tasked with oversight and
administration of the programs. Moreover, GVEA encourages a
delay in passage of HB 31 while the RCA is investigating these
issues.
4:49:15 PM
ROBERT REAGAN, Rates & Tariffs Supervisor, Anchorage Municipal
Light & Power (ML&P), Municipality of Anchorage, stated that
ML&P believes that net metering is potentially a very large
subsidy paid by rate payers to fellow customers. Therefore, HB
31 is a violation of the cost-causer/cost-payer principle. He
urged the committee to consider that the RCA has more expertise
and information on this subject than the legislature, thus the
legislature should not preempt a decision by the RCA.
Furthermore, any exemptions in legislation should apply to all
utilities equally, unless there is a compelling reason.
4:51:28 PM
DEAN THOMPSON, Attorney-at-Law, Kemppel, Huffman & Ellis, stated
he was representing the Alaska Power Association (APA) that is a
statewide trade group representing almost 40 municipal,
cooperative, and other electric utilities. The APA encourages
the committee to wait on any relevant legislation until the RCA
completes its work that was begun in 2006. At that time the RCA
opened a docket to consider federal requirements regarding a
federal net metering standard, and it now has two dockets open
to consider a specific Alaskan net metering standard and a
specific Alaskan interconnection standard. He called attention
to a technical workshop attended by industry representatives and
net metering proponents that began to bridge the gap between the
two sides. Mr. Thompson urged the committee to allow the RCA to
make its decision in the best interest of all of the parties.
Finally, he emphasized the APA and its members are not opposed
to renewable generation or to customers who wish to offset their
energy load; in fact, federal and state law gives the consumer-
generator the right to sell power to an electric utility. Mr.
Thompson opined the dispute is based on the price.
4:55:04 PM
HB 31 was held over for further public testimony.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Special Committee on Energy meeting was adjourned at [4:55 p.m.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 31 net metering map.PDF |
HENE 3/24/2009 3:00:00 PM HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 31 |
| Alaska Coal PowerPoint 03242009.pdf |
HENE 3/24/2009 3:00:00 PM |
|
| HJR 25 fiscal note.pdf.pdf |
HENE 3/24/2009 3:00:00 PM |
|
| IREC Net Metering chart.PDF |
HENE 3/24/2009 3:00:00 PM |
|
| HB 31 sectional summary.PDF |
HENE 3/24/2009 3:00:00 PM HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 31 |
| HB 31 sponsor statement.PDF |
HENE 3/24/2009 3:00:00 PM HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 31 |
| HJR 25 sponsor statement.PDF |
HENE 3/24/2009 3:00:00 PM |
|
| HJR 25 NHA Waterpower.PDF |
HENE 3/24/2009 3:00:00 PM |
|
| HB31-CED-RCA-03-23-09.pdf |
HENE 3/24/2009 3:00:00 PM |
HB 31 |
| HJR 25 CS changes.pdf |
HENE 3/24/2009 3:00:00 PM |