Legislature(2009 - 2010)BARNES 124
03/10/2009 03:00 PM House ENERGY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Presentation(s): Southeast Alaska Interties, by Robert Venables, Southeast Conference | |
| Presentation(s): Cook Inlet Natural Gas, by Ed Kerr, Armstrong Oil and Gas | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON ENERGY
March 10, 2009
3:05 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Bryce Edgmon, Co-Chair
Representative Charisse Millett, Co-Chair
Representative Nancy Dahlstrom
Representative Kyle Johansen
Representative Pete Petersen
Representative Chris Tuck
MEMBERS ABSENT
Representative Jay Ramras
OTHER LEGISLATORS PRESENT
Representative Cathy Engstrom Munoz
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
PRESENTATION(S): SOUTHEAST ALASKA INTERTIES,
BY ROBERT VENABLES, SOUTHEAST CONFERENCE
-HEARD
PRESENTATION(S): COOK INLET NATURAL GAS,
BY ED KERR, ARMSTRONG OIL AND GAS COMPANY
- HEARD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
No previous action to record
WITNESS REGISTER
ROBERT VENABLES, Energy Coordinator
Southeast Conference (SEC)
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Gave a PowerPoint presentation on
Southeast Alaska Interties.
REPRESENTATIVE CATHY ENGSTROM MUNOZ
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Asked questions during the
presentation by Mr. Venables.
ED KERR, Vice President for Land and Development
Armstrong Oil & Gas
Denver, Colorado
POSITION STATEMENT: Gave a presentation regarding Cook
Inlet natural gas.
ACTION NARRATIVE
CO-CHAIR CHARISSE MILLETT called the House Special
Committee on Energy meeting to order at 3:05 p.m.
Present at the call to order were Representatives
Johansen, Petersen, Tuck, and Millett. Representatives
Dahlstrom and Edgmon arrived as the meeting was in
progress. Representative Munoz was also in attendance.
^PRESENTATION(S): SOUTHEAST ALASKA INTERTIES, BY ROBERT
VENABLES, SOUTHEAST CONFERENCE
CO-CHAIR MILLETT announced that the first order of
business would be a presentation on Southeast Alaska
Interties by Robert Venables, Energy Coordinator,
Southeast Conference.
3:06:17 PM
ROBERT VENABLES, Energy Coordinator, Southeast
Conference (SEC), informed the committee Southeast
Conference is a private membership organization that
brings together the communities, municipalities, and
businesses throughout the region of Southeast Alaska.
It is one of seven Alaska Regional Development
Organizations (ARDORs), is a Federal Economic
Development District (EDD), and is the USDA Resource
Conservation and Development (RC&D) Council for the
region. Southeast Conference's mission statement is to
undertake and support activities that promote strong
economies, healthy communities, and a quality
environment in Southeast Alaska. He noted the causes
embraced by SEC include tourism, timber, fisheries,
health care, transportation, and energy. The mission
statement of the SEC Energy Committee is: To reduce,
to the maximum extent possible, the use of diesel as a
primary fuel source for the generation of electricity.
He noted that studies over the past eighty years have
shown Southeast has a plethora of hydroelectric
resources to develop. Furthermore, these resources can
be connected through a grid system and shared
throughout the region. The program goal for the SEC
Energy Committee is to reduce dependence on fossil
fuels and lower costs to rate payers. This will be
accomplished by working with member communities to
develop the infrastructure that is needed to complete
the regional grid. Mr. Venables advised hydropower is
the best resource to be utilized in this region. The
SEC Energy Committee has been working on an energy plan
for the region since 1997-1998. In 2000, the Acres
Report was recognized by Congress and up to $384
million was authorized for the Southeast interties.
Because of its standing with the state and federal
governments, SEC has been able to partner with the
Denali Commission, USDA Rural Development, and with the
state legislature to tackle energy issues. Mr.
Venables relayed the Kake/Petersburg intertie and the
Reynolds Creek project are approaching construction,
and the Swan Lake/Tyee intertie is nearing completion.
He explained the purpose of each of the interties is to
provide lower cost power to smaller communities,
especially those using 100 percent diesel fuel, and
those that are approaching the maximum capacity of
their existing hydro systems. As the grid system
develops, it allows the connection of resources on a
regional basis, so that as the intertie goes from point
to point, power generation from areas of low population
is picked up. The production of surplus energy will
lower rates, thereby encouraging the development of
economic ventures such as mining, or a technical-based
industry. In addition, there would be opportunities
along the grid for the development of biomass, tidal,
geothermal, and other future sources of energy.
3:12:32 PM
MR. VENABLES opined the intertie will allow Alaskans to
maintain "quality of life" and will support the
development of other renewable sources of energy that
can then be sold into the line. He said hydro power is
Southeast's "bullet line." Slide 7 listed identified
hydroelectric sites in the region that have the
potential of producing a total of over 339 megawatts of
power. Slide 8 was a map that showed the location of
the existing and potential hydro plants that are needed
to provide power to the growing population centers of
Sitka, Ketchikan, Wrangell, and Petersburg. Mr.
Venables warned against letting the opportunity to
develop renewable resources go by if oil prices fall,
and praised the legislature's commitment to renewable
energy. He presented a series of maps that pictured
the vision of the intertie, but cautioned that as costs
escalate for certain portions of the submarine cable,
the development of certain legs may be delayed. He
stressed that the number one priority for SEC is to
facilitate the intertie project in Kake. Kake has a
dire need for improvements in transportation and
energy; in fact, the electricity rates there are 63
cents per kilowatt hour. This high rate has resulted
in the closing of businesses, the loss of population,
and in social difficulties. Southeast Conference
continues to work in Kake with local municipalities,
utilities, and multiple governmental agencies,
including the Department of Transportation & Public
Facilities (DOTPF), on a northern route for a road
between Kake and Petersburg that will meet the needs of
transportation and energy.
3:17:34 PM
MR. VENABLES said there will soon be a determination of
the best route; in fact, the reason to co-locate the
road and the intertie is to reduce environmental
impact, the cost of development, and the cost of
maintenance. Slide 12 was of Prince of Wales Island
and illustrated an intertie system with a sub [marine]
unit. The island will have a full build-up when the
system continues to Naukati and Coffman Cove; all
communities will be connected except for Whale Pass.
Slide 13 showed the northern end of Lynn Canal with the
connections between the communities of Skagway, Haines,
and Klukwan. In this instance, two utilities are
working together with an interconnected grid. Mr.
Venables turned to the future and indicated SEC will be
looking for construction funds for the Kake project and
will be working with Haida Corporation to advance the
Reynolds Creek project. In addition, every community
has a project, whether it is municipal or regional, and
SEC will continue to advance each project in its time.
Studies of alternative energy sources will continue, as
will the consideration of short-term "band-aids" such
as expansion of the PCE program, and long-term
solutions such as hydro and interties. Also, SEC will
watch the proposed unification of the utilities in the
Railbelt for ideas that can be used in Southeast. He
thanked the legislature for funding the Alaska
Renewable Energy Fund, that provided grants for
Southeast in the amount of $16,956,187; however, there
is much left to be done to complete the Southeast
interties.
3:24:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN asked whether the newest in
"smart technology" was being used in the construction
of the interties.
3:25:02 PM
MR. VENABLES observed a lot of the equipment in
Southeast Alaska is antiquated, especially the diesel
generated infrastructure; however, the upgrades are in
step with new technology as much as possible and, in
the future, delivery systems will be cheaper for the
intertie.
3:25:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CATHY ENGSTROM MUNOZ, Alaska State
Legislature, asked whether any funds will be
available to match the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA)
authorization in the amount of $380,000,000.
3:26:08 PM
MR. VENABLES advised state funds can be used as a
match, as well as the considerable local investment
that is made by private utilities.
3:26:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked whether the SEC is working
with the Congressional delegation on this issue.
3:26:56 PM
MR. VENABLES said yes. The SEC communicates with the
Congressional delegation so they are aware of its
program, community needs, and the resources available
to assist the delegation. As a federal agency of
standing, SEC is prepared to receive guidance and
advocate for the region.
3:27:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ further asked whether any of the
money that has been authorized has also been
appropriated.
3:28:07 PM
MR. VENABLE confirmed some appropriations have gone to
Greens Creek Mining Company; however, about $60 million
is still available to be appropriated for Southeast
intertie development.
3:28:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ referred to the "Southeast
governance model" and asked whether SEC is working with
other entities, such as Tlingit and Haida and other
private developers, to promote intertie connections.
3:28:55 PM
MR. VENABLES explained the governance model is a new
item to SEC; in fact, it will be introduced by AEA next
week. However, there is already a similar model that
covered a portion of the region in the Southeast Alaska
Power Agency (SEPA) - formerly the Four Dam Pool Power
Agency.
3:30:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK asked who will manage the Southeast
intertie after completion.
3:30:26 PM
MR. VENABLES advised the utilities currently have
ownership; for example, a portion of Greens Creek is
under the Kwaan Electric Transmission Intertie
Cooperative, Inc. He remarked:
Right now, like the build outs, AP&T, they've
all been split in their own system in
certificated areas, so we really have not
joined a regional ... grid development that's
become an issue yet. And I think that's what
is going to be brought to the table as we
develop the intertie, especially over to Kake,
because that's going to have to be decided,
how's that line going to be owned and operated.
Right now we've got the Kwaan agency that is
capable, but it could very well be SEPA as
well.
3:31:43 PM
CO-CHAIR MILLETT asked about the importance of co-
locating roads [and interties] and whether there have
been problems.
3:32:04 PM
MR. VENABLES acknowledged the difficulty DOTPF has
building roads in the region. Although there is full
support for the Kake intertie, there are reservations
about road development. Construction of a roadbed to
open a corridor for utility work allows for easier
construction and maintenance of the intertie and also
encourages economic development and commerce; however,
there are not many successful examples except for the
logging roads on Prince of Wales Island. He opined
that the existence of successful logging "opened up
some roads which then allowed for the interties to be
built. ... So Prince of Wales Island would be the
closest answer to your question to see how you could
both develop roads and energy corridors ... and let the
communities build and develop in their own areas
instead of just urban."
3:33:35 PM
CO-CHAIR MILLETT asked whether there are estimates for
each project on the additional cost to build an
intertie where there is no access by road.
3:33:47 PM
MR. VENABLES said he was unsure; however, the Swan-Tyee
intertie project encountered very challenging terrain.
He deferred the question to Mr. Carlson.
3:34:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked whether the power rights-of-
way have been designated in the Tongass National Forest
Land Management Plan (TLMP).
3:34:56 PM
MR. VENABLES advised most of the corridors have been
identified in the Southeast Alaska Transportation Plan
(SATP). The SEC is meeting with DOTPF to discuss
integrated corridor development for Kake, Pelican,
Hoonah, and Baranof Island. Although most primary
utility corridors have been identified, more "corridor
work" is being pursued by tribal governments.
3:35:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked whether the corridors are
only on state land.
3:35:48 PM
MR. VENABLES explained the Tongass forest is federal
land, but the state has obtained the rights-of-way.
Federal agencies such as the USDA Forest Service, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) are also involved when
projects are proposed for this land.
3:36:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ expressed her understanding that
rights-of-way for the development of "lines" were
required to be designated in the TLMP.
MR. VENABLES said he would confirm that for the
committee.
3:36:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN asked whether there may be
money available through the [federal] stimulus package.
3:36:57 PM
MR. VENABLES said the stimulus package has very little
application to the development of hydro interties in
Alaska. Part of that will depend on how the Department
of Energy (DOE) interprets the law; however, at this
time the grids seem to apply to the grid across the
contiguous states. Furthermore, the funds directed to
the development of renewable energy are not available
for hydro.
3:38:00 PM
CO-CHAIR EDGMON observed the total planned capacity of
all of the hydro sites is 339 megawatts (MW) and asked
whether there is enough demand for that much power.
3:38:22 PM
MR. VENABLES noted that not all of the projects will be
developed. An updated integrated resource plan (IRP)
is needed to "point the way" to the most economically
viable projects. He opined the projects closest to the
grid will be developed first such as Whitman Lake and
Mahoney Lake in Ketchikan, and Triangle Lake in
Metlakatla. All of the projects listed on Slide 7 are
far in excess of the demand for electricity in the near
future.
3:39:42 PM
CO-CHAIR EDGMON asked what the present electrical
demand is for Southeast communities.
3:40:09 PM
MR. VENABLE advised the combined Southeast communities
are now "in the 100, 120 megawatt range." The
legislation proposed by Senator Stedman highlights the
projects that are necessary. Slide 7 merely identifies
the location of all of the potential sources for
hydroelectric power.
3:41:13 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN asked Mr. Venables to describe
the responsibilities of the energy coordinator.
3:41:52 PM
MR. VENABLES said each of the utilities throughout the
region is generating power to the best of its ability.
As the energy coordinator, he works with all of the
utilities as a group and has formed a technical
advisory group within the energy committee. The energy
committee meets regularly with a core working group of
the Southeast utilities, and with tribal organizations
and private power producers to "network on a very
extensive basis."
3:42:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN observed there are estimates
for the Swan-Tyee project on the difference in cost
when there is a road; in fact, there is a huge
difference when road access is available for
maintenance and operation. He referred to [slide 8]
that showed Kake's location in the center of Southeast
and asked how important the connection to Kake is in
the overall incremental build-out of the intertie
system connecting power from north to south.
3:43:57 PM
MR. VENABLES acknowledged the importance of the
connection, although the immediate goal of the intertie
is to service the needs of the community of Kake.
Southeast Conference has instructed the contractor to
construct the line to the capacity that can be utilized
as part of the overall intertie, even though it likely
will be energized at half of that capacity. This plan
is mindful of the overall system, but strives to build
and operate the line at an "effective" cost.
3:44:39 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN asked whether an entity such as
Central Council Tlingit & Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska
(CCTHITA) could manage the operation of the intertie.
3:45:26 PM
MR. VENABLES opined that question will be answered
through public process and deliberation; however, a
model in Southeast does exist in the Kwaan power agency
that is set up with partners and participants as an
oversight body. He suggested that the Alaska Railbelt
Electrical Grid Authority (REGA) report may provide
guidance for Southeast Alaska on how utilities can
decide how assets should be developed and operated.
3:46:07 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN asked whether the
aforementioned is a preferable model to [using] an
organization with other interests and duties.
3:46:22 PM
MR. VENABLES assured the committee that SEC is not
looking to create more governing agencies, but to find
the best and most efficient manner [of governance] for
the public benefit.
3:46:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN asked whether SEC has an
official position on whether the Southeast Alaska
interties and facilities should be built before the
construction of a connection to British Colombia (AKBC
Intertie) that would result in the sale of surplus
energy on the national grid.
3:47:26 PM
MR. VENABLES indicated SEC supports the concept of the
AKBC Intertie and its benefits; however, the immediate
need is in Southeast communities such as Kake, Angoon,
and Hoonah. A line to Canada will not help them, in
addition to the fact that the infrastructure in British
Columbia does not exist. He stressed SEC's efforts are
focused totally on Alaska communities.
3:49:03 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN observed mines in British
Columbia may be the future industrial users of excess
power from Southeast. He then asked for a matrix of
the PCE funding that would be displaced by the
[state's] investment in the construction of the
intertie.
3:50:38 PM
MR. VENABLES gave a PowerPoint presentation showing
slides from the construction of the Swan-Tyee intertie.
The slides showed the construction corridor, the Tyee
Lake powerhouse, and a housing camp on a barge 70 miles
north of Ketchikan. Mr. Venables noted the project is
on schedule and fully funded; in fact, the project is
scheduled to be energized in November.
3:56:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DAHLSTROM asked how much revenue was
earned from assembling barges for the project.
3:57:08 PM
MR. VENABLES said he was unsure and would provide that
information to the committee.
3:57:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN expressed his appreciation for
the work Mr. Venables has done. He opined energy plans
are most successful if developed regionally as the
state is large and very different. In addition,
Haines, Skagway, and Klukwan are an example for the
rest of the state of communities that have jointly
developed and shared a source of energy.
3:58:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN asked whether there was the
potential to export excess power from these projects.
3:59:15 PM
MR. VENABLES affirmed that the possibility exists;
however, if there were excess power, the first priority
would be to support local industry and create local
jobs and revenue.
^PRESENTATION(S): COOK INLET NATURAL GAS, BY ED KERR,
ARMSTRONG OIL AND GAS
3:59:54 PM
ED KERR, Vice President for Land and Development,
Armstrong Oil & Gas, informed the committee Armstrong
Oil & Gas is a privately held, independent oil and gas
company that has been in business in a large part of
the U. S. for 23 years. The company's initial work in
Alaska began ten years ago with a feasibility study
that was followed by the acquisition of 360,000 acres
and the drilling of eleven "wildcats" on the North
Slope. The wells showed some success at Ooguruk Island
and at the Nikaitchuq project, both of which are now
being further developed by other companies. About
three years ago, his company studied the possibilities
and challenges of doing business in the Cook Inlet. In
spite of the significant issues associated with
developing a "reasonable" gas supply, Armstrong began
work on the North Fork Unit. The North Fork Unit was
originally drilled by Unocal Oil Company in 1965 and
then sat idle for 40 years because, although some gas
was found, Unocal was looking for oil. Mr. Kerr
advised Armstrong acquired all of the rights, and then
drilled a second well in the North Fork Unit and found
gas. He opined the gas from this well could provide
part of the solution to the shortage of gas in Cook
Inlet. At this point, the company has begun a
preliminary dialog with various utilities about a gas
contract and is also meeting with the Regulatory
Commission of Alaska (RCA). Mr. Kerr described the
Cook Inlet as an oil basin and pointed out almost all
of the production has been from oil and gas that was
found in the '60s and '70s, when there was no market
for gas. Over time, the wells have fallen into a
overall decline of 15 percent to 24 percent,
predominately due to a lack of drilling. To explain
the lack of drilling, he noted Armstrong has found that
the cost of drilling a comparable well in the Cook
Inlet is substantially higher than in some Lower 48
basins. Unfortunately, the service companies do not
have a huge infrastructure located within the Cook
Inlet and there are a limited number of services
available. "When you have that type of limited number
of people, it doesn't foster competition ... [and]
ultimately the costs go up," he said. Therefore, the
cost to drill and complete the work associated with the
wells is higher when compared to other Armstrong
operations. He compared the San Juan basin in
northwest New Mexico, and the Big Horn basin in
northwest Wyoming, that are basins of similar
geographic size to Cook Inlet. Mr. Kerr pointed out
that the Cook Inlet productivity to date is 7.6
trillion cubic feet (tcf) and 1.3 billion barrels of
oil; the Big Horn productivity to date is 2.4 tcf and
3.1 billion barrels of oil; the San Juan productivity
to date is 41.5 tcf and 380 million barrels of oil. In
further comparison, in the San Juan there were 984
wells drilled in 2007; in the Big Horn there were 100
wells drilled in 2007; and in the Cook Inlet there were
7 to 14 wells drilled. He concluded that because the
Cook Inlet does not have as much drilling activity,
costs remain high. In addition, the San Juan has
44,744 completed wells, the Big Horn has 12,878
completed wells, and Cook Inlet has 13,012 completed
wells. He opined the Cook Inlet is under drilled and
advised there are unknown opportunities there. Wells
have not been drilled there because the "majors" held
the leases and controlled the level of activity. In
addition, there are few independents working in the
Cook Inlet and the vast majority of wells are drilled
by independents. Mr. Kerr stated Armstrong feels it
can make a difference in the Cook Inlet; in fact, it
will present the successes and challenges of its plans
to the RCA. The potential to develop this field can
make a difference in the gas supply in the Cook Inlet.
Armstrong can also make a difference in the economy of
the region as in the course of drilling the North Fork
Unit well, the company employed about 250 people
working for 80 different Alaskan vendors. If granted a
gas contract and a pipeline, there is the potential for
his company to drill many wells. He then pointed out
that newer technology, such as horizontal drilling, is
being utilized in the Lower 48, but is not being fully
utilized in Cook Inlet.
4:13:07 PM
MR. KERR further explained that other independents are
not willing to come to the Cook Inlet due to the
concern that they will not get a reasonable return on
their investment; however, Armstrong feels it can
overcome this challenge. If its negotiations are
successful it will drill additional wells; however, the
contracts must insure the "reasonable chance of making
a return on investment." He advised his company has
already taken some risks in drilling one well and
acquiring the asset and, from a business perspective,
it needs an opportunity to begin to recoup its
investment. Mr. Kerr said he wanted the committee to
know Armstrong's intent on being a part of the solution
in Cook Inlet, as long as it can enter into a prudent
business agreement.
4:15:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DAHLSTROM asked whether Armstrong used
its own rig on the well that was drilled.
4:16:19 PM
MR. KERR said his company used a leased Aurora rig that
was in Alaska. In further response to Representative
Dahlstrom, he said for subsequent drilling the company
would first "try to look within rigs that are located
in the Cook Inlet." This is a dynamic business and
rigs in the Cook Inlet can be taken up quickly.
4:17:34 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DAHLSTROM described the existing
situation with drilling rigs.
4:18:12 PM
MR. KERR added that the Cook Inlet well was drilled at
9,100 feet. A comparable well in west Texas would cost
between 400 percent and 600 percent less: A bigger
infrastructure and drilling more wells will mitigate
costs.
4:19:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN asked how long a pipeline is
needed to connect the North Fork Unit to existing
facilities.
4:20:10 PM
MR. KERR said the North Fork Unit is approximately nine
miles due east of Anchor Point; depending on the route,
eighteen to twenty-nine miles of pipeline would be
needed.
CO-CHAIR MILLETT asked whether Armstrong has applied
for exploration credits on the drilling in Cook Inlet.
4:21:19 PM
MR. KERR said the company applied for credits but has
yet to receive them.
4:21:26 PM
CO-CHAIR MILLETT restated the challenges to Cook Inlet
gas development and asked what is Alaska's role "in
easing some of those [challenges] ... in the
marketplace like that?"
4:21:48 PM
MR. KERR suggested that independent oil and gas
companies must have an opportunity to get a return on
investment; in fact, the challenge in the Cook Inlet
is to get a gas contract that recognizes the potential
costs and overruns. This situation is keeping
independents out of the Cook Inlet. Historically,
drilling companies have pulled out and not many wells
have been drilled. He advised the success of one
company will encourage others to explore, as happened
in the Haynesville shale area of Louisiana.
4:24:45 PM
CO-CHAIR MILLETT observed shale oil development is in
competition with Alaska. She asked for the amount of
Armstrong's investment in the first well.
4:25:11 PM
MR. KERR estimated a gross investment of $8 million to
$10 million for the first well, without exploration
credits.
4:25:39 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK referred to the geological "de-
risk" in Louisiana and asked whether an independent
made a discovery or if there was another factor.
4:26:07 PM
MR. KERR stated Chesapeake Energy Corporation, an
independent oil company, utilized horizontal technology
and developed a very successful well.
4:26:40 PM
CO-CHAIR MILLETT thanked the presenters.
4:27:21 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee,
the House Special Committee on Energy meeting was
adjourned at 4:27 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| House Energy Presentation_March_2009.pdf |
HENE 3/10/2009 3:00:00 PM |
|
| Legislative_Energy_Report_2009.pdf |
HENE 3/10/2009 3:00:00 PM |
|
| SEC Legislative Priorities 03102009.pdf |
HENE 3/10/2009 3:00:00 PM |