02/09/2024 08:00 AM House ARCTIC POLICY, ECONOMIC DEV., & TOURISM
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Presentation(s): Alaska's Arctic Policy | |
| HB291 | |
| Adjourn |
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 291 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON ARCTIC POLICY,
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND TOURISM
February 9, 2024
8:00 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Thomas Baker, Chair
Representative George Rauscher
Representative Laddie Shaw
Representative Jesse Sumner
Representative Cathy Tilton
Representative Jennie Armstrong
Representative Maxine Dibert
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
PRESENTATION(S): ALASKA'S ARCTIC POLICY
- HEARD
HOUSE BILL NO. 291
"An Act relating to reports of Alaska Native Claims Settlement
Act corporations."
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 291
SHORT TITLE: ANCSA REPORTS
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) WRIGHT
01/24/24 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/24/24 (H) AET
02/09/24 (H) AET AT 8:00 AM BARNES 124
WITNESS REGISTER
A.L. LOVECRAFT, PhD, Professor
University of Alaska Fairbanks
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Gave the Alaska's Arctic Policy
presentation.
REPRESENTATIVE STANLEY WRIGHT
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: As prime sponsor, presented HB 291.
CYNTHIA BERNS, Vice President
Community & External Affairs
Old Harbor Native Corporation
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Gave invited testimony on HB 291.
CHRISTOPHER SLOTEE, Vice President/General Counsel
Old Harbor Native Corporation
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Gave invited testimony on HB 291.
ACTION NARRATIVE
8:00:41 AM
CHAIR BAKER called the House Special Committee on Arctic Policy,
Economic Development, and Tourism meeting to order at 8:00 a.m.
Representatives Shaw, Rauscher, Sumner, Armstrong, Dibert, and
Baker were present at the call to order. Representative Tilton
arrived as the meeting was in progress.
^PRESENTATION(s): Alaska's Arctic Policy
PRESENTATION(s): Alaska's Arctic Policy
8:01:43 AM
CHAIR BAKER announced that the first order of business would be
the Alaska's Arctic Policy presentation.
8:01:59 AM*
The committee took an at-ease from 8:02 a.m. to 8:03 a.m.
8:03:10 AM
CHAIR BAKER introduced A.L. Lovecraft.
8:05:38 AM
A.L. LOVECRAFT, PhD, Professor, University of Alaska Fairbanks,
She offered a background of the Center for Arctic Policy Studies
(CAPS) at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) and explained
what this presentation aims to achieve. She then began the
PowerPoint [hardcopy included in the committee packet], on slide
1, which explained the importance and history of local
legislative action and boards in the Arctic Region of Alaska.
She continued to slide 2, which described Alaska statutes as
they relate to current Arctic policy. The slide gave context to
Alaska's significance in the Arctic on the world stage and gave
a history of Alaska's Arctic policy.
8:10:32 AM
DR. LOVECRAFT moved on to slide 3, which explained a section of
Alaska statute known as the "Declaration of State Arctic
Policy." She continued to slide 4, which provided background
information on UAF's CAPS and how it serves Alaska. She listed
the ways that CAPS serves Alaska, saying it helps deliver UAF
research to stakeholders, advise leaders at all levels of
government to Arctic policy issues, and bring diverse scholars
together to create solutions. She mentioned that CAPS offers a
scholarship to those with innovative solutions and ideas to
address the unique problems of the Arctic and added that CAPS
recognizes and utilizes historical knowledge of Arctic policy to
influence further decisions made in governance of the region.
8:17:45 AM
DR. LOVECRAFT skipped to slide 7, which described the unique
challenges Alaska faces in the Arctic and recent political
history of the Region. It explained the Northern Bering Sea
Climate Resilience Area (NBSCRA) and the "Polar Paradox," a
phenomenon that describes how rising oil costs both benefit and
harm Alaska. The slide touches on how the Arctic is both
managed and driven by external governance and geophysical
change, elaborating on the NBSCRA and its impacts and
implications for Arctic policy in Alaska.
8:23:37 AM
MS. LOVECRAFT moved to slide 8, which described products that
CAPS had prepared for the legislature. It gave background
information relating to the authors of the prepared products and
detailed the role that the University of Alaska system plays in
relationship with the state government.
8:25:28 AM
MS. LOVECRAFT moved to slide 9, which displayed previous reports
made by the CAPS and where to find them. She touched on the
report titled "Alaska's Arctic Energy System" and encouraged
moving to renewables as a way to reduce cost and "carve our own
path forward."
MS. LOVECRAFT moved to slide 10, which explained how
international maritime borders are established and enforced
under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
(UNCLOS) and what that means for coastal security and
infrastructure in the Arctic Region.
MS. LOVECRAFT moved to slide 11, which described relevant State
of Alaska policy decisions and how they affect salmon, caribou,
moose, and agriculture. She mentioned the impacts of bycatch to
salmon harvest, saying Alaska needs to change how it approaches
management of the salmon fishery from a policy perspective and
the state needs more research on how policy decisions affect
caribou and moose. She touched on agriculture, saying Alaska is
gaining farmland every year due to a climate change induced lack
of permafrost.
8:32:48 AM
MS. LOVECRAFT moved to slide 12, which explained pending and
past state decisions relating to development of Alaska's mineral
resources. She reviewed the proposed Ambler Road project and
the past Willow project, detailing how the current approach to
Arctic policy influences these projects and their success. She
referenced the proposed Ambler Road project and said that once a
massive infrastructure project begins many other development
projects generally follow suit. She emphasized that the Alaska
Industrial Development and Export Authority (AIDEA) has invested
$35 million in the proposed Ambler Road project, even though
there is strong tribal, regional, and national opposition to the
project.
8:37:01 AM
MS. LOVECRAFT continued to slide 13, which gave context to
Alaska's position as it relates to the rest of the world. She
described Alaska's geopolitical role and power in the Arctic
Region and touched on Arctic military operations in Alaska. She
explained how other world events impact Alaska, such as wars in
Europe, trade tariffs, and refugee events that bring people in
search of asylum to Alaska.
8:41:57 AM
MS. LOVECRAFT moved to slide 14, which explained how climate
change has impacted the Arctic in Alaska. She said that recent
events of extreme precipitation and warm temperatures are in
part influenced and amplified by climate change and gave context
to how these events relate to state and federal law surrounding
Arctic climate policy. She touched on how climate change has
impacted seasonal harvests and gave context to what governing
body manages those resources for both commercial and subsistence
use.
8:44:56 AM
MS. LOVECRAFT concluded the presentation on the final slide,
which displayed a graph that explained the different scales of
governance - local, state, and federal - and their possible
impacts to different facets of human security in Alaska's Arctic
Region.
8:48:19 AM
The committee took an at-ease from 8:48 a.m. to 8:49 a.m.
HB 291-ANCSA REPORTS
8:49:52 AM
CHAIR BAKER announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 291, "An Act relating to reports of Alaska Native
Claims Settlement Act corporations."
REPRESENTATIVE STANLEY WRIGHT, Alaska State Legislature, as
prime sponsor, presented HB 291. He said that when the Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) was passed, it required
that Alaska Native corporations be incorporated under state law.
He referenced a current Alaska statute that requires an Alaska
Native corporation with over 500 shareholders to file extensive
materials with the Alaska Division of Banking and Security. He
said this threshold of 500 shareholders has become problematic,
as shares are passed down through generations of shareholders,
thus imparting smaller villages with an unjustly large amount of
paperwork in a complex world of regulatory demands. He said
that HB 291 aims to alleviate the unintended burden on these
corporations by proposing a revision to the "arbitrary assets
threshold" and specifying the shareholders' count to be current
to the time of incorporation.
8:52:36 AM
CYNTHIA BERNS, Vice President, Community & External Affairs, Old
Harbor Native Corporation, gave invited testimony on HB 291.
She gave context to what the Old Harbor Native Corporation is
and said that it is one of 52 Native corporations established by
Congress. She echoed the bill sponsor's remark that due to
current statute, there is unjust burden placed on the employees
and shareholders to file tremendous amounts of extra paperwork
because of shares passed through generations. She cautioned
that because shareholder information is public, there is general
concern for how that information could be used against the
associated communities and people. She said over the last
several years, there have been significant efforts by
corporations in the Lower 48 to attack Alaska Native
corporations and their shareholders. She stated that HB 291
would reduce these burdens and help communities by alleviating
the regulatory requirements currently in statute.
8:57:35 AM
CHRISTOPHER SLOTEE, Vice President/General Counsel, gave invited
testimony on HB 291. He said under the current statutory
regime, Alaska Native corporations with more than $1 million in
assets and 500 or more shareholders must file copies of all
annual reports, proxy consents/authorizations, proxy statements,
and other materials related to proxy solicitations. He said
that current statute is based on the number of shareholders, not
the number of shares, which inevitably leads to all village
corporations being subject to this statute through the natural
dilution of their shares as they are inherited and gifted
through shareholders' descendants. He purported that all Alaska
Native corporations are harmed by this burden and said that HB
291 would relieve that burden.
9:02:30 AM
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER asked whether it could be an issue if
the State of Alaska doesn't know who a shareholder is.
MR. SLOTEE replied that that does it reduce the obligation to
provide information to the shareholders. He said that HB 291
only addresses the current need for corporations to file with
the State of Alaska. He added that currently, no other private
corporation is required to file a list of their shareholders.
[HB 291 was held over.]
9:04:42 AM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Special Committee on Arctic Policy, Economic Development, and
Tourism meeting was adjourned at 9:04 a.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB291 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HAET 2/9/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 291 |
| HB291 Version A.pdf |
HAET 2/9/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 291 |
| HB291 Supporitng Document - Alaska Native Village Corporation Association Letter of Support 2.6.24.pdf |
HAET 2/9/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 291 |
| Lovecraft_Committee_9Feb2024.pdf |
HAET 2/9/2024 8:00:00 AM |
Arctic Policy Presentation - Dr. Lovecraft |